-
Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.; Abdoli, M.; Stuart, E.; Makita, M.; Wilson, P.; Levitt, J.: Why are coauthored academic articles more cited : higher quality or larger audience? (2023)
0.02
0.017975623 = product of:
0.035951246 = sum of:
0.005317885 = weight(_text_:e in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005317885 = score(doc=995,freq=4.0), product of:
0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.03294669 = queryNorm
0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
0.023193657 = weight(_text_:k in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023193657 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11761237 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.03294669 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
0.0074397037 = product of:
0.02231911 = sum of:
0.02231911 = weight(_text_:22 in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02231911 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1153737 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03294669 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 18:11:50
- Language
- e
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: Are wikipedia citations important evidence of the impact of scholarly articles and books? (2017)
0.02
0.017230602 = product of:
0.034461204 = sum of:
0.0037603125 = weight(_text_:e in 3440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0037603125 = score(doc=3440,freq=2.0), product of:
0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.03294669 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 3440, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3440)
0.023193657 = weight(_text_:k in 3440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023193657 = score(doc=3440,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11761237 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.03294669 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 3440, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3440)
0.007507236 = product of:
0.022521708 = sum of:
0.022521708 = weight(_text_:29 in 3440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022521708 = score(doc=3440,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11589616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03294669 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3440, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3440)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Date
- 16.11.2017 13:29:45
- Language
- e
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: How is science cited on the Web? : a classification of google unique Web citations (2007)
0.02
0.017196836 = product of:
0.034393672 = sum of:
0.0037603125 = weight(_text_:e in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0037603125 = score(doc=586,freq=2.0), product of:
0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.03294669 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
0.023193657 = weight(_text_:k in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023193657 = score(doc=586,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11761237 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.03294669 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
0.0074397037 = product of:
0.02231911 = sum of:
0.02231911 = weight(_text_:22 in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02231911 = score(doc=586,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1153737 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03294669 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Abstract
- Although the analysis of citations in the scholarly literature is now an established and relatively well understood part of information science, not enough is known about citations that can be found on the Web. In particular, are there new Web types, and if so, are these trivial or potentially useful for studying or evaluating research communication? We sought evidence based upon a sample of 1,577 Web citations of the URLs or titles of research articles in 64 open-access journals from biology, physics, chemistry, and computing. Only 25% represented intellectual impact, from references of Web documents (23%) and other informal scholarly sources (2%). Many of the Web/URL citations were created for general or subject-specific navigation (45%) or for self-publicity (22%). Additional analyses revealed significant disciplinary differences in the types of Google unique Web/URL citations as well as some characteristics of scientific open-access publishing on the Web. We conclude that the Web provides access to a new and different type of citation information, one that may therefore enable us to measure different aspects of research, and the research process in particular; but to obtain good information, the different types should be separated.
- Language
- e
-
Orduna-Malea, E.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: Web citations in patents : evidence of technological impact? (2017)
0.01
0.011404618 = product of:
0.034213852 = sum of:
0.0063814623 = weight(_text_:e in 3764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0063814623 = score(doc=3764,freq=4.0), product of:
0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.03294669 = queryNorm
0.13475344 = fieldWeight in 3764, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3764)
0.027832389 = weight(_text_:k in 3764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027832389 = score(doc=3764,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11761237 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.03294669 = queryNorm
0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 3764, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3764)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Language
- e
-
Thelwall, M.; Thelwall, S.: ¬A thematic analysis of highly retweeted early COVID-19 tweets : consensus, information, dissent and lockdown life (2020)
0.01
0.011218065 = product of:
0.033654194 = sum of:
0.0037603125 = weight(_text_:e in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0037603125 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.03294669 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
0.02989388 = product of:
0.04484082 = sum of:
0.022521708 = weight(_text_:29 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022521708 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11589616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03294669 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
0.02231911 = weight(_text_:22 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02231911 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1153737 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03294669 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Purpose Public attitudes towards COVID-19 and social distancing are critical in reducing its spread. It is therefore important to understand public reactions and information dissemination in all major forms, including on social media. This article investigates important issues reflected on Twitter in the early stages of the public reaction to COVID-19. Design/methodology/approach A thematic analysis of the most retweeted English-language tweets mentioning COVID-19 during March 10-29, 2020. Findings The main themes identified for the 87 qualifying tweets accounting for 14 million retweets were: lockdown life; attitude towards social restrictions; politics; safety messages; people with COVID-19; support for key workers; work; and COVID-19 facts/news. Research limitations/implications Twitter played many positive roles, mainly through unofficial tweets. Users shared social distancing information, helped build support for social distancing, criticised government responses, expressed support for key workers and helped each other cope with social isolation. A few popular tweets not supporting social distancing show that government messages sometimes failed. Practical implications Public health campaigns in future may consider encouraging grass roots social web activity to support campaign goals. At a methodological level, analysing retweet counts emphasised politics and ignored practical implementation issues. Originality/value This is the first qualitative analysis of general COVID-19-related retweeting.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Language
- e
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: Can Amazon.com reviews help to assess the wider impacts of books? (2016)
0.01
0.010781588 = product of:
0.032344762 = sum of:
0.0045123748 = weight(_text_:e in 2768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0045123748 = score(doc=2768,freq=2.0), product of:
0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.03294669 = queryNorm
0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 2768, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2768)
0.027832389 = weight(_text_:k in 2768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027832389 = score(doc=2768,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11761237 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.03294669 = queryNorm
0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 2768, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2768)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Language
- e
-
Mohammadi, E.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: Can Mendeley bookmarks reflect readership? : a survey of user motivations (2016)
0.01
0.009503848 = product of:
0.028511543 = sum of:
0.005317885 = weight(_text_:e in 2897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005317885 = score(doc=2897,freq=4.0), product of:
0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.03294669 = queryNorm
0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 2897, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2897)
0.023193657 = weight(_text_:k in 2897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023193657 = score(doc=2897,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11761237 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.03294669 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 2897, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2897)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Language
- e
-
Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.; Abdoli, M.; Stuart, E.; Makita, M.; Wilson, P.; Levitt, J.: Do altmetric scores reflect article quality? : evidence from the UK Research Excellence Framework 2021 (2023)
0.01
0.009503848 = product of:
0.028511543 = sum of:
0.005317885 = weight(_text_:e in 947) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005317885 = score(doc=947,freq=4.0), product of:
0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.03294669 = queryNorm
0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 947, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=947)
0.023193657 = weight(_text_:k in 947) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023193657 = score(doc=947,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11761237 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.03294669 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 947, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=947)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Language
- e
-
Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.; Stuart, E.; Makita, M.; Abdoli, M.; Wilson, P.; Levitt, J.: In which fields are citations indicators of research quality? (2023)
0.01
0.009503848 = product of:
0.028511543 = sum of:
0.005317885 = weight(_text_:e in 1033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005317885 = score(doc=1033,freq=4.0), product of:
0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.03294669 = queryNorm
0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 1033, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1033)
0.023193657 = weight(_text_:k in 1033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023193657 = score(doc=1033,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11761237 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.03294669 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 1033, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1033)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Language
- e
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: Google Scholar citations and Google Web/URL citations : a multi-discipline exploratory analysis (2007)
0.01
0.008984657 = product of:
0.02695397 = sum of:
0.0037603125 = weight(_text_:e in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0037603125 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.03294669 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
0.023193657 = weight(_text_:k in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023193657 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11761237 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.03294669 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Language
- e
-
Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: Online presentations as a source of scientific impact? : an analysis of PowerPoint files citing academic journals (2008)
0.01
0.008984657 = product of:
0.02695397 = sum of:
0.0037603125 = weight(_text_:e in 1614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0037603125 = score(doc=1614,freq=2.0), product of:
0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.03294669 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 1614, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1614)
0.023193657 = weight(_text_:k in 1614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023193657 = score(doc=1614,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11761237 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.03294669 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 1614, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1614)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Language
- e
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: Google book search : citation analysis for social science and the humanities (2009)
0.01
0.008984657 = product of:
0.02695397 = sum of:
0.0037603125 = weight(_text_:e in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0037603125 = score(doc=2946,freq=2.0), product of:
0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.03294669 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
0.023193657 = weight(_text_:k in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023193657 = score(doc=2946,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11761237 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.03294669 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Language
- e
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.; Rezaie, S.: Assessing the citation impact of books : the role of Google Books, Google Scholar, and Scopus (2011)
0.01
0.008984657 = product of:
0.02695397 = sum of:
0.0037603125 = weight(_text_:e in 4920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0037603125 = score(doc=4920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.03294669 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 4920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4920)
0.023193657 = weight(_text_:k in 4920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023193657 = score(doc=4920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11761237 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.03294669 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 4920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4920)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Language
- e
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.; Abdoli, M.: ¬The role of online videos in research communication : a content analysis of YouTube videos cited in academic publications (2012)
0.01
0.008984657 = product of:
0.02695397 = sum of:
0.0037603125 = weight(_text_:e in 382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0037603125 = score(doc=382,freq=2.0), product of:
0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.03294669 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 382, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=382)
0.023193657 = weight(_text_:k in 382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023193657 = score(doc=382,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11761237 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.03294669 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 382, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=382)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Language
- e
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: ¬An automatic method for extracting citations from Google Books (2015)
0.01
0.008984657 = product of:
0.02695397 = sum of:
0.0037603125 = weight(_text_:e in 1658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0037603125 = score(doc=1658,freq=2.0), product of:
0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.03294669 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 1658, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1658)
0.023193657 = weight(_text_:k in 1658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023193657 = score(doc=1658,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11761237 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.03294669 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 1658, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1658)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Language
- e
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: Patent citation analysis with Google (2017)
0.01
0.008984657 = product of:
0.02695397 = sum of:
0.0037603125 = weight(_text_:e in 3317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0037603125 = score(doc=3317,freq=2.0), product of:
0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.03294669 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 3317, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3317)
0.023193657 = weight(_text_:k in 3317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023193657 = score(doc=3317,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11761237 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.03294669 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 3317, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3317)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Language
- e
-
Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: ResearchGate articles : age, discipline, audience size, and impact (2017)
0.01
0.008984657 = product of:
0.02695397 = sum of:
0.0037603125 = weight(_text_:e in 3349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0037603125 = score(doc=3349,freq=2.0), product of:
0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.03294669 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 3349, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3349)
0.023193657 = weight(_text_:k in 3349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023193657 = score(doc=3349,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11761237 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.03294669 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 3349, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3349)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Language
- e
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: News stories as evidence for research? : BBC citations from articles, Books, and Wikipedia (2017)
0.01
0.008984657 = product of:
0.02695397 = sum of:
0.0037603125 = weight(_text_:e in 3760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0037603125 = score(doc=3760,freq=2.0), product of:
0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.03294669 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 3760, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3760)
0.023193657 = weight(_text_:k in 3760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023193657 = score(doc=3760,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11761237 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.03294669 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 3760, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3760)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Language
- e
-
Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: SlideShare presentations, citations, users, and trends : a professional site with academic and educational uses (2017)
0.01
0.008984657 = product of:
0.02695397 = sum of:
0.0037603125 = weight(_text_:e in 3766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0037603125 = score(doc=3766,freq=2.0), product of:
0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.03294669 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 3766, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3766)
0.023193657 = weight(_text_:k in 3766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023193657 = score(doc=3766,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11761237 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.03294669 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 3766, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3766)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Language
- e
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.; Abdoli, M.: Goodreads reviews to assess the wider impacts of books (2017)
0.01
0.008984657 = product of:
0.02695397 = sum of:
0.0037603125 = weight(_text_:e in 3768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0037603125 = score(doc=3768,freq=2.0), product of:
0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.03294669 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 3768, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3768)
0.023193657 = weight(_text_:k in 3768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023193657 = score(doc=3768,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11761237 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.03294669 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 3768, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3768)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Language
- e
