Bohlen, G.A.; Ferratt, T.W.: End user training : an experimental comparison of lecture versus computer-based training (1997)
0.00
0.001674345 = product of:
0.00334869 = sum of:
0.00334869 = product of:
0.00669738 = sum of:
0.00669738 = weight(_text_:a in 1368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00669738 = score(doc=1368,freq=4.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 1368, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1368)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Lecture-based and computer-based training are experimentally compared for end users with different learning styles (as measured by the Kolb Learning Style Inventory). The end user training outcomes measures were: achievement, efficiency and satisfaction. The end users who participated in the study were college students learning to use a word processing package. Computer based training is more effective than lecture based training except for assimilators, who appear to learn equally well under either method. Given the limitations of the study and taking into account suggested cautions, these results should be replicated before being widely accepted
- Type
- a
