Search (926 results, page 1 of 47)

  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Rodrigues Barbosa, E.; Godoy Viera, A.F.: Relações semânticas e interoperabilidade em tesauros representados em SKOS : uma revisao sistematica da literatura (2022) 0.08 
    0.076189496 = product of:
  0.11428424 = sum of:
    0.018549696 = weight(_text_:e in 254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018549696 = score(doc=254,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.064891934 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0451463 = queryNorm
        0.28585517 = fieldWeight in 254, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=254)
    0.095734544 = product of:
      0.19146909 = sum of:
        0.19146909 = weight(_text_:de in 254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19146909 = score(doc=254,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.19401574 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0451463 = queryNorm
            0.986874 = fieldWeight in 254, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=254)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Objetivo: Este estudo tem como objetivo compreender como o modelo de dados Simple Knowledge Organization System e seus modelos de extensão tem sido utilizado para promover a interoperabilidade com outros vocabulários e refinar as relações semânticas em tesauros na web. Metodologia: Utiliza a pesquisa documental nos guias de referência dos modelos de dados utilizados para representar os tesauros na web. Resultados: os modelos de dados têm sido utilizados para representar os termos e suas variações linguísticas, os relacionamentos entre grupos e subgrupos de conceitos, numa perspectiva intra-vocabulários, e os relacionamentos entre conceitos de vocabulários distintos, numa perspectiva inter-vocabulários. Conclusões: O uso do Simple Knowledge Organization System, e dos seus modelos de extensão contribuem para uma melhor estruturação dos conceitos em tesauros. Os modelos de extensão são apropriados para a representação dos relacionamentos de equivalência compostos, ou para a estruturação de grupos e subgrupos de conceitos em tesauros.
  2. Belabbes, M.A.; Ruthven, I.; Moshfeghi, Y.; Rasmussen Pennington, D.: Information overload : a concept analysis (2023) 0.05 
    0.054531004 = product of:
  0.081796505 = sum of:
    0.0051526935 = weight(_text_:e in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0051526935 = score(doc=950,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.064891934 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0451463 = queryNorm
        0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
    0.07664381 = sum of:
      0.046060305 = weight(_text_:de in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.046060305 = score(doc=950,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19401574 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0451463 = queryNorm
          0.23740499 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
      0.030583505 = weight(_text_:22 in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030583505 = score(doc=950,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15809466 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0451463 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Purpose With the shift to an information-based society and to the de-centralisation of information, information overload has attracted a growing interest in the computer and information science research communities. However, there is no clear understanding of the meaning of the term, and while there have been many proposed definitions, there is no consensus. The goal of this work was to define the concept of "information overload". In order to do so, a concept analysis using Rodgers' approach was performed. Design/methodology/approach A concept analysis using Rodgers' approach based on a corpus of documents published between 2010 and September 2020 was conducted. One surrogate for "information overload", which is "cognitive overload" was identified. The corpus of documents consisted of 151 documents for information overload and ten for cognitive overload. All documents were from the fields of computer science and information science, and were retrieved from three databases: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Digital Library, SCOPUS and Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA). Findings The themes identified from the authors' concept analysis allowed us to extract the triggers, manifestations and consequences of information overload. They found triggers related to information characteristics, information need, the working environment, the cognitive abilities of individuals and the information environment. In terms of manifestations, they found that information overload manifests itself both emotionally and cognitively. The consequences of information overload were both internal and external. These findings allowed them to provide a definition of information overload. Originality/value Through the authors' concept analysis, they were able to clarify the components of information overload and provide a definition of the concept.
    Date
    22. 4.2023 19:27:56
    Language
    e
  3. Baecker, D.: ¬Der Frosch, die Fliege und der Mensch : zum Tod von Humberto Maturana (2021) 0.05 
    0.051095873 = product of:
  0.15328762 = sum of:
    0.15328762 = sum of:
      0.09212061 = weight(_text_:de in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09212061 = score(doc=236,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19401574 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0451463 = queryNorm
          0.47480997 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
      0.06116701 = weight(_text_:22 in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06116701 = score(doc=236,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15809466 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0451463 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Die Frage, was Leben ist, hat Humberto Maturana beantwortet. Die Frage, was Erkennen ist, ließ ihn nie los. Nun ist der Forscher an den Schnittstellen von Neurobiologie und Philosophie in Santiago de Chile gestorben.
    Date
    7. 5.2021 22:10:24
  4. Wolfangel, E.: DeepMind will Problem der Proteinfaltung gelöst haben (2020) 0.05 
    0.050296333 = product of:
  0.0754445 = sum of:
    0.010305387 = weight(_text_:e in 5635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010305387 = score(doc=5635,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.064891934 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0451463 = queryNorm
        0.15880844 = fieldWeight in 5635, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5635)
    0.06513911 = product of:
      0.13027821 = sum of:
        0.13027821 = weight(_text_:de in 5635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13027821 = score(doc=5635,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19401574 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0451463 = queryNorm
            0.6714827 = fieldWeight in 5635, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5635)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Source
    https://www.spektrum.de/news/deepmind-will-problem-der-proteinfaltung-geloest-haben/1802324?utm_source=pocket-newtab-global-de-DE
  5. Almeida, M.B.: Ontologia em Ciência da Informação: Teoria e Método (1ª ed., Vol. 1). CRV. http://dx.doi.org/10.24824/978655578679.8; Tecnologia e Aplicações (1ª ed., Vol. 2). CRV. http://dx.doi.org/10.24824/978652511477.4; Curso completo com teoria e exercícios (1ª ed., volume suplementar para professores). CRV. [Review] (2022) 0.05 
    0.04694542 = product of:
  0.07041813 = sum of:
    0.015145764 = weight(_text_:e in 631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015145764 = score(doc=631,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.064891934 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0451463 = queryNorm
        0.2333998 = fieldWeight in 631, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=631)
    0.055272363 = product of:
      0.110544726 = sum of:
        0.110544726 = weight(_text_:de in 631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.110544726 = score(doc=631,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.19401574 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0451463 = queryNorm
            0.56977195 = fieldWeight in 631, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=631)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Nos últimos 30 anos, o tema das ontologias tem sido um dos terrenos mais férteis de investigação na área da Organização do Conhecimento. É um tema complexo e revestido de polémica, pela dificuldade na definição do próprio conceito e pelas apropriações que diferentes campos científicos têm exercido sobre ele. Com origem no domínio da filosofia, a ontologia é hoje um território partilhado pelas Ciências da Computação, com destaque para a Ciência dos Dados (Data Science), e pela Ciência da Informação, particularmente pela Organização do Conhecimento. São raros os autores desta área que não escreveram sobre o tema, abordando as suas fronteiras conceptuais ou discutindo a relação das ontologias com outros sistemas de organização do conhecimento, como as taxonomias, os tesauros ou as classificações.
    Source
    Boletim do Arquivo da Universidade de Coimbra 35(2022) no.1, S.191-198
  6. Rieger, F.: Lügende Computer (2023) 0.04 
    0.040876698 = product of:
  0.12263009 = sum of:
    0.12263009 = sum of:
      0.07369649 = weight(_text_:de in 912) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07369649 = score(doc=912,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19401574 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0451463 = queryNorm
          0.37984797 = fieldWeight in 912, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=912)
      0.048933607 = weight(_text_:22 in 912) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048933607 = score(doc=912,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15809466 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0451463 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 912, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=912)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    16. 3.2023 19:22:55
    Source
    https://steadyhq.com/de/realitatsabzweig/posts/3ed79605-0650-4725-ab35-43f1243b57ee
  7. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.04 
    0.039974302 = product of:
  0.059961453 = sum of:
    0.05377822 = product of:
      0.21511288 = sum of:
        0.21511288 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21511288 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38275084 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0451463 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    0.0061832317 = weight(_text_:e in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0061832317 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.064891934 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0451463 = queryNorm
        0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Language
    e
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  8. Henshaw, Y.; Wu, S.: RILM Index (Répertoire International de Littérature Musicale) (2021) 0.04 
    0.03520743 = product of:
  0.052811146 = sum of:
    0.0072137704 = weight(_text_:e in 587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0072137704 = score(doc=587,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.064891934 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0451463 = queryNorm
        0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 587, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=587)
    0.045597374 = product of:
      0.09119475 = sum of:
        0.09119475 = weight(_text_:de in 587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09119475 = score(doc=587,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19401574 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0451463 = queryNorm
            0.47003788 = fieldWeight in 587, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=587)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    RILM Index is a partially controlled vocabulary designated to index scholarly writings on music and related subjects, created and curated by Répertoire International de Littérature Musicale (RILM). It has been developed over 50 years and has served the music community as a primary research tool. This analytical review of the characteristics of RILM Index reveals several issues, related to the Index's history, that impinge on its usefulness. An in-progress thesaurus is presented as a possible solution to these issues. RILM Index, despite being imperfect, provides a foundation for developing an ontological structure for both indexing and information retrieval purposes.
    Language
    e
  9. Fagundes, P.B.; Freund, G.P.; Vital, L.P.; Monteiro de Barros, C.; Macedo, D.D.J.de: Taxonomias, ontologias e tesauros : possibilidades de contribuição para o processo de Engenharia de Requisitos (2020) 0.03 
    0.034142002 = product of:
  0.051213 = sum of:
    0.0051526935 = weight(_text_:e in 5828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0051526935 = score(doc=5828,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.064891934 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0451463 = queryNorm
        0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 5828, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5828)
    0.046060305 = product of:
      0.09212061 = sum of:
        0.09212061 = weight(_text_:de in 5828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09212061 = score(doc=5828,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.19401574 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0451463 = queryNorm
            0.47480997 = fieldWeight in 5828, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5828)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  10. Campos, L.M.: Princípios teóricos usados na elaboracao de ontologias e sua influência na recuperacao da informacao com uso de de inferências [Theoretical principles used in ontology building and their influence on information retrieval using inferences] (2021) 0.03 
    0.034142002 = product of:
  0.051213 = sum of:
    0.0051526935 = weight(_text_:e in 826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0051526935 = score(doc=826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.064891934 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0451463 = queryNorm
        0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=826)
    0.046060305 = product of:
      0.09212061 = sum of:
        0.09212061 = weight(_text_:de in 826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09212061 = score(doc=826,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.19401574 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0451463 = queryNorm
            0.47480997 = fieldWeight in 826, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=826)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Source
    Ponto de Acesso, Salvador. 15(2021) no.3, S.344-380
  11. Schrader, A.C.: ORCID DE Monitor online! (2021) 0.03 
    0.030706871 = product of:
  0.09212061 = sum of:
    0.09212061 = product of:
      0.18424122 = sum of:
        0.18424122 = weight(_text_:de in 292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18424122 = score(doc=292,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.19401574 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0451463 = queryNorm
            0.94961995 = fieldWeight in 292, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=292)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Der ORCID DE Monitor ist ein Instrument zur Analyse der Nutzung der ORCID iD in der wissenschaftlichen Publikationslandschaft und wurde federführend durch die Universitätsbibliothek der Universität Bielefeld entwickelt. Mit der Vorstellung des Prototyps auf dem 109. Bibliothekartag wurde ein weiterer Meilenstein im Projekt ORCID DE erreicht.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: https://www.orcid-de.org/orcid-de-monitor-online.
  12. Fernanda de Jesus, A.; Ferreira de Castro, F.: Proposal for the publication of linked open bibliographic data (2024) 0.03 
    0.030177798 = product of:
  0.045266695 = sum of:
    0.0061832317 = weight(_text_:e in 1161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0061832317 = score(doc=1161,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.064891934 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0451463 = queryNorm
        0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 1161, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1161)
    0.039083462 = product of:
      0.078166924 = sum of:
        0.078166924 = weight(_text_:de in 1161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.078166924 = score(doc=1161,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19401574 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0451463 = queryNorm
            0.4028896 = fieldWeight in 1161, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1161)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Language
    e
  13. Collard, J.; Paiva, V. de; Fong, B.; Subrahmanian, E.: Extracting mathematical concepts from text (2022) 0.03 
    0.028296016 = product of:
  0.042444024 = sum of:
    0.010201813 = weight(_text_:e in 668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010201813 = score(doc=668,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.064891934 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0451463 = queryNorm
        0.15721233 = fieldWeight in 668, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=668)
    0.032242212 = product of:
      0.064484425 = sum of:
        0.064484425 = weight(_text_:de in 668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064484425 = score(doc=668,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19401574 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0451463 = queryNorm
            0.33236697 = fieldWeight in 668, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=668)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Language
    e
  14. Wagner, E.: Über Impfstoffe zur digitalen Identität? (2020) 0.03 
    0.02725926 = product of:
  0.04088889 = sum of:
    0.010305387 = weight(_text_:e in 5846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010305387 = score(doc=5846,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.064891934 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0451463 = queryNorm
        0.15880844 = fieldWeight in 5846, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5846)
    0.030583505 = product of:
      0.06116701 = sum of:
        0.06116701 = weight(_text_:22 in 5846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06116701 = score(doc=5846,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15809466 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0451463 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5846, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5846)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    4. 5.2020 17:22:40
  15. Fugmann, R.: What is information? : an information veteran looks back (2022) 0.03 
    0.02725926 = product of:
  0.04088889 = sum of:
    0.010305387 = weight(_text_:e in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010305387 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.064891934 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0451463 = queryNorm
        0.15880844 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
    0.030583505 = product of:
      0.06116701 = sum of:
        0.06116701 = weight(_text_:22 in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06116701 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15809466 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0451463 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    18. 8.2022 19:22:57
    Language
    e
  16. Pérez Pozo, Á.; Rosa, J. de la; Ros, S.; González-Blanco, E.; Hernández, L.; Sisto, M. de: ¬A bridge too far for artificial intelligence? : automatic classification of stanzas in Spanish poetry (2022) 0.03 
    0.026571043 = product of:
  0.039856564 = sum of:
    0.007287009 = weight(_text_:e in 468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007287009 = score(doc=468,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.064891934 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0451463 = queryNorm
        0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 468, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=468)
    0.032569554 = product of:
      0.06513911 = sum of:
        0.06513911 = weight(_text_:de in 468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06513911 = score(doc=468,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19401574 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0451463 = queryNorm
            0.33574134 = fieldWeight in 468, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=468)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Language
    e
  17. Al-Khatib, K.; Ghosa, T.; Hou, Y.; Waard, A. de; Freitag, D.: Argument mining for scholarly document processing : taking stock and looking ahead (2021) 0.03 
    0.02630399 = product of:
  0.039455984 = sum of:
    0.0072137704 = weight(_text_:e in 568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0072137704 = score(doc=568,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.064891934 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0451463 = queryNorm
        0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 568, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=568)
    0.032242212 = product of:
      0.064484425 = sum of:
        0.064484425 = weight(_text_:de in 568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064484425 = score(doc=568,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19401574 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0451463 = queryNorm
            0.33236697 = fieldWeight in 568, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=568)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Language
    e
  18. Stieler, W.: Anzeichen von Bewusstsein bei ChatGPT und Co.? (2023) 0.03 
    0.02630399 = product of:
  0.039455984 = sum of:
    0.0072137704 = weight(_text_:e in 1047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0072137704 = score(doc=1047,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.064891934 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0451463 = queryNorm
        0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 1047, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1047)
    0.032242212 = product of:
      0.064484425 = sum of:
        0.064484425 = weight(_text_:de in 1047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064484425 = score(doc=1047,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19401574 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0451463 = queryNorm
            0.33236697 = fieldWeight in 1047, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1047)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Ein interdisziplinäres Forschungsteam hat eine Liste von Eigenschaften aufgestellt, die auf Bewusstsein deuten, und aktuelle KI-Systeme darauf abgeklopft. Ein interdisziplinäres Forscherteam hat ein Paper [https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.08708] veröffentlicht, das eine Liste von 14 "Indikatoren" für Bewusstsein enthält, die aus sechs aktuellen Theorien über das Bewusstsein stammen. Aktuelle KI-Modelle wie GPT-3, Palm-E oder AdA von Deepmind weisen demnach einzelne dieser Indikatoren auf. "Es spricht viel dafür, dass die meisten oder alle Bedingungen für das Bewusstsein, die von derzeitigen Theorien vorgeschlagenen Bedingungen für das Bewusstsein mit den bestehenden Techniken der KI erfüllt werden können", schreiben die Autoren. Zum Team gehörte auch der Deep-Learning-Pionier Yoshua Bengio von der Université de Montréal.
  19. Isaac, A.; Raemy, J.A.; Meijers, E.; Valk, S. De; Freire, N.: Metadata aggregation via linked data : results of the Europeana Common Culture project (2020) 0.02 
    0.02425373 = product of:
  0.036380593 = sum of:
    0.008744411 = weight(_text_:e in 39) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008744411 = score(doc=39,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.064891934 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0451463 = queryNorm
        0.13475344 = fieldWeight in 39, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=39)
    0.027636182 = product of:
      0.055272363 = sum of:
        0.055272363 = weight(_text_:de in 39) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055272363 = score(doc=39,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19401574 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0451463 = queryNorm
            0.28488597 = fieldWeight in 39, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=39)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Language
    e
  20. Schrader, A.: ORCID DE 2 erfolgreich beendet (2022) 0.02 
    0.022564849 = product of:
  0.067694545 = sum of:
    0.067694545 = product of:
      0.13538909 = sum of:
        0.13538909 = weight(_text_:de in 828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13538909 = score(doc=828,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.19401574 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0451463 = queryNorm
            0.69782525 = fieldWeight in 828, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=828)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    "Zum 30. November 2022 wurde das Projekt ORCID DE 2 erfolgreich beendet. Das Projekt wurde in zwei Förderphasen ( <http://doi.org/10.2312/lis.16.01> 2016 bis 2019 und <https://doi.org/10.2312/lis.20.01> 2020 bis 2022) von der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) gefördert und von der Deutschen Initiative für Netzwerkinformation (DINI) initiiert. ORCID spielt auf der Ebene nationaler Standards, wie dem DINI-Zertifikat und dem Kerndatensatz Forschung (KDSF), aber auch auf lokaler Ebene in den wissenschaftlichen Einrichtungen eine zentrale Rolle. Die Notwendigkeit und der Nutzen von Persistent Identifiern zur dauerhaft verlässlichen Identifizierung der mit Forschungsprozessen verknüpften Ressourcen, der Akteure und ihrer Forschungsprodukte wird anhand von ORCID besonders deutlich. Was im Projekt erreicht wurde und wie es nach Ende des Projektes weiter geht, lesen Sie in folgendem Blogpost: https://www.orcid-de.org/support/blogbeitraege/projekt-orcid-de-2-erfolgreich-beendet Die Mailingliste "ORCID DE Dialog" (<https://www.listserv.dfn.de/sympa/subscribe/orcid-de-dialog?previous_action=info> hier zu abonnieren) bleibt für den Austausch aller ORCID-Interessierten weiterhin geöffnet."
    Object
    ORCID DE 2

Authors

Languages

  • e 825
  • d 94
  • pt 6
  • m 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 860
  • el 127
  • m 28
  • p 13
  • s 7
  • x 2
  • A 1
  • EL 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications