Search (1001 results, page 2 of 51)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Goggins, S.P.; Mascaro, C.; Valetto, G.: Group informatics : a methodological approach and ontology for sociotechnical group research (2013) 0.04
    0.039721094 = product of:
      0.07944219 = sum of:
        0.07944219 = sum of:
          0.042499214 = weight(_text_:g in 665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042499214 = score(doc=665,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04544495 = queryNorm
              0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 665, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=665)
          0.036942977 = weight(_text_:22 in 665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036942977 = score(doc=665,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04544495 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 665, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=665)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:36:45
  2. Ding, Y.; Zhang, G.; Chambers, T.; Song, M.; Wang, X.; Zhai, C.: Content-based citation analysis : the next generation of citation analysis (2014) 0.04
    0.039721094 = product of:
      0.07944219 = sum of:
        0.07944219 = sum of:
          0.042499214 = weight(_text_:g in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042499214 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04544495 = queryNorm
              0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
          0.036942977 = weight(_text_:22 in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036942977 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04544495 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 16:52:04
  3. Pepermans, G.; Rousseau, S.: ¬The decision to submit to a journal : another example of a valence-consistent shift? (2016) 0.04
    0.039721094 = product of:
      0.07944219 = sum of:
        0.07944219 = sum of:
          0.042499214 = weight(_text_:g in 2925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042499214 = score(doc=2925,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04544495 = queryNorm
              0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 2925, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2925)
          0.036942977 = weight(_text_:22 in 2925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036942977 = score(doc=2925,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04544495 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2925, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2925)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7. 5.2016 20:02:22
  4. Zhao, G.; Wu, J.; Wang, D.; Li, T.: Entity disambiguation to Wikipedia using collective ranking (2016) 0.04
    0.039721094 = product of:
      0.07944219 = sum of:
        0.07944219 = sum of:
          0.042499214 = weight(_text_:g in 3266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042499214 = score(doc=3266,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04544495 = queryNorm
              0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 3266, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3266)
          0.036942977 = weight(_text_:22 in 3266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036942977 = score(doc=3266,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04544495 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3266, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3266)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    24.10.2016 19:22:54
  5. Tang, X.-B.; Liu, G.-C.; Yang, J.; Wei, W.: Knowledge-based financial statement fraud detection system : based on an ontology and a decision tree (2018) 0.04
    0.039721094 = product of:
      0.07944219 = sum of:
        0.07944219 = sum of:
          0.042499214 = weight(_text_:g in 4306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042499214 = score(doc=4306,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04544495 = queryNorm
              0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 4306, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4306)
          0.036942977 = weight(_text_:22 in 4306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036942977 = score(doc=4306,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04544495 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4306, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4306)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    21. 6.2018 10:22:43
  6. Dreisiebner, S.; Beutelspacher, L.; Henkel, M.: Informationskompetenz - Forschung in Graz und Düsseldorf (2017) 0.04
    0.039721094 = product of:
      0.07944219 = sum of:
        0.07944219 = sum of:
          0.042499214 = weight(_text_:g in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042499214 = score(doc=4362,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04544495 = queryNorm
              0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
          0.036942977 = weight(_text_:22 in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036942977 = score(doc=4362,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04544495 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 5.2018 14:48:22
    Footnote
    Teil eines Themenheftes: Themenheft: Düsseldorfer und Grazer Informationswissenschaft / Gastherausgeber: Wolfgang G. Stock, Christian Schlögl.
