-
Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997)
0.03
0.032004006 = product of:
0.06400801 = sum of:
0.06400801 = product of:
0.09601201 = sum of:
0.047281947 = weight(_text_:c in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047281947 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15508012 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044958513 = queryNorm
0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.048730064 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048730064 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15743706 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044958513 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
-
Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017)
0.03
0.028982788 = product of:
0.057965577 = sum of:
0.057965577 = product of:
0.086948365 = sum of:
0.04430956 = weight(_text_:k in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04430956 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16049191 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.044958513 = queryNorm
0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.042638805 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042638805 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15743706 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044958513 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.22-36
- Source
- Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
-
Gnoli, C.: ¬The meaning of facets in non-disciplinary classifications (2006)
0.02
0.024480473 = product of:
0.048960947 = sum of:
0.048960947 = product of:
0.073441416 = sum of:
0.031649686 = weight(_text_:k in 2291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031649686 = score(doc=2291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16049191 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.044958513 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 2291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2291)
0.041791733 = weight(_text_:c in 2291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041791733 = score(doc=2291,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15508012 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044958513 = queryNorm
0.2694848 = fieldWeight in 2291, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2291)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
-
Gnoli, C.; Poli, R.: Levels of reality and levels of representation (2004)
0.02
0.024480361 = product of:
0.048960723 = sum of:
0.048960723 = product of:
0.07344108 = sum of:
0.03797962 = weight(_text_:k in 3533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03797962 = score(doc=3533,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16049191 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.044958513 = queryNorm
0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 3533, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3533)
0.03546146 = weight(_text_:c in 3533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03546146 = score(doc=3533,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15508012 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044958513 = queryNorm
0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 3533, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3533)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Ontology, in its philosophical meaning, is the discipline investigating the structure of reality. Its findings can be relevant to knowledge organization, and models of knowledge can, in turn, offer relevant ontological suggestions. Several philosophers in time have pointed out that reality is structured into a series of integrative levels, like the physical, the biological, the mental, and the cultural, and that each level plays as a base for the emergence of more complex levels. More detailed theories of levels have been developed by Nicolai Hartmann and James K. Feibleman, and these have been considered as a source for structuring principles in bibliographic classification by both the Classification Research Group (CRG) and Ingetraut Dahlberg. CRG's analysis of levels and of their possible application to a new general classification scheme based an phenomena instead of disciplines, as it was formulated by Derek Austin in 1969, is examined in detail. Both benefits and open problems in applying integrative levels to bibliographic classification are pointed out.
-
Jacob, E.K.: Proposal for a classification of classifications built on Beghtol's distinction between "Naïve Classification" and "Professional Classification" (2010)
0.02
0.024003003 = product of:
0.048006006 = sum of:
0.048006006 = product of:
0.072009005 = sum of:
0.03546146 = weight(_text_:c in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03546146 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15508012 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044958513 = queryNorm
0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
0.036547545 = weight(_text_:22 in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036547545 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15743706 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044958513 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Argues that Beghtol's (2003) use of the terms "naive classification" and "professional classification" is valid because they are nominal definitions and that the distinction between these two types of classification points up the need for researchers in knowledge organization to broaden their scope beyond traditional classification systems intended for information retrieval. Argues that work by Beghtol (2003), Kwasnik (1999) and Bailey (1994) offer direction for the development of a classification of classifications based on the pragmatic dimensions of extant classification systems. Bezugnahme auf: Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society. In: Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag 2004. S.19-22. (Advances in knowledge organization; vol.9)
-
Gnoli, C.: Classifying phenomena : part 4: themes and rhemes (2018)
0.02
0.024003003 = product of:
0.048006006 = sum of:
0.048006006 = product of:
0.072009005 = sum of:
0.03546146 = weight(_text_:c in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03546146 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15508012 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044958513 = queryNorm
0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
0.036547545 = weight(_text_:22 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036547545 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15743706 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044958513 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17. 2.2018 18:22:25
-
Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society (2004)
0.02
0.020002503 = product of:
0.040005006 = sum of:
0.040005006 = product of:
0.060007505 = sum of:
0.029551215 = weight(_text_:c in 3483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029551215 = score(doc=3483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15508012 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044958513 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 3483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3483)
0.030456292 = weight(_text_:22 in 3483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030456292 = score(doc=3483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15743706 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044958513 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3483)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.19-22
-
Zackland, M.; Fontaine, D.: Systematic building of conceptual classification systems with C-KAT (1996)
0.01
0.0137905665 = product of:
0.027581133 = sum of:
0.027581133 = product of:
0.0827434 = sum of:
0.0827434 = weight(_text_:c in 5145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0827434 = score(doc=5145,freq=8.0), product of:
0.15508012 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044958513 = queryNorm
0.5335526 = fieldWeight in 5145, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5145)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- C-KAT is a method and a tool which supports the design of feature oriented classification systems for knowlegde based systems. It uses a specialized Heuristic Classification conceptual model named 'classification by structural shift' which sees the classification process as the matching of different classifications of the same set of objects or situations organized around different structural principles. To manage the complexity induced by the cross-product, C-KAT supports the use of a leastcommittment strategy which applies in a context of constraint-directed reasoning. Presents this method using an example from the field of industrial fire insurance
- Object
