Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Suchmaschinen"
  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  1. Dresel, R.; Hörnig, D.; Kaluza, H.; Peter, A.; Roßmann, A.; Sieber, W.: Evaluation deutscher Web-Suchwerkzeuge : Ein vergleichender Retrievaltest (2001) 0.03 
    0.033300392 = product of:
  0.066600785 = sum of:
    0.066600785 = sum of:
      0.019575253 = weight(_text_:d in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.019575253 = score(doc=261,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.08242767 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04338591 = queryNorm
          0.237484 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
      0.047025535 = weight(_text_:22 in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047025535 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15193006 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04338591 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Die deutschen Suchmaschinen, Abacho, Acoon, Fireball und Lycos sowie die Web-Kataloge Web.de und Yahoo! werden einem Qualitätstest nach relativem Recall, Precision und Availability unterzogen. Die Methoden der Retrievaltests werden vorgestellt. Im Durchschnitt werden bei einem Cut-Off-Wert von 25 ein Recall von rund 22%, eine Precision von knapp 19% und eine Verfügbarkeit von 24% erreicht
    Language
    d
  2. Griesbaum, J.; Rittberger, M.; Bekavac, B.: Deutsche Suchmaschinen im Vergleich : AltaVista.de, Fireball.de, Google.de und Lycos.de (2002) 0.00 
    0.0043255608 = product of:
  0.0086511215 = sum of:
    0.0086511215 = product of:
      0.017302243 = sum of:
        0.017302243 = weight(_text_:d in 1159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017302243 = score(doc=1159,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08242767 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04338591 = queryNorm
            0.20990817 = fieldWeight in 1159, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1159)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
  3. Grasso, L.L.; Wahlig, H.: Google und seine Suchparameter : Eine Top 20-Precision Analyse anhand repräsentativ ausgewählter Anfragen (2005) 0.00 
    0.0034604485 = product of:
  0.006920897 = sum of:
    0.006920897 = product of:
      0.013841794 = sum of:
        0.013841794 = weight(_text_:d in 3275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013841794 = score(doc=3275,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08242767 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04338591 = queryNorm
            0.16792654 = fieldWeight in 3275, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3275)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
  4. Günther, M.: Vermitteln Suchmaschinen vollständige Bilder aktueller Themen? : Untersuchung der Gewichtung inhaltlicher Aspekte von Suchmaschinenergebnissen in Deutschland und den USA (2016) 0.00 
    0.0030586333 = product of:
  0.0061172666 = sum of:
    0.0061172666 = product of:
      0.012234533 = sum of:
        0.012234533 = weight(_text_:d in 3068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012234533 = score(doc=3068,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08242767 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04338591 = queryNorm
            0.1484275 = fieldWeight in 3068, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3068)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
    Location
    D
  5. Griesbaum, J.: Evaluierung hybrider Suchsysteme im WWW (2000) 0.00 
    0.0025953362 = product of:
  0.0051906724 = sum of:
    0.0051906724 = product of:
      0.010381345 = sum of:
        0.010381345 = weight(_text_:d in 2482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010381345 = score(doc=2482,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08242767 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04338591 = queryNorm
            0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 2482, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2482)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
  6. Schaer, P.; Mayr, P.; Sünkler, S.; Lewandowski, D.: How relevant is the long tail? : a relevance assessment study on million short (2016) 0.00 
    0.0021627804 = product of:
  0.0043255608 = sum of:
    0.0043255608 = product of:
      0.0086511215 = sum of:
        0.0086511215 = weight(_text_:d in 3144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0086511215 = score(doc=3144,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08242767 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04338591 = queryNorm
            0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 3144, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3144)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Authors

Years

Languages

Types