Search (382 results, page 2 of 20)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Boßmeyer, C.; Henze, V.: Neue MAB-Formatversion MAB2 endgültig verabschiedet (1995) 0.02
    0.020227827 = product of:
      0.040455654 = sum of:
        0.040455654 = product of:
          0.06068348 = sum of:
            0.010754423 = weight(_text_:a in 2365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010754423 = score(doc=2365,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 2365, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2365)
            0.04992906 = weight(_text_:h in 2365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04992906 = score(doc=2365,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.4391927 = fieldWeight in 2365, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2365)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 7(1995) H.3, S.28
    Type
    a
  2. Boßmeyer, C.: UNIMARC und MAB : Strukturunterschiede und Kompatibilitätsfragen (1995) 0.02
    0.020227827 = product of:
      0.040455654 = sum of:
        0.040455654 = product of:
          0.06068348 = sum of:
            0.010754423 = weight(_text_:a in 2368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010754423 = score(doc=2368,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 2368, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2368)
            0.04992906 = weight(_text_:h in 2368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04992906 = score(doc=2368,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.4391927 = fieldWeight in 2368, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2368)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 42(1995) H.5, S.465-480
    Type
    a
  3. Heuvelmann, R.: Neues vom MAB-Format (1999) 0.02
    0.020227827 = product of:
      0.040455654 = sum of:
        0.040455654 = product of:
          0.06068348 = sum of:
            0.010754423 = weight(_text_:a in 3719) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010754423 = score(doc=3719,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3719, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3719)
            0.04992906 = weight(_text_:h in 3719) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04992906 = score(doc=3719,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.4391927 = fieldWeight in 3719, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3719)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 11(1999) H.1, S.28-30
    Type
    a
  4. Kohl, E.: ¬Das neue maschinelle Austauschformat für bibliographische Datensätze (MAB1) (1973) 0.02
    0.020227827 = product of:
      0.040455654 = sum of:
        0.040455654 = product of:
          0.06068348 = sum of:
            0.010754423 = weight(_text_:a in 6182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010754423 = score(doc=6182,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 6182, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6182)
            0.04992906 = weight(_text_:h in 6182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04992906 = score(doc=6182,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.4391927 = fieldWeight in 6182, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6182)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Bibliotheksforum Bayern. 1(1973) H.3, S.163-180
    Type
    a
  5. Henze, V.: MAB2 und die Verbundkooperation (1998) 0.02
    0.020227827 = product of:
      0.040455654 = sum of:
        0.040455654 = product of:
          0.06068348 = sum of:
            0.010754423 = weight(_text_:a in 547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010754423 = score(doc=547,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 547, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=547)
            0.04992906 = weight(_text_:h in 547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04992906 = score(doc=547,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.4391927 = fieldWeight in 547, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=547)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 32(1998) H.2, S.323-326
    Type
    a
  6. Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004) 0.02
    0.020117057 = product of:
      0.040234115 = sum of:
        0.040234115 = product of:
          0.06035117 = sum of:
            0.010754423 = weight(_text_:a in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010754423 = score(doc=767,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
            0.049596746 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049596746 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
    Type
    a
  7. Cundiff, M.V.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) (2004) 0.02
    0.020117057 = product of:
      0.040234115 = sum of:
        0.040234115 = product of:
          0.06035117 = sum of:
            0.010754423 = weight(_text_:a in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010754423 = score(doc=2834,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
            0.049596746 = weight(_text_:22 in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049596746 = score(doc=2834,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article provides an introductory overview of the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard, better known as METS. It will be of most use to librarians and technical staff who are encountering METS for the first time. The article contains a brief history of the development of METS, a primer covering the basic structure and content of METS documents, and a discussion of several issues relevant to the implementation and continuing development of METS including object models, extension schemata, and application profiles.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.52-64
    Type
    a
  8. Syré, L.: AACR2: Stellungnahme der AG Regionalbibliographie (2002) 0.02
    0.019984622 = product of:
      0.039969243 = sum of:
        0.039969243 = sum of:
          0.0026886058 = weight(_text_:a in 841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0026886058 = score(doc=841,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045758117 = queryNorm
              0.050957955 = fieldWeight in 841, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=841)
          0.012482265 = weight(_text_:h in 841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.012482265 = score(doc=841,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045758117 = queryNorm
              0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 841, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=841)
          0.024798373 = weight(_text_:22 in 841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024798373 = score(doc=841,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045758117 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 841, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=841)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    "Die Mitglieder der Arbeitsgruppe Regionalbibliographie in der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Regionalbibliotheken (DBV Sektion 4) haben auf ihrer Jahrestagung am 22. und 23. April 2002 in Bautzen einen etwaigen Umstieg von RAK auf AACR2 beraten und sich einstimmig dagegen ausgesprochen. - Begründung - Der personelle, technische und finanzielle Aufwand für den Umstieg wäre für die Landes- und Regionalbibliographien gewaltig. Diejenigen Bibliographien, die ihre eigenen Datenbanken unterhalten, müssten diese sowohl vollständig EDV-technisch (z.B. hinsichtlich des Datenformats) anpassen als auch sämtliche Änderungen (z.B. bei Zeitschriftenaufnahmen, bei der Ansetzung von Körperschaften) nachführen. Dies ist umso schwerwiegender, als nicht alle Bibliographie- Datenbanken über entsprechende eigene Normdateien verfügen. Alle Landes- und Regionalbibliographien, also auch diejenigen, die in die Verbunddatenbanken integriert sind, wären überdies vom zusätzlichen Schulungsaufwand für das neue Regelwerk sowie von Revisionsarbeiten an den Normdateien betroffen. Weitere Nachteile wären Inkonsistenzen im Datenbestand bzw. Qualitätsverluste bei der Konvertierung der Altdaten. Diesen schwerwiegenden Nachteilen steht kein ersichtlicher Vorteil bei Erstellung oder Benutzung der Landes- und Regionalbibliographien gegenüber: Der Rationalisierungseffekt ist unbedeutend, da in Regionalbibliographien ganz überwiegend unselbstständige deutschsprachige Titel verzeichnet werden, für die keine Katalogisate aus AACR-Ländern genutzt werden können. Auch für die Benutzer der Datenbanken steht keine Verbesserung der Rechercheergebnisse zu erwarten. Die Landes- und Regionalbibliographien sehen sich derzeit einer Vielzahl von Aufgaben und neuen Herausforderungen gegenüber, die sie mit bestenfalls stagnierendem Personalstand zu erfüllen haben: Neben einer stetig wachsenden Titelzahl sind dies z.B. die neuen Publikationsformen im WWW, der Aufbau eines gemeinsamen Suchinstruments ("Virtuelle Deutsche Landesbibliographie° in KVK-Technik) und die Integration der noch konventionell vorliegenden älteren Bibliographienachweise in die Datenbanken. In dieser Situation wäre es kontraproduktiv, wenn enorme Ressourcen für einen Regelwerks- und Formatwechsel ohne praktischen Nutzen abgezogen würden. Die AG Regionalbibliographie lehnt daher einen Umstieg auf AACR2 ab. Sie empfiehlt stattdessen, das bestehende Regelwerk weiterzuentwickeln sowie alternative und zeitgemäße Methoden zu erarbeiten, um die internationale Zusammenarbeit zu verbessern (z.B. durch das Projekt "Virtuelle internationale Normdatei")."
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 36(2002) H.7, S.893-894
    Type
    a
  9. El-Sherbini, M.: Metadata and the future of cataloging (2001) 0.02
    0.019636784 = product of:
      0.039273567 = sum of:
        0.039273567 = product of:
          0.05891035 = sum of:
            0.009313605 = weight(_text_:a in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009313605 = score(doc=751,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
            0.049596746 = weight(_text_:22 in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049596746 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article is a survey of representative metadata efforts comparing them to MARC 21 metadata in order to determine if new electronic formats require the development of a new set of standards. This study surveys the ongoing metadata projects in order to identify what types of metadata exist and how they are used and also compares and analyzes selected metadata elements in an attempt to illustrate how they are related to MARC 21 metadata format elements.
    Date
    23. 1.2007 11:22:30
    Type
    a
  10. Bales, K.: ¬The USMARC formats and visual materials (1989) 0.02
    0.01906709 = product of:
      0.03813418 = sum of:
        0.03813418 = product of:
          0.05720127 = sum of:
            0.007604526 = weight(_text_:a in 2861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007604526 = score(doc=2861,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 2861, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2861)
            0.049596746 = weight(_text_:22 in 2861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049596746 = score(doc=2861,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2861, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2861)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Paper presented at a symposium on 'Implementing the Art and Architecture Thesaurus (AAT): Controlled Vocabulary in the Extended MARC format', held at the 1989 Annual Conference of the Art Libraries Society of North America. Describes how changes are effected in MARC and the role of the various groups in the library community that are involved in the implementing these changes. Discusses the expansion of the formats to accomodate cataloguing and retrieval for visual materials. Expanded capabilities for coding visual materials offer greater opportunity for user access.
    Date
    4.12.1995 22:40:20
    Type
    a
  11. McCallum, S.H.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) (2004) 0.02
    0.01906709 = product of:
      0.03813418 = sum of:
        0.03813418 = product of:
          0.05720127 = sum of:
            0.007604526 = weight(_text_:a in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007604526 = score(doc=81,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
            0.049596746 = weight(_text_:22 in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049596746 = score(doc=81,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper provides an introduction to the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS), a MARC21 compatible XML schema for descriptive metadata. It explains the requirements that the schema targets and the special features that differentiate it from MARC, such as user-oriented tags, regrouped data elements, linking, recursion, and accommodations for electronic resources.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.82-88
    Type
    a
  12. Radwanski, A.: Rozwoj formatu MARC (1996) 0.02
    0.01906709 = product of:
      0.03813418 = sum of:
        0.03813418 = product of:
          0.05720127 = sum of:
            0.007604526 = weight(_text_:a in 3052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007604526 = score(doc=3052,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 3052, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3052)
            0.049596746 = weight(_text_:22 in 3052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049596746 = score(doc=3052,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3052, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3052)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1999 20:34:37
    Type
    a
  13. Jacobs, J.W.; Summers, E.; Ankersen, E.: Cyril: expanding the horizons of MARC21 (2004) 0.02
    0.01906709 = product of:
      0.03813418 = sum of:
        0.03813418 = product of:
          0.05720127 = sum of:
            0.007604526 = weight(_text_:a in 4749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007604526 = score(doc=4749,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 4749, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4749)
            0.049596746 = weight(_text_:22 in 4749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049596746 = score(doc=4749,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4749, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4749)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the construction of the author's Perl program, Cyril, to add vernacular Russian (Cyrillic) characters to existing MARC records. The program takes advantage of the ALA-LC standards for Romanization to create character mappings that "de-transliterate" specified MARC fields. The creation of Cyril raises both linguistic and technical issues, which are thoroughly examined. Concludes by considering the implications for cataloging and authority control standards, as we move to a multilingual, multi-script bibliographic environment.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.8-17
    Type
    a
  14. Yee, M.M.: New perspectives on the shared cataloging environment and a MARC 21 shopping list (2004) 0.02
    0.01906709 = product of:
      0.03813418 = sum of:
        0.03813418 = product of:
          0.05720127 = sum of:
            0.007604526 = weight(_text_:a in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007604526 = score(doc=132,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
            0.049596746 = weight(_text_:22 in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049596746 = score(doc=132,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  15. Weber, L.B.: Reading formatting MARC AMC (1990) 0.02
    0.01906709 = product of:
      0.03813418 = sum of:
        0.03813418 = product of:
          0.05720127 = sum of:
            0.007604526 = weight(_text_:a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007604526 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
            0.049596746 = weight(_text_:22 in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049596746 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper discusses how archivists use the MARC AMC format to exchange information about archival materials. The paper explains the modifications that MARC AMC introduced to the MARC bibliographic formats; gives examples of a record in generic USMARC AMC, RLIN AMC, and OCLC AMC; and considers the possible impact of format integration. The paper concludes with some thoughts about the changes that MARC AMC is causing in the archival profession.
    Date
    8. 1.2007 14:22:51
    Type
    a
  16. Carvalho, J.R. de; Cordeiro, M.I.; Lopes, A.; Vieira, M.: Meta-information about MARC : an XML framework for validation, explanation and help systems (2004) 0.02
    0.01861519 = product of:
      0.03723038 = sum of:
        0.03723038 = product of:
          0.05584557 = sum of:
            0.01244842 = weight(_text_:a in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01244842 = score(doc=2848,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
            0.04339715 = weight(_text_:22 in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04339715 = score(doc=2848,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article proposes a schema for meta-information about MARC that can express at a fairly comprehensive level the syntactic and semantic aspects of MARC formats in XML, including not only rules but also all texts and examples that are conveyed by MARC documentation. It can be thought of as an XML version of the MARC or UNIMARC manuals, for both machine and human usage. The article explains how such a schema can be the central piece of a more complete framework, to be used in conjunction with "slim" record formats, providing a rich environment for the automated processing of bibliographic data.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.131-137
    Type
    a
  17. Aalberg, T.; Haugen, F.B.; Husby, O.: ¬A Tool for Converting from MARC to FRBR (2006) 0.02
    0.01861519 = product of:
      0.03723038 = sum of:
        0.03723038 = product of:
          0.05584557 = sum of:
            0.01244842 = weight(_text_:a in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01244842 = score(doc=2425,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
            0.04339715 = weight(_text_:22 in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04339715 = score(doc=2425,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The FRBR model is by many considered to be an important contribution to the next generation of bibliographic catalogues, but a major challenge for the library community is how to use this model on already existing MARC-based bibliographic catalogues. This problem requires a solution for the interpretation and conversion of MARC records, and a tool for this kind of conversion is developed as a part of the Norwegian BIBSYS FRBR project. The tool is based on a systematic approach to the interpretation and conversion process and is designed to be adaptable to the rules applied in different catalogues.
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
    Type
    a
  18. Bourne, R.: MARC harmonization : progress and problems (1997) 0.02
    0.018324653 = product of:
      0.036649305 = sum of:
        0.036649305 = product of:
          0.054973956 = sum of:
            0.0053772116 = weight(_text_:a in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0053772116 = score(doc=873,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
            0.049596746 = weight(_text_:22 in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049596746 = score(doc=873,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    LASER link. 1997, Spring/Summer, S.22-24
    Type
    a
  19. Mishra, K.S.: Bibliographic databases and exchange formats (1997) 0.02
    0.018324653 = product of:
      0.036649305 = sum of:
        0.036649305 = product of:
          0.054973956 = sum of:
            0.0053772116 = weight(_text_:a in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0053772116 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
            0.049596746 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049596746 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    DESIDOC bulletin of information technology. 17(1997) no.5, S.17-22
    Type
    a
  20. Carini, P.; Shepherd, K.: ¬The MARC standard and encoded archival description (2004) 0.02
    0.018324653 = product of:
      0.036649305 = sum of:
        0.036649305 = product of:
          0.054973956 = sum of:
            0.0053772116 = weight(_text_:a in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0053772116 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
            0.049596746 = weight(_text_:22 in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049596746 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.18-27
    Type
    a

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 337
  • m 22
  • el 16
  • s 12
  • b 2
  • l 2
  • n 2
  • r 2
  • ? 1
  • More… Less…