Search (23 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × type_ss:"m"
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994) 0.05
    0.049642794 = product of:
      0.09928559 = sum of:
        0.09928559 = sum of:
          0.011911262 = weight(_text_:s in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.011911262 = score(doc=5666,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.23783323 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
          0.08737433 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08737433 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
    Pages
    185 S
  2. Scholarly metrics under the microscope : from citation analysis to academic auditing (2015) 0.03
    0.029132169 = product of:
      0.058264337 = sum of:
        0.058264337 = sum of:
          0.008336147 = weight(_text_:s in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.008336147 = score(doc=4654,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.1664486 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
          0.04992819 = weight(_text_:22 in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04992819 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2017 17:12:50
    Footnote
    Rez. in JASIST 67(2017) no.2, S.537-538 (Ronald Rousseau).
    Pages
    976 S
    Type
    s
  3. ¬The Web of knowledge : Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield (2000) 0.00
    0.0030080476 = product of:
      0.006016095 = sum of:
        0.006016095 = product of:
          0.01203219 = sum of:
            0.01203219 = weight(_text_:s in 461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01203219 = score(doc=461,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.24024783 = fieldWeight in 461, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=461)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 28(2001) no.1, S.45-46 (M.J. López Huertas u. E. Jiménez-Contreras); Password 2002, H.3, S.14-19 (W.G. Stock)
    Pages
    564 S
    Type
    s
  4. Sellen, M.K.: Bibliometrics : an annotated bibliography 1970-1990 (1993) 0.00
    0.0029778155 = product of:
      0.005955631 = sum of:
        0.005955631 = product of:
          0.011911262 = sum of:
            0.011911262 = weight(_text_:s in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011911262 = score(doc=402,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.23783323 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Library quarterly. 64(1994) no.3, S.357-358 (B.C. Peritz)
    Pages
    XIV,169 S
  5. Wang, C.: Bibliometrics : a textbook (1990) 0.00
    0.0025524131 = product of:
      0.0051048263 = sum of:
        0.0051048263 = product of:
          0.010209653 = sum of:
            0.010209653 = weight(_text_:s in 5040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010209653 = score(doc=5040,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.20385705 = fieldWeight in 5040, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5040)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of information, communication, and library science. 2(1995) no.2, S.84-85 (J. Qin)
    Pages
    333 S
  6. Boyce, B.R.; Meadow, C.T.; Kraft, D.H.: Measurement in information science (1994) 0.00
    0.0025524131 = product of:
      0.0051048263 = sum of:
        0.0051048263 = product of:
          0.010209653 = sum of:
            0.010209653 = weight(_text_:s in 4822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010209653 = score(doc=4822,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.20385705 = fieldWeight in 4822, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4822)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez in: JASIS 47(1996) no.3, S.257-258 (V. Raghavan)
    Pages
    XVII,283 S
  7. Stock, W.G.: Wissenschaftsevaluation : die Bewertung wissenschaftlicher Forschung und Lehre (1994) 0.00
    0.002406438 = product of:
      0.004812876 = sum of:
        0.004812876 = product of:
          0.009625752 = sum of:
            0.009625752 = weight(_text_:s in 242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009625752 = score(doc=242,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 242, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=242)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    126 S
  8. Garvey, W.D.: Communication: the essence of science : facilitating information exchange among librarians, scientists, engineers and students (1979) 0.00
    0.0021056333 = product of:
      0.0042112665 = sum of:
        0.0042112665 = product of:
          0.008422533 = sum of:
            0.008422533 = weight(_text_:s in 4318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008422533 = score(doc=4318,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 4318, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4318)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    XII,332 S
  9. Wolfram, D.: Applied informetrics for information retrieval research (2003) 0.00
    0.0018048285 = product of:
      0.003609657 = sum of:
        0.003609657 = product of:
          0.007219314 = sum of:
            0.007219314 = weight(_text_:s in 4589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007219314 = score(doc=4589,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 4589, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4589)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    232 S
  10. Crawford, S.Y.; Hurd, J.M.; Weller, A.C.: From print to electronic : the transformation of scientific communication (1997) 0.00
    0.0014889077 = product of:
      0.0029778155 = sum of:
        0.0029778155 = product of:
          0.005955631 = sum of:
            0.005955631 = weight(_text_:s in 2368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.005955631 = score(doc=2368,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.118916616 = fieldWeight in 2368, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2368)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIS 49(1998) no.7, S.670 (M. Afifi)
    Pages
    118 S
  11. Thelwall, M.: Web indicators for research evaluation : a practical guide (2016) 0.00
    0.001302523 = product of:
      0.002605046 = sum of:
        0.002605046 = product of:
          0.005210092 = sum of:
            0.005210092 = weight(_text_:s in 3384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.005210092 = score(doc=3384,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.10403037 = fieldWeight in 3384, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3384)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In recent years there has been an increasing demand for research evaluation within universities and other research-based organisations. In parallel, there has been an increasing recognition that traditional citation-based indicators are not able to reflect the societal impacts of research and are slow to appear. This has led to the creation of new indicators for different types of research impact as well as timelier indicators, mainly derived from the Web. These indicators have been called altmetrics, webometrics or just web metrics. This book describes and evaluates a range of web indicators for aspects of societal or scholarly impact, discusses the theory and practice of using and evaluating web indicators for research assessment and outlines practical strategies for obtaining many web indicators. In addition to describing impact indicators for traditional scholarly outputs, such as journal articles and monographs, it also covers indicators for videos, datasets, software and other non-standard scholarly outputs. The book describes strategies to analyse web indicators for individual publications as well as to compare the impacts of groups of publications. The practical part of the book includes descriptions of how to use the free software Webometric Analyst to gather and analyse web data. This book is written for information science undergraduate and Master?s students that are learning about alternative indicators or scientometrics as well as Ph.D. students and other researchers and practitioners using indicators to help assess research impact or to study scholarly communication.
