Search (30 results, page 2 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Szostak, R."
  1. Szostak, R.; Smiraglia, R.P.: Comparative approaches to interdisciplinary KOSs : use cases of converting UDC to BCC (2017) 0.00
    0.0013582341 = product of:
      0.0027164682 = sum of:
        0.0027164682 = product of:
          0.008149404 = sum of:
            0.008149404 = weight(_text_:a in 3874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008149404 = score(doc=3874,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 3874, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3874)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    We take a small sample of works and compare how these are classified within both the Universal Decimal Classification and the Basic concepts Classification. We examine notational length, expressivity, network effects, and the number of subject strings. One key finding is that BCC typically synthesizes many more terms than UDC in classifying a particular document - but the length of classificatory notations is roughly equivalent for the two KOSs. BCC captures documents with fewer subject strings (generally one) but these are more complex.
    Type
    a
  2. Szostak, R.; Scharnhorst, A.; Beek, W.; Smiraglia, R.P.: Connecting KOSs and the LOD cloud (2018) 0.00
    0.0012674211 = product of:
      0.0025348421 = sum of:
        0.0025348421 = product of:
          0.007604526 = sum of:
            0.007604526 = weight(_text_:a in 4794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007604526 = score(doc=4794,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 4794, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4794)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  3. Szostak, R.: ¬A schema for unifying human science : interdisciplinary perspectives on culture (2003) 0.00
    0.0011642005 = product of:
      0.002328401 = sum of:
        0.002328401 = product of:
          0.006985203 = sum of:
            0.006985203 = weight(_text_:a in 803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006985203 = score(doc=803,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 803, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=803)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This book develops a schema, consisting of a hierarchically organized list of the phenomena of interest to human scientists, and the causal links (influences) which exist among these. This organizing device, and particularly the "unpacking" of "culture" into its constituent phenomena, allows the true complexity of culture to be captured. Unpacking also allows us to sail between the twin dangers of culture bigotry and cultural relativism.
  4. Szostak, R.: Basic Concepts Classification (BCC) (2020) 0.00
    9.701671E-4 = product of:
      0.0019403342 = sum of:
        0.0019403342 = product of:
          0.0058210026 = sum of:
            0.0058210026 = weight(_text_:a in 5883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0058210026 = score(doc=5883,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 5883, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5883)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Basics Concept Classification (BCC) is a "universal" scheme: it attempts to encompass all areas of human understanding. Whereas most universal schemes are organized around scholarly disciplines, the BCC is instead organized around phenomena (things), the relationships that exist among phenomena, and the properties that phenomena and relators may possess. This structure allows the BCC to apply facet analysis without requiring the use of "facet indicators." The main motivation for the BCC was a recognition that existing classifications that are organized around disciplines serve interdisciplinary scholarship poorly. Complex concepts that might be understood quite differently across groups and individuals can generally be broken into basic concepts for which there is enough shared understanding for the purposes of classification. Documents, ideas, and objects are classified synthetically by combining entries from the schedules of phenomena, relators, and properties. The inclusion of separate schedules of-generally verb-like-relators is one of the most unusual aspects of the BCC. This (and the schedules of properties that serve as adjectives or adverbs) allows the production of sentence-like subject strings. Documents can then be classified in terms of the main arguments made in the document. BCC provides very precise descriptors of documents by combining phenomena, relators, and properties synthetically. The terminology employed in the BCC reduces terminological ambiguity. The BCC is still being developed and it needs to be fleshed out in certain respects. Yet it also needs to be applied; only in application can the feasibility and desirability of the classification be adequately assessed.
    Type
    a
  5. Szostak, R.: Comment on Hjørland's concept theory (2010) 0.00
    8.9620193E-4 = product of:
      0.0017924039 = sum of:
        0.0017924039 = product of:
          0.0053772116 = sum of:
            0.0053772116 = weight(_text_:a in 5107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0053772116 = score(doc=5107,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 5107, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5107)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  6. Szostak, R.: Interdisciplinarity and the classification of scholarly documents by phenomena, theories and methods (2007) 0.00
    8.9620193E-4 = product of:
      0.0017924039 = sum of:
        0.0017924039 = product of:
          0.0053772116 = sum of:
            0.0053772116 = weight(_text_:a in 1135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0053772116 = score(doc=1135,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 1135, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1135)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  7. Szostak, R.: Applied Knowledge Organization and the history of the world (2018) 0.00
    8.9620193E-4 = product of:
      0.0017924039 = sum of:
        0.0017924039 = product of:
          0.0053772116 = sum of:
            0.0053772116 = weight(_text_:a in 4699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0053772116 = score(doc=4699,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 4699, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4699)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  8. Smiraglia, R.P.; Szostak, R.: Converting UDC to BCC : comparative approaches to interdisciplinarity (2018) 0.00
    8.9620193E-4 = product of:
      0.0017924039 = sum of:
        0.0017924039 = product of:
          0.0053772116 = sum of:
            0.0053772116 = weight(_text_:a in 4795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0053772116 = score(doc=4795,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 4795, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4795)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  9. Szostak, R.; Lee, D.: Classifying musical genres : building musical form and genre into BCC: repurposing LCGFT terms for music into the Basic Concepts Classification (2022) 0.00
    8.9620193E-4 = product of:
      0.0017924039 = sum of:
        0.0017924039 = product of:
          0.0053772116 = sum of:
            0.0053772116 = weight(_text_:a in 227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0053772116 = score(doc=227,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 227, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=227)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  10. Gnoli, C.; Szostak, R.: ¬The Leon Manifesto (2007) 0.00
    7.9213816E-4 = product of:
      0.0015842763 = sum of:
        0.0015842763 = product of:
          0.0047528287 = sum of:
            0.0047528287 = weight(_text_:a in 661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0047528287 = score(doc=661,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.090081796 = fieldWeight in 661, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=661)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Some relevant proposals regarding the future of knowledge organization emerged during the 8th conference of the ISKO Spanish chapter, which took place in the beautiful, lively atmosphere of the town of León, between 18 and 20 of April 2007. These proposals are here labeled as "the Leon manifesto", and can be summarized in the following points: - the current trend towards an increasing interdisciplinarity of knowledge calls for essentially new knowledge organization systems (KOS), based on a substantive revision of the principles underlying the traditional discipline-based KOS; - this innovation is not only desirable, but also feasible, and should be implemented by actually developing some new KOS; instead of disciplines, the basic unity of the new KOS should be phenomena of the real world as it is represented in human knowledge; - the new KOS should allow users to shift from one perspective or viewpoint to another, thus reflecting the multidimensional nature of complex thought. In particular, it should allow them to search independently for particular phenomena, for particular theories about phenomena (and about relations between phenomena), and for particular methods of investigation; - the connections between phenomena, those between phenomena and the theories studying them, and those between phenomena and the methods to investigate them, can be expressed and managed by analytico-synthetic techniques already developed in faceted classification.
    Type
    a