Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Huffman, G.D."
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Huffman, G.D.; Vital, D.A.; Bivins, R.G.: Generating indices with lexical association methods : term uniqueness (1990) 0.03 
    0.030285986 = product of:
  0.060571972 = sum of:
    0.060571972 = product of:
      0.121143945 = sum of:
        0.121143945 = weight(_text_:d.a in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.121143945 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31009138 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.071914 = idf(docFreq=101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043848295 = queryNorm
            0.39067176 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.071914 = idf(docFreq=101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  2. Huffman, G.D.: Semi-automatic determination of citation relevancy : user evaluation (1990) 0.01 
    0.0103964675 = product of:
  0.020792935 = sum of:
    0.020792935 = product of:
      0.04158587 = sum of:
        0.04158587 = weight(_text_:22 in 4158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04158587 = score(doc=4158,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15354925 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043848295 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4158, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4158)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Online bibiographic, database searches typically produce hundreds of retrieved citations with only about 20-40% relevant to the search topic and/or problem statement. Significant amounts of time are required to categorize and select the relevant citations. A software system-SORT-AIDS/SABRE-has been developes which ranks the citations in terms of relevance. This paper presents the results of a comprehensive user evaluation of the relevance ranking procedures. Test results show that the software generated distributions approach the ideal distribution-all relevant citations at the beginning of the collection-in 22% of the cases, are 23% better than the random distribution-relevant citations distributed uniformly throughout the dcollection-on average and are poorer than the random distribution in 4% of the cae.

Authors

Themes