Search (100 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Indexieren"
  1. Sparck Jones, K.: Automatic keyword classification for information retrieval (1971) 0.16
    0.16403808 = product of:
      0.24605711 = sum of:
        0.18436936 = product of:
          0.3687387 = sum of:
            0.3687387 = weight(_text_:jones in 5176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.3687387 = score(doc=5176,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27039436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04381386 = queryNorm
                1.3637072 = fieldWeight in 5176, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=5176)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.06168775 = product of:
          0.1233755 = sum of:
            0.1233755 = weight(_text_:k in 5176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1233755 = score(doc=5176,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15640575 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04381386 = queryNorm
                0.7888169 = fieldWeight in 5176, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=5176)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
  2. Biebricher, N.; Fuhr, N.; Lustig, G.; Schwantner, M.; Knorz, G.: ¬The automatic indexing system AIR/PHYS : from research to application (1988) 0.14
    0.14215611 = product of:
      0.21323416 = sum of:
        0.09218468 = product of:
          0.18436936 = sum of:
            0.18436936 = weight(_text_:jones in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18436936 = score(doc=1952,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27039436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04381386 = queryNorm
                0.6818536 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.12104948 = sum of:
          0.06168775 = weight(_text_:k in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06168775 = score(doc=1952,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15640575 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04381386 = queryNorm
              0.39440846 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
          0.059361733 = weight(_text_:22 in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.059361733 = score(doc=1952,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15342867 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04381386 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    16. 8.1998 12:51:22
    Footnote
    Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.513-517.
  3. Sparck Jones, K.; Tait, J.I.: Automatic search term variant generation (1984) 0.13
    0.13123047 = product of:
      0.1968457 = sum of:
        0.1474955 = product of:
          0.294991 = sum of:
            0.294991 = weight(_text_:jones in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.294991 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27039436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04381386 = queryNorm
                1.0909657 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.049350202 = product of:
          0.098700404 = sum of:
            0.098700404 = weight(_text_:k in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.098700404 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15640575 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04381386 = queryNorm
                0.63105357 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
  4. Sparck Jones, K.; Jackson, D.M.: ¬The use of automatically obtained keyword classification for information retrieval (1970) 0.13
    0.13123047 = product of:
      0.1968457 = sum of:
        0.1474955 = product of:
          0.294991 = sum of:
            0.294991 = weight(_text_:jones in 5177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.294991 = score(doc=5177,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27039436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04381386 = queryNorm
                1.0909657 = fieldWeight in 5177, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5177)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.049350202 = product of:
          0.098700404 = sum of:
            0.098700404 = weight(_text_:k in 5177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.098700404 = score(doc=5177,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15640575 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04381386 = queryNorm
                0.63105357 = fieldWeight in 5177, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5177)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
  5. Sparck Jones, K.: Index term weighting (1973) 0.13
    0.13123047 = product of:
      0.1968457 = sum of:
        0.1474955 = product of:
          0.294991 = sum of:
            0.294991 = weight(_text_:jones in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.294991 = score(doc=5491,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27039436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04381386 = queryNorm
                1.0909657 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.049350202 = product of:
          0.098700404 = sum of:
            0.098700404 = weight(_text_:k in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.098700404 = score(doc=5491,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15640575 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04381386 = queryNorm
                0.63105357 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
  6. Porter, M.F.: ¬An algorithm for suffix stripping (1980) 0.10
    0.09842285 = product of:
      0.14763427 = sum of:
        0.110621616 = product of:
          0.22124323 = sum of:
            0.22124323 = weight(_text_:jones in 3122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22124323 = score(doc=3122,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27039436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04381386 = queryNorm
                0.8182243 = fieldWeight in 3122, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3122)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.03701265 = product of:
          0.0740253 = sum of:
            0.0740253 = weight(_text_:k in 3122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0740253 = score(doc=3122,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15640575 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04381386 = queryNorm
                0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 3122, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3122)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Footnote
    Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.313-316.
  7. Salton, G.; Wong, A.; Yang, C.S.: ¬A vector space model for automatic indexing (1975) 0.08
    0.08201904 = product of:
      0.123028554 = sum of:
        0.09218468 = product of:
          0.18436936 = sum of:
            0.18436936 = weight(_text_:jones in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18436936 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27039436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04381386 = queryNorm
                0.6818536 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.030843874 = product of:
          0.06168775 = sum of:
            0.06168775 = weight(_text_:k in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06168775 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15640575 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04381386 = queryNorm
                0.39440846 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Footnote
    Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.273-280.
  8. Salton, G.; Allan, J.; Buckley, C.; Singhal, A.: Automatic analysis, theme generation, and summarization of machine readable texts (1994) 0.08
    0.08201904 = product of:
      0.123028554 = sum of:
        0.09218468 = product of:
          0.18436936 = sum of:
            0.18436936 = weight(_text_:jones in 1949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18436936 = score(doc=1949,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27039436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04381386 = queryNorm
                0.6818536 = fieldWeight in 1949, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1949)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.030843874 = product of:
          0.06168775 = sum of:
            0.06168775 = weight(_text_:k in 1949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06168775 = score(doc=1949,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15640575 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04381386 = queryNorm
                0.39440846 = fieldWeight in 1949, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1949)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Footnote
    Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.478-483.
  9. Needham, R.M.; Sparck Jones, K.: Keywords and clumps (1985) 0.06
    0.055294186 = product of:
      0.08294128 = sum of:
        0.072145924 = product of:
          0.14429185 = sum of:
            0.14429185 = weight(_text_:jones in 3645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14429185 = score(doc=3645,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.27039436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04381386 = queryNorm
                0.53363484 = fieldWeight in 3645, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3645)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.010795357 = product of:
          0.021590713 = sum of:
            0.021590713 = weight(_text_:k in 3645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021590713 = score(doc=3645,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15640575 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04381386 = queryNorm
                0.13804297 = fieldWeight in 3645, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3645)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The selection that follows was chosen as it represents "a very early paper an the possibilities allowed by computers an documentation." In the early 1960s computers were being used to provide simple automatic indexing systems wherein keywords were extracted from documents. The problem with such systems was that they lacked vocabulary control, thus documents related in subject matter were not always collocated in retrieval. To improve retrieval by improving recall is the raison d'être of vocabulary control tools such as classifications and thesauri. The question arose whether it was possible by automatic means to construct classes of terms, which when substituted, one for another, could be used to improve retrieval performance? One of the first theoretical approaches to this question was initiated by R. M. Needham and Karen Sparck Jones at the Cambridge Language Research Institute in England.t The question was later pursued using experimental methodologies by Sparck Jones, who, as a Senior Research Associate in the Computer Laboratory at the University of Cambridge, has devoted her life's work to research in information retrieval and automatic naturai language processing. Based an the principles of numerical taxonomy, automatic classification techniques start from the premise that two objects are similar to the degree that they share attributes in common. When these two objects are keywords, their similarity is measured in terms of the number of documents they index in common. Step 1 in automatic classification is to compute mathematically the degree to which two terms are similar. Step 2 is to group together those terms that are "most similar" to each other, forming equivalence classes of intersubstitutable terms. The technique for forming such classes varies and is the factor that characteristically distinguishes different approaches to automatic classification. The technique used by Needham and Sparck Jones, that of clumping, is described in the selection that follows. Questions that must be asked are whether the use of automatically generated classes really does improve retrieval performance and whether there is a true eco nomic advantage in substituting mechanical for manual labor. Several years after her work with clumping, Sparck Jones was to observe that while it was not wholly satisfactory in itself, it was valuable in that it stimulated research into automatic classification. To this it might be added that it was valuable in that it introduced to libraryl information science the methods of numerical taxonomy, thus stimulating us to think again about the fundamental nature and purpose of classification. In this connection it might be useful to review how automatically derived classes differ from those of manually constructed classifications: 1) the manner of their derivation is purely a posteriori, the ultimate operationalization of the principle of literary warrant; 2) the relationship between members forming such classes is essentially statistical; the members of a given class are similar to each other not because they possess the class-defining characteristic but by virtue of sharing a family resemblance; and finally, 3) automatically derived classes are not related meaningfully one to another, that is, they are not ordered in traditional hierarchical and precedence relationships.
