-
Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019)
0.06
0.059353966 = sum of:
0.054507013 = product of:
0.21802805 = sum of:
0.21802805 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21802805 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3879378 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.004846953 = product of:
0.014540859 = sum of:
0.014540859 = weight(_text_:a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014540859 = score(doc=400,freq=26.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.27559727 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- On a scientific concept hierarchy, a parent concept may have a few attributes, each of which has multiple values being a group of child concepts. We call these attributes facets: classification has a few facets such as application (e.g., face recognition), model (e.g., svm, knn), and metric (e.g., precision). In this work, we aim at building faceted concept hierarchies from scientific literature. Hierarchy construction methods heavily rely on hypernym detection, however, the faceted relations are parent-to-child links but the hypernym relation is a multi-hop, i.e., ancestor-to-descendent link with a specific facet "type-of". We use information extraction techniques to find synonyms, sibling concepts, and ancestor-descendent relations from a data science corpus. And we propose a hierarchy growth algorithm to infer the parent-child links from the three types of relationships. It resolves conflicts by maintaining the acyclic structure of a hierarchy.
- Content
- Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
- Type
- a
-
Nielsen, M.: Neuronale Netze : Alpha Go - Computer lernen Intuition (2018)
0.06
0.05642446 = product of:
0.11284892 = sum of:
0.11284892 = sum of:
0.0067215143 = weight(_text_:a in 4523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0067215143 = score(doc=4523,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 4523, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4523)
0.044131473 = weight(_text_:h in 4523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044131473 = score(doc=4523,freq=4.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.3881952 = fieldWeight in 4523, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4523)
0.061995935 = weight(_text_:22 in 4523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061995935 = score(doc=4523,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4523, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4523)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl. auch den Beitrag: Sokol, J.: Spielend lernen. In: Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2018, H.11, S.72-76.
- Source
- Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2018, H.1, S.22-27
- Type
- a
-
Knorz, G.; Rein, B.: Semantische Suche in einer Hochschulontologie (2005)
0.03
0.034973085 = product of:
0.06994617 = sum of:
0.06994617 = sum of:
0.0047050603 = weight(_text_:a in 1852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0047050603 = score(doc=1852,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 1852, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1852)
0.021843962 = weight(_text_:h in 1852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021843962 = score(doc=1852,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 1852, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1852)
0.04339715 = weight(_text_:22 in 1852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04339715 = score(doc=1852,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1852, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1852)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 11. 2.2011 18:22:58
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 56(2005) H.5/6, S.281-290
- Type
- a
-
Järvelin, K.; Kristensen, J.; Niemi, T.; Sormunen, E.; Keskustalo, H.: ¬A deductive data model for query expansion (1996)
0.03
0.03199339 = product of:
0.06398678 = sum of:
0.06398678 = sum of:
0.008065818 = weight(_text_:a in 2230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008065818 = score(doc=2230,freq=8.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 2230, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2230)
0.018723397 = weight(_text_:h in 2230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018723397 = score(doc=2230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 2230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2230)
0.03719756 = weight(_text_:22 in 2230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03719756 = score(doc=2230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2230)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- We present a deductive data model for concept-based query expansion. It is based on three abstraction levels: the conceptual, linguistic and occurrence levels. Concepts and relationships among them are represented at the conceptual level. The expression level represents natural language expressions for concepts. Each expression has one or more matching models at the occurrence level. Each model specifies the matching of the expression in database indices built in varying ways. The data model supports a concept-based query expansion and formulation tool, the ExpansionTool, for environments providing heterogeneous IR systems. Expansion is controlled by adjustable matching reliability.
- Source
- Proceedings of the 19th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (ACM SIGIR '96), Zürich, Switzerland, August 18-22, 1996. Eds.: H.P. Frei et al
- Type
- a
-
Almeida Campos, M.L. de; Machado Campos, M.L.; Dávila, A.M.R.; Espanha Gomes, H.; Campos, L.M.; Lira e Oliveira, L. de: Information sciences methodological aspects applied to ontology reuse tools : a study based on genomic annotations in the domain of trypanosomatides (2013)
0.03
0.029121403 = product of:
0.058242805 = sum of:
0.058242805 = sum of:
0.011642005 = weight(_text_:a in 635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011642005 = score(doc=635,freq=24.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 635, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=635)
0.015602832 = weight(_text_:h in 635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015602832 = score(doc=635,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 635, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=635)
0.030997967 = weight(_text_:22 in 635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030997967 = score(doc=635,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 635, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=635)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Despite the dissemination of modeling languages and tools for representation and construction of ontologies, their underlying methodologies can still be improved. As a consequence, ontology tools can be enhanced accordingly, in order to support users through the ontology construction process. This paper proposes suggestions for ontology tools' improvement based on a case study within the domain of bioinformatics, applying a reuse method ology. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were carried out on a subset of 28 terms of Gene Ontology on a semi-automatic alignment with other biomedical ontologies. As a result, a report is presented containing suggestions for enhancing ontology reuse tools, which is a product derived from difficulties that we had in reusing a set of OBO ontologies. For the reuse process, a set of steps closely related to those of Pinto and Martin's methodology was used. In each step, it was observed that the experiment would have been significantly improved if ontology manipulation tools had provided certain features. Accordingly, problematic aspects in ontology tools are presented and suggestions are made aiming at getting better results in ontology reuse.
- Date
- 22. 2.2013 12:03:53
- Type
- a
-
Cui, H.: Competency evaluation of plant character ontologies against domain literature (2010)
0.03
0.027416471 = product of:
0.054832943 = sum of:
0.054832943 = sum of:
0.008232141 = weight(_text_:a in 3466) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008232141 = score(doc=3466,freq=12.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.15602624 = fieldWeight in 3466, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3466)
0.015602832 = weight(_text_:h in 3466) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015602832 = score(doc=3466,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 3466, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3466)
0.030997967 = weight(_text_:22 in 3466) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030997967 = score(doc=3466,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3466, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3466)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Specimen identification keys are still the most commonly created tools used by systematic biologists to access biodiversity information. Creating identification keys requires analyzing and synthesizing large amounts of information from specimens and their descriptions and is a very labor-intensive and time-consuming activity. Automating the generation of identification keys from text descriptions becomes a highly attractive text mining application in the biodiversity domain. Fine-grained semantic annotation of morphological descriptions of organisms is a necessary first step in generating keys from text. Machine-readable ontologies are needed in this process because most biological characters are only implied (i.e., not stated) in descriptions. The immediate question to ask is How well do existing ontologies support semantic annotation and automated key generation? With the intention to either select an existing ontology or develop a unified ontology based on existing ones, this paper evaluates the coverage, semantic consistency, and inter-ontology agreement of a biodiversity character ontology and three plant glossaries that may be turned into ontologies. The coverage and semantic consistency of the ontology/glossaries are checked against the authoritative domain literature, namely, Flora of North America and Flora of China. The evaluation results suggest that more work is needed to improve the coverage and interoperability of the ontology/glossaries. More concepts need to be added to the ontology/glossaries and careful work is needed to improve the semantic consistency. The method used in this paper to evaluate the ontology/glossaries can be used to propose new candidate concepts from the domain literature and suggest appropriate definitions.
- Date
- 1. 6.2010 9:55:22
- Type
- a
-
Schmitz-Esser, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility (1996)
0.02
0.022905817 = product of:
0.045811635 = sum of:
0.045811635 = product of:
0.06871745 = sum of:
0.0067215143 = weight(_text_:a in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0067215143 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
0.061995935 = weight(_text_:22 in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061995935 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.11-22
- Type
- a
-
Rath, H.H.: Mozart oder Kugel : Mit Topic Maps intelligente Informationsnetze aufbauen (1999)
0.02
0.020227827 = product of:
0.040455654 = sum of:
0.040455654 = product of:
0.06068348 = sum of:
0.010754423 = weight(_text_:a in 3893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010754423 = score(doc=3893,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3893, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3893)
0.04992906 = weight(_text_:h in 3893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04992906 = score(doc=3893,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.4391927 = fieldWeight in 3893, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3893)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- iX. 1999, H.12, S.149-155
- Type
- a
-
Deokattey, S.; Neelameghan, A.; Kumar, V.: ¬A method for developing a domain ontology : a case study for a multidisciplinary subject (2010)
0.02
0.019425288 = product of:
0.038850576 = sum of:
0.038850576 = product of:
0.05827586 = sum of:
0.014878708 = weight(_text_:a in 3694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014878708 = score(doc=3694,freq=20.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.28200063 = fieldWeight in 3694, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3694)
0.04339715 = weight(_text_:22 in 3694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04339715 = score(doc=3694,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3694, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3694)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A method to develop a prototype domain ontology has been described. The domain selected for the study is Accelerator Driven Systems. This is a multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary subject comprising Nuclear Physics, Nuclear and Reactor Engineering, Reactor Fuels and Radioactive Waste Management. Since Accelerator Driven Systems is a vast topic, select areas in it were singled out for the study. Both qualitative and quantitative methods such as Content analysis, Facet analysis and Clustering were used, to develop the web-based model.
- Date
- 22. 7.2010 19:41:16
- Type
- a
-
Giunchiglia, F.; Villafiorita, A.; Walsh, T.: Theories of abstraction (1997)
0.02
0.01906709 = product of:
0.03813418 = sum of:
0.03813418 = product of:
0.05720127 = sum of:
0.007604526 = weight(_text_:a in 4476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007604526 = score(doc=4476,freq=4.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 4476, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4476)
0.049596746 = weight(_text_:22 in 4476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049596746 = score(doc=4476,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4476, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4476)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1.10.2018 14:13:22
- Type
- a
-
Synak, M.; Dabrowski, M.; Kruk, S.R.: Semantic Web and ontologies (2009)
0.02
0.018324653 = product of:
0.036649305 = sum of:
0.036649305 = product of:
0.054973956 = sum of:
0.0053772116 = weight(_text_:a in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0053772116 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
0.049596746 = weight(_text_:22 in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049596746 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 31. 7.2010 16:58:22
- Type
- a
-
Hauff-Hartig, S.: Wissensrepräsentation durch RDF: Drei angewandte Forschungsbeispiele : Bitte recht vielfältig: Wie Wissensgraphen, Disco und FaBiO Struktur in Mangas und die Humanities bringen (2021)
0.02
0.018324653 = product of:
0.036649305 = sum of:
0.036649305 = product of:
0.054973956 = sum of:
0.0053772116 = weight(_text_:a in 318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0053772116 = score(doc=318,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 318, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=318)
0.049596746 = weight(_text_:22 in 318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049596746 = score(doc=318,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 318, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=318)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.2021 12:43:05
- Type
- a
-
Priss, U.: Faceted information representation (2000)
0.02
0.017602425 = product of:
0.03520485 = sum of:
0.03520485 = product of:
0.05280727 = sum of:
0.009410121 = weight(_text_:a in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009410121 = score(doc=5095,freq=8.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
0.04339715 = weight(_text_:22 in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04339715 = score(doc=5095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper presents an abstract formalization of the notion of "facets". Facets are relational structures of units, relations and other facets selected for a certain purpose. Facets can be used to structure large knowledge representation systems into a hierarchical arrangement of consistent and independent subsystems (facets) that facilitate flexibility and combinations of different viewpoints or aspects. This paper describes the basic notions, facet characteristics and construction mechanisms. It then explicates the theory in an example of a faceted information retrieval system (FaIR)
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 17:47:06
- Type
- a
-
Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999)
0.02
0.017602425 = product of:
0.03520485 = sum of:
0.03520485 = product of:
0.05280727 = sum of:
0.009410121 = weight(_text_:a in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009410121 = score(doc=2654,freq=8.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
0.04339715 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04339715 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Faceted Knowledge Representation provides a formalism for implementing knowledge systems. The basic notions of faceted knowledge representation are "unit", "relation", "facet" and "interpretation". Units are atomic elements and can be abstract elements or refer to external objects in an application. Relations are sequences or matrices of 0 and 1's (binary matrices). Facets are relational structures that combine units and relations. Each facet represents an aspect or viewpoint of a knowledge system. Interpretations are mappings that can be used to translate between different representations. This paper introduces the basic notions of faceted knowledge representation. The formalism is applied here to an abstract modeling of a faceted thesaurus as used in information retrieval.
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 17:30:31
- Type
- a
-
Roth, G.; Schwegler, H.: Kognitive Referenz und Selbstreferentialität des Gehirns : ein Beitrag zur Klärung des Verhältnisses zwischen Erkenntnistheorie und Hirnforschung (1992)
0.02
0.016950997 = product of:
0.033901993 = sum of:
0.033901993 = product of:
0.050852988 = sum of:
0.0067215143 = weight(_text_:a in 4607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0067215143 = score(doc=4607,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 4607, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4607)
0.044131473 = weight(_text_:h in 4607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044131473 = score(doc=4607,freq=4.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.3881952 = fieldWeight in 4607, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4607)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Stellungnahmen dazu von H. Tetens, M. Boenke u. L. Läsker
- Type
- a
-
Madalli, D.P.; Balaji, B.P.; Sarangi, A.K.: Music domain analysis for building faceted ontological representation (2014)
0.02
0.016683705 = product of:
0.03336741 = sum of:
0.03336741 = product of:
0.05005111 = sum of:
0.0066539603 = weight(_text_:a in 1437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0066539603 = score(doc=1437,freq=4.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 1437, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1437)
0.04339715 = weight(_text_:22 in 1437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04339715 = score(doc=1437,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1437, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1437)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper describes to construct faceted ontologies for domain modeling. Building upon the faceted theory of S.R. Ranganathan (1967), the paper intends to address the faceted classification approach applied to build domain ontologies. As classificatory ontologies are employed to represent the relationships of entities and objects on the web, the faceted approach helps to analyze domain representation in an effective way for modeling. Based on this perspective, an ontology of the music domain has been analyzed that would serve as a case study.
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
- Type
- a
-
Priss, U.: Description logic and faceted knowledge representation (1999)
0.02
0.016650246 = product of:
0.033300493 = sum of:
0.033300493 = product of:
0.049950738 = sum of:
0.012753177 = weight(_text_:a in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012753177 = score(doc=2655,freq=20.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.24171482 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
0.03719756 = weight(_text_:22 in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03719756 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The term "facet" was introduced into the field of library classification systems by Ranganathan in the 1930's [Ranganathan, 1962]. A facet is a viewpoint or aspect. In contrast to traditional classification systems, faceted systems are modular in that a domain is analyzed in terms of baseline facets which are then synthesized. In this paper, the term "facet" is used in a broader meaning. Facets can describe different aspects on the same level of abstraction or the same aspect on different levels of abstraction. The notion of facets is related to database views, multicontexts and conceptual scaling in formal concept analysis [Ganter and Wille, 1999], polymorphism in object-oriented design, aspect-oriented programming, views and contexts in description logic and semantic networks. This paper presents a definition of facets in terms of faceted knowledge representation that incorporates the traditional narrower notion of facets and potentially facilitates translation between different knowledge representation formalisms. A goal of this approach is a modular, machine-aided knowledge base design mechanism. A possible application is faceted thesaurus construction for information retrieval and data mining. Reasoning complexity depends on the size of the modules (facets). A more general analysis of complexity will be left for future research.
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 17:30:31
- Type
- a
-
Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2010)
0.02
0.01603407 = product of:
0.03206814 = sum of:
0.03206814 = product of:
0.04810221 = sum of:
0.0047050603 = weight(_text_:a in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0047050603 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
0.04339715 = weight(_text_:22 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04339715 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
- Type
- a
-
Gendt, M. van; Isaac, I.; Meij, L. van der; Schlobach, S.: Semantic Web techniques for multiple views on heterogeneous collections : a case study (2006)
0.02
0.015087794 = product of:
0.030175587 = sum of:
0.030175587 = product of:
0.04526338 = sum of:
0.008065818 = weight(_text_:a in 2418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008065818 = score(doc=2418,freq=8.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 2418, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2418)
0.03719756 = weight(_text_:22 in 2418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03719756 = score(doc=2418,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2418, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2418)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Integrated digital access to multiple collections is a prominent issue for many Cultural Heritage institutions. The metadata describing diverse collections must be interoperable, which requires aligning the controlled vocabularies that are used to annotate objects from these collections. In this paper, we present an experiment where we match the vocabularies of two collections by applying the Knowledge Representation techniques established in recent Semantic Web research. We discuss the steps that are required for such matching, namely formalising the initial resources using Semantic Web languages, and running ontology mapping tools on the resulting representations. In addition, we present a prototype that enables the user to browse the two collections using the obtained alignment while still providing her with the original vocabulary structures.
- Source
- Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
- Type
- a
-
Renear, A.H.; Wickett, K.M.; Urban, R.J.; Dubin, D.; Shreeves, S.L.: Collection/item metadata relationships (2008)
0.02
0.015087794 = product of:
0.030175587 = sum of:
0.030175587 = product of:
0.04526338 = sum of:
0.008065818 = weight(_text_:a in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008065818 = score(doc=2623,freq=8.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
0.03719756 = weight(_text_:22 in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03719756 = score(doc=2623,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Contemporary retrieval systems, which search across collections, usually ignore collection-level metadata. Alternative approaches, exploiting collection-level information, will require an understanding of the various kinds of relationships that can obtain between collection-level and item-level metadata. This paper outlines the problem and describes a project that is developing a logic-based framework for classifying collection/item metadata relationships. This framework will support (i) metadata specification developers defining metadata elements, (ii) metadata creators describing objects, and (iii) system designers implementing systems that take advantage of collection-level metadata. We present three examples of collection/item metadata relationship categories, attribute/value-propagation, value-propagation, and value-constraint and show that even in these simple cases a precise formulation requires modal notions in addition to first-order logic. These formulations are related to recent work in information retrieval and ontology evaluation.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
- Type
- a
