Search (23 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Theorie verbaler Dokumentationssprachen"
  1. Krömmelbein, U.: Natürliche Sprache und Strukturprinzipien von Dokumentationssprachen : eine vergleichende Analyse (1981) 0.02 
    0.023483178 = product of:
  0.046966355 = sum of:
    0.046966355 = product of:
      0.14089906 = sum of:
        0.14089906 = weight(_text_:x in 1372) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14089906 = score(doc=1372,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18875335 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04469987 = queryNorm
            0.7464718 = fieldWeight in 1372, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1372)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    x
  2. Maille, B.: ¬Les relations sémantiques des thésaurus (1991) 0.02 
    0.016531529 = product of:
  0.033063058 = sum of:
    0.033063058 = product of:
      0.09918917 = sum of:
        0.09918917 = weight(_text_:b in 5525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09918917 = score(doc=5525,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15836994 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04469987 = queryNorm
            0.6263131 = fieldWeight in 5525, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5525)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  3. Krömmelbein, U.: linguistische und fachwissenschaftliche Gesichtspunkte. Eine vergleichende Untersuchung der Regeln für die Schlagwortvergabe der Deutschen Bibliothek, RSWK, Voll-PRECIS und Kurz-PRECIS : Schlagwort-Syntax (1983) 0.01 
    0.014676986 = product of:
  0.029353973 = sum of:
    0.029353973 = product of:
      0.088061914 = sum of:
        0.088061914 = weight(_text_:x in 2566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.088061914 = score(doc=2566,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18875335 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04469987 = queryNorm
            0.4665449 = fieldWeight in 2566, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2566)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    x
  4. Mooers, C.N.: ¬The indexing language of an information retrieval system (1985) 0.01 
    0.014298129 = product of:
  0.028596258 = sum of:
    0.028596258 = product of:
      0.042894386 = sum of:
        0.02169763 = weight(_text_:b in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02169763 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15836994 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04469987 = queryNorm
            0.13700598 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
        0.021196755 = weight(_text_:22 in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021196755 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15653133 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04469987 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Calvin Mooers' work toward the resolution of the problem of ambiguity in indexing went unrecognized for years. At the time he introduced the "descriptor" - a term with a very distinct meaning-indexers were, for the most part, taking index terms directly from the document, without either rationalizing them with context or normalizing them with some kind of classification. It is ironic that Mooers' term came to be attached to the popular but unsophisticated indexing methods which he was trying to root out. Simply expressed, what Mooers did was to take the dictionary definitions of terms and redefine them so clearly that they could not be used in any context except that provided by the new definition. He did, at great pains, construct such meanings for over four hundred words; disambiguation and specificity were sought after and found for these words. He proposed that all indexers adopt this method so that when the index supplied a term, it also supplied the exact meaning for that term as used in the indexed document. The same term used differently in another document would be defined differently and possibly renamed to avoid ambiguity. The disambiguation was achieved by using unabridged dictionaries and other sources of defining terminology. In practice, this tends to produce circularity in definition, that is, word A refers to word B which refers to word C which refers to word A. It was necessary, therefore, to break this chain by creating a new, definitive meaning for each word. Eventually, means such as those used by Austin (q.v.) for PRECIS achieved the same purpose, but by much more complex means than just creating a unique definition of each term. Mooers, however, was probably the first to realize how confusing undefined terminology could be. Early automatic indexers dealt with distinct disciplines and, as long as they did not stray beyond disciplinary boundaries, a quick and dirty keyword approach was satisfactory. The trouble came when attempts were made to make a combined index for two or more distinct disciplines. A number of processes have since been developed, mostly involving tagging of some kind or use of strings. Mooers' solution has rarely been considered seriously and probably would be extremely difficult to apply now because of so much interdisciplinarity. But for a specific, weIl defined field, it is still weIl worth considering. Mooers received training in mathematics and physics from the University of Minnesota and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He was the founder of Zator Company, which developed and marketed a coded card information retrieval system, and of Rockford Research, Inc., which engages in research in information science. He is the inventor of the TRAC computer language.
    Footnote
    Original in: Information retrieval today: papers presented at an Institute conducted by the Library School and the Center for Continuation Study, University of Minnesota, Sept. 19-22, 1962. Ed. by Wesley Simonton. Minneapolis, Minn.: The Center, 1963. S.21-36.