- C-KAT
-
Gnoli, C.: Classificazione a facette (2004)
0.01
0.0137905665 = product of:
0.027581133 = sum of:
0.027581133 = product of:
0.0827434 = sum of:
0.0827434 = weight(_text_:c in 3746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0827434 = score(doc=3746,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15508012 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044958513 = queryNorm
0.5335526 = fieldWeight in 3746, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3746)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Kumar, K.: Theoretical bases for universal classification systems (1982)
0.01
0.012659874 = product of:
0.025319748 = sum of:
0.025319748 = product of:
0.07595924 = sum of:
0.07595924 = weight(_text_:k in 34) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07595924 = score(doc=34,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16049191 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.044958513 = queryNorm
0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 34, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=34)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
LaBarre, K.: Interrogating facet theory : decolonizing knowledge organization (2017)
0.01
0.012659874 = product of:
0.025319748 = sum of:
0.025319748 = product of:
0.07595924 = sum of:
0.07595924 = weight(_text_:k in 4155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07595924 = score(doc=4155,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16049191 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.044958513 = queryNorm
0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 4155, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4155)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999)
0.01
0.012182515 = product of:
0.02436503 = sum of:
0.02436503 = product of:
0.07309509 = sum of:
0.07309509 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07309509 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15743706 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044958513 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
-
Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999)
0.01
0.012182515 = product of:
0.02436503 = sum of:
0.02436503 = product of:
0.07309509 = sum of:
0.07309509 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07309509 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15743706 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044958513 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
-
Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017)
0.01
0.012182515 = product of:
0.02436503 = sum of:
0.02436503 = product of:
0.07309509 = sum of:
0.07309509 = weight(_text_:22 in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07309509 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15743706 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044958513 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 5.2017 18:46:22
-
Gnoli, C.: Classifying phenomena : part 3: facets (2017)
0.01
0.011820487 = product of:
0.023640973 = sum of:
0.023640973 = product of:
0.07092292 = sum of:
0.07092292 = weight(_text_:c in 4158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07092292 = score(doc=4158,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15508012 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044958513 = queryNorm
0.45733082 = fieldWeight in 4158, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4158)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Facets: a fruitful notion in many domains : special issue on facet analysis (2008)
0.01
0.01020015 = product of:
0.0204003 = sum of:
0.0204003 = product of:
0.030600451 = sum of:
0.015824843 = weight(_text_:k in 3262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015824843 = score(doc=3262,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16049191 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.044958513 = queryNorm
0.098602116 = fieldWeight in 3262, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3262)
0.014775608 = weight(_text_:c in 3262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014775608 = score(doc=3262,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15508012 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044958513 = queryNorm
0.09527725 = fieldWeight in 3262, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3262)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Editor
- Gnoli, C.
- Footnote
- Rez. in: KO 36(2009) no.1, S.62-63 (K. La Barre): "This special issue of Axiomathes presents an ambitious dual agenda. It attempts to highlight aspects of facet analysis (as used in LIS) that are shared by cognate approaches in philosophy, psychology, linguistics and computer science. Secondarily, the issue aims to attract others to the study and use of facet analysis. The authors represent a blend of lifetime involvement with facet analysis, such as Vickery, Broughton, Beghtol, and Dahlberg; those with well developed research agendas such as Tudhope, and Priss; and relative newcomers such as Gnoli, Cheti and Paradisi, and Slavic. Omissions are inescapable, but a more balanced issue would have resulted from inclusion of at least one researcher from the Indian school of facet theory. Another valuable addition might have been a reaction to the issue by one of the chief critics of facet analysis. Potentially useful, but absent, is a comprehensive bibliography of resources for those wishing to engage in further study, that now lie scattered throughout the issue. Several of the papers assume relative familiarity with facet analytical concepts and definitions, some of which are contested even within LIS. Gnoli's introduction (p. 127-130) traces the trajectory, extensions and new developments of this analytico- synthetic approach to subject access, while providing a laundry list of cognate approaches that are similar to facet analysis. This brief essay and the article by Priss (p. 243-255) directly addresses this first part of Gnoli's agenda. Priss provides detailed discussion of facet-like structures in computer science (p. 245- 246), and outlines the similarity between Formal Concept Analysis and facets. This comparison is equally fruitful for researchers in computer science and library and information science. By bridging into a discussion of visualization challenges for facet display, further research is also invited. Many of the remaining papers comprehensively detail the intellectual heritage of facet analysis (Beghtol; Broughton, p. 195-198; Dahlberg; Tudhope and Binding, p. 213-215; Vickery). Beghtol's (p. 131-144) examination of the origins of facet theory through the lens of the textbooks written by Ranganathan's mentor W.C.B. Sayers (1881-1960), Manual of Classification (1926, 1944, 1955) and a textbook written by Mills A Modern Outline of Classification (1964), serves to reveal the deep intellectual heritage of the changes in classification theory over time, as well as Ranganathan's own influence on and debt to Sayers.
-
Connaway, L.S.; Sievert, M.C.: Comparison of three classification systems for information on health insurance (1996)
0.01
0.008121678 = product of:
0.016243355 = sum of:
0.016243355 = product of:
0.048730064 = sum of:
0.048730064 = weight(_text_:22 in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048730064 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15743706 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044958513 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 4.1997 21:10:19
-
Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006)
0.01
0.008121678 = product of:
0.016243355 = sum of:
0.016243355 = product of:
0.048730064 = sum of:
0.048730064 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048730064 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15743706 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044958513 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27. 5.2007 22:19:35
-
Lorenz, B.: Zur Theorie und Terminologie der bibliothekarischen Klassifikation (2018)
0.01
0.008121678 = product of:
0.016243355 = sum of:
0.016243355 = product of:
0.048730064 = sum of:
0.048730064 = weight(_text_:22 in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048730064 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15743706 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044958513 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.1-22
-
Zins, C.: Knowledge organization : an epistemological perspective (2004)
0.01
0.0078803245 = product of:
0.015760649 = sum of:
0.015760649 = product of:
0.047281947 = sum of:
0.047281947 = weight(_text_:c in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047281947 = score(doc=3074,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15508012 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044958513 = queryNorm
0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
