Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

0.024433566 = product of:
  0.0733007 = sum of:
    0.0733007 = sum of:
      0.04361983 = weight(_text_:k in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04361983 = score(doc=767,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.15640575 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04381386 = queryNorm
          0.2788889 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
      0.029680867 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.029680867 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15342867 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04381386 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Classification

TVK (FH K)

Date

22. 3.2008 14:24:08

GHBS

TVK (FH K)

0.019546852 = product of:
  0.058640555 = sum of:
    0.058640555 = sum of:
      0.034895863 = weight(_text_:k in 2249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034895863 = score(doc=2249,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.15640575 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04381386 = queryNorm
          0.22311112 = fieldWeight in 2249, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2249)
      0.023744693 = weight(_text_:22 in 2249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.023744693 = score(doc=2249,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15342867 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04381386 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2249, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2249)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Classification

BCNH (FH K)

Date

22. 3.2008 18:05:16

GHBS

BCNH (FH K)

0.0076820566 = product of:
  0.02304617 = sum of:
    0.02304617 = product of:
      0.04609234 = sum of:
        0.04609234 = weight(_text_:jones in 2100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04609234 = score(doc=2100,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27039436 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04381386 = queryNorm
            0.1704634 = fieldWeight in 2100, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2100)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

She is Chair of the Heron User Group and Association of Information Professionals in the Social Sciences (ALISS). She is the Conference Officer for CILIP Information Literacy Group and a founder member of the Librarians' Information Literacy Annual Conference (LILAC). Debbi Boden is a Faculty Team Leader at Imperial College London. She is chair and a founder member of the CILIP CSG Information Literacy Group and a member of the Information Literacy Annual Conference (LILAC) Committee. Gwyneth Price is Student Services Librarian at the Institute of Education, University of London. She is Editor of Education Libraries Journal. Readership: The book is aimed at library managers, information literacy/skills librarians/managers, and learner support librarians/managers.Contents: Getting started with the information literacy cookbook (Jane Secker, Debbi Boden and Gwyneth Price) Feeding the masses: digital citizenship and the public library (Ronan O'Beirne) Healthy mind, healthy body: digital literacy in the NHS (Di Mullen and Helen Roberts) Information discovery stir-fry: information literacy in the commercial sector (Angela Donnelly and Carey Craddock) Alone in the kitchen: when you're the only one providing the service (Sarah Hinton) Educating the palate of pupils and teachers: recipes for success in school libraries (Rebecca Jones) Variety is the spice of life, or choosing your topics with care: information literacy challenges in the further education sector (Gwyneth Price and Jane Del-Pizzo) Information literacy beef bourguignon (also known as information skills stew or i-skills casserole): the higher education sector (Jane Secker, Debbi Boden and Gwyneth Price) Conclusion: coffee, cheese, biscuits and petit fours (Jane Secker, Debbi Boden and Gwyneth Price)

0.007269972 = product of:
  0.021809915 = sum of:
    0.021809915 = product of:
      0.04361983 = sum of:
        0.04361983 = weight(_text_:k in 2141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04361983 = score(doc=2141,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15640575 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04381386 = queryNorm
            0.2788889 = fieldWeight in 2141, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2141)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Classification

OCS (FH K)

GHBS

OCS (FH K)

0.007269972 = product of:
  0.021809915 = sum of:
    0.021809915 = product of:
      0.04361983 = sum of:
        0.04361983 = weight(_text_:k in 4076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04361983 = score(doc=4076,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15640575 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04381386 = queryNorm
            0.2788889 = fieldWeight in 4076, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4076)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Classification

BBO (FH K)

GHBS

BBO (FH K)

0.0061687753 = product of:
  0.018506326 = sum of:
    0.018506326 = product of:
      0.03701265 = sum of:
        0.03701265 = weight(_text_:k in 4323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03701265 = score(doc=4323,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15640575 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04381386 = queryNorm
            0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 4323, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4323)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Content

Das Buchprojekt entstand im Rahmen des Forschungsprojektes Theseus (Teilprojekt Alexandria). - Als Online Publikation vgl.: http://www.bui.haw-hamburg.de/fileadmin/user_upload/lewandowski/Web20-Buch/lewandowski-maass.pdf. Rez. in: ZfBB 56(2009) H.2, S.134-135 (K. Lepsky)

0.006145646 = product of:
  0.018436937 = sum of:
    0.018436937 = product of:
      0.036873873 = sum of:
        0.036873873 = weight(_text_:jones in 46) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036873873 = score(doc=46,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27039436 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04381386 = queryNorm
            0.13637072 = fieldWeight in 46, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=46)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Footnote

