Search (374 results, page 1 of 19)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Hamm, S.; Schneider, K.: Automatische Erschließung von Universitätsdissertationen (2015) 0.04
    0.039969243 = product of:
      0.079938486 = sum of:
        0.079938486 = sum of:
          0.0053772116 = weight(_text_:a in 1715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0053772116 = score(doc=1715,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045758117 = queryNorm
              0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 1715, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1715)
          0.02496453 = weight(_text_:h in 1715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02496453 = score(doc=1715,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045758117 = queryNorm
              0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 1715, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1715)
          0.049596746 = weight(_text_:22 in 1715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049596746 = score(doc=1715,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045758117 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1715, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1715)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 27(2015) H.1, S.18-22
    Type
    a
  2. Devaul, H.; Diekema, A.R.; Ostwald, J.: Computer-assisted assignment of educational standards using natural language processing (2011) 0.03
    0.03199339 = product of:
      0.06398678 = sum of:
        0.06398678 = sum of:
          0.008065818 = weight(_text_:a in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.008065818 = score(doc=4199,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045758117 = queryNorm
              0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
          0.018723397 = weight(_text_:h in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018723397 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045758117 = queryNorm
              0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
          0.03719756 = weight(_text_:22 in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03719756 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045758117 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Educational standards are a central focus of the current educational system in the United States, underpinning educational practice, curriculum design, teacher professional development, and high-stakes testing and assessment. Digital library users have requested that this information be accessible in association with digital learning resources to support teaching and learning as well as accountability requirements. Providing this information is complex because of the variability and number of standards documents in use at the national, state, and local level. This article describes a cataloging tool that aids catalogers in the assignment of standards metadata to digital library resources, using natural language processing techniques. The research explores whether the standards suggestor service would suggest the same standards as a human, whether relevant standards are ranked appropriately in the result set, and whether the relevance of the suggested assignments improve when, in addition to resource content, metadata is included in the query to the cataloging tool. The article also discusses how this service might streamline the cataloging workflow.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:25:32
    Type
    a
  3. Hüning, C.; Jansen, H.; Kauke, V.; Roschanski, J.; Schackmann, E.; Schomburg, S.; Selbach, M.: ¬Der Umstieg auf die neuen Bibliothekssysteme : Herausforderungen am Beispiel der FH Münster und des hbz-Verbundes (2016) 0.02
    0.020341193 = product of:
      0.040682387 = sum of:
        0.040682387 = product of:
          0.061023578 = sum of:
            0.008065818 = weight(_text_:a in 3741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008065818 = score(doc=3741,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 3741, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3741)
            0.052957762 = weight(_text_:h in 3741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052957762 = score(doc=3741,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.4658342 = fieldWeight in 3741, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3741)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 63(2016) H.5/6, S.xxx-xxx
    Type
    a
  4. Noruzi, A.: FRBR and Tillett's taxonomy of bibliographic relationships (2012) 0.02
    0.020117057 = product of:
      0.040234115 = sum of:
        0.040234115 = product of:
          0.06035117 = sum of:
            0.010754423 = weight(_text_:a in 4564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010754423 = score(doc=4564,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 4564, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4564)
            0.049596746 = weight(_text_:22 in 4564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049596746 = score(doc=4564,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4564, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4564)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliographic relationships are one of the most active research areas in knowledge organization, especially in cataloguing. This study attempts to examine and map the FRBR (Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records) bibliographic relationships with Tillett's taxonomy of bibliographic relationships, and to a ssess the congruence between them. The FRBR conceptual model provides a taxonomy of bibliographic relationships in chapter 5, illustrating them in 11 tables. This study shows that there is considerable congruence between these two taxonomies.