  5. Ruge, G.: ¬A spreading activation network for automatic generation of thesaurus relationships (1991) 0.01 
    0.01413117 = product of:
  0.02826234 = sum of:
    0.02826234 = product of:
      0.08478702 = sum of:
        0.08478702 = weight(_text_:22 in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08478702 = score(doc=4506,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15653133 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04469987 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    8.10.2000 11:52:22
  6. Neet, H.: Assoziationsrelationen in Dokumentationslexika für die verbale Sacherschließung (1984) 0.01 
    0.011741589 = product of:
  0.023483178 = sum of:
    0.023483178 = product of:
      0.07044953 = sum of:
        0.07044953 = weight(_text_:x in 1254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07044953 = score(doc=1254,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18875335 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04469987 = queryNorm
            0.3732359 = fieldWeight in 1254, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1254)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    x
  7. Mikacic, M.: Statistical system for subject designation (SSSD) for libraries in Croatia (1996) 0.01 
    0.01141971 = product of:
  0.02283942 = sum of:
    0.02283942 = product of:
      0.06851826 = sum of:
        0.06851826 = weight(_text_:22 in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06851826 = score(doc=2943,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15653133 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04469987 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    31. 7.2006 14:22:21
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.1, S.77-93
  8. Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2008) 0.01 
    0.01027389 = product of:
  0.02054778 = sum of:
    0.02054778 = product of:
      0.061643336 = sum of:
        0.061643336 = weight(_text_:x in 2461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061643336 = score(doc=2461,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18875335 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04469987 = queryNorm
            0.32658142 = fieldWeight in 2461, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2461)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    x
  9. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility (1996) 0.01 
    0.010093693 = product of:
  0.020187385 = sum of:
    0.020187385 = product of:
      0.060562156 = sum of:
        0.060562156 = weight(_text_:22 in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060562156 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15653133 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04469987 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.11-22
  10. Principles underlying subject heading languages (SHLs) (1999) 0.01 
    0.008806191 = product of:
  0.017612383 = sum of:
    0.017612383 = product of:
      0.052837145 = sum of:
        0.052837145 = weight(_text_:x in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052837145 = score(doc=1659,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18875335 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04469987 = queryNorm
            0.27992693 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    X,183
  11. Degez, D.: Compatibilité des langages d'indexation mariage, cohabitation ou fusion? : Quelques examples concrèts (1998) 0.01 
    0.007065585 = product of:
  0.01413117 = sum of:
    0.01413117 = product of:
      0.04239351 = sum of:
        0.04239351 = weight(_text_:22 in 2245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04239351 = score(doc=2245,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15653133 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04469987 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2245, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2245)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  12. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Thesaural relationships (2001) 0.01 
    0.007065585 = product of:
  0.01413117 = sum of:
    0.01413117 = product of:
      0.04239351 = sum of:
        0.04239351 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04239351 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15653133 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04469987 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:45:57
  13. Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2010) 0.01 
    0.007065585 = product of:
  0.01413117 = sum of:
    0.01413117 = product of:
      0.04239351 = sum of:
        0.04239351 = weight(_text_:22 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04239351 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15653133 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04469987 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  14. Fugmann, R.: ¬Die Funktion von semantischen Kategorien in Indexierungssprachen und bei der Indexierung (1986) 0.01 
    0.0061993236 = product of:
  0.012398647 = sum of:
    0.012398647 = product of:
      0.03719594 = sum of:
        0.03719594 = weight(_text_:b in 1554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03719594 = score(doc=1554,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15836994 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04469987 = queryNorm