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 69(2018) no.3, S.498-499 (Isidro F. Aguillo).
    Pages
    170 S
  12. Ball, R.; Tunger, D.: Bibliometrische Analysen - Daten, Fakten und Methoden : Grundwissen Bibliometrie für Wissenschaftler, Wissenschaftsmanager, Forschungseinrichtungen und Hochschulen (2005) 0.00
    0.0012762066 = product of:
      0.0025524131 = sum of:
        0.0025524131 = product of:
          0.0051048263 = sum of:
            0.0051048263 = weight(_text_:s in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0051048263 = score(doc=4992,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis 57(2006) H.1, S.61-62 (M. Ockenfeld): " ... Das Werk endet mit der "Autorenhinweise" betitelten Seite 81, auf der man zwei Farbfotos der Autoren und jeweils einige Sätze zu ihrer fachlichen und beruflichen Qualifikation findet. Sortiert man alle leeren Seiten aus, so bleiben allenfalls 50 Seiten Text übrig. Satzfehler, uneinheitlicher Sprachstil, variierende Schreibweisen - ganz abgesehen von zahlreichen Rechtschreibfehlern wie Fussnote - und Wiederholungen erwecken den Eindruck eines lieblosen Recyclings früherer Beiträge, nicht aber eines planmäßig und mit einem redaktionellen Konzept erarbeiteten Ratgebers. Der von den Autoren im Rückentext und Vorwort beschriebene Missstand - das Fehlen einer knappen und gut lesbaren Übersicht - wird durch diese Schrift nicht, wie reklamiert, behoben, sondern bekräftigt. Ihrem gerechtfertigten Anliegen haben sie einen Bärendienst erwiesen. Si tacuissent..."
    Pages
    81 S
  13. Mayr, P.: Information Retrieval-Mehrwertdienste für Digitale Bibliotheken: : Crosskonkordanzen und Bradfordizing (2010) 0.00
    0.0012762066 = product of:
      0.0025524131 = sum of:
        0.0025524131 = product of:
          0.0051048263 = sum of:
            0.0051048263 = weight(_text_:s in 4910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0051048263 = score(doc=4910,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 4910, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4910)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: iwp 62(2011) H.6/7, S. 323-324 (D. Lewandowski)
    Pages
    270 S
  14. Solla Price, D. de: Little science, big science : Von der Studierstube zur Großforschung (1974) 0.00
    0.001203219 = product of:
      0.002406438 = sum of:
        0.002406438 = product of:
          0.004812876 = sum of:
            0.004812876 = weight(_text_:s in 272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004812876 = score(doc=272,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 272, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=272)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    127 S
  15. Rousseau, R.; Egghe, L.; Guns, R.: Becoming metric-wise : a bibliometric guide for researchers (2018) 0.00
    0.0010635054 = product of:
      0.0021270108 = sum of:
        0.0021270108 = product of:
          0.0042540217 = sum of:
            0.0042540217 = weight(_text_:s in 5226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0042540217 = score(doc=5226,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 5226, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5226)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 70(2019) no.5, S.530-532 (I. Dorsch)
    Pages
    xv, 385 S
  16. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Introduction to informetrics : quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science (1990) 0.00
    0.0010528166 = product of:
      0.0021056333 = sum of:
        0.0021056333 = product of:
          0.0042112665 = sum of:
            0.0042112665 = weight(_text_:s in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0042112665 = score(doc=1515,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    XI,450 S
  17. De Bellis, N.: Bibliometrics and citation analysis : from the Science citation index to cybermetrics (2008) 0.00
    0.0010420184 = product of:
      0.0020840368 = sum of:
        0.0020840368 = product of:
          0.0041680736 = sum of:
            0.0041680736 = weight(_text_:s in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0041680736 = score(doc=3585,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.0832243 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIS 61(2010) no.1, S.205-207 (Jeppe Nicolaisen) Weitere Rez. in: Mitt VÖB 63(2010) H.1/2, S.134-135 (J. Gorraiz u. M. Wieland): "Das Buch entwickelte sich aus einem mehrjährigen Forschungsprojekt mit dem Ziel, den schwer verständlichen quantitativen Kern der Bibliometrie in einem für primär italienische Bibliothekare leichteren historischen und philosophischen Kontext zu vermitteln, wie der Autor im Vorwort erklärt. Dank einer Empfehlung von Eugene Garfield steht dieses Werk nun auch in englischer Übersetzung einer internationalen Leserschaft zur Verfügung. Die über 400 Seiten lange Monografie von de Bellis gibt in acht Kapiteln einen detaillierten und sehr präzisen Überblick über die Bibliometrie und die Zitationsanalyse, ihre Natur und Entwicklung, ihre Kontroverse und Prognose. . . . Das Buch von de Bellis ist sehr empfehlenswert für alle die beabsichtigen, sich mit dieser neuen Wissenschaft zu beschäftigen. Es endet mit folgendem Statement: "Scientometricians have to learn to live in a multidimensional world". Und genau hier liegt die Herausforderung und Schönheit dieses Metiers."
