Search (20 results, page 1 of 1)

0.012018718 = product of:
  0.036056153 = sum of:
    0.012033 = weight(_text_:e in 1248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012033 = score(doc=1248,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.2540935 = fieldWeight in 1248, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1248)
    0.024023153 = product of:
      0.07206946 = sum of:
        0.07206946 = weight(_text_:29 in 1248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07206946 = score(doc=1248,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11589616 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03294669 = queryNorm
            0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 1248, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1248)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Language

e

Source

International classification. 9(1982), S.27-29

0.0071877255 = product of:
  0.021563176 = sum of:
    0.00300825 = weight(_text_:e in 571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00300825 = score(doc=571,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.063523374 = fieldWeight in 571, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=571)
    0.018554926 = weight(_text_:k in 571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018554926 = score(doc=571,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11761237 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.15776339 = fieldWeight in 571, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=571)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

A native of Germany and a former teacher of languages and music, Julius Otto Kaiser (1868-1927) came to the Philadelphia Commercial Museum to be its librarian in 1896. Faced with the problem of making "information" accessible, he developed a method of indexing he called systematic indexing. The first draft of his scheme, published in 1896-97, was an important landmark in the history of subject analysis. R. K. Olding credits Kaiser with making the greatest single advance in indexing theory since Charles A. Cutter and John Metcalfe eulogizes him by observing that "in sheer capacity for really scientific and logical thinking, Kaiser's was probably the best mind that has ever applied itself to subject indexing." Kaiser was an admirer of "system." By systematic indexing he meant indicating information not with natural language expressions as, for instance, Cutter had advocated, but with artificial expressions constructed according to formulas. Kaiser grudged natural language its approximateness, its vagaries, and its ambiguities. The formulas he introduced were to provide a "machinery for regularising or standardising language" (paragraph 67). Kaiser recognized three categories or "facets" of index terms: (1) terms of concretes, representing things, real or imaginary (e.g., money, machines); (2) terms of processes, representing either conditions attaching to things or their actions (e.g., trade, manufacture); and (3) terms of localities, representing, for the most part, countries (e.g., France, South Africa). Expressions in Kaiser's index language were called statements. Statements consisted of sequences of terms, the syntax of which was prescribed by formula. These formulas specified sequences of terms by reference to category types. Only three citation orders were permitted: a term in the concrete category followed by one in the process category (e.g., Wool-Scouring); (2) a country term followed by a process term (e.g., Brazil - Education); and (3) a concrete term followed by a country term, followed by a process term (e.g., Nitrate-Chile-Trade). Kaiser's system was a precursor of two of the most significant developments in twentieth-century approaches to subject access-the special purpose use of language for indexing, thus the concept of index language, which was to emerge as a generative idea at the time of the second Cranfield experiment (1966) and the use of facets to categorize subject indicators, which was to become the characterizing feature of analytico-synthetic indexing methods such as the Colon classification. In addition to its visionary quality, Kaiser's work is notable for its meticulousness and honesty, as can be seen, for instance, in his observations about the difficulties in facet definition.

Language

e

0.0035033766 = product of:
  0.02102026 = sum of:
    0.02102026 = product of:
      0.063060775 = sum of:
        0.063060775 = weight(_text_:29 in 1167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.063060775 = score(doc=1167,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11589616 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03294669 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 1167, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1167)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Source

DK-Mitteilungen. 29(1985) Nr.5, S.15-18

0.0020055 = product of:
  0.012033 = sum of:
    0.012033 = weight(_text_:e in 683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012033 = score(doc=683,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.2540935 = fieldWeight in 683, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=683)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Language

e

0.0020055 = product of:
  0.012033 = sum of:
    0.012033 = weight(_text_:e in 1244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012033 = score(doc=1244,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.2540935 = fieldWeight in 1244, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1244)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Language

e

0.0020055 = product of:
  0.012033 = sum of:
    0.012033 = weight(_text_:e in 1942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012033 = score(doc=1942,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.2540935 = fieldWeight in 1942, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1942)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Language

e

0.0020055 = product of:
  0.012033 = sum of:
    0.012033 = weight(_text_:e in 3340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012033 = score(doc=3340,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.2540935 = fieldWeight in 3340, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3340)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Language

e

0.0020055 = product of:
  0.012033 = sum of:
    0.012033 = weight(_text_:e in 3901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012033 = score(doc=3901,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.2540935 = fieldWeight in 3901, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3901)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Language

e

0.0017548124 = product of:
  0.010528875 = sum of:
    0.010528875 = weight(_text_:e in 3407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010528875 = score(doc=3407,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.2223318 = fieldWeight in 3407, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3407)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Language

e

0.0017548124 = product of:
  0.010528875 = sum of:
    0.010528875 = weight(_text_:e in 1534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010528875 = score(doc=1534,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.2223318 = fieldWeight in 1534, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1534)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Language

e

0.001504125 = product of:
  0.0090247495 = sum of:
    0.0090247495 = weight(_text_:e in 49) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0090247495 = score(doc=49,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 49, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=49)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Language

e

0.00100275 = product of:
  0.0060165 = sum of:
    0.0060165 = weight(_text_:e in 4521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0060165 = score(doc=4521,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 4521, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4521)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Language

e

8.774062E-4 = product of:
  0.0052644373 = sum of:
    0.0052644373 = weight(_text_:e in 1243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0052644373 = score(doc=1243,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 1243, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1243)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Language

e

7.520625E-4 = product of:
  0.0045123748 = sum of:
    0.0045123748 = weight(_text_:e in 971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0045123748 = score(doc=971,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 971, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=971)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Language

e

7.090514E-4 = product of:
  0.004254308 = sum of:
    0.004254308 = weight(_text_:e in 3626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004254308 = score(doc=3626,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.08983562 = fieldWeight in 3626, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3626)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

One of the earliest works on the theory of classification appeared in a series of six chapters an the "Principles of Book Classification" published between October 1911 and May 1912 in the Library Association Record. In this publication, the author, E. Wyndham Hulme (1859-1954) whose career included twenty-five years as Librarian of the British Patent Office, set forth the fundamentals of classification as manifested in both the classed and the alphabetical catalogs. The work and the ideas contained therein have largely been forgotten. However, one phrase stands out and has been used frequently in the discussions of classification and indexing, particularly in reference to systems such as Library of Congress Classification, Dewey Decimal Classification, and Library of Congress Subject Headings. That phrase is "literary warrant"-meaning that the basis for classification is to be found in the actual published literature rather than abstract philosophical ideas or concepts in the universe of knowledge or the "order of nature and system of the sciences." To the extent that classification and indexing systems should be based upon existing literature rather than the universe of human knowledge, the concept of "literary warrant" defines systems used in library and information services, as distinguished from a purely philosophical classification. Library classification attempts to classify library materials-the records of knowledge-rather than knowledge itself; the establishment of a class or a heading for a subject is based an existing literature treating that subject. The following excerpt contains Hulme's definition of "literary warrant." Hulme first rejects the notion of using "the nature of the subject matter to be divided" as the basis for establishing headings, then he proceeds to propose the use of "literary warrant," that is, "an accurate survey and measurement of classes in literature," as the determinant.

Language

e

6.204199E-4 = product of:
  0.0037225194 = sum of:
    0.0037225194 = weight(_text_:e in 3631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0037225194 = score(doc=3631,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.078606166 = fieldWeight in 3631, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3631)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

Among the theorists in the field of subject analysis in the twentieth century, none has been more influential than S. R. Ranganathan (1892-1972) of India, a mathematician by training who turned to librarianship and made some of the most far-reaching contributions to the theory of librarianship in general and subject analysis in particular. Dissatisfied with both the Dewey Decimal Classification and the Universal Decimal Classification, Ranganathan set out to develop his own system. His Colon Classification was first published in 1933 and went through six editions; the seventh edition was in progress when Ranganathan died in 1972. In the course of developing the Colon Classification, Ranganathan formulated a body of classification theory which was published in numerous writings, of which the best known are Elements of Library Classification (1945; 3rd ed., 1962) and Prolegomena to Library Classification (1967). Among the principles Ranganathan established, the most powerful and influential are those relating to facet analysis. Ranganathan demonstrated that facet analysis (breaking down subjects into their component parts) and synthesis (recombining these parts to fit the documents) provide the most viable approach to representing the contents of documents. Although the idea and use of facets, though not always called by that name, have been present for a long time (for instance, in the Dewey Decimal Classification and Charles A. Cutter's Expansive Classification), Ranganathan was the person who systematized the ideas and established principles for them. For his Colon Classification, Ranganathan identified five fundamental categories: Personality (P), Material (M), Energy (E), Space (S) and Time (T) and the citation order PMEST based an the idea of decreasing concreteness.

Language

e

5.01375E-4 = product of:
  0.00300825 = sum of:
    0.00300825 = weight(_text_:e in 3621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00300825 = score(doc=3621,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.063523374 = fieldWeight in 3621, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3621)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Language

e

5.01375E-4 = product of:
  0.00300825 = sum of:
    0.00300825 = weight(_text_:e in 3623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00300825 = score(doc=3623,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.063523374 = fieldWeight in 3623, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3623)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Language

e

5.01375E-4 = product of:
  0.00300825 = sum of:
    0.00300825 = weight(_text_:e in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00300825 = score(doc=3628,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.063523374 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Language

e

5.01375E-4 = product of:
  0.00300825 = sum of:
    0.00300825 = weight(_text_:e in 3629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00300825 = score(doc=3629,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.063523374 = fieldWeight in 3629, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3629)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Language

e