  10. Jones, K.P.: Natural-language processing and automatic indexing : a reply (1990) 0.05
    0.049165167 = product of:
      0.1474955 = sum of:
        0.1474955 = product of:
          0.294991 = sum of:
            0.294991 = weight(_text_:jones in 394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.294991 = score(doc=394,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27039436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04381386 = queryNorm
                1.0909657 = fieldWeight in 394, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=394)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  11. Dow Jones unveils knowledge indexing system (1997) 0.05
    0.049165167 = product of:
      0.1474955 = sum of:
        0.1474955 = product of:
          0.294991 = sum of:
            0.294991 = weight(_text_:jones in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.294991 = score(doc=751,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.27039436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04381386 = queryNorm
                1.0909657 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Dow Jones Interactive Publishing has developed a sophisticated automatic knowledge indexing system that will allow searchers of the Dow Jones News / Retrieval service to get highly targeted results from a search in the service's Publications Library. Instead of relying on a thesaurus of company names, the new system uses a combination of that basic algorithm plus unique rules based on the editorial styles of individual publications in the Library. Dow Jones have also announced its acceptance of the definitions of 'selected full text' and 'full text' from Bibliodata's Fulltext Sources Online directory
  12. Kutschekmanesch, S.; Lutes, B.; Moelle, K.; Thiel, U.; Tzeras, K.: Automated multilingual indexing : a synthesis of rule-based and thesaurus-based methods (1998) 0.05
    0.048867133 = product of:
      0.1466014 = sum of:
        0.1466014 = sum of:
          0.08723966 = weight(_text_:k in 4157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08723966 = score(doc=4157,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15640575 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04381386 = queryNorm
              0.5577778 = fieldWeight in 4157, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4157)
          0.059361733 = weight(_text_:22 in 4157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.059361733 = score(doc=4157,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15342867 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04381386 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4157, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4157)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
  13. Lepsky, K.; Vorhauer, J.: Lingo - ein open source System für die Automatische Indexierung deutschsprachiger Dokumente (2006) 0.03
    0.032279864 = product of:
      0.09683959 = sum of:
        0.09683959 = sum of:
          0.049350202 = weight(_text_:k in 3581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049350202 = score(doc=3581,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15640575 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04381386 = queryNorm
              0.31552678 = fieldWeight in 3581, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3581)
          0.047489386 = weight(_text_:22 in 3581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047489386 = score(doc=3581,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15342867 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04381386 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3581, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3581)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    24. 3.2006 12:22:02
  14. Jones, R.L.: Automatic document content analysis : the AIDA project (1992) 0.03
    0.030728227 = product of:
      0.09218468 = sum of:
        0.09218468 = product of:
          0.18436936 = sum of:
            0.18436936 = weight(_text_:jones in 2607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18436936 = score(doc=2607,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27039436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04381386 = queryNorm
                0.6818536 = fieldWeight in 2607, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2607)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  15. Koryconski, C.; Newell, A.F.: Natural-language processing and automatic indexing (1990) 0.02
    0.024582583 = product of:
      0.07374775 = sum of:
        0.07374775 = product of:
          0.1474955 = sum of:
            0.1474955 = weight(_text_:jones in 2313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1474955 = score(doc=2313,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27039436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04381386 = queryNorm
                0.5454829 = fieldWeight in 2313, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2313)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The task of producing satisfactory indexes by automatic means has been tackled on two fronts: by statistical analysis of text and by attempting content analysis of the text in much the same way as a human indexer does. Though statistical techniques have a lot to offer for free-text database systems, neither method has had much success with back-of-the-book indexing. This review examines some problems associated with the application of natural-language processing techniques to book texts. - Vgl. auch die Erwiderung von K.P. Jones
  16. Pritchard-Schoch, T.: Natural language comes of age (1993) 0.02
    0.024582583 = product of:
      0.07374775 = sum of:
        0.07374775 = product of:
          0.1474955 = sum of:
            0.1474955 = weight(_text_:jones in 2570) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1474955 = score(doc=2570,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27039436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04381386 = queryNorm
                0.5454829 = fieldWeight in 2570, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2570)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses natural languages and the natural language implementations of Westlaw's full-text legal documents, Westlaw Is Natural. Natural language is not aritificial intelligence but a hybrid of linguistics, mathematics and statistics. Provides 3 classes of retrieval models. Explains how Westlaw processes an English query. Assesses WIN. Covers WIN enhancements; the natural language features of Congressional Quarterly's Washington Alert using a document for a query; the personal librarian front end search software and Dowquest from Dow Jones news/retrieval. Conmsiders whether natural language encourages fuzzy thinking and whether Boolean logic will still be needed
  17. Klinger, K.-H.: Automatische Inhaltserschließung einer Volltextdatenbank : Machbarkeitsstudie am Beispiel der FAZ (1994) 0.02
    0.016450068 = product of:
      0.049350202 = sum of:
        0.049350202 = product of:
          0.098700404 = sum of:
            0.098700404 = weight(_text_:k in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.098700404 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15640575 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04381386 = queryNorm
                0.63105357 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  18. Lepsky, K.: Automatische Indexierung (2012) 0.02
    0.016450068 = product of:
      0.049350202 = sum of:
        0.049350202 = product of:
          0.098700404 = sum of:
            0.098700404 = weight(_text_:k in 442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.098700404 = score(doc=442,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15640575 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04381386 = queryNorm
                0.63105357 = fieldWeight in 442, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=442)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  19. Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986) 0.02
    0.015829796 = product of:
      0.047489386 = sum of:
        0.047489386 = product of:
          0.09497877 = sum of:
            0.09497877 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09497877 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15342867 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04381386 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
  20. Jones, S.; Paynter, G.W.: Automatic extractionof document keyphrases for use in digital libraries : evaluations and applications (2002) 0.02
    0.015364113 = product of:
      0.04609234 = sum of:
        0.04609234 = product of:
          0.09218468 = sum of:
            0.09218468 = weight(_text_:jones in 601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09218468 = score(doc=601,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27039436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04381386 = queryNorm
                0.3409268 = fieldWeight in 601, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=601)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    

Years

Languages

  • e 51
  • d 47
  • chi 1
  • ru 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 90
  • x 5
  • el 4
  • m 4
  • s 2
  • More… Less…