Sein Feldzug war erfolgreich: Europa will eine gemeinsame virtuelle Bibliothek aufbauen, an der sich nur die portugiesische Nationalbibliothek und die British Library nicht beteiligen wollen. Die Staatschefs sind sich einig, die Kulturminister im Gespräch. Es fehlen natürlich noch das Geld und sicher auch der Glaube daran, dass die träge Brüsseler Maschinerie es mit einem agilen amerikanischen Unternehmen aufnehmen könnte. Aber auch dort läuft nicht alles wie geplant: Selbst amerikanische Verleger haben gegen die Verletzung des Urheberrechtes protestiert und für Verzögerungen gesorgt. Jeanneney sieht in einem amerikanischen Alleingang und dem De-facto-Monopol von Google vor allem drei Gefahren: Erstens eine Hierarchisierung und Ordnung des Wissens nach rein kommerziellen Gesichtspunkten. "Kultur heißt nicht, alles kunterbunt auf einen Wühltisch zu schütten", sagt Jeanneney. Wissen und Kulturerbe müsse organisiert, das Angebot hierarchisiert werden. Die zweite kurzfristige Gefahr sieht er in der angelsächsischen Dominanz, in der Tatsache, dass die Trefferliste vor allem englische Texte anzeigen wird oder solche, die unter angloamerikanischem Blickwinkel ausgewählt wurden. Langfristig müsse man sich vor allem fragen, und darin sieht er die dritte Gefahr, wie ein Unternehmen, das so schnell eingehen kann wie es entstanden ist, den Fortbestand dieses Projektes sichern will. Jeanneney fordert die Staaten deshalb auf, sich einzumischen und diesem rein am Kapital orientierten Projekt einen längeren Atem einzuhauchen, "den Atem von mehreren Generationen". Jeanneneys Versuch, hinter dem moralischen Deckmäntelchen die materiellen Interessen von Google zu benennen, wird in Deutschland als "kulturkritisches Ressentiment" abgetan. Drängt sich die Frage auf, ob es sich in diesem Fall um ein antiamerikanisches oder womöglich eher um ein antifranzösisches Ressentiment handelt. Frankreichs Sozialromantiker und Kulturkämpfer stören offensichtlich den ungebrochen naiven Glauben an das messianische Versprechen des Kapitalismus, nach den Waren nun auch das Wissen der Welt zu verteilen. Es sieht aus, als gäbe es alles umsonst. Aber Google lässt sich seine Informationsbeschaffung bekanntlich bezahlen. Es gilt eben nicht das Gesetz der Enzyklopädie, sondern immer noch die Logik des Dow Jones."

0.005815977 = product of:
  0.017447932 = sum of:
    0.017447932 = product of:
      0.034895863 = sum of:
        0.034895863 = weight(_text_:k in 3589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034895863 = score(doc=3589,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15640575 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04381386 = queryNorm
            0.22311112 = fieldWeight in 3589, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3589)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Classification

ASLP (FH K)

GHBS

ASLP (FH K)

0.005815977 = product of:
  0.017447932 = sum of:
    0.017447932 = product of:
      0.034895863 = sum of:
        0.034895863 = weight(_text_:k in 584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034895863 = score(doc=584,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15640575 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04381386 = queryNorm
            0.22311112 = fieldWeight in 584, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=584)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Classification

BAHU (FH K)

GHBS

BAHU (FH K)

0.00508898 = product of:
  0.015266939 = sum of:
    0.015266939 = product of:
      0.030533878 = sum of:
        0.030533878 = weight(_text_:k in 2930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030533878 = score(doc=2930,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15640575 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04381386 = queryNorm
            0.19522223 = fieldWeight in 2930, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2930)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Classification

TZE (FH K)

GHBS

TZE (FH K)

0.0034979237 = product of:
  0.010493771 = sum of:
    0.010493771 = product of:
      0.020987542 = sum of:
        0.020987542 = weight(_text_:22 in 677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020987542 = score(doc=677,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15342867 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04381386 = queryNorm
            0.13679022 = fieldWeight in 677, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=677)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Footnote

Inhaltsbeschreibung Die verschiedenen Initiativen zum Open Access führen zu zwei Systemen, dem so genannten »grünen Weg«, der bereits in gedruckter Form veröffentlichte Publikationen ins Internet stellt, und dem »goldenen Weg«, bei dem die Volltextspeicherung die einzige oder jedenfalls die vorrangige Form darstellt. Die Internationalisierung des Open Access erfolgte auf drei Konferenzen, die 2001 in Budapest, 2003 in Bethesda und im gleichen Jahr in Berlin stattfanden. Diese Volltextspeicherung war ursprünglich auf die naturwissenschaftlich-technischen Disziplinen konzentriert. Doch treten in zunehmendem Maße auch die Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaften dem Prinzip bei. Dabei entstehen natürlich sehr differenzierende Aspekte, zum Beispiel für die Bibliotheken - etwa der Erwerb gedruckter Zeitschriften, Langzeitarchivierung von Interneteintragungen, für den Buchhandel wie für die Autoren - etwa das Urheberrecht, aber auch dort das ökonomische Interesse, wie der Plan des Börsenvereins des Deutschen Buchhandels zu einer eigenen Volltextspeicherung zeigt, dem die Deutsche UNESCO-Kommission eine Ergänzung zum vorliegenden Text nachsandte. Open Access hat mittlerweile ein so weites Interesse gefunden, dass das Auswärtige Amt zusammen mit der Deutschen UNESCO-Kommission 2006 zu einer Konferenz einlud, über deren Ergebnisse die Deutsche UNESCO-Kommission dieses Handbuch veröffentlicht hat, das neben einer definitorischen und einer historischen Einleitung (Norbert Lossau S.18-22 und Peter Schirmbacher S. 22-25) in vier weiteren Kapiteln die Möglichkeiten und Probleme darstellt. Im zweiten Kapitel werden drei verschiedene Modelle vorgestellt: Open-Access-Repositories am Berliner Beispiel des edoc-Servers (Susanne Dobratz S. 28-32), Open-Access-Journale am Beispiel des New Journal of Physics (Eberhard Bodenschatz S.33-36) und ein Verlagsmodell (Springer Open Choice) von Jan Velterop (S. 37-40). Das dritte Kapitel ist den Formen der Realisierung gewidmet, z. B. der Finanzierung (Stefan Gradmann S.42-45), des Urheberrechts (Karl-Nikolaus Peifer S.46-59), der Qualitätssicherung (Eberhard Bodenschatz und Ulrich Pöschl S.50-55), der Langzeitarchivierung (Ute Schwens und Reinhard Altenhöner S. 50-58), der Struktur der Wissenschaftskommunikation (Hans Pfeiffenberger S.59-62), der Datenverarbeitung (Wolfram Horst-mann S. 65) sowie der Akzeptanz (Johannes Fournier S. 66-70).

0.0030843876 = product of:
  0.009253163 = sum of:
    0.009253163 = product of:
      0.018506326 = sum of:
        0.018506326 = weight(_text_:k in 726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018506326 = score(doc=726,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15640575 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04381386 = queryNorm
            0.118322544 = fieldWeight in 726, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=726)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.002570323 = product of:
  0.0077109686 = sum of:
    0.0077109686 = product of:
      0.015421937 = sum of:
        0.015421937 = weight(_text_:k in 1717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015421937 = score(doc=1717,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15640575 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04381386 = queryNorm
            0.098602116 = fieldWeight in 1717, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1717)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Footnote

The release of Stimulated Recall and Mental Models, therefore, could not have been timelier. It describes an empirical qualitative, case study research conducted by authors Lyn Henderson and Julie Tallman in which they studied the mental models of school librarians teaching K-12 students how to use electronic databases. In this research, funded by the Spencer Foundation, Henderson and Tallman studied and analyzed the mental models of their subjects, six American and four Australian school librarians, as they went about the task of teaching students one-on-one how to access and retrieve the information they needed for class assignments from electronic databases. Each librarian and student underwent a structured pre-lesson interview to ascertain their mental models (the sum of their prior learning and experiences) regarding the upcoming lesson. The lesson followed immediately and was carefully video- and audio-recorded, with the full knowledge of the librarian and her student. After the lessons, both student and librarian were interviewed with the intent of learning what each were thinking and feeling at specific points during the lesson, using the recordings as memory joggers. After the first librarian-pupil session, the student was freed but the librarian was re-studied tutoring a second learner. Again, the teacher and new student were preinterviewed, their lesson was recorded, and they were debriefed using the recordings for stimulated recall. It is important to note here the use of the recordings to create stimulated recall. Though considered a dubious practice by many respected researchers, Henderson and Tallman expend considerable time and effort in this book trying to establish the credibility of stimulated recall as a valid research tool. I find it interesting that the authors report that their realization of the value of stimulated recall was a collateral benefit of their study; they claim the original objective of their research was to analyze and compare the pre- and post-lesson mental models of the teacher-librarians (p.15). Apparently, this realization provided the inspiration for this book (pp. I & 208). Hence, its place of importance in the book's title.