    Date
    22. 2.2013 11:13:52
    Type
    a
  5. Snow, K.; Hoffman, G.L.: What makes an effective cataloging course? : a study of the factors that promote learning (2015) 0.02
    0.01890169 = product of:
      0.03780338 = sum of:
        0.03780338 = product of:
          0.056705073 = sum of:
            0.013307921 = weight(_text_:a in 2609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013307921 = score(doc=2609,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 2609, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2609)
            0.04339715 = weight(_text_:22 in 2609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04339715 = score(doc=2609,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2609, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2609)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents the results of a research study, a survey of library and information science master's degree holders who have taken a beginning cataloging course, to identify the elements of a beginning cataloging course that help students to learn cataloging concepts and skills. The results suggest that cataloging practice (the hands-on creation of bibliographic records or catalog cards), the effectiveness of the instructor, a balance of theory and practice, and placing cataloging in a real-world context contribute to effective learning. However, more research is needed to determine how, and to what the extent, each element should be incorporated into beginning cataloging courses.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  6. Taylor, A.G.: Implementing AACR and AACR2 : a personal perspective and lessons learned (2012) 0.02
    0.018307384 = product of:
      0.03661477 = sum of:
        0.03661477 = product of:
          0.05492215 = sum of:
            0.011524997 = weight(_text_:a in 2546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011524997 = score(doc=2546,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 2546, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2546)
            0.04339715 = weight(_text_:22 in 2546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04339715 = score(doc=2546,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2546, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2546)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    As we move toward implementing RDA: Resource Description and Access, I have been pondering how we might manage the transition to new cataloging rules effectively. I was a practicing cataloger when Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd ed., was implemented and remember it as a traumatic process. The published literature that I found focused on the impact of the then-new rules on specific formats and genres, but no one seems to have addressed the process of implementation and what type of training worked well (or did not). After a bit of sleuthing, I found a pertinent presentation by Arlene G. Taylor, which she graciously agreed to repurpose as this guest editorial.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  7. Bloss, M.E.: Testing RDA at Dominican University's Graduate School of Library and Information Science : the students' perspectives (2011) 0.02
    0.017972663 = product of:
      0.035945326 = sum of:
        0.035945326 = product of:
          0.053917985 = sum of:
            0.0105208345 = weight(_text_:a in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0105208345 = score(doc=1899,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
            0.04339715 = weight(_text_:22 in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04339715 = score(doc=1899,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Dominican University's Graduate School of Library and Information Science (GSLIS) was one of a funnel group of graduate schools of library and information science selected to test RDA. A seminar specifically for this purpose was conducted from August to December 2010. Fifteen students participated in the test, creating records in AACR2 and in RDA, encoding them in the MARC format, and responding to the required questionnaires. In addition to record creation, the students were also asked to submit a final paper in which they described their experiences and recommended whether or not to accept RDA as a replacement for AACR2.
    Date
    25. 5.2015 18:36:22
    Type
    a
  8. Theimer, S.: ¬A cataloger's resolution to become more creative : how and why (2012) 0.02
    0.017972663 = product of:
      0.035945326 = sum of:
        0.035945326 = product of:
          0.053917985 = sum of:
            0.0105208345 = weight(_text_:a in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0105208345 = score(doc=1934,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
            0.04339715 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04339715 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Creativity is now a core requirement for successful organizations. Libraries, like all organizations, need to produce and utilize new ideas to improve user service and experiences. With changes in cataloging such as Resource Description and Access (RDA), the opportunity to rethink cataloging practices is here now. Everyone has creative potential, although catalogers may have both a personality and work environment that make it more difficult. To be able to maximize creative capacity, catalogers need the proper work environment, support from their organization, and a plan for accomplishing creative goals. Given that environment, catalogers may create ideas that will shape the future. (RDA).
    Date
    29. 5.2015 11:08:22
    Type
    a
  9. Kratzer, M.; Lohrum, S.; Risch, U.; Thiessen, P.: Zum Stand des Projektes 'Cloudbasierte Infrastruktur für Bibliotheksdaten' (CIB) (2016) 0.02
    0.01769935 = product of:
      0.0353987 = sum of:
        0.0353987 = product of:
          0.053098045 = sum of:
            0.009410121 = weight(_text_:a in 2473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009410121 = score(doc=2473,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 2473, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2473)
            0.043687925 = weight(_text_:h in 2473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043687925 = score(doc=2473,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.38429362 = fieldWeight in 2473, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2473)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 63(2016) H.5/6, S.250-257
    Type
    a
  10. Albrecht, R.; Meßmer, G.; Rusch, B.; Thiessen, P.: Katalogisierung in der Datenwolke (2016) 0.02
    0.01769935 = product of:
      0.0353987 = sum of:
        0.0353987 = product of:
          0.053098045 = sum of:
            0.009410121 = weight(_text_:a in 3740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009410121 = score(doc=3740,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 3740, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3740)
            0.043687925 = weight(_text_:h in 3740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043687925 = score(doc=3740,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.38429362 = fieldWeight in 3740, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3740)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 63(2016) H.5/6, S.xxx-xxx
    Type
    a
  11. Sieber, M.; Hupfer, G.: ¬Die Common Bibliographic Data Zone (CBDZ) : ein Werkstattbericht (2016) 0.02
    0.01769935 = product of:
      0.0353987 = sum of:
        0.0353987 = product of:
          0.053098045 = sum of:
            0.009410121 = weight(_text_:a in 4959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009410121 = score(doc=4959,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4959, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4959)
            0.043687925 = weight(_text_:h in 4959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043687925 = score(doc=4959,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.38429362 = fieldWeight in 4959, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4959)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 63(2016) H.5/6, S.xxx-xxx
    Type
    a
  12. Behrens, R.: Erschließungspolitik unter RDA (2017) 0.02
    0.01769935 = product of:
      0.0353987 = sum of:
        0.0353987 = product of:
          0.053098045 = sum of:
            0.009410121 = weight(_text_:a in 4975) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009410121 = score(doc=4975,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4975, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4975)
            0.043687925 = weight(_text_:h in 4975) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043687925 = score(doc=4975,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.38429362 = fieldWeight in 4975, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4975)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 64(2017) H.2, S.xx-xx
    Type
    a
  13. Parka, A.L.; Panchyshyn, R.S.: ¬The path to an RDA hybridized catalog : lessons from the Kent State University Libraries' RDA enrichment project (2016) 0.02
    0.017182186 = product of:
      0.034364372 = sum of:
        0.034364372 = product of:
          0.051546555 = sum of:
            0.008149404 = weight(_text_:a in 2632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008149404 = score(doc=2632,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 2632, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2632)
            0.04339715 = weight(_text_:22 in 2632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04339715 = score(doc=2632,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2632, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2632)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes in detail the library implementation of a Resource Description and Access (RDA) Enrichment project. The library "hybridized," or enriched legacy data from Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules bibliographic records by the addition of specific RDA elements. The project also cleaned up various other elements in the bibliographic data that were not directly RDA-related. There were over 28 million changes and edits made to these records, changes that would never have been made otherwise because the library lacked the resources to do them independently. The enrichment project made the bibliographic data consistent, and helped prepared the data for its eventual transition to a linked data environment.
    Date
    21. 1.2016 19:08:22
    Type
    a
  14. Knowlton, S.A.: Power and change in the US cataloging community (2014) 0.02
    0.016683705 = product of:
      0.03336741 = sum of:
        0.03336741 = product of:
          0.05005111 = sum of:
            0.0066539603 = weight(_text_:a in 2599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0066539603 = score(doc=2599,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 2599, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2599)
            0.04339715 = weight(_text_:22 in 2599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04339715 = score(doc=2599,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2599, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2599)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The US cataloging community is an interorganizational network with the Library of Congress (LC) as the lead organization, which reserves to itself the power to shape cataloging rules. Peripheral members of the network who are interested in modifying changes to the rules or to the network can use various strategies for organizational change that incorporate building ties to the decision-makers located at the hub of the network. The story of William E. Studwell's campaign for a subject heading code illustrates how some traditional scholarly methods of urging change-papers and presentations-are insufficient to achieve reform in an interorganizational network, absent strategies to build alliances with the decision makers.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  15. Mugridge, R.L.; Edmunds, J.: Batchloading MARC bibliographic records (2012) 0.02
