Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × classification_ss:"TWPN (SI)"
  1. Reichenberger, K.: Kompendium semantische Netze : Konzepte, Technologie, Modellierung (2010) 0.01
    0.008806191 = product of:
      0.017612383 = sum of:
        0.017612383 = product of:
          0.052837145 = sum of:
            0.052837145 = weight(_text_:x in 4413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052837145 = score(doc=4413,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18875335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04469987 = queryNorm
                0.27992693 = fieldWeight in 4413, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4413)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    X, 210 S
  2. Hitzler, P.; Krötzsch, M.; Rudolph, S.; Sure, Y.: Semantic Web : Grundlagen (2008) 0.01
    0.007338493 = product of:
      0.014676986 = sum of:
        0.014676986 = product of:
          0.044030957 = sum of:
            0.044030957 = weight(_text_:x in 358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044030957 = score(doc=358,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18875335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04469987 = queryNorm
                0.23327245 = fieldWeight in 358, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=358)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    X, 277 S
  3. Conner-Sax, K.; Krol, E.: ¬The whole Internet : the next generation (1999) 0.00
    0.004037477 = product of:
      0.008074954 = sum of:
        0.008074954 = product of:
          0.024224862 = sum of:
            0.024224862 = weight(_text_:22 in 1448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024224862 = score(doc=1448,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15653133 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04469987 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1448, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1448)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Internet Professionell. 2000, H.2, S.22
  4. Good tags - bad tags : Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation (2008) 0.00
    0.0036529861 = product of:
      0.0073059723 = sum of:
        0.0073059723 = product of:
          0.021917917 = sum of:
            0.021917917 = weight(_text_:b in 3054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021917917 = score(doc=3054,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15836994 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04469987 = queryNorm
                0.13839695 = fieldWeight in 3054, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3054)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Editor
    Gaiser, B. u.a.
    Footnote
    Der Band zeigt eindrucksvoll die Fülle der Anwendungsgebiete für Tagging-Systeme und die Vielfalt der Forschungsfragen, die sich daraus ergeben. Dabei bleiben eine Reihe von Desideraten bestehen, etwa zum tatsächlichen Sprachgebrauch in Tagging-Systemen, dem Zusammenhang zwischen Tagverwendung und Systemdesign oder der tatsächlichen Effektivität der tagbasierten Suche. Für die Bewertung z. B. der Retrievaleffektivität der Suche bei Flickr oder YouTube sind aber sicher auch neue Qualitätsmodelle der Inhaltsbewertung erforderlich, weil die Bewertungskriterien der Fachinformation dort nur bedingt greifen."

Languages

Types