-
Loos, A.: ¬Die Million ist geknackt (2015)
0.06
0.061624352 = product of:
0.123248704 = sum of:
0.123248704 = sum of:
0.011406789 = weight(_text_:a in 4208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011406789 = score(doc=4208,freq=4.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 4208, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4208)
0.037446793 = weight(_text_:h in 4208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037446793 = score(doc=4208,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 4208, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4208)
0.07439512 = weight(_text_:22 in 4208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07439512 = score(doc=4208,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4208, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4208)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 7. 4.2015 17:22:03
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 2015, H.1, S.10-11
- Type
- a
-
Hrachovec, H.: Offen gesagt: Beschwerden eines Archivars (2018)
0.04
0.04047157 = product of:
0.08094314 = sum of:
0.08094314 = sum of:
0.0066539603 = weight(_text_:a in 4443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0066539603 = score(doc=4443,freq=4.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 4443, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4443)
0.03089203 = weight(_text_:h in 4443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03089203 = score(doc=4443,freq=4.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.27173662 = fieldWeight in 4443, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4443)
0.04339715 = weight(_text_:22 in 4443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04339715 = score(doc=4443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4443)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 9.2018 12:22:52
- Location
- A
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 70(2018) H.1, S.8-20
- Type
- a
-
Schmale, W.: Strategische Optionen für universitäre Repositorien in den Digital Humanities (2018)
0.04
0.03594754 = product of:
0.07189508 = sum of:
0.07189508 = sum of:
0.0066539603 = weight(_text_:a in 3909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0066539603 = score(doc=3909,freq=4.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 3909, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3909)
0.021843962 = weight(_text_:h in 3909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021843962 = score(doc=3909,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 3909, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3909)
0.04339715 = weight(_text_:22 in 3909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04339715 = score(doc=3909,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3909, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3909)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 9.2018 12:22:39
- Location
- A
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 70(2018) H.1, S.21-29
- Type
- a
-
Müller, S.: Schattenbibliotheken : Welche Auswirkungen haben Sci-Hub und Co. auf Verlage und Bibliotheken? (2019)
0.03
0.034973085 = product of:
0.06994617 = sum of:
0.06994617 = sum of:
0.0047050603 = weight(_text_:a in 765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0047050603 = score(doc=765,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 765, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=765)
0.021843962 = weight(_text_:h in 765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021843962 = score(doc=765,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 765, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=765)
0.04339715 = weight(_text_:22 in 765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04339715 = score(doc=765,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 765, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=765)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- B.I.T.online. 22(2019) H.5, S.397-404
- Type
- a
-
Wolchover, N.: Wie ein Aufsehen erregender Beweis kaum Beachtung fand (2017)
0.03
0.03146567 = product of:
0.06293134 = sum of:
0.06293134 = product of:
0.094397 = sum of:
0.0067215143 = weight(_text_:a in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0067215143 = score(doc=3582,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
0.08767549 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08767549 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 4.2017 10:42:05
22. 4.2017 10:48:38
- Type
- a
-
Münch, V.: They have a dream (2019)
0.03
0.030812176 = product of:
0.061624352 = sum of:
0.061624352 = sum of:
0.0057033943 = weight(_text_:a in 5631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0057033943 = score(doc=5631,freq=4.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 5631, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5631)
0.018723397 = weight(_text_:h in 5631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018723397 = score(doc=5631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 5631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5631)
0.03719756 = weight(_text_:22 in 5631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03719756 = score(doc=5631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5631)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- B.I.T.online. 22(2019) H.1, S.25-39
- Type
- a
-
Taglinger, H.: Ausgevogelt, jetzt wird es ernst (2018)
0.02
0.024980778 = product of:
0.049961556 = sum of:
0.049961556 = sum of:
0.0033607571 = weight(_text_:a in 4281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0033607571 = score(doc=4281,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 4281, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4281)
0.015602832 = weight(_text_:h in 4281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015602832 = score(doc=4281,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 4281, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4281)
0.030997967 = weight(_text_:22 in 4281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030997967 = score(doc=4281,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4281, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4281)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2018 11:38:55
- Type
- a
-
Schleim, S.: Warum die Wissenschaft nicht frei ist (2017)
0.02
0.018324653 = product of:
0.036649305 = sum of:
0.036649305 = product of:
0.054973956 = sum of:
0.0053772116 = weight(_text_:a in 3882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0053772116 = score(doc=3882,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 3882, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3882)
0.049596746 = weight(_text_:22 in 3882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049596746 = score(doc=3882,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3882, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3882)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9.10.2017 15:48:22
- Type
- a
-
Benoit, G.; Hussey, L.: Repurposing digital objects : case studies across the publishing industry (2011)
0.02
0.016683705 = product of:
0.03336741 = sum of:
0.03336741 = product of:
0.05005111 = sum of:
0.0066539603 = weight(_text_:a in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0066539603 = score(doc=4198,freq=4.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
0.04339715 = weight(_text_:22 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04339715 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Large, data-rich organizations have tremendously large collections of digital objects to be "repurposed," to respond quickly and economically to publishing, marketing, and information needs. Some management typically assume that a content management system, or some other technique such as OWL and RDF, will automatically address the workflow and technical issues associated with this reuse. Four case studies show that the sources of some roadblocks to agile repurposing are as much managerial and organizational as they are technical in nature. The review concludes with suggestions on how digital object repurposing can be integrated given these organizations' structures.
