Search (5893 results, page 1 of 295)

0.0882881 = product of:
  0.13243215 = sum of:
    0.12804727 = product of:
      0.25609455 = sum of:
        0.25609455 = weight(_text_:lopes in 4917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25609455 = score(doc=4917,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35332254 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04308612 = queryNorm
            0.724818 = fieldWeight in 4917, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4917)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.004384873 = product of:
      0.008769746 = sum of:
        0.008769746 = weight(_text_:a in 4917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008769746 = score(doc=4917,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04968032 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04308612 = queryNorm
            0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 4917, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4917)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Source

Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei

Type

a

0.08775167 = product of:
  0.1316275 = sum of:
    0.12804727 = product of:
      0.25609455 = sum of:
        0.25609455 = weight(_text_:lopes in 4783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25609455 = score(doc=4783,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35332254 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04308612 = queryNorm
            0.724818 = fieldWeight in 4783, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4783)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0035802338 = product of:
      0.0071604676 = sum of:
        0.0071604676 = weight(_text_:a in 4783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0071604676 = score(doc=4783,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04968032 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04308612 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 4783, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4783)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Type

a

0.08705258 = product of:
  0.13057888 = sum of:
    0.12804727 = product of:
      0.25609455 = sum of:
        0.25609455 = weight(_text_:lopes in 4757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25609455 = score(doc=4757,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35332254 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04308612 = queryNorm
            0.724818 = fieldWeight in 4757, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4757)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0025316074 = product of:
      0.005063215 = sum of:
        0.005063215 = weight(_text_:a in 4757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005063215 = score(doc=4757,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04968032 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04308612 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 4757, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4757)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Type

a

0.08705258 = product of:
  0.13057888 = sum of:
    0.12804727 = product of:
      0.25609455 = sum of:
        0.25609455 = weight(_text_:lopes in 4759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25609455 = score(doc=4759,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35332254 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04308612 = queryNorm
            0.724818 = fieldWeight in 4759, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4759)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0025316074 = product of:
      0.005063215 = sum of:
        0.005063215 = weight(_text_:a in 4759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005063215 = score(doc=4759,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04968032 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04308612 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 4759, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4759)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Type

a

0.0767827 = product of:
  0.115174055 = sum of:
    0.112041354 = product of:
      0.22408271 = sum of:
        0.22408271 = weight(_text_:lopes in 5909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22408271 = score(doc=5909,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35332254 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04308612 = queryNorm
            0.6342157 = fieldWeight in 5909, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5909)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0031327046 = product of:
      0.0062654093 = sum of:
        0.0062654093 = weight(_text_:a in 5909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0062654093 = score(doc=5909,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04968032 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04308612 = queryNorm
            0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 5909, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5909)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Type

a

0.06655525 = product of:
  0.09983286 = sum of:
    0.09603545 = product of:
      0.1920709 = sum of:
        0.1920709 = weight(_text_:lopes in 2917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1920709 = score(doc=2917,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35332254 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04308612 = queryNorm
            0.5436135 = fieldWeight in 2917, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2917)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0037974115 = product of:
      0.007594823 = sum of:
        0.007594823 = weight(_text_:a in 2917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007594823 = score(doc=2917,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.04968032 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04308612 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 2917, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2917)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Research data on indexing policies in Brazilian and Portuguese school libraries are presented and discussed. Legal and organizational contexts regarding these types of libraries are briefly described. The collection of empirical data was obtained by means of an inquiry that resulted in 150 questionnaires from Brazil and 406 from Portugal. Based on these samples, a generic identification of school libraries was carried out in terms of teaching levels and institutional/geographical integration. The existence of a catalog in the libraries was also determined. The use of the two main kinds of indexing languages (classification systems and verbal indexing languages) were identified as well as the existence of manuals designed to guide indexing procedures. References are made to aspects related to the specificity and the number of terms/subjects selected for each document and the use of indexing norms by comparing both Brazilian and Portuguese realities.

