Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"McKercher, B."
  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. McKercher, B.; Chang, P.X.: ¬A comparison of USMARC and UNIMARC for system design (1995) 0.00 
    0.0026473717 = product of:
  0.0052947435 = sum of:
    0.0052947435 = product of:
      0.010589487 = sum of:
        0.010589487 = weight(_text_:a in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010589487 = score(doc=2627,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046056706 = queryNorm
            0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Provides a background to the development of the MINISIS relational database management system. The new MINISIS will offer a forms-based 4GL application development environment for building an integrated library system at the heart of which will be the catalogue database. Describes the research on the the database structure involving a comparison between USMARC and UNIMARC. Covers the worldwide use of the 2 systems. Discusses differences in field/subfield content designation; differences in field attributes; access points; linking entries, related fields; control information numbers and codes; USMARC format integration and linkage to other languages and holdings information; linkage with other MARC files; and considerations regarding systems design
    Type
    a
  2. McKercher, B.; Chang, P.X.: ¬A survey of the use of MARC formats in national libraries (1995) 0.00 
    0.0023435948 = product of:
  0.0046871896 = sum of:
    0.0046871896 = product of:
      0.009374379 = sum of:
        0.009374379 = weight(_text_:a in 3818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009374379 = score(doc=3818,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046056706 = queryNorm
            0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 3818, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3818)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Presents the results of a survey to discover the use of MARC bibliographic formats in national libraries worldwide in order to determine which formats should be supported by the MINISIS Integrated Library System. The results show USMARC (LCMARC) and UNIMARC (and their derivatives) are the most commonly implemented
    Type
    a