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:23:07
- Type
- a
-
Vogt, T.; Botz, G.W.: Open Access - schöne neue Welt? : Ein Interview mit Georg W. Botz, Koordinator der Open Access Poliy der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft (2013)
0.02
0.01517087 = product of:
0.03034174 = sum of:
0.03034174 = product of:
0.04551261 = sum of:
0.008065818 = weight(_text_:a in 794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008065818 = score(doc=794,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 794, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=794)
0.037446793 = weight(_text_:h in 794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037446793 = score(doc=794,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 794, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=794)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 2013, H.2, S.98-101
- Type
- a
-
Strecker, D.: Nutzung der Schattenbibliothek Sci-Hub in Deutschland (2019)
0.01
0.01374349 = product of:
0.02748698 = sum of:
0.02748698 = product of:
0.04123047 = sum of:
0.004032909 = weight(_text_:a in 596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004032909 = score(doc=596,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 596, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=596)
0.03719756 = weight(_text_:22 in 596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03719756 = score(doc=596,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 596, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=596)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 1.2020 13:22:34
- Type
- a
-
Moed, H.F.; Halevi, G.: On full text download and citation distributions in scientific-scholarly journals (2016)
0.01
0.013076703 = product of:
0.026153406 = sum of:
0.026153406 = product of:
0.03923011 = sum of:
0.008232141 = weight(_text_:a in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008232141 = score(doc=2646,freq=12.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.15602624 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
0.030997967 = weight(_text_:22 in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030997967 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A statistical analysis of full text downloads of articles in Elsevier's ScienceDirect covering all disciplines reveals large differences in download frequencies, their skewness, and their correlation with Scopus-based citation counts, between disciplines, journals, and document types. Download counts tend to be 2 orders of magnitude higher and less skewedly distributed than citations. A mathematical model based on the sum of two exponentials does not adequately capture monthly download counts. The degree of correlation at the article level within a journal is similar to that at the journal level in the discipline covered by that journal, suggesting that the differences between journals are, to a large extent, discipline specific. Despite the fact that in all studied journals download and citation counts per article positively correlate, little overlap may exist between the set of articles appearing in the top of the citation distribution and that with the most frequently downloaded ones. Usage and citation leaks, bulk downloading, differences between reader and author populations in a subject field, the type of document or its content, differences in obsolescence patterns between downloads and citations, and different functions of reading and citing in the research process all provide possible explanations of differences between download and citation distributions.
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 14:11:17
- Type
- a
-
Walters, W.H.; Linvill, A.C.: Bibliographic index coverage of open-access journals in six subject areas (2011)
0.01
0.011916932 = product of:
0.023833863 = sum of:
0.023833863 = product of:
0.035750795 = sum of:
0.0047528287 = weight(_text_:a in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0047528287 = score(doc=4635,freq=4.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.090081796 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
0.030997967 = weight(_text_:22 in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030997967 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- We investigate the extent to which open-access (OA) journals and articles in biology, computer science, economics, history, medicine, and psychology are indexed in each of 11 bibliographic databases. We also look for variations in index coverage by journal subject, journal size, publisher type, publisher size, date of first OA issue, region of publication, language of publication, publication fee, and citation impact factor. Two databases, Biological Abstracts and PubMed, provide very good coverage of the OA journal literature, indexing 60 to 63% of all OA articles in their disciplines. Five databases provide moderately good coverage (22-41%), and four provide relatively poor coverage (0-12%). OA articles in biology journals, English-only journals, high-impact journals, and journals that charge publication fees of $1,000 or more are especially likely to be indexed. Conversely, articles from OA publishers in Africa, Asia, or Central/South America are especially unlikely to be indexed. Four of the 11 databases index commercially published articles at a substantially higher rate than articles published by universities, scholarly societies, nonprofit publishers, or governments. Finally, three databases-EBSCO Academic Search Complete, ProQuest Research Library, and Wilson OmniFile-provide less comprehensive coverage of OA articles than of articles in comparable subscription journals.
- Type
- a
-
Li, X.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: ¬The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC in formal scholarly communication (2015)
0.01
0.011916932 = product of:
0.023833863 = sum of:
0.023833863 = product of:
0.035750795 = sum of:
0.0047528287 = weight(_text_:a in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0047528287 = score(doc=2593,freq=4.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.090081796 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
0.030997967 = weight(_text_:22 in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030997967 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose The four major Subject Repositories (SRs), arXiv, Research Papers in Economics (RePEc), Social Science Research Network (SSRN) and PubMed Central (PMC), are all important within their disciplines but no previous study has systematically compared how often they are cited in academic publications. In response, the purpose of this paper is to report an analysis of citations to SRs from Scopus publications, 2000-2013. Design/methodology/approach Scopus searches were used to count the number of documents citing the four SRs in each year. A random sample of 384 documents citing the four SRs was then visited to investigate the nature of the citations. Findings Each SR was most cited within its own subject area but attracted substantial citations from other subject areas, suggesting that they are open to interdisciplinary uses. The proportion of documents citing each SR is continuing to increase rapidly, and the SRs all seem to attract substantial numbers of citations from more than one discipline. Research limitations/implications Scopus does not cover all publications, and most citations to documents found in the four SRs presumably cite the published version, when one exists, rather than the repository version. Practical implications SRs are continuing to grow and do not seem to be threatened by institutional repositories and so research managers should encourage their continued use within their core disciplines, including for research that aims at an audience in other disciplines. Originality/value This is the first simultaneous analysis of Scopus citations to the four most popular SRs.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Type
- a
-
Ortega, J.L.: ¬The presence of academic journals on Twitter and its relationship with dissemination (tweets) and research impact (citations) (2017)
0.01
0.011916932 = product of:
0.023833863 = sum of:
0.023833863 = product of:
0.035750795 = sum of:
0.0047528287 = weight(_text_:a in 4410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0047528287 = score(doc=4410,freq=4.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.090081796 = fieldWeight in 4410, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4410)
0.030997967 = weight(_text_:22 in 4410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030997967 = score(doc=4410,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4410, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4410)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze the relationship between dissemination of research papers on Twitter and its influence on research impact. Design/methodology/approach Four types of journal Twitter accounts (journal, owner, publisher and no Twitter account) were defined to observe differences in the number of tweets and citations. In total, 4,176 articles from 350 journals were extracted from Plum Analytics. This altmetric provider tracks the number of tweets and citations for each paper. Student's t-test for two-paired samples was used to detect significant differences between each group of journals. Regression analysis was performed to detect which variables may influence the getting of tweets and citations. Findings The results show that journals with their own Twitter account obtain more tweets (46 percent) and citations (34 percent) than journals without a Twitter account. Followers is the variable that attracts more tweets (ß=0.47) and citations (ß=0.28) but the effect is small and the fit is not good for tweets (R2=0.46) and insignificant for citations (R2=0.18). Originality/value This is the first study that tests the performance of research journals on Twitter according to their handles, observing how the dissemination of content in this microblogging network influences the citation of their papers.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Type
- a
-
Müller, H.: Rechtliche Rahmenbedingungen für Digitale Information (2010)
0.01
0.011865697 = product of:
0.023731394 = sum of:
0.023731394 = product of:
0.03559709 = sum of:
0.0047050603 = weight(_text_:a in 3365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0047050603 = score(doc=3365,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 3365, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3365)
0.03089203 = weight(_text_:h in 3365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03089203 = score(doc=3365,freq=4.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.27173662 = fieldWeight in 3365, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3365)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 57(2010) H.5, S.245-252
- Type
- a
-
Steenweg, H.: Publikationsmanagement : eine wichtige zukünftige Aufgabe an Hochschulen (2010)
0.01
0.011865697 = product of:
0.023731394 = sum of:
0.023731394 = product of:
0.03559709 = sum of:
0.0047050603 = weight(_text_:a in 3928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0047050603 = score(doc=3928,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 3928, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3928)
0.03089203 = weight(_text_:h in 3928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03089203 = score(doc=3928,freq=4.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.27173662 = fieldWeight in 3928, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3928)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- ABI-Technik. 30(2010) H.2, S.130-138
- Type
- a
-
Somers, J.: Torching the modern-day library of Alexandria : somewhere at Google there is a database containing 25 million books and nobody is allowed to read them. (2017)
0.01
0.0117371 = product of:
0.0234742 = sum of:
0.0234742 = product of:
0.0352113 = sum of:
0.010412926 = weight(_text_:a in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010412926 = score(doc=3608,freq=30.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.19735932 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
30.0 = termFreq=30.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
0.024798373 = weight(_text_:22 in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024798373 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- You were going to get one-click access to the full text of nearly every book that's ever been published. Books still in print you'd have to pay for, but everything else-a collection slated to grow larger than the holdings at the Library of Congress, Harvard, the University of Michigan, at any of the great national libraries of Europe-would have been available for free at terminals that were going to be placed in every local library that wanted one. At the terminal you were going to be able to search tens of millions of books and read every page of any book you found. You'd be able to highlight passages and make annotations and share them; for the first time, you'd be able to pinpoint an idea somewhere inside the vastness of the printed record, and send somebody straight to it with a link. Books would become as instantly available, searchable, copy-pasteable-as alive in the digital world-as web pages. It was to be the realization of a long-held dream. "The universal library has been talked about for millennia," Richard Ovenden, the head of Oxford's Bodleian Libraries, has said. "It was possible to think in the Renaissance that you might be able to amass the whole of published knowledge in a single room or a single institution." In the spring of 2011, it seemed we'd amassed it in a terminal small enough to fit on a desk. "This is a watershed event and can serve as a catalyst for the reinvention of education, research, and intellectual life," one eager observer wrote at the time. On March 22 of that year, however, the legal agreement that would have unlocked a century's worth of books and peppered the country with access terminals to a universal library was rejected under Rule 23(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. When the library at Alexandria burned it was said to be an "international catastrophe." When the most significant humanities project of our time was dismantled in court, the scholars, archivists, and librarians who'd had a hand in its undoing breathed a sigh of relief, for they believed, at the time, that they had narrowly averted disaster.
- Type
- a
-
Ergül, A.; Böhm, A.; Schmidt, E.; Hissen, S.; Sariklis, T.: Erfolgsfaktoren für die Durchsetzung von PDF/A als weltweiter Standard für elektronische Langzeitarchivierung (2012)
0.01
0.011122987 = product of:
0.022245973 = sum of:
0.022245973 = product of:
0.03336896 = sum of:
0.011524997 = weight(_text_:a in 4794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011524997 = score(doc=4794,freq=12.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 4794, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4794)
0.021843962 = weight(_text_:h in 4794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021843962 = score(doc=4794,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 4794, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4794)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Der Artikel befasst sich mit der historischen Entwicklung der Langzeitarchivierung und den damit verbundenen Ansprüchen und Problemen. Insbesondere geht es um die rechtlichen Aspekte, die Dokumentenechtheit, die Revisionssicherheit, die Plattformunabhängigkeit und die Kostenkalkulation der zu archivierenden Daten. Auf dieser Basis werden die Erfolgsfaktoren für die Etablierung des PDF/A-Formats in Zusammenhang mit der digitalen Langzeitarchivierung dargestellt. Aus den Ergebnissen der eigens erstellten Online-Befragung auf der "PDF-Association"- Website zum Thema Kundenzufriedenheit werden Nutzen und Probleme der Anwender zusammengefasst.
- Object
- PDF/A
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 63(2012) H.6, S.361-366
- Type
- a
-
Loos, A.: Ein Jahr Elsevier-Boykott (2013)
0.01
0.010856352 = product of:
0.021712704 = sum of:
0.021712704 = product of:
0.032569055 = sum of:
0.007604526 = weight(_text_:a in 945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007604526 = score(doc=945,freq=4.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 945, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=945)
0.02496453 = weight(_text_:h in 945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02496453 = score(doc=945,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 945, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=945)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 2013, H.2, S.90-97
- Type
- a