Type

a

0.06581375 = product of:
  0.098720625 = sum of:
    0.09603545 = product of:
      0.1920709 = sum of:
        0.1920709 = weight(_text_:lopes in 2826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1920709 = score(doc=2826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35332254 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04308612 = queryNorm
            0.5436135 = fieldWeight in 2826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2826)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0026851753 = product of:
      0.0053703506 = sum of:
        0.0053703506 = weight(_text_:a in 2826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0053703506 = score(doc=2826,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04968032 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04308612 = queryNorm
            0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 2826, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2826)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

This paper is aimed at assessing the potential of interoperable knowledge organization systems to respond to search strategies in order to retrieve information from databases in the areas of health and biomedicine. An analysis was done on the semantic consistency of synonym grouping of a term selected from the Metathesaurus, the Unified Medical Language System of the National Library of Medicine, based on the characteristics of equivalence proposed in ISO 25964: 2: 2011 and based on the following categories: semantic, morphological, syntactic and typographical variations. This paper highlights the importance of understanding the results of automatic mapping as well as the need for characterization, evaluation and selection of equivalences for preparation of consistent search strategies and presentation of search results in scientific work methodologies.

Type

a

0.05614386 = product of:
  0.08421579 = sum of:
    0.08002954 = product of:
      0.16005908 = sum of:
        0.16005908 = weight(_text_:lopes in 739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16005908 = score(doc=739,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35332254 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04308612 = queryNorm
            0.45301124 = fieldWeight in 739, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=739)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0041862526 = product of:
      0.008372505 = sum of:
        0.008372505 = weight(_text_:a in 739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008372505 = score(doc=739,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.04968032 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04308612 = queryNorm
            0.1685276 = fieldWeight in 739, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=739)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

English is by far the most used language on the web. In some domains, the existence of less content in the users' native language may not be problematic and even help to cope with the information overload. Yet, in domains such as health, where information quality is critical, a larger quantity of information may mean easier access to higher quality content. Query translation may be a good strategy to access content in other languages, but the presence of medical terms in health queries makes the translation process more difficult, even for users with very good language proficiencies. In this study, we evaluate how translating a health query affects users with different language proficiencies. We chose English as the non-native language because it is a widely spoken language and it is the most used language on the web. Our findings suggest that non-English-speaking users having at least elementary English proficiency can benefit from a system that suggests English alternatives for their queries, or automatically retrieves English content from a non-English query. This awareness of the user profile results in higher precision, more accurate medical knowledge, and better access to high-quality content. Moreover, the suggestions of English-translated queries may also trigger new health search strategies.

Type

a

0.05593684 = product of:
  0.08390526 = sum of:
    0.08002954 = product of:
      0.16005908 = sum of:
        0.16005908 = weight(_text_:lopes in 4307) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16005908 = score(doc=4307,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35332254 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04308612 = queryNorm
            0.45301124 = fieldWeight in 4307, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4307)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0038757168 = product of:
      0.0077514336 = sum of:
        0.0077514336 = weight(_text_:a in 4307) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0077514336 = score(doc=4307,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.04968032 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04308612 = queryNorm
            0.15602624 = fieldWeight in 4307, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4307)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

The construction and updating of indexing languages depend on the organization of their hierarchical structures in order to determine the classification of related terms and, above all, to allow a constant updating of vocabulary, a condition for knowledge evolution. The elaboration of an indexing language for online catalogs of libraries' networks is important considering the diversity and specificity of knowledge areas. From this perspective, the present paper reports on the work of a team of catalogers and researchers engaged in the construction of a hierarchical structure of an indexing language for an online catalog of a university library's network. The work on hierarchical structures began by defining the categories and subcategories that form the indexing language macrostructure by using the parameters of the Library of Congress Subject Headings , the National Library Terminology and the Vocabulary of the University of São Paulo Library's system. Throughout the stages of the elaboration process of the macrostructure, difficulties and improvements were observed and discussed. The results enabled the assessment of the hierarchical structures of the languages used in the organization of the superordinate and subordinate terms, which has contributed to the systematization of operational procedures contained in an indexing language manual for online catalogs of libraries.

Type

a

0.055711713 = product of:
  0.08356757 = sum of:
    0.08002954 = product of:
      0.16005908 = sum of:
        0.16005908 = weight(_text_:lopes in 1069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16005908 = score(doc=1069,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35332254 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04308612 = queryNorm
            0.45301124 = fieldWeight in 1069, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1069)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0035380293 = product of:
      0.0070760585 = sum of:
        0.0070760585 = weight(_text_:a in 1069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0070760585 = score(doc=1069,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.04968032 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04308612 = queryNorm
            0.14243183 = fieldWeight in 1069, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1069)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

The semiotics of C. S. Peirce presents fundamental concepts to discover aspects of the indexing process, including representation and classes of signs. However, we still know little of its theoretical potential for subject indexing. We believe that the main difficulty in the proposals to understand the process of subject indexing based on Peircean semiotics stems from an incomplete interpretation of his semiotic system. This paper attempts to describe the contributions of Peircean semiotics to subject indexing. First, we analyze some of the concepts of the branches of semiotics, after which, we discuss strategies for conceptual approximation. Secondly, and aiming to raise the level of interlocution between the areas, we intend to argue that subject indexing is an inferential process, as explained by the second branch of semiotics. Thus, we seek to go beyond the level of speculative grammar, the first branch of semiotics, to forge a closer link with pure or critical logic, the second branch. We conclude that the indexer's work does not produce a mere reflection of what already exists in documents, but involves an instigating action to discover, through the inferential matrix, the meaning of a text in order to find the subject and the most a ppropriate subject added entry to the information system.

Type

a

0.0554627 = product of:
  0.08319405 = sum of:
    0.08002954 = product of:
      0.16005908 = sum of:
        0.16005908 = weight(_text_:lopes in 1302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16005908 = score(doc=1302,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35332254 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04308612 = queryNorm
            0.45301124 = fieldWeight in 1302, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1302)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0031645093 = product of:
      0.0063290186 = sum of:
        0.0063290186 = weight(_text_:a in 1302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0063290186 = score(doc=1302,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.04968032 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04308612 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 1302, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1302)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

The Brazilian Lattes Platform is an important academic/résumé data set that registers all academic activities of researchers associated with different major knowledge areas. The academic information collected in this data set is used to evaluate, analyze, and document the scientific production of research groups. Information about the interactions between Brazilian researchers in the form of coauthorships, however, has not been analyzed. In this article, we identified and characterized Brazilian academic coauthorship networks of researchers registered in the Lattes Platform using topological properties of graphs. For this purpose, we explored (a) strategies to develop a large Lattes curricula vitae data set, (b) an algorithm for identifying automatic coauthorships based on bibliographic information, and (c) topological metrics to investigate interactions among researchers. This study characterized coauthorship networks to gain an in-depth understanding of the network structures and dynamics (social behavior) among researchers in all available major Brazilian knowledge areas. In this study, we evaluated information from a total of 1,131,912 researchers associated with the eight major Brazilian knowledge areas: agricultural sciences; biological sciences; exact and earth sciences; humanities; applied social sciences; health sciences; engineering; and linguistics, letters, and arts.

Type

a

0.055180058 = product of:
  0.08277009 = sum of:
    0.08002954 = product of:
      0.16005908 = sum of:
        0.16005908 = weight(_text_:lopes in 3783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16005908 = score(doc=3783,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35332254 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04308612 = queryNorm
            0.45301124 = fieldWeight in 3783, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3783)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0027405457 = product of:
      0.0054810913 = sum of:
        0.0054810913 = weight(_text_:a in 3783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0054810913 = score(doc=3783,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04968032 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04308612 = queryNorm
            0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 3783, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3783)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Searching for health information is one of the most popular activities on the web. In this domain, users often misspell or lack knowledge of the proper medical terms to use in queries. To overcome these difficulties and attempt to retrieve higher-quality content, we developed a query suggestion system that provides alternative queries combining the Portuguese or English language with lay or medico-scientific terminology. Here we evaluate this system's impact on the medical accuracy of the knowledge acquired during the search. Evaluation shows that simply providing these suggestions contributes to reduce the quantity of incorrect content. This indicates that even when suggestions are not clicked, they are useful either for subsequent queries' formulation or for interpreting search results. Clicking on suggestions, regardless of type, leads to answers with more correct content. An analysis by type of suggestion and user characteristics showed that the benefits of certain languages and terminologies are more perceptible in users with certain levels of English proficiency and health literacy. This suggests a personalization of this suggestion system toward these characteristics. Overall, the effect of language is more preponderant than the effect of terminology. Clicks on English suggestions are clearly preferable to clicks on Portuguese ones.

