Search (50 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × author_ss:"Cronin, B."
  1. Cronin, B.: Vernacular and vehicular language (2009) 0.03
    0.03206814 = product of:
      0.06413628 = sum of:
        0.06413628 = product of:
          0.09620442 = sum of:
            0.009410121 = weight(_text_:a in 7192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009410121 = score(doc=7192,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 7192, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7192)
            0.0867943 = weight(_text_:22 in 7192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0867943 = score(doc=7192,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7192, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7192)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 11:44:11
    Type
    a
  2. Cronin, B.: Thinking about data (2013) 0.03
    0.03206814 = product of:
      0.06413628 = sum of:
        0.06413628 = product of:
          0.09620442 = sum of:
            0.009410121 = weight(_text_:a in 4347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009410121 = score(doc=4347,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4347, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4347)
            0.0867943 = weight(_text_:22 in 4347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0867943 = score(doc=4347,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4347, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4347)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2013 16:18:36
    Type
    a
  3. Cronin, B.: ¬The writing on the wall (2015) 0.03
    0.02748698 = product of:
      0.05497396 = sum of:
        0.05497396 = product of:
          0.08246094 = sum of:
            0.008065818 = weight(_text_:a in 7297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008065818 = score(doc=7297,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 7297, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7297)
            0.07439512 = weight(_text_:22 in 7297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07439512 = score(doc=7297,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 7297, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7297)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26. 4.2015 19:27:22
    Type
    a
  4. Davenport, E.; Cronin, B.: Knowledge management : Semantic drift or conceptual shift? (2000) 0.02
    0.023833863 = product of:
      0.047667727 = sum of:
        0.047667727 = product of:
          0.07150159 = sum of:
            0.0095056575 = weight(_text_:a in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0095056575 = score(doc=2277,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
            0.061995935 = weight(_text_:22 in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061995935 = score(doc=2277,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    31. 7.2001 20:22:57
    Footnote
    Thematisierung der Verschiebung des Verständnisses von Wissensmanagement; vgl. auch: Day, R.E.: Totality and representation: a history of knowledge management ... in: JASIS 52(2001) no.9, S.725-735
    Type
    a
  5. Cronin, B.; Meho, L.I.: Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists (2006) 0.02
    0.020227827 = product of:
      0.040455654 = sum of:
        0.040455654 = product of:
          0.06068348 = sum of:
            0.010754423 = weight(_text_:a in 196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010754423 = score(doc=196,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 196, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=196)
            0.04992906 = weight(_text_:h in 196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04992906 = score(doc=196,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.4391927 = fieldWeight in 196, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=196)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The authors apply a new bibliometric measure, the h-index (Hirsch, 2005), to the literature of information science. Faculty rankings based on raw citation counts are compared with those based on h-counts. There is a strong positive correlation between the two sets of rankings. It is shown how the h-index can be used to express the broad impact of a scholar's research output over time in more nuanced fashion than straight citation counts.
    Type
    a
  6. Cronin, B.; Snyder, H.; Atkins, H.: Comparative citation rankings of authors in mongraphic and journal literature : a study of sociology (1997) 0.01
    0.013434051 = product of:
      0.026868101 = sum of:
        0.026868101 = product of:
          0.04030215 = sum of:
            0.009410121 = weight(_text_:a in 4709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009410121 = score(doc=4709,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4709, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4709)
            0.03089203 = weight(_text_:h in 4709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03089203 = score(doc=4709,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.27173662 = fieldWeight in 4709, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4709)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a study which examined the scholarly literature of sociology. Tens of thousands of references from monographs and leading academic journals were analyzed. The relative rankings of authors who were highly cited in the monographic literature did not change in the journal literature of the same period. However, there was only a small overlap between the most highly cited authors based on the journal sample and those based on the monograph sample. The lack of correlation suggests that there may be 2 distinct populations of highly cited authors
    Type
    a
  7. Cronin, B.; Snyder, H.W.; Rosembaum, H.; Martinson, A.; Callahan, E.: Invoked on the Web (1998) 0.01
    0.010856352 = product of:
      0.021712704 = sum of:
        0.021712704 = product of:
          0.032569055 = sum of:
            0.007604526 = weight(_text_:a in 2327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007604526 = score(doc=2327,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 2327, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2327)
            0.02496453 = weight(_text_:h in 2327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02496453 = score(doc=2327,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 2327, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2327)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  8. Snyder, H.; Cronin, B.; Davenport, E.: What's the use of citation? : Citation analysis as a literature topic in selected disciplines of the social sciences (1995) 0.01
    0.008929739 = product of:
      0.017859478 = sum of:
        0.017859478 = product of:
          0.026789214 = sum of:
            0.008065818 = weight(_text_:a in 1825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008065818 = score(doc=1825,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 1825, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1825)
            0.018723397 = weight(_text_:h in 1825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018723397 = score(doc=1825,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 1825, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1825)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a study to investigate the place and role of citation analysis in selected disciplines in the social sciences, including library and information science. 5 core library and information science periodicals: Journal of documentation; Library quarterly; Journal of the American Society for Information Science; College and research libraries; and the Journal of information science, were studed to determine the percentage of articles devoted to citation analysis and develop an indictive typology to categorize the major foci of research being conducted under the rubric of citation analysis. Similar analysis was conducted for periodicals in other social sciences disciplines. Demonstrates how the rubric can be used to dertermine how citatiion analysis is applied within library and information science and other disciplines. By isolating citation from bibliometrics in general, this work is differentiated from other, previous studies. Analysis of data from a 10 year sample of transdisciplinary social sciences literature suggests that 2 application areas predominate: the validity of citation as an evaluation tool; and impact or performance studies of authors, periodicals, and institutions
    Type
    a
  9. Davenport, E.; Cronin, B.: Who dunnit? : Metatags and hyperauthorship (2001) 0.00
    0.0020747366 = product of:
      0.0041494733 = sum of:
        0.0041494733 = product of:
          0.01244842 = sum of:
            0.01244842 = weight(_text_:a in 6031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01244842 = score(doc=6031,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 6031, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6031)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Multiple authorship is a topic of growing concern in a number of scientific domains. When, as is increasingly common, scholarly articles and clinical reports have scores or even hundreds of authors-what Cronin (in press) has termed "hyperauthorship" -the precise nature of each individual's contribution is often masked. A notation that describes collaborators' contributions and allows those contributions to be tracked in, and across, texts (and over time) offers a solution. Such a notation should be useful, easy to use, and acceptable to communities of scientists. Drawing on earlier work, we present a proposal for an XML-like "contribution" mark-up, and discuss the potential benefits and possible drawbacks
    Type
    a
  10. Larivière, V.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Cronin, B.: ¬A bibliometric chronicling of library and information science's first hundred years (2012) 0.00
    0.0018577286 = product of:
      0.0037154572 = sum of:
        0.0037154572 = product of:
          0.011146371 = sum of:
            0.011146371 = weight(_text_:a in 244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011146371 = score(doc=244,freq=22.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.21126054 = fieldWeight in 244, product of:
                  4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                    22.0 = termFreq=22.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=244)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents a condensed history of Library and Information Science (LIS) over the course of more than a century using a variety of bibliometric measures. It examines in detail the variable rate of knowledge production in the field, shifts in subject coverage, the dominance of particular publication genres at different times, prevailing modes of production, interactions with other disciplines, and, more generally, observes how the field has evolved. It shows that, despite a striking growth in the number of journals, papers, and contributing authors, a decrease was observed in the field's market-share of all social science and humanities research. Collaborative authorship is now the norm, a pattern seen across the social sciences. The idea of boundary crossing was also examined: in 2010, nearly 60% of authors who published in LIS also published in another discipline. This high degree of permeability in LIS was also demonstrated through reference and citation practices: LIS scholars now cite and receive citations from other fields more than from LIS itself. Two major structural shifts are revealed in the data: in 1960, LIS changed from a professional field focused on librarianship to an academic field focused on information and use; and in 1990, LIS began to receive a growing number of citations from outside the field, notably from Computer Science and Management, and saw a dramatic increase in the number of authors contributing to the literature of the field.
    Type
    a
  11. Davenport, L.; Cronin, B.: What does hypertext offer the information scientist? (1989) 0.00
    0.0017924039 = product of:
      0.0035848077 = sum of:
        0.0035848077 = product of:
          0.010754423 = sum of:
            0.010754423 = weight(_text_:a in 5293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010754423 = score(doc=5293,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 5293, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5293)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  12. Cronin, B.; Davenport, E.: Social intelligence (1993) 0.00
    0.0017924039 = product of:
      0.0035848077 = sum of:
        0.0035848077 = product of:
          0.010754423 = sum of:
            0.010754423 = weight(_text_:a in 7239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010754423 = score(doc=7239,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 7239, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7239)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  13. Davenport, E.; Cronin, B.: Hypertext and the conduct of science (1990) 0.00
    0.0017924039 = product of:
      0.0035848077 = sum of:
        0.0035848077 = product of:
          0.010754423 = sum of:
            0.010754423 = weight(_text_:a in 5378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010754423 = score(doc=5378,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 5378, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5378)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  14. Cronin, B.: Metatheorizing citation (1998) 0.00
    0.0017924039 = product of:
      0.0035848077 = sum of:
        0.0035848077 = product of:
          0.010754423 = sum of:
            0.010754423 = weight(_text_:a in 5127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010754423 = score(doc=5127,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 5127, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5127)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews a variety of perspectives on citation. Argues that citations have multiple articulations in that they inform our understanding of the sociocultural, cognitive, and textual aspects of scientific communication. Proposes 2 metatheoretical frameworks as a means of negotiating the interpretative differences which characterize the various discourse communities concerned with citation theory and practice
    Footnote
    Contribution to a thematic issue devoted to 'Theories of citation?'
    Type
    a
  15. Cronin, B.; Meho, L.I.: Applying the author affiliation index to library and information science journals (2008) 0.00
    0.0017924039 = product of:
      0.0035848077 = sum of:
        0.0035848077 = product of:
          0.010754423 = sum of:
            0.010754423 = weight(_text_:a in 2361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010754423 = score(doc=2361,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 2361, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2361)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The authors use a novel method - the Author Affiliation Index (AAI) - to determine whether faculty at the top-10 North American library and information science (LIS) programs have a disproportionate presence in the premier journals of the field. The study finds that LIS may be both too small and too interdisciplinary a domain for the AAI to provide reliable results.
    Type
    a
  16. Cronin, B.; Weaver-Wozniak, S.: Online access to acknowledgements (1993) 0.00
    0.0017534725 = product of:
      0.003506945 = sum of:
        0.003506945 = product of:
          0.0105208345 = sum of:
            0.0105208345 = weight(_text_:a in 7827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0105208345 = score(doc=7827,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 7827, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7827)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews the scale, range and consistency of acknowledgement behaviour, in citations, for a number of academic disciplines. The qualitative and quantitative evidence suggests a pervasive and consistent practice in which acknowledgements define a variety of social, cognitive and instrumental relationships between scholars and within and across disciplines. As such they may be used alongside other bibliometric indicators, such as citations, to map networks of influence. Considers the case for using acknowledgements data in the assessment of academic performance and proposes an online acknowledgement index to facilitate this process, perhaps as a logical extension of ISI's citation indexing products
    Type
    a
  17. Cronin, B.; Shaw, D.; LaBarre, K.: ¬A cast of thousands : Coauthorship and subauthorship collaboration in the 20th century as manifested in the scholarly journal literature of psychology and philosophy (2003) 0.00
    0.0017534725 = product of:
      0.003506945 = sum of:
        0.003506945 = product of:
          0.0105208345 = sum of:
            0.0105208345 = weight(_text_:a in 1731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0105208345 = score(doc=1731,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 1731, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1731)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    We chronicle the use of acknowledgments in 20th-century scholarship by analyzing and classifying more than 4,500 specimens covering a 100-year period. Our results show that the intensity of acknowledgment varies by discipline, reflecting differences in prevailing sociocognitive structures and work practices. We demonstrate that the acknowledgment has gradually established itself as a constitutive element of academic writing, one that provides a revealing insight into the nature and extent of subauthorship collaboration. Complementary data an rates of coauthorship are also presented to highlight the growing importance of collaboration and the increasing division of labor in contemporary research and scholarship.
    Type
    a
  18. Cronin, B.; Shaw, D.; LaBarre, K.: Visible, Less Visible, and Invisible Work : Patterns of Collaboration in 20th Century Chemistry (2004) 0.00
    0.0017534725 = product of:
      0.003506945 = sum of:
        0.003506945 = product of:
          0.0105208345 = sum of:
            0.0105208345 = weight(_text_:a in 2094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0105208345 = score(doc=2094,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 2094, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2094)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    We chronicle the use of acknowledgments in 20th century chemistry by analyzing and classifying over 2,000 specimens covering a 100-year period. Our results show that acknowledgment has gradually established itself as a constitutive element of academic writing- one that provides a revealing insight into the structural nature of subauthorship collaboration in science. Complementary data an rates of coauthorship are also presented to highlight the growing importance of teamwork and the increasing division of labor in contemporary chemistry. The results of this study are compared with the findings of a parallel study of collaboration in both the social sciences and the humanities.
    Type
    a
  19. Cronin, B.: On the epistemic significance of place (2008) 0.00
    0.0015842763 = product of:
      0.0031685526 = sum of:
        0.0031685526 = product of:
          0.0095056575 = sum of:
            0.0095056575 = weight(_text_:a in 4853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0095056575 = score(doc=4853,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 4853, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4853)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The author describes an exploratory analysis of the influence of place and proximity on collaboration. Bibliometric data and biographical information are combined to reveal the extent to which co-authorship relationships are a function of physical collocation.
    Type
    a
  20. Cronin, B.: Standing on ceremony (2013) 0.00
    0.0015683535 = product of:
      0.003136707 = sum of:
        0.003136707 = product of:
          0.009410121 = sum of:
            0.009410121 = weight(_text_:a in 1106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009410121 = score(doc=1106,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 1106, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1106)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a