-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.07
0.06552921 = sum of:
0.05338521 = product of:
0.21354084 = sum of:
0.21354084 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21354084 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3799537 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.044816375 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.012144001 = product of:
0.036432 = sum of:
0.036432 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036432 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15693931 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044816375 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
-
Fagni, T.; Sebastiani, F.: Selecting negative examples for hierarchical text classification: An experimental comparison (2010)
0.03
0.03011794 = product of:
0.06023588 = sum of:
0.06023588 = product of:
0.09035382 = sum of:
0.05102239 = weight(_text_:c in 4101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05102239 = score(doc=4101,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15458983 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044816375 = queryNorm
0.3300501 = fieldWeight in 4101, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4101)
0.03933143 = weight(_text_:f in 4101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03933143 = score(doc=4101,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17862847 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.044816375 = queryNorm
0.22018565 = fieldWeight in 4101, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4101)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Hierarchical text classification (HTC) approaches have recently attracted a lot of interest on the part of researchers in human language technology and machine learning, since they have been shown to bring about equal, if not better, classification accuracy with respect to their "flat" counterparts while allowing exponential time savings at both learning and classification time. A typical component of HTC methods is a "local" policy for selecting negative examples: Given a category c, its negative training examples are by default identified with the training examples that are negative for c and positive for the categories which are siblings of c in the hierarchy. However, this policy has always been taken for granted and never been subjected to careful scrutiny since first proposed 15 years ago. This article proposes a thorough experimental comparison between this policy and three other policies for the selection of negative examples in HTC contexts, one of which (BEST LOCAL (k)) is being proposed for the first time in this article. We compare these policies on the hierarchical versions of three supervised learning algorithms (boosting, support vector machines, and naïve Bayes) by performing experiments on two standard TC datasets, REUTERS-21578 and RCV1-V2.
-
Jenkins, C.: Automatic classification of Web resources using Java and Dewey Decimal Classification (1998)
0.03
0.027914967 = product of:
0.055829935 = sum of:
0.055829935 = product of:
0.0837449 = sum of:
0.0412409 = weight(_text_:c in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0412409 = score(doc=1673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15458983 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044816375 = queryNorm
0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
0.042504 = weight(_text_:22 in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042504 = score(doc=1673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15693931 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044816375 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
-
Yoon, Y.; Lee, C.; Lee, G.G.: ¬An effective procedure for constructing a hierarchical text classification system (2006)
0.03
0.027914967 = product of:
0.055829935 = sum of:
0.055829935 = product of:
0.0837449 = sum of:
0.0412409 = weight(_text_:c in 5273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0412409 = score(doc=5273,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15458983 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044816375 = queryNorm
0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 5273, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5273)
0.042504 = weight(_text_:22 in 5273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042504 = score(doc=5273,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15693931 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044816375 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5273, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5273)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 16:24:52
-
Hung, C.-M.; Chien, L.-F.: Web-based text classification in the absence of manually labeled training documents (2007)
0.03
0.027515685 = product of:
0.05503137 = sum of:
0.05503137 = product of:
0.08254705 = sum of:
0.035349347 = weight(_text_:c in 87) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035349347 = score(doc=87,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15458983 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044816375 = queryNorm
0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 87, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=87)
0.04719771 = weight(_text_:f in 87) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04719771 = score(doc=87,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17862847 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.044816375 = queryNorm
0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 87, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=87)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Subramanian, S.; Shafer, K.E.: Clustering (2001)
0.01
0.012144001 = product of:
0.024288002 = sum of:
0.024288002 = product of:
0.072864 = sum of:
0.072864 = weight(_text_:22 in 1046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.072864 = score(doc=1046,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15693931 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044816375 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1046, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1046)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 5. 5.2003 14:17:22
-
Autonomy, Inc.: Automatic classification (o.J.)
0.01
0.010488382 = product of:
0.020976763 = sum of:
0.020976763 = product of:
0.062930286 = sum of:
0.062930286 = weight(_text_:f in 1666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062930286 = score(doc=1666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17862847 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.044816375 = queryNorm
0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 1666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1666)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- http://www.autonomy.com/Content/Products/IDOL/f/Classification#01
-
Guerrero-Bote, V.P.; Moya Anegón, F. de; Herrero Solana, V.: Document organization using Kohonen's algorithm (2002)
0.01
0.010488382 = product of:
0.020976763 = sum of:
0.020976763 = product of:
0.062930286 = sum of:
0.062930286 = weight(_text_:f in 2564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062930286 = score(doc=2564,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17862847 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.044816375 = queryNorm
0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 2564, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2564)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Reiner, U.: Automatische DDC-Klassifizierung von bibliografischen Titeldatensätzen (2009)
0.01
0.010120001 = product of:
0.020240001 = sum of:
0.020240001 = product of:
0.060720004 = sum of:
0.060720004 = weight(_text_:22 in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060720004 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15693931 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044816375 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 8.2009 12:54:24
-
HaCohen-Kerner, Y. et al.: Classification using various machine learning methods and combinations of key-phrases and visual features (2016)
0.01
0.010120001 = product of:
0.020240001 = sum of:
0.020240001 = product of:
0.060720004 = sum of:
0.060720004 = weight(_text_:22 in 2748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060720004 = score(doc=2748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15693931 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044816375 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2748)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 2.2016 18:25:22
-
Miyamoto, S.: Information clustering based an fuzzy multisets (2003)
0.01
0.009720575 = product of:
0.01944115 = sum of:
0.01944115 = product of:
0.05832345 = sum of:
0.05832345 = weight(_text_:c in 1071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05832345 = score(doc=1071,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15458983 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044816375 = queryNorm
0.3772787 = fieldWeight in 1071, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1071)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A fuzzy multiset model for information clustering is proposed with application to information retrieval on the World Wide Web. Noting that a search engine retrieves multiple occurrences of the same subjects with possibly different degrees of relevance, we observe that fuzzy multisets provide an appropriate model of information retrieval on the WWW. Information clustering which means both term clustering and document clustering is considered. Three methods of the hard c-means, fuzzy c-means, and an agglomerative method using cluster centers are proposed. Two distances between fuzzy multisets and algorithms for calculating cluster centers are defined. Theoretical properties concerning the clustering algorithms are studied. Illustrative examples are given to show how the algorithms work.
-
Salles, T.; Rocha, L.; Gonçalves, M.A.; Almeida, J.M.; Mourão, F.; Meira Jr., W.; Viegas, F.: ¬A quantitative analysis of the temporal effects on automatic text classification (2016)
0.01
0.009270506 = product of:
0.018541012 = sum of:
0.018541012 = product of:
0.055623036 = sum of:
0.055623036 = weight(_text_:f in 3014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055623036 = score(doc=3014,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17862847 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.044816375 = queryNorm
0.31138954 = fieldWeight in 3014, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3014)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Sebastiani, F.: Classification of text, automatic (2006)
0.01
0.009177333 = product of:
0.018354665 = sum of:
0.018354665 = product of:
0.055063996 = sum of:
0.055063996 = weight(_text_:f in 5003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055063996 = score(doc=5003,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17862847 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.044816375 = queryNorm
0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 5003, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5003)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Wille, J.: Automatisches Klassifizieren bibliographischer Beschreibungsdaten : Vorgehensweise und Ergebnisse (2006)
0.01
0.009177333 = product of:
0.018354665 = sum of:
0.018354665 = product of:
0.055063996 = sum of:
0.055063996 = weight(_text_:f in 6090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055063996 = score(doc=6090,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17862847 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.044816375 = queryNorm
0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 6090, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6090)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Diese Arbeit befasst sich mit den praktischen Aspekten des Automatischen Klassifizierens bibliographischer Referenzdaten. Im Vordergrund steht die konkrete Vorgehensweise anhand des eigens zu diesem Zweck entwickelten Open Source-Programms COBRA "Classification Of Bibliographic Records, Automatic". Es werden die Rahmenbedingungen und Parameter f¨ur einen Einsatz im bibliothekarischen Umfeld geklärt. Schließlich erfolgt eine Auswertung von Klassifizierungsergebnissen am Beispiel sozialwissenschaftlicher Daten aus der Datenbank SOLIS.
-
Sebastiani, F.: Machine learning in automated text categorization (2002)
0.01
0.007866286 = product of:
0.015732571 = sum of:
0.015732571 = product of:
0.04719771 = sum of:
0.04719771 = weight(_text_:f in 3389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04719771 = score(doc=3389,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17862847 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.044816375 = queryNorm
0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 3389, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3389)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Sebastiani, F.: ¬A tutorial an automated text categorisation (1999)
0.01
0.007866286 = product of:
0.015732571 = sum of:
0.015732571 = product of:
0.04719771 = sum of:
0.04719771 = weight(_text_:f in 3390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04719771 = score(doc=3390,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17862847 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.044816375 = queryNorm
0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 3390, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3390)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Liu, X.; Yu, S.; Janssens, F.; Glänzel, W.; Moreau, Y.; Moor, B.de: Weighted hybrid clustering by combining text mining and bibliometrics on a large-scale journal database (2010)
0.01
0.007866286 = product of:
0.015732571 = sum of:
0.015732571 = product of:
0.04719771 = sum of:
0.04719771 = weight(_text_:f in 3464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04719771 = score(doc=3464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17862847 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.044816375 = queryNorm
0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 3464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3464)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Godby, C. J.; Stuler, J.: ¬The Library of Congress Classification as a knowledge base for automatic subject categorization (2001)
0.01
0.007855411 = product of:
0.015710821 = sum of:
0.015710821 = product of:
0.047132462 = sum of:
0.047132462 = weight(_text_:c in 1567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047132462 = score(doc=1567,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15458983 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044816375 = queryNorm
0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 1567, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1567)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Pfister, J.: Clustering von Patent-Dokumenten am Beispiel der Datenbanken des Fachinformationszentrums Karlsruhe (2006)
0.01
0.007855411 = product of:
0.015710821 = sum of:
0.015710821 = product of:
0.047132462 = sum of:
0.047132462 = weight(_text_:c in 5976) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047132462 = score(doc=5976,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15458983 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044816375 = queryNorm
0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 5976, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5976)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Effektive Information Retrieval Verfahren in Theorie und Praxis: ausgewählte und erweiterte Beiträge des Vierten Hildesheimer Evaluierungs- und Retrievalworkshop (HIER 2005), Hildesheim, 20.7.2005. Hrsg.: T. Mandl u. C. Womser-Hacker
-
Bock, H.-H.: Datenanalyse zur Strukturierung und Ordnung von Information (1989)
0.01
0.0070840004 = product of:
0.014168001 = sum of:
0.014168001 = product of:
0.042504 = sum of:
0.042504 = weight(_text_:22 in 141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042504 = score(doc=141,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15693931 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044816375 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 141, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=141)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.1-22