Type

a

0.050185375 = product of:
  0.07527806 = sum of:
    0.06843218 = product of:
      0.20529653 = sum of:
        0.20529653 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20529653 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3652846 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04308612 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.0068458803 = product of:
      0.013691761 = sum of:
        0.013691761 = weight(_text_:a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013691761 = score(doc=400,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.04968032 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04308612 = queryNorm
            0.27559727 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

On a scientific concept hierarchy, a parent concept may have a few attributes, each of which has multiple values being a group of child concepts. We call these attributes facets: classification has a few facets such as application (e.g., face recognition), model (e.g., svm, knn), and metric (e.g., precision). In this work, we aim at building faceted concept hierarchies from scientific literature. Hierarchy construction methods heavily rely on hypernym detection, however, the faceted relations are parent-to-child links but the hypernym relation is a multi-hop, i.e., ancestor-to-descendent link with a specific facet "type-of". We use information extraction techniques to find synonyms, sibling concepts, and ancestor-descendent relations from a data science corpus. And we propose a hierarchy growth algorithm to infer the parent-child links from the three types of relationships. It resolves conflicts by maintaining the acyclic structure of a hierarchy.

Content

Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.

Type

a

0.047411572 = product of:
  0.07111736 = sum of:
    0.06843218 = product of:
      0.20529653 = sum of:
        0.20529653 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20529653 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3652846 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04308612 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.0026851753 = product of:
      0.0053703506 = sum of:
        0.0053703506 = weight(_text_:a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0053703506 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04968032 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04308612 = queryNorm
            0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Footnote

https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.

Location

A

Type

a

0.045621455 = product of:
  0.13686436 = sum of:
    0.13686436 = product of:
      0.41059306 = sum of:
        0.41059306 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.41059306 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3652846 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04308612 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.

0.041671943 = product of:
  0.06250791 = sum of:
    0.05702682 = product of:
      0.17108046 = sum of:
        0.17108046 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17108046 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3652846 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04308612 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.0054810913 = product of:
      0.010962183 = sum of:
        0.010962183 = weight(_text_:a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010962183 = score(doc=4997,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.04968032 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04308612 = queryNorm
            0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

While classifications are heavily used to categorize web content, the evolution of the web foresees a more formal structure - ontology - which can serve this purpose. Ontologies are core artifacts of the Semantic Web which enable machines to use inference rules to conduct automated reasoning on data. Lightweight ontologies bridge the gap between classifications and ontologies. A lightweight ontology (LO) is an ontology representing a backbone taxonomy where the concept of the child node is more specific than the concept of the parent node. Formal lightweight ontologies can be generated from their informal ones. The key applications of formal lightweight ontologies are document classification, semantic search, and data integration. However, these applications suffer from the following problems: the disambiguation accuracy of the state of the art NLP tools used in generating formal lightweight ontologies from their informal ones; the lack of background knowledge needed for the formal lightweight ontologies; and the limitation of ontology reuse. In this dissertation, we propose a novel solution to these problems in formal lightweight ontologies; namely, faceted lightweight ontology (FLO). FLO is a lightweight ontology in which terms, present in each node label, and their concepts, are available in the background knowledge (BK), which is organized as a set of facets. A facet can be defined as a distinctive property of the groups of concepts that can help in differentiating one group from another. Background knowledge can be defined as a subset of a knowledge base, such as WordNet, and often represents a specific domain.

Content

PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.

0.040601693 = product of:
  0.060902536 = sum of:
    0.05702682 = product of:
      0.17108046 = sum of:
        0.17108046 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17108046 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3652846 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04308612 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.0038757168 = product of:
      0.0077514336 = sum of:
        0.0077514336 = weight(_text_:a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0077514336 = score(doc=855,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.04968032 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04308612 = queryNorm
            0.15602624 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Converting UDC numbers manually to a complex format such as the one mentioned above is an unrealistic expectation; supporting building these representations, as far as possible automatically, is a well-founded requirement. An additional advantage of this approach is that the existing records could also be processed and converted. In my dissertation I would like to prove also that it is possible to design and implement an algorithm that is able to convert pre-coordinated UDC numbers into the introduced format by identifying all their elements and revealing their whole syntactic structure as well. In my dissertation I will discuss a feasible way of building a UDC-specific XML schema for describing the most detailed and complicated UDC numbers (containing not only the common auxiliary signs and numbers, but also the different types of special auxiliaries). The schema definition is available online at: http://piros.udc-interpreter.hu#xsd. The primary goal of my research is to prove that it is possible to support building, retrieving, and analyzing UDC numbers without compromises, by taking the whole syntactic richness of the scheme by storing the UDC numbers reserving the meaning of pre-coordination. The research has also included the implementation of a software that parses UDC classmarks attended to prove that such solution can be applied automatically without any additional effort or even retrospectively on existing collections.

Content

Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>

0.03801788 = product of:
  0.11405364 = sum of:
    0.11405364 = product of:
      0.3421609 = sum of:
        0.3421609 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3421609 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3652846 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04308612 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja

0.03308285 = product of:
  0.049624275 = sum of:
    0.04562145 = product of:
      0.13686435 = sum of:
        0.13686435 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13686435 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3652846 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04308612 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.004002823 = product of:
      0.008005646 = sum of:
        0.008005646 = weight(_text_:a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008005646 = score(doc=5820,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.04968032 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04308612 = queryNorm
            0.16114321 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

The successes of information retrieval (IR) in recent decades were built upon bag-of-words representations. Effective as it is, bag-of-words is only a shallow text understanding; there is a limited amount of information for document ranking in the word space. This dissertation goes beyond words and builds knowledge based text representations, which embed the external and carefully curated information from knowledge bases, and provide richer and structured evidence for more advanced information retrieval systems. This thesis research first builds query representations with entities associated with the query. Entities' descriptions are used by query expansion techniques that enrich the query with explanation terms. Then we present a general framework that represents a query with entities that appear in the query, are retrieved by the query, or frequently show up in the top retrieved documents. A latent space model is developed to jointly learn the connections from query to entities and the ranking of documents, modeling the external evidence from knowledge bases and internal ranking features cooperatively. To further improve the quality of relevant entities, a defining factor of our query representations, we introduce learning to rank to entity search and retrieve better entities from knowledge bases. In the document representation part, this thesis research also moves one step forward with a bag-of-entities model, in which documents are represented by their automatic entity annotations, and the ranking is performed in the entity space.
This proposal includes plans to improve the quality of relevant entities with a co-learning framework that learns from both entity labels and document labels. We also plan to develop a hybrid ranking system that combines word based and entity based representations together with their uncertainties considered. At last, we plan to enrich the text representations with connections between entities. We propose several ways to infer entity graph representations for texts, and to rank documents using their structure representations. This dissertation overcomes the limitation of word based representations with external and carefully curated information from knowledge bases. We believe this thesis research is a solid start towards the new generation of intelligent, semantic, and structured information retrieval.

Content

Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.

0.030195555 = product of:
  0.09058666 = sum of:
    0.09058666 = sum of:
      0.008860626 = weight(_text_:a in 4347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.008860626 = score(doc=4347,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.04968032 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04308612 = queryNorm
          0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4347, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4347)
      0.08172604 = weight(_text_:22 in 4347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08172604 = score(doc=4347,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15088025 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04308612 = queryNorm
          0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4347, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4347)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

22. 3.2013 16:18:36

Type

a