Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Li, G."
  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Meng, K.; Ba, Z.; Ma, Y.; Li, G.: ¬A network coupling approach to detecting hierarchical linkages between science and technology (2024) 0.01
    0.014624438 = product of:
      0.043873314 = sum of:
        0.0045123748 = weight(_text_:e in 1205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0045123748 = score(doc=1205,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03294669 = queryNorm
            0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 1205, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1205)
        0.03936094 = weight(_text_:k in 1205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03936094 = score(doc=1205,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11761237 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03294669 = queryNorm
            0.33466667 = fieldWeight in 1205, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1205)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Detecting science-technology hierarchical linkages is beneficial for understanding deep interactions between science and technology (S&T). Previous studies have mainly focused on linear linkages between S&T but ignored their structural linkages. In this paper, we propose a network coupling approach to inspect hierarchical interactions of S&T by integrating their knowledge linkages and structural linkages. S&T knowledge networks are first enhanced with bidirectional encoder representation from transformers (BERT) knowledge alignment, and then their hierarchical structures are identified based on K-core decomposition. Hierarchical coupling preferences and strengths of the S&T networks over time are further calculated based on similarities of coupling nodes' degree distribution and similarities of coupling edges' weight distribution. Extensive experimental results indicate that our approach is feasible and robust in identifying the coupling hierarchy with superior performance compared to other isomorphism and dissimilarity algorithms. Our research extends the mindset of S&T linkage measurement by identifying patterns and paths of the interaction of S&T hierarchical knowledge.
    Language
    e
  2. Liang, Z.; Mao, J.; Li, G.: Bias against scientific novelty : a prepublication perspective (2023) 0.01
    0.009310008 = product of:
      0.027930023 = sum of:
        0.0045123748 = weight(_text_:e in 845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0045123748 = score(doc=845,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03294669 = queryNorm
            0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 845, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=845)
        0.023417648 = weight(_text_:u in 845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023417648 = score(doc=845,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.107882105 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03294669 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 845, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=845)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Novel ideas often experience resistance from incumbent forces. While evidence of the bias against novelty has been widely identified in science, there is still a lack of large-scale quantitative work to study this problem occurring in the prepublication process of manuscripts. This paper examines the association between manuscript novelty and handling time of publication based on 778,345 articles in 1,159 journals indexed by PubMed. Measuring the novelty as the extent to which manuscripts disrupt existing knowledge, we found systematic evidence that higher novelty is associated with longer handling time. Matching and fixed-effect models were adopted to confirm the statistical significance of this pattern. Moreover, submissions from prestigious authors and institutions have the advantage of shorter handling time, but this advantage is diminishing as manuscript novelty increases. In addition, we found longer handling time is negatively related to the impact of manuscripts, while the relationships between novelty and 3- and 5-year citations are U-shape. This study expands the existing knowledge of the novelty bias by examining its existence in the prepublication process of manuscripts.
    Language
    e
  3. Li, G.; Siddharth, L.; Luo, J.: Embedding knowledge graph of patent metadata to measure knowledge proximity (2023) 0.00
    0.004480006 = product of:
      0.0134400185 = sum of:
        0.0045123748 = weight(_text_:e in 920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0045123748 = score(doc=920,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03294669 = queryNorm
            0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 920, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=920)
        0.008927643 = product of:
          0.02678293 = sum of:
            0.02678293 = weight(_text_:22 in 920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02678293 = score(doc=920,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1153737 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03294669 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 920, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=920)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2023 12:06:55
    Language
    e
  4. Yu, C.; Xue, H.; An, L.; Li, G.: ¬A lightweight semantic-enhanced interactive network for efficient short-text matching (2023) 0.00
    0.0042525297 = product of:
      0.012757588 = sum of:
        0.005317885 = weight(_text_:e in 890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005317885 = score(doc=890,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03294669 = queryNorm
            0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 890, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=890)
        0.0074397037 = product of:
          0.02231911 = sum of:
            0.02231911 = weight(_text_:22 in 890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02231911 = score(doc=890,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1153737 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03294669 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 890, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=890)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Knowledge-enhanced short-text matching has been a significant task attracting much attention in recent years. However, the existing approaches cannot effectively balance effect and efficiency. Effective models usually consist of complex network structures leading to slow inference speed and the difficulties of applications in actual practice. In addition, most knowledge-enhanced models try to link the mentions in the text to the entities of the knowledge graphs-the difficulties of entity linking decrease the generalizability among different datasets. To address these problems, we propose a lightweight Semantic-Enhanced Interactive Network (SEIN) model for efficient short-text matching. Unlike most current research, SEIN employs an unsupervised method to select WordNet's most appropriate paraphrase description as the external semantic knowledge. It focuses on integrating semantic information and interactive information of text while simplifying the structure of other modules. We conduct intensive experiments on four real-world datasets, that is, Quora, Twitter-URL, SciTail, and SICK-E. Compared with state-of-the-art methods, SEIN achieves the best performance on most datasets. The experimental results proved that introducing external knowledge could effectively improve the performance of the short-text matching models. The research sheds light on the role of lightweight models in leveraging external knowledge to improve the effect of short-text matching.
    Date
    22. 1.2023 19:05:27
    Language
    e
  5. Wang, S.; Ma, Y.; Mao, J.; Bai, Y.; Liang, Z.; Li, G.: Quantifying scientific breakthroughs by a novel disruption indicator based on knowledge entities : On the rise of scrape-and-report scholarship in online reviews research (2023) 0.00
    0.0037333388 = product of:
      0.011200016 = sum of:
        0.0037603125 = weight(_text_:e in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0037603125 = score(doc=882,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03294669 = queryNorm
            0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
        0.0074397037 = product of:
          0.02231911 = sum of:
            0.02231911 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02231911 = score(doc=882,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1153737 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03294669 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:37:33
    Language
    e