    0.016683705 = product of:
      0.03336741 = sum of:
        0.03336741 = product of:
          0.05005111 = sum of:
            0.0066539603 = weight(_text_:a in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0066539603 = score(doc=2600,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
            0.04339715 = weight(_text_:22 in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04339715 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Research libraries are using batchloading to provide access to many resources that they would otherwise be unable to catalog given the staff and other resources available. To explore how such libraries are managing their batchloading activities, the authors conducted a survey of the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Directors of Large Research Libraries Interest Group member libraries. The survey addressed staffing, budgets, scope, workflow, management, quality standards, information technology support, collaborative efforts, and assessment of batchloading activities. The authors provide an analysis of the survey results along with suggestions for process improvements and future research.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  16. Ilik, V.; Storlien, J.; Olivarez, J.: Metadata makeover (2014) 0.02
    0.016683705 = product of:
      0.03336741 = sum of:
        0.03336741 = product of:
          0.05005111 = sum of:
            0.0066539603 = weight(_text_:a in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0066539603 = score(doc=2606,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
            0.04339715 = weight(_text_:22 in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04339715 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Catalogers have become fluent in information technology such as web design skills, HyperText Markup Language (HTML), Cascading Stylesheets (CSS), eXensible Markup Language (XML), and programming languages. The knowledge gained from learning information technology can be used to experiment with methods of transforming one metadata schema into another using various software solutions. This paper will discuss the use of eXtensible Stylesheet Language Transformations (XSLT) for repurposing, editing, and reformatting metadata. Catalogers have the requisite skills for working with any metadata schema, and if they are excluded from metadata work, libraries are wasting a valuable human resource.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  17. Conradt, V.; Hänger, C.; Klein, A.: ¬Die Anbindung von Alma an den SWB-Verbund am Beispiel der UB Mannheim (2016) 0.02
    0.01628453 = product of:
      0.03256906 = sum of:
        0.03256906 = product of:
          0.048853584 = sum of:
            0.011406789 = weight(_text_:a in 2312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011406789 = score(doc=2312,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 2312, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2312)
            0.037446793 = weight(_text_:h in 2312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037446793 = score(doc=2312,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 2312, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2312)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 63(2016) H.5/6, S.xxx-xxx
    Type
    a
  18. Chambers, S.; Myall, C.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2007-8 (2010) 0.02
    0.01603407 = product of:
      0.03206814 = sum of:
        0.03206814 = product of:
          0.04810221 = sum of:
            0.0047050603 = weight(_text_:a in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0047050603 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
            0.04339715 = weight(_text_:22 in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04339715 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  19. Stalberg, E.; Cronin, C.: Assessing the cost and value of bibliographic control (2011) 0.02
    0.01603407 = product of:
      0.03206814 = sum of:
        0.03206814 = product of:
          0.04810221 = sum of:
            0.0047050603 = weight(_text_:a in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0047050603 = score(doc=2592,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
            0.04339715 = weight(_text_:22 in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04339715 = score(doc=2592,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  20. Lee, S.; Jacob, E.K.: ¬An integrated approach to metadata interoperability : construction of a conceptual structure between MARC and FRBR (2011) 0.02
    0.015692044 = product of:
      0.031384088 = sum of:
        0.031384088 = product of:
          0.04707613 = sum of:
            0.009878568 = weight(_text_:a in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009878568 = score(doc=302,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
            0.03719756 = weight(_text_:22 in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03719756 = score(doc=302,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC) is currently the most broadly used bibliographic standard for encoding and exchanging bibliographic data. However, MARC may not fully support representation of the dynamic nature and semantics of digital resources because of its rigid and single-layered linear structure. The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) model, which is designed to overcome the problems of MARC, does not provide sufficient data elements and adopts a predetermined hierarchy. A flexible structure for bibliographic data with detailed data elements is needed. Integrating MARC format with the hierarchical structure of FRBR is one approach to meet this need. The purpose of this research is to propose an approach that can facilitate interoperability between MARC and FRBR by providing a conceptual structure that can function as a mediator between MARC data elements and FRBR attributes.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a

Languages

  • e 294
  • d 67
  • i 5
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 331
  • el 68
  • m 21
  • n 8
  • b 4
  • ag 2
  • r 2
  • s 2
  • More… Less…

Subjects