Search (51 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Theorie verbaler Dokumentationssprachen"
  1. ¬The semantics of relationships : an interdisciplinary perspective (2002) 0.03
    0.03491859 = product of:
      0.06983718 = sum of:
        0.06983718 = product of:
          0.104755774 = sum of:
            0.066198096 = weight(_text_:c in 1430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.066198096 = score(doc=1430,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.15536073 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503986 = queryNorm
                0.42609286 = fieldWeight in 1430, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1430)
            0.038557675 = weight(_text_:r in 1430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038557675 = score(doc=1430,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14909357 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503986 = queryNorm
                0.25861394 = fieldWeight in 1430, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1430)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: Pt.1: Types of relationships: CRUDE, D.A.: Hyponymy and its varieties; FELLBAUM, C.: On the semantics of troponymy; PRIBBENOW, S.: Meronymic relationships: from classical mereology to complex part-whole relations; KHOO, C. u.a.: The many facets of cause-effect relation - Pt.2: Relationships in knowledge representation and reasoning: GREEN, R.: Internally-structured conceptual models in cognitive semantics; HOVY, E.: Comparing sets of semantic relations in ontologies; GUARINO, N., C. WELTY: Identity and subsumption; JOUIS; C.: Logic of relationships - Pt.3: Applications of relationships: EVENS, M.: Thesaural relations in information retrieval; KHOO, C., S.H. MYAENG: Identifying semantic relations in text for information retrieval and information extraction; McCRAY, A.T., O. BODENREICHER: A conceptual framework for the biiomedical domain; HETZLER, B.: Visual analysis and exploration of relationships
    Editor
    Green, R., C.A. Bean u. S.H. Myaeng
  2. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Thesaural relationships (2001) 0.03
    0.026962034 = product of:
      0.05392407 = sum of:
        0.05392407 = product of:
          0.0808861 = sum of:
            0.03817015 = weight(_text_:r in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03817015 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14909357 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503986 = queryNorm
                0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
            0.04271595 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04271595 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1577219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503986 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:45:57
    Source
    Relationships in the organization of knowledge. Eds.: Bean, C.A. u. R. Green
  3. Relationships in the organization of knowledge (2001) 0.03
    0.025609335 = product of:
      0.05121867 = sum of:
        0.05121867 = product of:
          0.076828 = sum of:
            0.029604686 = weight(_text_:c in 1139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029604686 = score(doc=1139,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15536073 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503986 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 1139, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1139)
            0.047223315 = weight(_text_:r in 1139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047223315 = score(doc=1139,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.14909357 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503986 = queryNorm
                0.3167361 = fieldWeight in 1139, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1139)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: GREEN, R.: Relationships in the organization of knowledge: an overview; TILLETT, B.: Bibliographic relationships; CLARKE, S.G.D.: Thesaural relationships; MILSTEAD, J.L.: Standards for relationships between subject indexing terms; HUDON, M.: Relationships in multilingual thesauri; BODENREIDER, O. u. C.A. BEAN: Relationships among knowledge structures: vocabulary integration within a subject domain; BEGHTOL, C.: Relationships in classificatory structure and meaning; BEAN, C.A. u. R. GREEN: Relevance relationships; EL-HOSHY, L.M.: Relationships in Library of Congress Subject Headings; MOLHOLT, P.: The Art and Architecture Thesaurus: controlling relationships through rules and structure; NELSON, S.J. u.a.: Relationships in Medical Subject Headings (MeSH); NEELAMEGHAN, A.: Lateral relationships in multicultural, mulrilingual databases in the spiritual and religous domains: the OM information service; SATIJA, M.P.: Relationships in Ranganathan's Colon classification; MITCHELL, J.S.: Relationships in the Dewey Decimal Classification System
    Editor
    Bean, C.A. u. R. Green
  4. Beghtol, C.: Relationships in classificatory structure and meaning (2001) 0.02
    0.022747632 = product of:
      0.045495264 = sum of:
        0.045495264 = product of:
          0.06824289 = sum of:
            0.035525624 = weight(_text_:c in 1138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035525624 = score(doc=1138,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15536073 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503986 = queryNorm
                0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 1138, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1138)
            0.032717273 = weight(_text_:r in 1138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032717273 = score(doc=1138,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14909357 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503986 = queryNorm
                0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 1138, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1138)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Relationships in the organization of knowledge. Eds.: Bean, C.A. u. R. Green
  5. Khoo, C.; Chan, S.; Niu, Y.: ¬The many facets of the cause-effect relation (2002) 0.02
    0.022747632 = product of:
      0.045495264 = sum of:
        0.045495264 = product of:
          0.06824289 = sum of:
            0.035525624 = weight(_text_:c in 1192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035525624 = score(doc=1192,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15536073 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503986 = queryNorm
                0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 1192, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1192)
            0.032717273 = weight(_text_:r in 1192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032717273 = score(doc=1192,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14909357 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503986 = queryNorm
                0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 1192, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1192)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    The semantics of relationships: an interdisciplinary perspective. Eds: Green, R., C.A. Bean u. S.H. Myaeng
  6. Fugmann, R.: ¬Die Aufgabenteilung zwischen Wortschatz und Grammatik in einer Indexsprache (1979) 0.01
    0.014541009 = product of:
      0.029082019 = sum of:
        0.029082019 = product of:
          0.08724605 = sum of:
            0.08724605 = weight(_text_:r in 3) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08724605 = score(doc=3,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14909357 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503986 = queryNorm
                0.5851765 = fieldWeight in 3, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  7. Fugmann, R.: ¬Die Grenzen des Thesaurus-Verfahrens bei der Wiedergabe von Begriffsrelationen (1975) 0.01
    0.014541009 = product of:
      0.029082019 = sum of:
        0.029082019 = product of:
          0.08724605 = sum of:
            0.08724605 = weight(_text_:r in 4765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08724605 = score(doc=4765,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14909357 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503986 = queryNorm
                0.5851765 = fieldWeight in 4765, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4765)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  8. Fugmann, R.: ¬The complementarity of natural and indexing languages (1982) 0.01
    0.014541009 = product of:
      0.029082019 = sum of:
        0.029082019 = product of:
          0.08724605 = sum of:
            0.08724605 = weight(_text_:r in 7648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08724605 = score(doc=7648,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14909357 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503986 = queryNorm
                0.5851765 = fieldWeight in 7648, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7648)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  9. Ruge, G.: ¬A spreading activation network for automatic generation of thesaurus relationships (1991) 0.01
    0.014238651 = product of:
      0.028477302 = sum of:
        0.028477302 = product of:
          0.0854319 = sum of:
            0.0854319 = weight(_text_:22 in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0854319 = score(doc=4506,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1577219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503986 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8.10.2000 11:52:22
  10. Mooers, C.N.: ¬The indexing language of an information retrieval system (1985) 0.01
    0.014027085 = product of:
      0.02805417 = sum of:
        0.02805417 = product of:
          0.042081255 = sum of:
            0.02072328 = weight(_text_:c in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02072328 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15536073 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503986 = queryNorm
                0.13338815 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
            0.021357976 = weight(_text_:22 in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021357976 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1577219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503986 = queryNorm
                0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Calvin Mooers' work toward the resolution of the problem of ambiguity in indexing went unrecognized for years. At the time he introduced the "descriptor" - a term with a very distinct meaning-indexers were, for the most part, taking index terms directly from the document, without either rationalizing them with context or normalizing them with some kind of classification. It is ironic that Mooers' term came to be attached to the popular but unsophisticated indexing methods which he was trying to root out. Simply expressed, what Mooers did was to take the dictionary definitions of terms and redefine them so clearly that they could not be used in any context except that provided by the new definition. He did, at great pains, construct such meanings for over four hundred words; disambiguation and specificity were sought after and found for these words. He proposed that all indexers adopt this method so that when the index supplied a term, it also supplied the exact meaning for that term as used in the indexed document. The same term used differently in another document would be defined differently and possibly renamed to avoid ambiguity. The disambiguation was achieved by using unabridged dictionaries and other sources of defining terminology. In practice, this tends to produce circularity in definition, that is, word A refers to word B which refers to word C which refers to word A. It was necessary, therefore, to break this chain by creating a new, definitive meaning for each word. Eventually, means such as those used by Austin (q.v.) for PRECIS achieved the same purpose, but by much more complex means than just creating a unique definition of each term. Mooers, however, was probably the first to realize how confusing undefined terminology could be. Early automatic indexers dealt with distinct disciplines and, as long as they did not stray beyond disciplinary boundaries, a quick and dirty keyword approach was satisfactory. The trouble came when attempts were made to make a combined index for two or more distinct disciplines. A number of processes have since been developed, mostly involving tagging of some kind or use of strings. Mooers' solution has rarely been considered seriously and probably would be extremely difficult to apply now because of so much interdisciplinarity. But for a specific, weIl defined field, it is still weIl worth considering. Mooers received training in mathematics and physics from the University of Minnesota and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He was the founder of Zator Company, which developed and marketed a coded card information retrieval system, and of Rockford Research, Inc., which engages in research in information science. He is the inventor of the TRAC computer language.
    Footnote
    Original in: Information retrieval today: papers presented at an Institute conducted by the Library School and the Center for Continuation Study, University of Minnesota, Sept. 19-22, 1962. Ed. by Wesley Simonton. Minneapolis, Minn.: The Center, 1963. S.21-36.
  11. ALA / Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures: Final Report to the ALCTS/CCS Subject Analysis Committee (1997) 0.01
    0.013269452 = product of:
      0.026538905 = sum of:
        0.026538905 = product of:
          0.039808355 = sum of:
            0.02072328 = weight(_text_:c in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02072328 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15536073 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503986 = queryNorm
                0.13338815 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
            0.019085076 = weight(_text_:r in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019085076 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14909357 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503986 = queryNorm
                0.12800737 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Enthält: Appendix A: Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures - REPORT TO THE ALCTS/CCS SUBJECT ANALYSIS COMMITTEE - July 1996 Appendix B (part 1): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (alphabetical display) (Separat in: http://web2.ala.org/ala/alctscontent/CCS/committees/subjectanalysis/subjectrelations/msrscu2.pdf) Appendix B (part 2): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (hierarchical display) Appendix C: Checklist of Candidate Subject Relationships for Information Retrieval. Compiled by Dee Michel, Pat Kuhr, and Jane Greenberg; edited by Greg Wool - June 1997 Appendix D: Review of Reference Displays in Selected CD-ROM Abstracts and Indexes by Harriette Hemmasi and Steven Riel Appendix E: Analysis of Relationships in Six LC Subject Authority Records by Harriette Hemmasi and Gary Strawn Appendix F: Report of a Preliminary Survey of Subject Referencing in OPACs by Gregory Wool Appendix G: LC Subject Referencing in OPACs--Why Bother? by Gregory Wool Appendix H: Research Needs on Subject Relationships and Reference Structures in Information Access compiled by Jane Greenberg and Steven Riel with contributions from Dee Michel and others edited by Gregory Wool Appendix I: Bibliography on Subject Relationships compiled mostly by Dee Michel with additional contributions from Jane Greenberg, Steven Riel, and Gregory Wool
    Type
    r
  12. Kuhlen, R.: Linguistische Grundlagen (1980) 0.01
    0.012723384 = product of:
      0.025446769 = sum of:
        0.025446769 = product of:
          0.0763403 = sum of:
            0.0763403 = weight(_text_:r in 3829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0763403 = score(doc=3829,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14909357 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503986 = queryNorm
                0.51202947 = fieldWeight in 3829, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3829)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  13. Mikacic, M.: Statistical system for subject designation (SSSD) for libraries in Croatia (1996) 0.01
    0.011506568 = product of:
      0.023013135 = sum of:
        0.023013135 = product of:
          0.069039404 = sum of:
            0.069039404 = weight(_text_:22 in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.069039404 = score(doc=2943,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1577219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503986 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    31. 7.2006 14:22:21
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.1, S.77-93
  14. DIN 31623: Indexierung zur inhaltlichen Erschließung von Dokumenten : T.1: Begriffe, Grundlagen; T.2: Gleichordnende Indexierung mit Deskriptoren; T.3: Syntaktische Indexierung mit Deskriptoren (1988) 0.01
    0.010905758 = product of:
      0.021811515 = sum of:
        0.021811515 = product of:
          0.065434545 = sum of:
            0.065434545 = weight(_text_:r in 832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065434545 = score(doc=832,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14909357 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503986 = queryNorm
                0.4388824 = fieldWeight in 832, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=832)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch den Beitrag: Jansen, R.: Intentionen der Indexierungsnorm 31623 und Überlegungen zum Verhältnis gleichordnende/syntaktische Indexierung
  15. Fugmann, R.: ¬Der Mangel an Grammatik bei Indexsprachen und seine Folgen (1987) 0.01
    0.010905758 = product of:
      0.021811515 = sum of:
        0.021811515 = product of:
          0.065434545 = sum of:
            0.065434545 = weight(_text_:r in 257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065434545 = score(doc=257,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14909357 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503986 = queryNorm
                0.4388824 = fieldWeight in 257, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=257)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  16. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility (1996) 0.01
    0.010170465 = product of:
      0.02034093 = sum of:
        0.02034093 = product of:
          0.061022792 = sum of:
            0.061022792 = weight(_text_:22 in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061022792 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1577219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503986 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.11-22
  17. Francu, V.: ¬A linguistic approach to information languages (2003) 0.01
    0.009868229 = product of:
      0.019736458 = sum of:
        0.019736458 = product of:
          0.059209373 = sum of:
            0.059209373 = weight(_text_:c in 3538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059209373 = score(doc=3538,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15536073 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503986 = queryNorm
                0.381109 = fieldWeight in 3538, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3538)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Tendencias de investigación en organización del conocimient: IV Cologuio International de Ciencas de la Documentación , VI Congreso del Capitulo Espanol de ISKO = Trends in knowledge organization research. Eds.: J.A. Frias u. C. Travieso
  18. Fugmann, R.: Theoretische Grundlagen der Indexierungspraxis (1985) 0.01
    0.009088131 = product of:
      0.018176261 = sum of:
        0.018176261 = product of:
          0.054528784 = sum of:
            0.054528784 = weight(_text_:r in 280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054528784 = score(doc=280,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14909357 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503986 = queryNorm
                0.36573532 = fieldWeight in 280, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=280)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  19. Fugmann, R.: ¬The complementarity of natural and controlled languages in indexing (1995) 0.01
    0.009088131 = product of:
      0.018176261 = sum of:
        0.018176261 = product of:
          0.054528784 = sum of:
            0.054528784 = weight(_text_:r in 1634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054528784 = score(doc=1634,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14909357 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503986 = queryNorm
                0.36573532 = fieldWeight in 1634, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1634)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  20. Casagrande, J.B.; Hale, K.L.: Semantic relations in Papago folk definitions (1967) 0.01
    0.009088131 = product of:
      0.018176261 = sum of:
        0.018176261 = product of:
          0.054528784 = sum of:
            0.054528784 = weight(_text_:r in 1194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054528784 = score(doc=1194,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14909357 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503986 = queryNorm
                0.36573532 = fieldWeight in 1194, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1194)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Zitiert in: Evens, M.: Thesaural relations in information retrieval. In: The semantics of relationships: an interdisciplinary perspective. Eds: R. Green u.a. Dordrecht: Kluwer 2002. S.143-160.