    Pages
    xxxi, 417 S
  18. Theories of informetrics and scholarly communication : a Festschrift in honor of Blaise Cronin (2016) 0.00
    0.0010420184 = product of:
      0.0020840368 = sum of:
        0.0020840368 = product of:
          0.0041680736 = sum of:
            0.0041680736 = weight(_text_:s in 3801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0041680736 = score(doc=3801,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.0832243 = fieldWeight in 3801, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3801)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 68(2017) no.9, S.2275-2283 (Anthony F.J. van Raan)
    Pages
    XI, 426 S
    Type
    s
  19. Chen, C.: Mapping scientific frontiers : the quest for knowledge visualization (2003) 0.00
    8.508044E-4 = product of:
      0.0017016088 = sum of:
        0.0017016088 = product of:
          0.0034032175 = sum of:
            0.0034032175 = weight(_text_:s in 2213) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0034032175 = score(doc=2213,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.06795235 = fieldWeight in 2213, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2213)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 55(2004) no.4, S.363-365 (J.W. Schneider): "Theories and methods for mapping scientific frontiers have existed for decades-especially within quantitative studies of science. This book investigates mapping scientific frontiers from the perspective of visual thinking and visual exploration (visual communication). The central theme is construction of visual-spatial representations that may convey insights into the dynamic structure of scientific frontiers. The author's previous book, Information Visualisation and Virtual Environments (1999), also concerns some of the ideas behind and possible benefits of visual communication. This new book takes a special focus an knowledge visualization, particularly in relation to science literature. The book is not a technical tutorial as the focus is an principles of visual communication and ways that may reveal the dynamics of scientific frontiers. The new approach to science mapping presented is the culmination of different approaches from several disciplines, such as philosophy of science, information retrieval, scientometrics, domain analysis, and information visualization. The book therefore addresses an audience with different disciplinary backgrounds and tries to stimulate interdisciplinary research. Chapter 1, The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, introduces a range of examples that illustrate fundamental issues concerning visual communication in general and science mapping in particular. Chapter 2, Mapping the Universe, focuses an the basic principles of cartography for visual communication. Chapter 3, Mapping the Mind, turns the attention inward and explores the design of mind maps, maps that represent our thoughts, experience, and knowledge. Chapter 4, Enabling Techniques for Science Mapping, essentially outlines the author's basic approach to science mapping.
    Pages
    240 S
  20. Tüür-Fröhlich, T.: ¬The non-trivial effects of trivial errors in scientific communication and evaluation (2016) 0.00
    8.508044E-4 = product of:
      0.0017016088 = sum of:
        0.0017016088 = product of:
          0.0034032175 = sum of:
            0.0034032175 = weight(_text_:s in 3137) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0034032175 = score(doc=3137,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.06795235 = fieldWeight in 3137, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3137)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    "Thomson Reuters' citation indexes i.e. SCI, SSCI and AHCI are said to be "authoritative". Due to the huge influence of these databases on global academic evaluation of productivity and impact, Terje Tüür-Fröhlich decided to conduct case studies on the data quality of Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) records. Tüür-Fröhlich investigated articles from social science and law. The main findings: SSCI records contain tremendous amounts of "trivial errors", not only misspellings and typos as previously mentioned in bibliometrics and scientometrics literature. But Tüür-Fröhlich's research documented fatal errors which have not been mentioned in the scientometrics literature yet at all. Tüür-Fröhlich found more than 80 fatal mutations and mutilations of Pierre Bourdieu (e.g. "Atkinson" or "Pierre, B. and "Pierri, B."). SSCI even generated zombie references (phantom authors and works) by data fields' confusion - a deadly sin for a database producer - as fragments of Patent Laws were indexed as fictional author surnames/initials. Additionally, horrific OCR-errors (e.g. "nuxure" instead of "Nature" as journal title) were identified. Tüür-Fröhlich´s extensive quantitative case study of an article of the Harvard Law Review resulted in a devastating finding: only 1% of all correct references from the original article were indexed by SSCI without any mistake or error. Many scientific communication experts and database providers' believe that errors in databanks are of less importance: There are many errors, yes - but they would counterbalance each other, errors would not result in citation losses and would not bear any effect on retrieval and evaluation outcomes. Terje Tüür-Fröhlich claims the contrary: errors and inconsistencies are not evenly distributed but linked with languages biases and publication cultures."
    Pages
    162 S

Years

Languages

Types