            0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 1554, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1554)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Wenn man unter "Indexierung" den zweistufigen Prozeß (a) des Erkennens der Essenz eines wiederauffindbar zu machenden Textes und (b) des Wiedergebens dieser Essenz in einer ausreichend wiedergabetreuen und genügend gut voraussagbaren Form versteht, dann kann die Qualität der Indexierung gesteigert werden, wenn sie unter besonderer Beachtung der Begriffe aus einer kleinen Zahl von besonders wichtigen semantischen Kategorien erfolgt. Bei der Gestaltung der Indexierungssprache müssen die Begriffe aus diesen Kategorien in der erforderlichen Detailliertheit in den Wortschatz aufgenommen werden, und Präkombinationen, die zu "multikategorialen" Begroffen führen, sind möglichst weitgehend zu vermeiden. Präkombinationen, die ausschließlich durch Einbeziehung von häufig vorkommenden ("ubiquitätren") monokategorialen Begriffen gebildet werden, können und sollen aus pragmatischen Gründen für den Wortschatz zugelassen werden. Das Konzept des "Relationenweges" erklärt, inwiefern solche Präkombinationen für den Wortschatz nicht schädlich sind
  15. Maniez, J.: Fusion de banques de donnees documentaires at compatibilite des languages d'indexation (1997) 0.01 
    0.0060562156 = product of:
  0.012112431 = sum of:
    0.012112431 = product of:
      0.036337294 = sum of:
        0.036337294 = weight(_text_:22 in 2246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036337294 = score(doc=2246,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15653133 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04469987 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2246, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2246)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  16. Fugmann, R.: ¬The complementarity of natural and indexing languages (1985) 0.01 
    0.0058707944 = product of:
  0.011741589 = sum of:
    0.011741589 = product of:
      0.035224766 = sum of:
        0.035224766 = weight(_text_:x in 3641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035224766 = score(doc=3641,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18875335 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04469987 = queryNorm
            0.18661796 = fieldWeight in 3641, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3641)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The second Cranfield experiment (Cranfield II) in the mid-1960s challenged assumptions held by librarians for nearly a century, namely, that the objective of providing subject access was to bring together all materials an a given topic and that the achieving of this objective required vocabulary control in the form of an index language. The results of Cranfield II were replicated by other retrieval experiments quick to follow its lead and increasing support was given to the opinion that natural language information systems could perform at least as effectively, and certainly more economically, than those employing index languages. When the results of empirical research dramatically counter conventional wisdom, an obvious course is to question the validity of the research and, in the case of retrieval experiments, this eventually happened. Retrieval experiments were criticized for their artificiality, their unrepresentative sampies, and their problematic definitions-particularly the definition of relevance. In the minds of some, at least, the relative merits of natural languages vs. indexing languages continued to be an unresolved issue. As with many eitherlor options, a seemingly safe course to follow is to opt for "both," and indeed there seems to be an increasing amount of counsel advising a combination of natural language and index language search capabilities. One strong voice offering such counsel is that of Robert Fugmann, a chemist by training, a theoretician by predilection, and, currently, a practicing information scientist at Hoechst AG, Frankfurt/Main. This selection from his writings sheds light an the capabilities and limitations of both kinds of indexing. Its special significance lies in the fact that its arguments are based not an empirical but an rational grounds. Fugmann's major argument starts from the observation that in natural language there are essentially two different kinds of concepts: 1) individual concepts, repre sented by names of individual things (e.g., the name of the town Augsburg), and 2) general concepts represented by names of classes of things (e.g., pesticides). Individual concepts can be represented in language simply and succinctly, often by a single string of alphanumeric characters; general concepts, an the other hand, can be expressed in a multiplicity of ways. The word pesticides refers to the concept of pesticides, but also referring to this concept are numerous circumlocutions, such as "Substance X was effective against pests." Because natural language is capable of infinite variety, we cannot predict a priori the manifold ways a general concept, like pesticides, will be represented by any given author. It is this lack of predictability that limits natural language retrieval and causes poor precision and recall. Thus, the essential and defining characteristic of an index language ls that it is a tool for representational predictability.
  17. Compatibility and integration of order systems : Research Seminar Proceedings of the TIP/ISKO Meeting, Warsaw, 13-15 September 1995 (1996) 0.01 
    0.005166103 = product of:
  0.010332206 = sum of:
    0.010332206 = product of:
      0.030996617 = sum of:
        0.030996617 = weight(_text_:b in 6050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030996617 = score(doc=6050,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15836994 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04469987 = queryNorm
            0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 6050, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6050)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: SCHMITZ-ESSER, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility; RIESTHUIS, G.: Theory of compatibility of information languages; DAHLBERG, I.: The compatibility guidelines - a re-evaluation; SOERGEL, D.: Data structure and software support for integrated thesauri; MURASZKIEWICZ, M., H. RYBINSKI u. W. STRUK: Software problems of merging multilingual thesauri; CHMIELEWSKA-GORCZYCA, E.: Compatibility of indexing tools in multidatabase environment; NEGRINI, G.: Towards structural compatibility between concept systems; SCIBOR, E.: Some remarks on the establishment of concordances between a universal classification system and an interdisciplinary thesaurus; HOPPE, S.: The UMLS - a model for knowledge integration in a subject field; DEXTRE-CLARKE, S.: Integrating thesauri in the agricultural sciences; ROULIN, C.: Bringing multilingual thesauri together: a feasibility study; ZIMMERMANN, H.: Conception and application possibilities of classification concordances in an OPAC environment; SOSINSKA-KALATA, B.: The Universal Decimal Classification as an international standard for knowledge organization in bibliographic databases and library catalogues; WOZNIAK, J. u. T. GLOWACKA: KABA Subject Authority File - an example of an integrated Polish-French-English subject headings system; BABIK, W.: Terminology as a level for the compatibility of indexing languages - some remarks; STANCIKOVA, P.: International integrated database systems linked to multilingual thesauri covering the field of environment and agriculture; SAMEK, T.: Indexing languages integration and the EUROVOC Thesaurus in the Czech Republic; SIWEK, K.: Compatibility discrepancies between Polish and foreign databases; GLINSKI, W. u. M. MURASZKIEWICZ: An intelligent front-end processor for accessing information systems
  18. Relationships in the organization of knowledge (2001) 0.01 
    0.005166103 = product of:
  0.010332206 = sum of:
    0.010332206 = product of:
      0.030996617 = sum of:
        0.030996617 = weight(_text_:b in 1139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030996617 = score(doc=1139,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15836994 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04469987 = queryNorm
            0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 1139, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1139)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: GREEN, R.: Relationships in the organization of knowledge: an overview; TILLETT, B.: Bibliographic relationships; CLARKE, S.G.D.: Thesaural relationships; MILSTEAD, J.L.: Standards for relationships between subject indexing terms; HUDON, M.: Relationships in multilingual thesauri; BODENREIDER, O. u. C.A. BEAN: Relationships among knowledge structures: vocabulary integration within a subject domain; BEGHTOL, C.: Relationships in classificatory structure and meaning; BEAN, C.A. u. R. GREEN: Relevance relationships; EL-HOSHY, L.M.: Relationships in Library of Congress Subject Headings; MOLHOLT, P.: The Art and Architecture Thesaurus: controlling relationships through rules and structure; NELSON, S.J. u.a.: Relationships in Medical Subject Headings (MeSH); NEELAMEGHAN, A.: Lateral relationships in multicultural, mulrilingual databases in the spiritual and religous domains: the OM information service; SATIJA, M.P.: Relationships in Ranganathan's Colon classification; MITCHELL, J.S.: Relationships in the Dewey Decimal Classification System
  19. ¬The semantics of relationships : an interdisciplinary perspective (2002) 0.01 
    0.005166103 = product of:
  0.010332206 = sum of:
    0.010332206 = product of:
      0.030996617 = sum of:
        0.030996617 = weight(_text_:b in 1430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030996617 = score(doc=1430,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15836994 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04469987 = queryNorm
            0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 1430, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1430)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: Pt.1: Types of relationships: CRUDE, D.A.: Hyponymy and its varieties; FELLBAUM, C.: On the semantics of troponymy; PRIBBENOW, S.: Meronymic relationships: from classical mereology to complex part-whole relations; KHOO, C. u.a.: The many facets of cause-effect relation - Pt.2: Relationships in knowledge representation and reasoning: GREEN, R.: Internally-structured conceptual models in cognitive semantics; HOVY, E.: Comparing sets of semantic relations in ontologies; GUARINO, N., C. WELTY: Identity and subsumption; JOUIS; C.: Logic of relationships - Pt.3: Applications of relationships: EVENS, M.: Thesaural relations in information retrieval; KHOO, C., S.H. MYAENG: Identifying semantic relations in text for information retrieval and information extraction; McCRAY, A.T., O. BODENREICHER: A conceptual framework for the biiomedical domain; HETZLER, B.: Visual analysis and exploration of relationships
  20. Mazzocchi, F.; Tiberi, M.; De Santis, B.; Plini, P.: Relational semantics in thesauri : an overview and some remarks at theoretical and practical levels (2007) 0.01 
    0.005166103 = product of:
  0.010332206 = sum of:
    0.010332206 = product of:
      0.030996617 = sum of:
        0.030996617 = weight(_text_:b in 1462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030996617 = score(doc=1462,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15836994 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04469987 = queryNorm
            0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 1462, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1462)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications