Search (38331 results, page 2 of 1917)

  1. Simões, M. da Graça; Machado, L.M.; Souza, R.R.; Almeida, M.B.; Tavares Lopes, A.: Automatic indexing and ontologies : the consistency of research chronology and authoring in the context of Information Science (2018) 0.08
    0.0767827 = product of:
      0.115174055 = sum of:
        0.112041354 = product of:
          0.22408271 = sum of:
            0.22408271 = weight(_text_:lopes in 5909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22408271 = score(doc=5909,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35332254 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04308612 = queryNorm
                0.6342157 = fieldWeight in 5909, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5909)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0031327046 = product of:
          0.0062654093 = sum of:
            0.0062654093 = weight(_text_:a in 5909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0062654093 = score(doc=5909,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.04968032 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04308612 = queryNorm
                0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 5909, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5909)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Type
    a
  2. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.07
    0.074034974 = product of:
      0.11105245 = sum of:
        0.06843218 = product of:
          0.20529653 = sum of:
            0.20529653 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20529653 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3652846 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04308612 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.042620268 = sum of:
          0.007594823 = weight(_text_:a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.007594823 = score(doc=562,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.04968032 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04308612 = queryNorm
              0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.035025444 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035025444 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15088025 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04308612 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Document representations for text classification are typically based on the classical Bag-Of-Words paradigm. This approach comes with deficiencies that motivate the integration of features on a higher semantic level than single words. In this paper we propose an enhancement of the classical document representation through concepts extracted from background knowledge. Boosting is used for actual classification. Experimental evaluations on two well known text corpora support our approach through consistent improvement of the results.
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
    Type
    a
  3. Terra, A.L.; Spotti Lopes Fujita, M.; Agustín Lacruz, M.C.: Indexing policies in Brazilian and Portuguese school libraries : a comparative analysis (2016) 0.07
    0.06655525 = product of:
      0.09983286 = sum of:
        0.09603545 = product of:
          0.1920709 = sum of:
            0.1920709 = weight(_text_:lopes in 2917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1920709 = score(doc=2917,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35332254 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04308612 = queryNorm
                0.5436135 = fieldWeight in 2917, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2917)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0037974115 = product of:
          0.007594823 = sum of:
            0.007594823 = weight(_text_:a in 2917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007594823 = score(doc=2917,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.04968032 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04308612 = queryNorm
                0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 2917, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2917)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Research data on indexing policies in Brazilian and Portuguese school libraries are presented and discussed. Legal and organizational contexts regarding these types of libraries are briefly described. The collection of empirical data was obtained by means of an inquiry that resulted in 150 questionnaires from Brazil and 406 from Portugal. Based on these samples, a generic identification of school libraries was carried out in terms of teaching levels and institutional/geographical integration. The existence of a catalog in the libraries was also determined. The use of the two main kinds of indexing languages (classification systems and verbal indexing languages) were identified as well as the existence of manuals designed to guide indexing procedures. References are made to aspects related to the specificity and the number of terms/subjects selected for each document and the use of indexing norms by comparing both Brazilian and Portuguese realities.
    Type
    a
  4. Marques Redigolo, F.; Lopes Fujita, M.S.; Gil-Leiva, I.: Guidelines for subject analysis in subject cataloging (2022) 0.07
    0.066216074 = product of:
      0.09932411 = sum of:
        0.09603545 = product of:
          0.1920709 = sum of:
            0.1920709 = weight(_text_:lopes in 736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1920709 = score(doc=736,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35332254 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04308612 = queryNorm
                0.5436135 = fieldWeight in 736, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=736)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0032886548 = product of:
          0.0065773097 = sum of:
            0.0065773097 = weight(_text_:a in 736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0065773097 = score(doc=736,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.04968032 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04308612 = queryNorm
                0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 736, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=736)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The representation of information in subject cataloging as a result of subject analysis will depend on the cataloger's prior knowledge, influenced by subjectivity. The subject analysis in cataloging is a central theme of this investigation with the aim to elaborate guidelines for subject analysis in cataloging. For this purpose, how books are cataloged in university libraries has been verified. The Individual Verbal Protocol was applied with catalogers from Brazilian and Spanish University Libraries. Directions for the elements and variables of the subject analysis and procedures for good development were obtained to constitute the Guidelines of Subject Analysis in Cataloging. It is concluded that the guidelines formed by four sections are indicated for incorporation in subject cataloging procedure manuals for the purpose of improving the levels of representation and information retrieval results.
    Type
    a
  5. Andrade, J. de; Lopes Ginez de Lara, M.: Interoperability and mapping between knowledge organization systems : metathesaurus - Unified Medical Language System of the National Library of Medicine (2016) 0.07
    0.06581375 = product of:
      0.098720625 = sum of:
        0.09603545 = product of:
          0.1920709 = sum of:
            0.1920709 = weight(_text_:lopes in 2826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1920709 = score(doc=2826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35332254 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04308612 = queryNorm
                0.5436135 = fieldWeight in 2826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2826)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0026851753 = product of:
          0.0053703506 = sum of:
            0.0053703506 = weight(_text_:a in 2826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0053703506 = score(doc=2826,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.04968032 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04308612 = queryNorm
                0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 2826, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2826)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper is aimed at assessing the potential of interoperable knowledge organization systems to respond to search strategies in order to retrieve information from databases in the areas of health and biomedicine. An analysis was done on the semantic consistency of synonym grouping of a term selected from the Metathesaurus, the Unified Medical Language System of the National Library of Medicine, based on the characteristics of equivalence proposed in ISO 25964: 2: 2011 and based on the following categories: semantic, morphological, syntactic and typographical variations. This paper highlights the importance of understanding the results of automatic mapping as well as the need for characterization, evaluation and selection of equivalences for preparation of consistent search strategies and presentation of search results in scientific work methodologies.
    Type
    a
  6. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.06
    0.0646025 = product of:
      0.09690375 = sum of:
        0.0912429 = product of:
          0.2737287 = sum of:
            0.2737287 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2737287 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3652846 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04308612 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.005660847 = product of:
          0.011321694 = sum of:
            0.011321694 = weight(_text_:a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011321694 = score(doc=230,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.04968032 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04308612 = queryNorm
                0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    In this lecture I intend to challenge those who uphold a monist or even a dualist view of the universe; and I will propose, instead, a pluralist view. I will propose a view of the universe that recognizes at least three different but interacting sub-universes.
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
    Type
    a
  7. Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008) 0.06
    0.06251635 = product of:
      0.09377451 = sum of:
        0.0912429 = product of:
          0.2737287 = sum of:
            0.2737287 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2737287 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3652846 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04308612 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.0025316074 = product of:
          0.005063215 = sum of:
            0.005063215 = weight(_text_:a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.005063215 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04968032 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04308612 = queryNorm
                0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
    Type
    a
  8. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.06
    0.056178577 = product of:
      0.08426786 = sum of:
        0.079837546 = product of:
          0.23951264 = sum of:
            0.23951264 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.23951264 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3652846 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04308612 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.004430313 = product of:
          0.008860626 = sum of:
            0.008860626 = weight(_text_:a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008860626 = score(doc=306,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.04968032 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04308612 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Although service-oriented architectures go a long way toward providing interoperability in distributed, heterogeneous environments, managing semantic differences in such environments remains a challenge. We give an overview of the issue of semantic interoperability (integration), provide a semantic characterization of services, and discuss the role of ontologies. Then we analyze four basic models of semantic interoperability that differ in respect to their mapping between service descriptions and ontologies and in respect to where the evaluation of the integration logic is performed. We also provide some guidelines for selecting one of the possible interoperability models.
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
    Type
    a
  9. Teixera Lopes, C.; Ribeiro, C.: Measuring the value of health query translation : An analysis by user language proficiency (2013) 0.06
    0.05614386 = product of:
      0.08421579 = sum of:
        0.08002954 = product of:
          0.16005908 = sum of:
            0.16005908 = weight(_text_:lopes in 739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16005908 = score(doc=739,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35332254 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04308612 = queryNorm
                0.45301124 = fieldWeight in 739, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=739)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0041862526 = product of:
          0.008372505 = sum of:
            0.008372505 = weight(_text_:a in 739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008372505 = score(doc=739,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.04968032 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04308612 = queryNorm
                0.1685276 = fieldWeight in 739, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=739)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    English is by far the most used language on the web. In some domains, the existence of less content in the users' native language may not be problematic and even help to cope with the information overload. Yet, in domains such as health, where information quality is critical, a larger quantity of information may mean easier access to higher quality content. Query translation may be a good strategy to access content in other languages, but the presence of medical terms in health queries makes the translation process more difficult, even for users with very good language proficiencies. In this study, we evaluate how translating a health query affects users with different language proficiencies. We chose English as the non-native language because it is a widely spoken language and it is the most used language on the web. Our findings suggest that non-English-speaking users having at least elementary English proficiency can benefit from a system that suggests English alternatives for their queries, or automatically retrieves English content from a non-English query. This awareness of the user profile results in higher precision, more accurate medical knowledge, and better access to high-quality content. Moreover, the suggestions of English-translated queries may also trigger new health search strategies.
    Type
    a
  10. Lopes Martins, D.; Silva Lemos, D.L. da; Rosa de Oliveira, L.F.; Siqueira, J.; Carmo, D. do; Nunes Medeiros, V.: Information organization and representation in digital cultural heritage in Brazil : systematic mapping of information infrastructure in digital collections for data science applications (2023) 0.06
    0.05614386 = product of:
      0.08421579 = sum of:
        0.08002954 = product of:
          0.16005908 = sum of:
            0.16005908 = weight(_text_:lopes in 968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16005908 = score(doc=968,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35332254 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04308612 = queryNorm
                0.45301124 = fieldWeight in 968, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=968)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0041862526 = product of:
          0.008372505 = sum of:
            0.008372505 = weight(_text_:a in 968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008372505 = score(doc=968,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.04968032 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04308612 = queryNorm
                0.1685276 = fieldWeight in 968, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=968)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper focuses on data science in digital cultural heritage in Brazil, where there is a lack of systematized information and curated databases for the integrated organization of documentary knowledge. Thus, the aim was to systematically map the different forms of information organization and representation applied to objects from collections belonging to institutions affiliated with the federal government's Special Department of Culture. This diagnosis is then used to discuss the requirements of devising strategies that favor a better data science information infrastructure to reuse information on Brazil's cultural heritage. Content analysis was used to identify analytical categories and obtain a broader understanding of the documentary sources of these institutions in order to extract, analyze, and interpret the data involved. A total of 215 hyperlinks that can be considered cultural collections of the institutions studied were identified, representing 2,537,921 cultural heritage items. The results show that the online publication of Brazil's digital cultural heritage is limited in terms of technology, copyright licensing, and established information organization practices. This paper provides a conceptual and analytical view to discuss the requirements for formulating strategies aimed at building a data science information infrastructure of Brazilian digital cultural collections that serves as future projects.
    Type
    a
  11. Fujita, M.; Lopes, L.; Moreira, W.; Piovezan dos Santos, L.B.; Andrade e Cruz, M.C.; Rodrigues de Barros Ribas, R.: Construction and evaluation of hierarchical structures of indexing languages for online catalogs of libraries : an experience of the São Paulo State University (UNESP) (2018) 0.06
    0.05593684 = product of:
      0.08390526 = sum of:
        0.08002954 = product of:
          0.16005908 = sum of:
            0.16005908 = weight(_text_:lopes in 4307) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16005908 = score(doc=4307,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35332254 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04308612 = queryNorm
                0.45301124 = fieldWeight in 4307, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4307)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0038757168 = product of:
          0.0077514336 = sum of:
            0.0077514336 = weight(_text_:a in 4307) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0077514336 = score(doc=4307,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.04968032 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04308612 = queryNorm
                0.15602624 = fieldWeight in 4307, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4307)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The construction and updating of indexing languages depend on the organization of their hierarchical structures in order to determine the classification of related terms and, above all, to allow a constant updating of vocabulary, a condition for knowledge evolution. The elaboration of an indexing language for online catalogs of libraries' networks is important considering the diversity and specificity of knowledge areas. From this perspective, the present paper reports on the work of a team of catalogers and researchers engaged in the construction of a hierarchical structure of an indexing language for an online catalog of a university library's network. The work on hierarchical structures began by defining the categories and subcategories that form the indexing language macrostructure by using the parameters of the Library of Congress Subject Headings , the National Library Terminology and the Vocabulary of the University of São Paulo Library's system. Throughout the stages of the elaboration process of the macrostructure, difficulties and improvements were observed and discussed. The results enabled the assessment of the hierarchical structures of the languages used in the organization of the superordinate and subordinate terms, which has contributed to the systematization of operational procedures contained in an indexing language manual for online catalogs of libraries.
    Type
    a
  12. Almeida, C.C. de; Lopes Fujita, M.S.; Reis, D.M. dos: Peircean semiotics and subject indexing : contributions of speculative grammar and pure logic (2013) 0.06
    0.055711713 = product of:
      0.08356757 = sum of:
        0.08002954 = product of:
          0.16005908 = sum of:
            0.16005908 = weight(_text_:lopes in 1069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16005908 = score(doc=1069,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35332254 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04308612 = queryNorm
                0.45301124 = fieldWeight in 1069, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1069)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0035380293 = product of:
          0.0070760585 = sum of:
            0.0070760585 = weight(_text_:a in 1069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0070760585 = score(doc=1069,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.04968032 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04308612 = queryNorm
                0.14243183 = fieldWeight in 1069, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1069)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The semiotics of C. S. Peirce presents fundamental concepts to discover aspects of the indexing process, including representation and classes of signs. However, we still know little of its theoretical potential for subject indexing. We believe that the main difficulty in the proposals to understand the process of subject indexing based on Peircean semiotics stems from an incomplete interpretation of his semiotic system. This paper attempts to describe the contributions of Peircean semiotics to subject indexing. First, we analyze some of the concepts of the branches of semiotics, after which, we discuss strategies for conceptual approximation. Secondly, and aiming to raise the level of interlocution between the areas, we intend to argue that subject indexing is an inferential process, as explained by the second branch of semiotics. Thus, we seek to go beyond the level of speculative grammar, the first branch of semiotics, to forge a closer link with pure or critical logic, the second branch. We conclude that the indexer's work does not produce a mere reflection of what already exists in documents, but involves an instigating action to discover, through the inferential matrix, the meaning of a text in order to find the subject and the most a ppropriate subject added entry to the information system.
    Type
    a
  13. Mena-Chalco, J.P.; Digiampietri, L.A.; Fabrício Martins Lopes, F.; Marcondes Cesar Junior, R.: Brazilian bibliometric coauthorship networks (2014) 0.06
    0.0554627 = product of:
      0.08319405 = sum of:
        0.08002954 = product of:
          0.16005908 = sum of:
            0.16005908 = weight(_text_:lopes in 1302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16005908 = score(doc=1302,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35332254 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04308612 = queryNorm
                0.45301124 = fieldWeight in 1302, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1302)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0031645093 = product of:
          0.0063290186 = sum of:
            0.0063290186 = weight(_text_:a in 1302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0063290186 = score(doc=1302,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.04968032 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04308612 = queryNorm
                0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 1302, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1302)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The Brazilian Lattes Platform is an important academic/résumé data set that registers all academic activities of researchers associated with different major knowledge areas. The academic information collected in this data set is used to evaluate, analyze, and document the scientific production of research groups. Information about the interactions between Brazilian researchers in the form of coauthorships, however, has not been analyzed. In this article, we identified and characterized Brazilian academic coauthorship networks of researchers registered in the Lattes Platform using topological properties of graphs. For this purpose, we explored (a) strategies to develop a large Lattes curricula vitae data set, (b) an algorithm for identifying automatic coauthorships based on bibliographic information, and (c) topological metrics to investigate interactions among researchers. This study characterized coauthorship networks to gain an in-depth understanding of the network structures and dynamics (social behavior) among researchers in all available major Brazilian knowledge areas. In this study, we evaluated information from a total of 1,131,912 researchers associated with the eight major Brazilian knowledge areas: agricultural sciences; biological sciences; exact and earth sciences; humanities; applied social sciences; health sciences; engineering; and linguistics, letters, and arts.
    Type
    a
  14. Subject indexing : principles and practices in the 90's. Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting Held in Lisbon, Portugal, 17-18 August 1993, and sponsored by the IFLA Section on Classification and Indexing and the Instituto da Biblioteca Nacional e do Livro, Lisbon, Portugal (1995) 0.06
    0.055180058 = product of:
      0.08277009 = sum of:
        0.08002954 = product of:
          0.16005908 = sum of:
            0.16005908 = weight(_text_:lopes in 6042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16005908 = score(doc=6042,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35332254 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04308612 = queryNorm
                0.45301124 = fieldWeight in 6042, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6042)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0027405457 = product of:
          0.0054810913 = sum of:
            0.0054810913 = weight(_text_:a in 6042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0054810913 = score(doc=6042,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.04968032 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04308612 = queryNorm
                0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 6042, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6042)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Enthält folgende Beiträge: McGARRY, D.: Introduction; HOLLEY, R.P.: Editor's comments; DECOURT, E. u. S.M.G. PACHECO: Subject analysis in the Brazilian Library Network BIBLIODATA CALCO; PARENT, I.: Subject access to library materials in Canada: overview; SCHWEITZER, A.: Subject access to library materials in Canada: a balancing act between conformity and divergence; WILLER, M.: Subject access systems in use in Croatia; MASTROVIC, M.: Cataloguing graphics in the prints collection: National and University Library, Zagreb, Croatia; JOUGUELET, S.: Evolution of subject indexing practice in France; HEINER-FREILING, M.: Subject indexing in the nineties: the situation in Germany; SOLTANI, P.: Subject access in Iran; SADOWSKA, J.: Subject catalogues in Poland; LOPES, M.I.: Subject indexing in Portuguese libraries: a new approach with SIPORbase; CASTELLOTE, P.B.: Subject indexing at the National Library of Spain; McILWAINE, I.C.: Subject control: the British viewpoint; CHAN, L.M.: Subject access systems in the USA; FUGMANN, R.: The complementary of natural and controlled languages in indexing; SVENONIUS, E.: Precoordination or not?; REY, J.: International tendencies in terminology and indexing; WILLIAMSON, N.J.: Standards and standardization in subject analysis systems: current status and future directions: BEALL, J.: Summary
  15. Teixera Lopes, C.; Paiva, D.; Ribeiro, C.: Effects of language and terminology of query suggestions on medical accuracy considering different user characteristics (2017) 0.06
    0.055180058 = product of:
      0.08277009 = sum of:
        0.08002954 = product of:
          0.16005908 = sum of:
            0.16005908 = weight(_text_:lopes in 3783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16005908 = score(doc=3783,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35332254 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04308612 = queryNorm
                0.45301124 = fieldWeight in 3783, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3783)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0027405457 = product of:
          0.0054810913 = sum of:
            0.0054810913 = weight(_text_:a in 3783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0054810913 = score(doc=3783,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.04968032 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04308612 = queryNorm
                0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 3783, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3783)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Searching for health information is one of the most popular activities on the web. In this domain, users often misspell or lack knowledge of the proper medical terms to use in queries. To overcome these difficulties and attempt to retrieve higher-quality content, we developed a query suggestion system that provides alternative queries combining the Portuguese or English language with lay or medico-scientific terminology. Here we evaluate this system's impact on the medical accuracy of the knowledge acquired during the search. Evaluation shows that simply providing these suggestions contributes to reduce the quantity of incorrect content. This indicates that even when suggestions are not clicked, they are useful either for subsequent queries' formulation or for interpreting search results. Clicking on suggestions, regardless of type, leads to answers with more correct content. An analysis by type of suggestion and user characteristics showed that the benefits of certain languages and terminologies are more perceptible in users with certain levels of English proficiency and health literacy. This suggests a personalization of this suggestion system toward these characteristics. Overall, the effect of language is more preponderant than the effect of terminology. Clicks on English suggestions are clearly preferable to clicks on Portuguese ones.
    Type
    a
  16. Alexandre Hannud Abdo, A.H. => Hannud Abdo, A.: 0.05
    0.05176381 = product of:
      0.15529142 = sum of:
        0.15529142 = sum of:
          0.015189646 = weight(_text_:a in 617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.015189646 = score(doc=617,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.04968032 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04308612 = queryNorm
              0.30574775 = fieldWeight in 617, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=617)
          0.14010178 = weight(_text_:22 in 617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14010178 = score(doc=617,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15088025 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04308612 = queryNorm
              0.92856276 = fieldWeight in 617, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=617)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    7. 6.2022 19:22:19
  17. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.05
    0.050185375 = product of:
      0.07527806 = sum of:
        0.06843218 = product of:
          0.20529653 = sum of:
            0.20529653 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20529653 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3652846 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04308612 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.0068458803 = product of:
          0.013691761 = sum of:
            0.013691761 = weight(_text_:a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013691761 = score(doc=400,freq=26.0), product of:
                0.04968032 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04308612 = queryNorm
                0.27559727 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                    26.0 = termFreq=26.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    On a scientific concept hierarchy, a parent concept may have a few attributes, each of which has multiple values being a group of child concepts. We call these attributes facets: classification has a few facets such as application (e.g., face recognition), model (e.g., svm, knn), and metric (e.g., precision). In this work, we aim at building faceted concept hierarchies from scientific literature. Hierarchy construction methods heavily rely on hypernym detection, however, the faceted relations are parent-to-child links but the hypernym relation is a multi-hop, i.e., ancestor-to-descendent link with a specific facet "type-of". We use information extraction techniques to find synonyms, sibling concepts, and ancestor-descendent relations from a data science corpus. And we propose a hierarchy growth algorithm to infer the parent-child links from the three types of relationships. It resolves conflicts by maintaining the acyclic structure of a hierarchy.
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
    Type
    a
  18. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.05
    0.04920169 = product of:
      0.07380253 = sum of:
        0.06843218 = product of:
          0.20529653 = sum of:
            0.20529653 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20529653 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3652846 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04308612 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.0053703506 = product of:
          0.010740701 = sum of:
            0.010740701 = weight(_text_:a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010740701 = score(doc=2918,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.04968032 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04308612 = queryNorm
                0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
    Type
    a
  19. Diederichs, A.: Wissensmanagement ist Macht : Effektiv und kostenbewußt arbeiten im Informationszeitalter (2005) 0.05
    0.04880339 = product of:
      0.14641017 = sum of:
        0.14641017 = sum of:
          0.014320935 = weight(_text_:a in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.014320935 = score(doc=3211,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.04968032 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04308612 = queryNorm
              0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
          0.13208923 = weight(_text_:22 in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13208923 = score(doc=3211,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15088025 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04308612 = queryNorm
              0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2005 9:16:22
    Type
    a
  20. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.05
    0.04845188 = product of:
      0.07267782 = sum of:
        0.06843218 = product of:
          0.20529653 = sum of:
            0.20529653 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20529653 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3652846 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04308612 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.004245635 = product of:
          0.00849127 = sum of:
            0.00849127 = weight(_text_:a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00849127 = score(doc=862,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.04968032 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04308612 = queryNorm
                0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This research revisits the classic Turing test and compares recent large language models such as ChatGPT for their abilities to reproduce human-level comprehension and compelling text generation. Two task challenges- summary and question answering- prompt ChatGPT to produce original content (98-99%) from a single text entry and sequential questions initially posed by Turing in 1950. We score the original and generated content against the OpenAI GPT-2 Output Detector from 2019, and establish multiple cases where the generated content proves original and undetectable (98%). The question of a machine fooling a human judge recedes in this work relative to the question of "how would one prove it?" The original contribution of the work presents a metric and simple grammatical set for understanding the writing mechanics of chatbots in evaluating their readability and statistical clarity, engagement, delivery, overall quality, and plagiarism risks. While Turing's original prose scores at least 14% below the machine-generated output, whether an algorithm displays hints of Turing's true initial thoughts (the "Lovelace 2.0" test) remains unanswerable.
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
    Type
    a

Authors

Languages

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications