Search (38 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
  1. Ranganathan, S.R.: Library classification as a discipline (1957) 0.07
    0.07226384 = product of:
      0.14452767 = sum of:
        0.14452767 = product of:
          0.28905535 = sum of:
            0.28905535 = weight(_text_:s.r in 564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.28905535 = score(doc=564,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2873241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5039306 = idf(docFreq=179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044176992 = queryNorm
                1.0060254 = fieldWeight in 564, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.5039306 = idf(docFreq=179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=564)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  2. Ranganathan, S.R.; Gopinath, M.A.: Prolegomena to library classification (1967) 0.06
    0.06194043 = product of:
      0.12388086 = sum of:
        0.12388086 = product of:
          0.24776173 = sum of:
            0.24776173 = weight(_text_:s.r in 672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24776173 = score(doc=672,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2873241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5039306 = idf(docFreq=179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044176992 = queryNorm
                0.8623075 = fieldWeight in 672, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.5039306 = idf(docFreq=179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=672)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Kumar, K.: Theory of classification (1985) 0.04
    0.0437985 = product of:
      0.087597 = sum of:
        0.087597 = product of:
          0.175194 = sum of:
            0.175194 = weight(_text_:s.r in 2069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.175194 = score(doc=2069,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.2873241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5039306 = idf(docFreq=179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044176992 = queryNorm
                0.6097435 = fieldWeight in 2069, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  6.5039306 = idf(docFreq=179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2069)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This book provides a coherent account of the theory of classification. It discusses the contributions made by theoreticians like E.C. Richardson, J.B. Brown, W. Hulme, W.C. Berwick Sayers, H.E. Bliss and S.R. Ranganathan. However, the theory put forward by S.R. Ranganathan predominates the whole book because his contribution is far more than anybody else's. Five major schemes - DDC, UDC, LCC, CC, and BC - have also been discussed. Library classification is a specialized area of study. In recent years, library classification has become a vast and complicated field of study using highly technical terminology. A special attempt has been made to provide descriptions as simple and direct as could be possible. To illustrate the theory of classification, large number of examples have been given from all major schemes so that an average student ould also grasp the concepts easily. This book has been especially written to meet the requirements of students, preparing for their library science, documentation, information science diplomas and degrees.
  4. Kaula, P.N.: Canons in analytico-synthetic classification (1979) 0.04
    0.04129362 = product of:
      0.08258724 = sum of:
        0.08258724 = product of:
          0.16517448 = sum of:
            0.16517448 = weight(_text_:s.r in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16517448 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2873241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5039306 = idf(docFreq=179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044176992 = queryNorm
                0.57487166 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.5039306 = idf(docFreq=179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Presentation of the rules (canons) which S.R. Ranganathan laid down for the three planes of work, the idea plane, the verbal plane and the notational plane and explanation of each of these 34 canons, indispensable tools for the establishment of any classification system. An overall survey of the canons is given
  5. Curras, E.: Ranganathan's classification theories under the systems science postulates (1992) 0.04
    0.04129362 = product of:
      0.08258724 = sum of:
        0.08258724 = product of:
          0.16517448 = sum of:
            0.16517448 = weight(_text_:s.r in 6993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16517448 = score(doc=6993,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2873241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5039306 = idf(docFreq=179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044176992 = queryNorm
                0.57487166 = fieldWeight in 6993, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.5039306 = idf(docFreq=179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6993)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the basic ideas concerning system science and discusses S.R. Ranganathan's ideas about concepts of 'universe of ideas', 'universe of science', 'universe of knowledge' and 'universe of classification'. Examines the principles, canons and postulates underlying Colon Classification. Discusses the structure of Colon Classification. Points out that the ideas of Ranganathan conform to the concept 'unity of science' and concludes that the principles of systems science or systems thinking are helpful in understanding the theory of classification formulated by Ranganathan
  6. Foskett, D.J.: Facet analysis (2009) 0.04
    0.04129362 = product of:
      0.08258724 = sum of:
        0.08258724 = product of:
          0.16517448 = sum of:
            0.16517448 = weight(_text_:s.r in 3754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16517448 = score(doc=3754,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2873241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5039306 = idf(docFreq=179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044176992 = queryNorm
                0.57487166 = fieldWeight in 3754, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.5039306 = idf(docFreq=179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3754)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The brothers Foskett, Anthony and Douglas, have both made major contributions to the theory and practice of subject analysis and description. Here, Douglas Foskett explains facet analysis, a vital technique in the development of both classification schemes and thesauri. Foskett himself created faceted classification schemes for specific disciplines, drawing from the philosophy of the great Indian classificationist, S.R. Ranganathan.
  7. Kumar, K.: Distinctive contribution of Ranganathan to library classification (1992) 0.04
    0.03613192 = product of:
      0.07226384 = sum of:
        0.07226384 = product of:
          0.14452767 = sum of:
            0.14452767 = weight(_text_:s.r in 6991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14452767 = score(doc=6991,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2873241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5039306 = idf(docFreq=179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044176992 = queryNorm
                0.5030127 = fieldWeight in 6991, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.5039306 = idf(docFreq=179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6991)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Stresses that S.R. Ranganathan was truly a great scholar, who made rich contribution to different aspects of library and information science, but is better known for his work in the field of library classification. discusses his distinctive contributions to classification such as normative principles, 3 plane model of work, freely faceted classification (involving facet analysis and the synthetic principle), postulational approach, fundamental categories and certain notational devices like the sector device, group notation device, emptying digit device and seminal mnemonic device. Regards these as seminal ideas forming the basis of his theory of library classification. Considers 7th ed. of the Colon Classification as the best example of the application of theses ideas
  8. Satija, M.P.: Library classification : an essay in terminology (2000) 0.04
    0.03613192 = product of:
      0.07226384 = sum of:
        0.07226384 = product of:
          0.14452767 = sum of:
            0.14452767 = weight(_text_:s.r in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14452767 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2873241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5039306 = idf(docFreq=179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044176992 = queryNorm
                0.5030127 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.5039306 = idf(docFreq=179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Arguing that an established technical terminology is crucial to the development of a discipline, and that classification terminology is neither well settled nor widely used by its exponents, this paper provides an explanation of some of the concepts generally accepted by classification theorists. In particular, the elaborate terminology generated by S.R. Ranganathan is examined. Definitions are provided for numerous concepts, including "classification"; "characteristics" and "attributes"; the genus-species relationship; the types of classes (canonical, systems, special, and environmental main classes); the kinds of subject (basic, compound, complex); as well as concepts such as facets, isolates, arrays, and chains. Comparisons between different classification systems, specifically the Dewey Decimal Classification, Colon Classification, and Library of Congress Classification, are also made
  9. Perreault, J.: Categories and relators : a new schema (1994) 0.03
    0.030970216 = product of:
      0.06194043 = sum of:
        0.06194043 = product of:
          0.12388086 = sum of:
            0.12388086 = weight(_text_:s.r in 8863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12388086 = score(doc=8863,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2873241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5039306 = idf(docFreq=179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044176992 = queryNorm
                0.43115374 = fieldWeight in 8863, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.5039306 = idf(docFreq=179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8863)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Based on the works of Aristotle, Ramon Lull, I. Kant and the experiences with relationships published in the works of S.R. Ranganathan, E.de Grolier, J. Mills, J.C. Costello, E. Wall, R. Pagès, A. Leroy, P. Braffort, M. Kervégant, J.C. Gardin and J. Farradane, categories and relationships were collected, analyzed, grouped and classified in a triadic way so that a scheme resulted by which 120 relationships could be defined and identified by their positions and their codes. The exercise was meant to create and supply a tool for the replacement of the non-significant relation symbol, the colon, in the UDC by a letter code which could express the actual relationship contained in a classificatory statement. Examples for their application illustrate different cases occuring
  10. Raju, A.A.N.: Colon Classification: theory and practice : a self instructional manual (2001) 0.03
    0.025808511 = product of:
      0.051617023 = sum of:
        0.051617023 = product of:
          0.103234045 = sum of:
            0.103234045 = weight(_text_:s.r in 1482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.103234045 = score(doc=1482,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2873241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5039306 = idf(docFreq=179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044176992 = queryNorm
                0.35929477 = fieldWeight in 1482, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.5039306 = idf(docFreq=179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1482)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Colon Classification (CC) is truly the first freely faceted scheme for library classification devised and propagated by Dr. S.R. Ranganathan. The scheme is being taught in theory and practice to the students in most of the LIS schools in India and abroad also. Many manuals, Guide books and Introductory works have been published on CC in the past. But the present work tread a new path in presenting CC to the student, teaching and professional community. The present work Colon Classification: Theory and Practice; A Self Instructional Manual is the result of author's twenty-five years experience of teaching theory and practice of CC to the students of LIS. For the first ime concerted and systematic attempt has been made to present theory and practice of CC in self-instructional mode, keeping in view the requirements of students learners of Open Universities/ Distance Education Institutions in particular. The other singificant and novel features introduced in this manual are: Presenting the scope of each block consisting certain units bollowed by objectives, introduction, sections, sub-sections, self check exercises, glossary and assignment of each unit. It is hoped that all these features will help the users/readers of this manual to understand and grasp quickly, the intricacies involved in theory and practice of CC(6th Edition). The manual is presented in three blocks and twelve units.
  11. Hjoerland, B.: Facet analysis : the logical approach to knowledge organization (2013) 0.03
    0.025808511 = product of:
      0.051617023 = sum of:
        0.051617023 = product of:
          0.103234045 = sum of:
            0.103234045 = weight(_text_:s.r in 2720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.103234045 = score(doc=2720,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2873241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5039306 = idf(docFreq=179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044176992 = queryNorm
                0.35929477 = fieldWeight in 2720, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.5039306 = idf(docFreq=179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2720)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The facet-analytic paradigm is probably the most distinct approach to knowledge organization within Library and Information Science, and in many ways it has dominated what has be termed "modern classification theory". It was mainly developed by S.R. Ranganathan and the British Classification Research Group, but it is mostly based on principles of logical division developed more than two millennia ago. Colon Classification (CC) and Bliss 2 (BC2) are among the most important systems developed on this theoretical basis, but it has also influenced the development of other systems, such as the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) and is also applied in many websites. It still has a strong position in the field and it is the most explicit and "pure" theoretical approach to knowledge organization (KO) (but it is not by implication necessarily also the most important one). The strength of this approach is its logical principles and the way it provides structures in knowledge organization systems (KOS). The main weaknesses are (1) its lack of empirical basis and (2) its speculative ordering of knowledge without basis in the development or influence of theories and socio-historical studies. It seems to be based on the problematic assumption that relations between concepts are a priori and not established by the development of models, theories and laws.
  12. Ranganathan, S.R.: Facet analysis: fundamental categories (1985) 0.03
    0.025549125 = product of:
      0.05109825 = sum of:
        0.05109825 = product of:
          0.1021965 = sum of:
            0.1021965 = weight(_text_:s.r in 3631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1021965 = score(doc=3631,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.2873241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5039306 = idf(docFreq=179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044176992 = queryNorm
                0.3556837 = fieldWeight in 3631, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  6.5039306 = idf(docFreq=179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3631)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Original in: Ranganathan, S.R.: Elements of library classification. 3rd ed. Bombay: Asia Publishing House 1962. S.82-89
  13. Olson, H.; Nielsen, J.; Dippie, S.R.: Encyclopaedist rivalry, classificatory commonality, illusory universality (2003) 0.02
    0.02064681 = product of:
      0.04129362 = sum of:
        0.04129362 = product of:
          0.08258724 = sum of:
            0.08258724 = weight(_text_:s.r in 2761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08258724 = score(doc=2761,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2873241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5039306 = idf(docFreq=179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044176992 = queryNorm
                0.28743583 = fieldWeight in 2761, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.5039306 = idf(docFreq=179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2761)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Khanna, J.K.: Analytico-synthetic classification : (a study in CC-7) (1994) 0.02
    0.02064681 = product of:
      0.04129362 = sum of:
        0.04129362 = product of:
          0.08258724 = sum of:
            0.08258724 = weight(_text_:s.r in 1471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08258724 = score(doc=1471,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2873241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5039306 = idf(docFreq=179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044176992 = queryNorm
                0.28743583 = fieldWeight in 1471, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.5039306 = idf(docFreq=179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1471)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    ANALYTICO-SYNTHETIC CLASSIFICATION- the brain-child of S.R. Ranganathan has brought about an intellectual revolution in the theory and methodology of library classification by generating new ideas. By his vast erudition and deeper research in the Universe of Subjects, Ranganathan applied a postulation approach to classification based on the concept of facet analysis, Phase Analysis, Sector Analysis and Zone Analysis. His enquiry into the concept of fundamental Categories as well as the Analytico-Synthetic quality associated with it, the use of different connecting symbols as in the Meccano apparatus for constructing expressive class numbers for subjects of any depth, the versality of Notation, the analysis of Rounds and Levels, the formation and sharpening of Isolates through various devices, the introduction of the novel concepts of Specals, Systems, Speciators, and Environment Constituents has systematized the whole study of classification into principles, rules and canons. These new methodologies in classification invented as a part of Colon Classification have not only lifted practical classification form mere guess work to scientific methodology but also form an important theme in international conferences. The present work discusses in details the unique methodologies of Ranganathan as used in CC-7. The concepts of Primary Basic Subjects and Non -Primary Basic Subjects have also been discussed at length.
  15. Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999) 0.02
    0.017956117 = product of:
      0.035912234 = sum of:
        0.035912234 = product of:
          0.07182447 = sum of:
            0.07182447 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07182447 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1547003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044176992 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  16. Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999) 0.02
    0.017956117 = product of:
      0.035912234 = sum of:
        0.035912234 = product of:
          0.07182447 = sum of:
            0.07182447 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07182447 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1547003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044176992 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  17. Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017) 0.02
    0.017956117 = product of:
      0.035912234 = sum of:
        0.035912234 = product of:
          0.07182447 = sum of:
            0.07182447 = weight(_text_:22 in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07182447 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1547003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044176992 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 5.2017 18:46:22
  18. Connaway, L.S.; Sievert, M.C.: Comparison of three classification systems for information on health insurance (1996) 0.01
    0.0119707445 = product of:
      0.023941489 = sum of:
        0.023941489 = product of:
          0.047882978 = sum of:
            0.047882978 = weight(_text_:22 in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047882978 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1547003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044176992 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 4.1997 21:10:19
  19. Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997) 0.01
    0.0119707445 = product of:
      0.023941489 = sum of:
        0.023941489 = product of:
          0.047882978 = sum of:
            0.047882978 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047882978 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1547003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044176992 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
  20. Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006) 0.01
    0.0119707445 = product of:
      0.023941489 = sum of:
        0.023941489 = product of:
          0.047882978 = sum of:
            0.047882978 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047882978 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1547003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044176992 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 5.2007 22:19:35