  7. Lembke, G.; Leipner, I.: ¬Die Lüge der digitalen Bildung : warum unsere Kinder das Lernen verlernen (2018) 0.04
    0.039476864 = product of:
      0.07895373 = sum of:
        0.07895373 = sum of:
          0.035416014 = weight(_text_:g in 4319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035416014 = score(doc=4319,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04544495 = queryNorm
              0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 4319, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4319)
          0.043537717 = weight(_text_:22 in 4319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043537717 = score(doc=4319,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04544495 = queryNorm
              0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4319, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4319)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Classification
    MBL 22
    SSD
    MBL 22
  8. Beck, G.; Meissner, S.: Strukturierung und Vermittlung von heterogenen (Nicht-)Wissensbeständen in der Risikokommunikation : Nutzen, Möglichkeiten, Herausforderungen, Wege (2010) 0.03
    0.033100914 = product of:
      0.06620183 = sum of:
        0.06620183 = sum of:
          0.035416014 = weight(_text_:g in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035416014 = score(doc=3734,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04544495 = queryNorm
              0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
          0.030785816 = weight(_text_:22 in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030785816 = score(doc=3734,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04544495 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  9. Dunsire, G.; Nicholson, D.: Signposting the crossroads : terminology Web services and classification-based interoperability (2010) 0.03
    0.033100914 = product of:
      0.06620183 = sum of:
        0.06620183 = sum of:
          0.035416014 = weight(_text_:g in 4066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035416014 = score(doc=4066,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04544495 = queryNorm
              0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 4066, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4066)
          0.030785816 = weight(_text_:22 in 4066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030785816 = score(doc=4066,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04544495 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4066, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4066)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 1.2011 19:22:48
  10. Stvilia, B.; Hinnant, C.C.; Schindler, K.; Worrall, A.; Burnett, G.; Burnett, K.; Kazmer, M.M.; Marty, P.F.: Composition of scientific teams and publication productivity at a national science lab (2011) 0.03
    0.033100914 = product of:
      0.06620183 = sum of:
        0.06620183 = sum of:
          0.035416014 = weight(_text_:g in 4191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035416014 = score(doc=4191,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04544495 = queryNorm
              0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 4191, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4191)
          0.030785816 = weight(_text_:22 in 4191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030785816 = score(doc=4191,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04544495 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4191, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4191)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 13:19:42
  11. Thelwall, M.; Buckley, K.; Paltoglou, G.; Cai, D.; Kappas, A.: Sentiment strength detection in short informal text (2010) 0.03
    0.033100914 = product of:
      0.06620183 = sum of:
        0.06620183 = sum of:
          0.035416014 = weight(_text_:g in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035416014 = score(doc=4200,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04544495 = queryNorm
              0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
          0.030785816 = weight(_text_:22 in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030785816 = score(doc=4200,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04544495 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:29:23
  12. Concepts in Context : Proceedings of the Cologne Conference on Interoperability and Semantics in Knowledge Organization July 19th - 20th, 2010 (2011) 0.03
    0.033100914 = product of:
      0.06620183 = sum of:
        0.06620183 = sum of:
          0.035416014 = weight(_text_:g in 628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035416014 = score(doc=628,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04544495 = queryNorm
              0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 628, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=628)
          0.030785816 = weight(_text_:22 in 628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030785816 = score(doc=628,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04544495 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 628, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=628)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Winfried Gödert: Programmatic Issues and Introduction - Dagobert Soergel: Conceptual Foundations for Semantic Mapping and Semantic Search - Jan-Helge Jacobs, Tina Mengel, Katrin Müller: Insights and Outlooks: A Retrospective View on the CrissCross Project - Yvonne Jahns, Helga Karg: Translingual Retrieval: Moving between Vocabularies - MACS 2010 - Jessica Hubrich: Intersystem Relations: Characteristics and Functionalities - Stella G Dextre Clarke: In Pursuit of Interoperability: Can We Standardize Mapping Types? - Philipp Mayr, Philipp Schaer, Peter Mutschke: A Science Model Driven Retrieval Prototype - Claudia Effenberger, Julia Hauser: Would an Explicit Versioning of the DDC Bring Advantages for Retrieval? - Gordon Dunsire: Interoperability and Semantics in RDF Representations of FRBR, FRAD and FRSAD - Maja Zumer: FRSAD: Challenges of Modeling the Aboutness - Michael Panzer: Two Tales of a Concept: Aligning FRSAD with SKOS - Felix Boteram: Integrating Semantic Interoperability into FRSAD
    Date
    22. 2.2013 11:34:18
  13. Baião Salgado Silva, G.; Lima, G.Â. Borém de Oliveira: Using topic maps in establishing compatibility of semantically structured hypertext contents (2012) 0.03
    0.033100914 = product of:
      0.06620183 = sum of:
        0.06620183 = sum of:
          0.035416014 = weight(_text_:g in 633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035416014 = score(doc=633,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04544495 = queryNorm
              0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 633, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=633)
          0.030785816 = weight(_text_:22 in 633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030785816 = score(doc=633,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04544495 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 633, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=633)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2013 11:39:23
  14. Moed, H.F.; Halevi, G.: On full text download and citation distributions in scientific-scholarly journals (2016) 0.03
    0.033100914 = product of:
      0.06620183 = sum of:
        0.06620183 = sum of:
          0.035416014 = weight(_text_:g in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035416014 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04544495 = queryNorm
              0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
          0.030785816 = weight(_text_:22 in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030785816 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04544495 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 14:11:17
  15. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.03
    0.03157815 = product of:
      0.0631563 = sum of:
        0.0631563 = product of:
          0.2526252 = sum of:
            0.2526252 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2526252 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38528278 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04544495 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  16. Zhang, C.-T.: Relationship of the h-index, g-index, and e-index (2010) 0.03
    0.030051483 = product of:
      0.060102966 = sum of:
        0.060102966 = product of:
          0.12020593 = sum of:
            0.12020593 = weight(_text_:g in 3418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12020593 = score(doc=3418,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04544495 = queryNorm
                0.70424014 = fieldWeight in 3418, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3418)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Of h-type indices available now, the g-index is an important one in that it not only keeps some advantages of the h-index but also counts citations from highly cited articles. However, the g-index has a drawback that one has to add fictitious articles with zero citation to calculate this index in some important cases. Based on an alternative definition without introducing fictitious articles, an analytical method has been proposed to calculate the g-index based approximately on the h-index and the e-index. If citations for a scientist are ranked by a power law, it is shown that the g-index can be calculated accurately by the h-index, the e-index, and the power parameter. The relationship of the h-, g-, and e-indices presented here shows that the g-index contains the citation information from the h-index, the e-index, and some papers beyond the h-core.
    Object
    g-index
  17. Rousseau, R.: Egghe's g-index is not a proper concentration measure (2015) 0.03
    0.030051483 = product of:
      0.060102966 = sum of:
        0.060102966 = product of:
          0.12020593 = sum of:
            0.12020593 = weight(_text_:g in 1864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12020593 = score(doc=1864,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04544495 = queryNorm
                0.70424014 = fieldWeight in 1864, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1864)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Object
    g-index
  18. Schreiber, M.: Do we need the g-index? (2013) 0.03
    0.028332809 = product of:
      0.056665618 = sum of:
        0.056665618 = product of:
          0.113331236 = sum of:
            0.113331236 = weight(_text_:g in 1113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.113331236 = score(doc=1113,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04544495 = queryNorm
                0.663964 = fieldWeight in 1113, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1113)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Using a very small sample of 8 data sets it was recently shown by De Visscher (2011) that the g-index is very close to the square root of the total number of citations. It was argued that there is no bibliometrically meaningful difference. Using another somewhat larger empirical sample of 26 data sets I show that the difference may be larger and I argue in favor of the g-index.
    Object
    g-index
  19. Hovden, R.: Bibliometrics for Internet media : applying the h-index to YouTube (2013) 0.03
    0.027717413 = product of:
      0.055434827 = sum of:
        0.055434827 = product of:
          0.11086965 = sum of:
            0.11086965 = weight(_text_:g in 1111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11086965 = score(doc=1111,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04544495 = queryNorm
                0.6495425 = fieldWeight in 1111, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1111)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The h-index can be a useful metric for evaluating a person's output of Internet media. Here I advocate and demonstrate adaption of the h-index and the g-index to the top video content creators on YouTube. The h-index for Internet video media is based on videos and their view counts. The h-index is defined as the number of videos with >=h × 10**5 views. The g-index is defined as the number of videos with >=g × 10**5 views on average. When compared with a video creator's total view count, the h-index and g-index better capture both productivity and impact in a single metric.
    Object
    g-index
  20. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.03
    0.027066985 = product of:
      0.05413397 = sum of:
        0.05413397 = product of:
          0.21653588 = sum of:
            0.21653588 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21653588 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38528278 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04544495 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.

Languages

  • e 727
  • d 262
  • a 1
  • f 1
  • hu 1
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 873
  • el 95
  • m 74
  • s 30
  • x 12
  • r 7
  • b 5
  • i 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications