Search (36 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Auszeichnungssprachen"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. as: XML: Extensible Markup Language : I: Was ist XML? (2001) 0.05 
    0.049961556 = product of:
  0.09992311 = sum of:
    0.09992311 = sum of:
      0.0067215143 = weight(_text_:a in 4950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0067215143 = score(doc=4950,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045758117 = queryNorm
          0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 4950, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4950)
      0.031205663 = weight(_text_:h in 4950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.031205663 = score(doc=4950,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045758117 = queryNorm
          0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 4950, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4950)
      0.061995935 = weight(_text_:22 in 4950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.061995935 = score(doc=4950,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045758117 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4950, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4950)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    30. 3.2003 11:06:22
    Source
    CD-Info. 2001, H.6, S.98-100
    Type
    a
  2. Mintert, S.; Wilde, E.; Behme, H.: Auszeichnend : Editoren für Extensible Markup Language (2002) 0.02 
    0.020341193 = product of:
  0.040682387 = sum of:
    0.040682387 = product of:
      0.061023578 = sum of:
        0.008065818 = weight(_text_:a in 4759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008065818 = score(doc=4759,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 4759, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4759)
        0.052957762 = weight(_text_:h in 4759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052957762 = score(doc=4759,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.4658342 = fieldWeight in 4759, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4759)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    iX. 2002, H.8, S.52-58
    Type
    a
  3. Trotman, A.: Searching structured documents (2004) 0.02 
    0.018307384 = product of:
  0.03661477 = sum of:
    0.03661477 = product of:
      0.05492215 = sum of:
        0.011524997 = weight(_text_:a in 2538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011524997 = score(doc=2538,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 2538, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2538)
        0.04339715 = weight(_text_:22 in 2538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04339715 = score(doc=2538,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2538, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2538)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Structured document interchange formats such as XML and SGML are ubiquitous, however, information retrieval systems supporting structured searching are not. Structured searching can result in increased precision. A search for the author "Smith" in an unstructured corpus of documents specializing in iron-working could have a lower precision than a structured search for "Smith as author" in the same corpus. Analysis of XML retrieval languages identifies additional functionality that must be supported including searching at, and broken across multiple nodes in the document tree. A data structure is developed to support structured document searching. Application of this structure to information retrieval is then demonstrated. Document ranking is examined and adapted specifically for structured searching.
    Date
    14. 8.2004 10:39:22
    Type
    a
  4. Ioannides, D.: XML schema languages : beyond DTD (2000) 0.01 
    0.014727588 = product of:
  0.029455176 = sum of:
    0.029455176 = product of:
      0.044182763 = sum of:
        0.006985203 = weight(_text_:a in 720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006985203 = score(doc=720,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 720, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=720)
        0.03719756 = weight(_text_:22 in 720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03719756 = score(doc=720,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 720, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=720)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The flexibility and extensibility of XML have largely contributed to its wide acceptance beyond the traditional realm of SGML. Yet, there is still one more obstacle to be overcome before XML is able to become the evangelized universal data/document format. The obstacle is posed by the limitations of the legacy standard for constraining the contents of an XML document. The traditionally used DTD (document type definition) format does not lend itself to be used in the wide variety of applications XML is capable of handling. The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) has charged the XML schema working group with the task of developing a schema language to replace DTD. This XML schema language is evolving based on early drafts of XML schema languages. Each one of these early efforts adopted a slightly different approach, but all of them were moving in the same direction.
    Date
    28. 1.2006 19:01:22
    Type
    a
  5. Bold, M.: ¬Die Zukunft des Web : Standards für das Web der Zukunft (2004) 0.01 
    0.012642393 = product of:
  0.025284786 = sum of:
    0.025284786 = product of:
      0.037927177 = sum of:
        0.0067215143 = weight(_text_:a in 1725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0067215143 = score(doc=1725,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 1725, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1725)
        0.031205663 = weight(_text_:h in 1725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031205663 = score(doc=1725,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 1725, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1725)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Internet Professionell. 2004, H.4, S.32-36
    Type
    a
  6. Vonhoegen, H.: Einstieg in XML (2002) 0.01 
    0.01238153 = product of:
  0.02476306 = sum of:
    0.02476306 = product of:
      0.03714459 = sum of:
        0.015446015 = weight(_text_:h in 4002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015446015 = score(doc=4002,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.13586831 = fieldWeight in 4002, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4002)
        0.021698575 = weight(_text_:22 in 4002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021698575 = score(doc=4002,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 4002, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4002)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: XML Magazin und Web Services 2003, H.1, S.14 (S. Meyen): "Seit dem 22. Februar 1999 ist das Resource Description Framework (RDF) als W3C-Empfehlung verfügbar. Doch was steckt hinter diesem Standard, der das Zeitalter des Semantischen Webs einläuten soll? Was RDF bedeutet, wozu man es einsetzt, welche Vorteile es gegenüber XML hat und wie man RDF anwendet, soll in diesem Artikel erläutert werden. Schlägt man das Buch auf und beginnt, im EinleitungsKapitel zu schmökern, fällt sogleich ins Auge, dass der Leser nicht mit Lektionen im Stile von "bei XML sind die spitzen Klammern ganz wichtig" belehrt wird, obgleich es sich um ein Buch für Anfänger handelt. Im Gegenteil: Es geht gleich zur Sache und eine gesunde Mischung an Vorkenntnissen wird vorausgesetzt. Wer sich heute für XML interessiert, der hat ja mit 99-prozentiger Wahrscheinlichkeit schon seine einschlägigen Erfahrungen mit HTML und dem Web gemacht und ist kein Newbie in dem Reich der spitzen Klammern und der (einigermaßen) wohlformatierten Dokumente. Und hier liegt eine deutliche Stärke des Werkes Helmut Vonhoegens, der seinen Einsteiger-Leser recht gut einzuschätzen weiß und ihn daher praxisnah und verständlich ans Thema heranführt. Das dritte Kapitel beschäftigt sich mit der Document Type Definition (DTD) und beschreibt deren Einsatzziele und Verwendungsweisen. Doch betont der Autor hier unablässig die Begrenztheit dieses Ansatzes, welche den Ruf nach einem neuen Konzept deutlich macht: XML Schema, welches er im folgenden Kapitel darstellt. Ein recht ausführliches Kapitel widmet sich dann dem relativ aktuellen XML Schema-Konzept und erläutert dessen Vorzüge gegenüber der DTD (Modellierung komplexer Datenstrukturen, Unterstützung zahlreicher Datentypen, Zeichenbegrenzungen u.v.m.). XML Schema legt, so erfährt der Leser, wie die alte DTD, das Vokabular und die zulässige Grammatik eines XML-Dokuments fest, ist aber seinerseits ebenfalls ein XML-Dokument und kann (bzw. sollte) wie jedes andere XML auf Wohlgeformtheit überprüft werden. Weitere Kapitel behandeln die Navigations-Standards XPath, XLink und XPointer, Transformationen mit XSLT und XSL und natürlich die XML-Programmierschnittstellen DOM und SAX. Dabei kommen verschiedene Implementierungen zum Einsatz und erfreulicherweise werden Microsoft-Ansätze auf der einen und Java/Apache-Projekte auf der anderen Seite in ungefähr vergleichbarem Umfang vorgestellt. Im letzten Kapitel schließlich behandelt Vonhoegen die obligatorischen Web Services ("Webdienste") als Anwendungsfall von XML und demonstriert ein kleines C#- und ASP-basiertes Beispiel (das Java-Äquivalent mit Apache Axis fehlt leider). "Einstieg in XML" präsentiert seinen Stoff in klar verständlicher Form und versteht es, seine Leser auf einem guten Niveau "abzuholen". Es bietet einen guten Überblick über die Grundlagen von XML und kann - zumindest derzeit noch - mit recht hoher Aktualität aufwarten."
  7. Geeb, F.: Lexikographische Informationsstrukturierung mit XML (2003) 0.01 
    0.010113914 = product of:
  0.020227827 = sum of:
    0.020227827 = product of:
      0.03034174 = sum of:
        0.0053772116 = weight(_text_:a in 1842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0053772116 = score(doc=1842,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 1842, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1842)
        0.02496453 = weight(_text_:h in 1842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02496453 = score(doc=1842,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 1842, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1842)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 54(2003) H.7, S.415-420
    Type
    a
  8. Barthelmes, C.: Darstellungsmöglichkeiten von Musik mithilfe ausgewählter Musikbeschreibungssprachen (2003) 0.01 
    0.0063211964 = product of:
  0.012642393 = sum of:
    0.012642393 = product of:
      0.018963588 = sum of:
        0.0033607571 = weight(_text_:a in 1831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0033607571 = score(doc=1831,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 1831, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1831)
        0.015602832 = weight(_text_:h in 1831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015602832 = score(doc=1831,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 1831, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1831)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 54(2003) H.6, S.349-356
    Type
    a
  9. Bach, M.: XSL und XPath - verständlich und praxisnah : Transformation und Ausgabe vom XML-Dokumenten mit XSL (2000) 0.01 
    0.005200944 = product of:
  0.010401888 = sum of:
    0.010401888 = product of:
      0.031205663 = sum of:
        0.031205663 = weight(_text_:h in 6259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031205663 = score(doc=6259,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 6259, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6259)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez .in: iX 2001, H.6, S.185 (S. Schröter)
  10. Anderson, R.; Birbeck, M.; Kay, M.; Livingstone, S.; Loesgen, B.; Martin, D.; Mohr, S.; Ozu, N.; Peat, B.; Pinnock, J.; Stark, P.; Williams, K.: XML professionell : behandelt W3C DOM, SAX, CSS, XSLT, DTDs, XML Schemas, XLink, XPointer, XPath, E-Commerce, BizTalk, B2B, SOAP, WAP, WML (2000) 0.00 
    0.0030997968 = product of:
  0.0061995937 = sum of:
    0.0061995937 = product of:
      0.01859878 = sum of:
        0.01859878 = weight(_text_:22 in 729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01859878 = score(doc=729,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 729, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=729)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 6.2005 15:12:11
  11. Pott, O.; Wielage, G.: XML Praxis und Referenz (2000) 0.00 
    0.002600472 = product of:
  0.005200944 = sum of:
    0.005200944 = product of:
      0.015602832 = sum of:
        0.015602832 = weight(_text_:h in 6985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015602832 = score(doc=6985,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 6985, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6985)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Als CD-Beilage von: PC Magazin 2002; H.7
  12. Behme, H.; Mintert, S.: XML in der Praxis : Professionelles Web-Publishing mit der Extensible Markup Language (2000) 0.00 
    0.0020803777 = product of:
  0.0041607553 = sum of:
    0.0041607553 = product of:
      0.012482265 = sum of:
        0.012482265 = weight(_text_:h in 1465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012482265 = score(doc=1465,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 1465, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1465)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  13. XML & Co : Die W3C-Spezifikationen für Dokumenten- und Datenarchitektur (2002) 0.00 
    0.0020803777 = product of:
  0.0041607553 = sum of:
    0.0041607553 = product of:
      0.012482265 = sum of:
        0.012482265 = weight(_text_:h in 197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012482265 = score(doc=197,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 197, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=197)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: XML Magazin und Web Services 2003, H.1, S.13 (T. Weitzel): "Die Standards der XML-Familie sind nun auch in deutscher Übersetzung und Kommentierung verfügbar. Unter der Leitung von Stefan Mintert, der 1998 bereits die XML-Spezifikation selbst übersetzte, ist zusammen mit einem Team namhafter XML-Spezialisten und mit Unterstützung des deutsch-österreichischen W3C-Büros eine Sammlung aller wichtigen Specs aus der XML-Familie bei Addison-Wesley erschienen. Genauer gesagt handelt es sich um die kommentierten und übersetzten Versionen der Standards aus der W3C Activity Domain Architecture/XML, und zwar, in chronologischer Reihenfolge, XML, Namensräume, Verknüpfen von Stylesheets mit XML-Dokumenten, XPath, XSLT, XML Schema 0-3 (Einführung, Strukturen und Datentypen), XLink, XML Base und XML Information Set. Ziel des Projekts "edition W3C" war es, den Inhalt der jeweiligen Spezifikationen besser verständlich zu machen und so auch einen Beitrag zur Verbreitung der Standards zu leisten. Daher liegen die Übersetzungen nicht nur in Buchform vor, sondern sind sie über das normative Original hinaus in unterschiedlichem Umfang durch die jeweiligen Experten kommentiert. Insbesondere XPath ist so ausführlich und liebevoll mit vielen Erläuterungen und Abbildungen versehen, dass eine analoge Behandlung etwa der Schema-Specs sicherlich den Rahmen des Buchs gesprengt hätte. Das erhoffte Feedback auf die unterschiedlichen Übersetzungen und Kommentierungen soll helfen, das geplante zweite Buch der edition W3C-Reihe zu XHTML und CSS an den Leserwünschen auszurichten. Interessant ist, dass das Buch selbst in XML erstellt wurde (XMLspec-DTD). Wie schon in "XML in der Praxis" (zusammen mit Henning Behme) hat Stefan Mintert für die edition W3C in lehrbuchmäßiger Cross-Media-Manier XML eingesetzt. So konnte beispielsweise das Stichwortverzeichnis (www.edition-w3c.de/ gesamtindex.html) direkt per Single Source aus den jeweiligen Spezifikationen generiert werden. Eine Besonderheit des 1999 initiierten Projekts liegt darin, dass es sich um die einzige durch das W3C legitimierte PrintPublikation überhaupt handelt, nachdem 1997 das WWW Journal (W3J) bei O'Reilly eingestellt wurde. Darüber hinaus ist die edition W3 C das einzige offizielle, also vom örtlichen W3C-Büro unterstützte, Übersetzungsprojekt. Bedenkt man, dass das W3C-neben Boston-Sitze in Frankreich und Japan hat, stellt sich die Frage, ob dort Übersetzungen nicht noch viel stärker nachgefragt werden könnten und somit auch zur weiteren Durchsetzung der XML-Familie beitragen könnten. Die Übersetzungen sind, allerdings ohne Kommentierungen, auch über die Website des Projekts bei www.edition-w3c.de/ verlinkt. Dort gibt es auch weitere Übersetzungen, etwa zu XHTML oder CSS L2."
  14. Lee, M.; Baillie, S.; Dell'Oro, J.: TML: a Thesaural Markpup Language (200?) 0.00 
    0.0020164545 = product of:
  0.004032909 = sum of:
    0.004032909 = product of:
      0.012098727 = sum of:
        0.012098727 = weight(_text_:a in 1622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012098727 = score(doc=1622,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.22931081 = fieldWeight in 1622, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1622)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Thesauri are used to provide controlled vocabularies for resource classification. Their use can greatly assist document discovery because thesauri man date a consistent shared terminology for describing documents. A particular thesauras classifies documents according to an information community's needs. As a result, there are many different thesaural schemas. This has led to a proliferation of schema-specific thesaural systems. In our research, we exploit schematic regularities to design a generic thesaural ontology and specfiy it as a markup language. The language provides a common representational framework in which to encode the idiosyncrasies of specific thesauri. This approach has several advantages: it offers consistent syntax and semantics in which to express thesauri; it allows general purpose thesaural applications to leverage many thesauri; and it supports a single thesaural user interface by which information communities can consistently organise, score and retrieve electronic documents.
  15. Chang, M.: ¬An electronic finding aid using extensible markup language (XML) and encoded archival description (EAD) (2000) 0.00 
    0.0017534725 = product of:
  0.003506945 = sum of:
    0.003506945 = product of:
      0.0105208345 = sum of:
        0.0105208345 = weight(_text_:a in 4886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0105208345 = score(doc=4886,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 4886, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4886)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Increasingly, XML applications are appearing on the World Wide Web, from e-commerce to information management. In the case of libraries and archives, XML enables more flexible information management and retrieval than using MARC or a relational database management system. Describes a project to explore the use of XML and the EAD, and the development of a prototype electronic finding aid. It focuses on the technical aspects, and reviews the options available and the choices made. This is done within the setting of a small- to medium-sized archive with minimal tools and resources.
    Type
    a
  16. Peis, E.; Moya, F. de; Fernández-Molina, J.C.: Encoded archival description (EAD) conversion : a methodological proposal (2000) 0.00 
    0.0015683535 = product of:
  0.003136707 = sum of:
    0.003136707 = product of:
      0.009410121 = sum of:
        0.009410121 = weight(_text_:a in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009410121 = score(doc=4899,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The eventual adaptation of archives to new technological possibilities could begin with the creation of digital versions of archival finding aids, which would allow the international diffusion of descriptive information. The Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML), document type definition (DTD) for archival description known as encoded archival description (EAD) is an appropriate tool for this purpose. Presents a methodological strategy that begins with an analysis of EAD and the informational object to be marked up, allowing the semiautomatic creation of a digital version.
    Type
    a
  17. Warwick, C.; Pritchard, E.: 'Hyped' text markup language : XML and the future of web markup (2000) 0.00 
    0.0015029765 = product of:
  0.003005953 = sum of:
    0.003005953 = product of:
      0.009017859 = sum of:
        0.009017859 = weight(_text_:a in 718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009017859 = score(doc=718,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 718, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=718)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    There is a widespread perception that, in terms of web-technology, XML is going to be the 'next big thing'. Given the amount of comment that it has generated, it seems to be on its way to achieving that status. But how much of the praise should be taken at face value, and how much of the hype is credible? In the following article we examine some of the claims made about the importance of XML and consider how far the enthusiasm about it can be justified. Will XML cause a revolution that will change the way that everyone uses the Internet, whether as searchers or data creators? Or is it a tool for certain types of e-commerce and large-scale markup, which may not have a significant impact on the majority of web users?
    Type
    a
  18. Marcoux, Y.; Rizkallah, E.: Knowledge organization in the light of intertextual semantics : a natural-language analysis of controlled vocabularies (2008) 0.00 
    0.0015029765 = product of:
  0.003005953 = sum of:
    0.003005953 = product of:
      0.009017859 = sum of:
        0.009017859 = weight(_text_:a in 2241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009017859 = score(doc=2241,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 2241, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2241)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Intertextual semantics is a semiotics-based approach to the design of communication artefacts primarily aimed at modeling XML structured documents. SKOS (Simple Knowledge Organization System) is a specification currently under development at the W3C that allows expressing various types of controlled vocabularies in XML. In this article, we show through an example how intertextual semantics could be applied to controlled vocabularies expressed in SKOS, and argue that it could facilitate the communication of meaning among the various persons who interact with a controlled vocabulary.
    Type
    a
  19. Learning XML : [creating self describing data] (2001) 0.00 
    0.0014861829 = product of:
  0.0029723658 = sum of:
    0.0029723658 = product of:
      0.008917097 = sum of:
        0.008917097 = weight(_text_:a in 1744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008917097 = score(doc=1744,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.16900843 = fieldWeight in 1744, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1744)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Although Learning XML covers XML with a broad brush, it nevertheless presents the key elements of the technology with enough detail to familiarise the reader with the crucial markup language. This guide is brief enough to tackle in a weekend. Author Erik T Ray begins with an excellent summary of XML's history as an outgrowth of SGML and HTML. He outlines very clearly the elements of markup, demystifying concepts such as attributes, entities and namespaces with numerous clear examples. To illustrate a real-world XML application, he gives the reader a look at a document written in DocBook--a publicly available XML document type for publishing technical writings--and explains the sections of the document step by step. A simplified version of DocBook is used later in the book to illustrate transformation--a powerful benefit of XML. The all-important Document Type Definition (DTD) is covered in depth, but the still-unofficial alternative--XML Schema--is only briefly addressed. The author makes liberal use of graphical illustrations, tables and code to demonstrate concepts along the way, keeping the reader engaged and on track. Ray also gets into a deep discussion of programming XML utilities with Perl. Learning XML is a highly readable introduction to XML for readers with existing knowledge of markup and Web technologies, and it meets its goals very well--to deliver a broad perspective of XML and its potential.
  20. Salminen, A.: Modeling documents in their context (2009) 0.00 
    0.0013582341 = product of:
  0.0027164682 = sum of:
    0.0027164682 = product of:
      0.008149404 = sum of:
        0.008149404 = weight(_text_:a in 3847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008149404 = score(doc=3847,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 3847, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3847)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This entry describes notions and methods for analyzing and modeling documents in an organizational context. A model for the analysis process is provided and methods for data gathering, modeling, and user needs analysis described. The methods have been originally developed and tested during document standardization activities carried out in the Finnish Parliament and ministries. Later the methods have been adopted and adapted in other Finnish organizations in their document management development projects. The methods are intended especially for cases where the goal is to develop an Extensible Markup Language (XML)-based solution for document management. This entry emphasizes the importance of analyzing and describing documents in their organizational context.
    Type
    a

Authors

Languages

  • e 25
  • d 11

Types

  • a 21
  • m 11
  • el 5
  • s 2
  • n 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications