Search (262 results, page 1 of 14)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Stock, W.: Informetrische Vermessung der Forschung und Entwicklung eines Landes : beispielhafte Resultate und Probleme (1992) 0.05
    0.054959368 = product of:
      0.109918736 = sum of:
        0.109918736 = product of:
          0.1648781 = sum of:
            0.063132174 = weight(_text_:k in 342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.063132174 = score(doc=342,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.160068 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044839766 = queryNorm
                0.39440846 = fieldWeight in 342, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=342)
            0.10174592 = weight(_text_:w in 342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10174592 = score(doc=342,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17087564 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044839766 = queryNorm
                0.5954384 = fieldWeight in 342, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=342)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information und Dokumentation in den 90er Jahren: neue Herausforderung, neue Technologien. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1991, Universität Ulm, 30.9.-2.10.1991. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer u. K.-H. Meier
  2. Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014) 0.05
    0.05307877 = product of:
      0.10615754 = sum of:
        0.10615754 = product of:
          0.15923631 = sum of:
            0.08633427 = weight(_text_:w in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08633427 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17087564 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044839766 = queryNorm
                0.5052462 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
            0.07290203 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07290203 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15702122 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044839766 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    18. 3.2014 19:13:22
  3. Vakkari, P.; Järvelin, K.; Chang, Y.-W.: ¬The association of disciplinary background with the evolution of topics and methods in Library and Information Science research 1995-2015 (2023) 0.05
    0.048957273 = product of:
      0.09791455 = sum of:
        0.09791455 = sum of:
          0.031566087 = weight(_text_:k in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031566087 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.160068 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044839766 = queryNorm
              0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
          0.035972614 = weight(_text_:w in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035972614 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17087564 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044839766 = queryNorm
              0.21051927 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
          0.030375848 = weight(_text_:22 in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030375848 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15702122 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044839766 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:15:06
  4. Chongde, W.; Zhe, W.: Evaluation of the models for Bradford's law (1998) 0.04
    0.043332696 = product of:
      0.08666539 = sum of:
        0.08666539 = product of:
          0.12999809 = sum of:
            0.081396736 = weight(_text_:w in 3688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.081396736 = score(doc=3688,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17087564 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044839766 = queryNorm
                0.47635072 = fieldWeight in 3688, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3688)
            0.048601355 = weight(_text_:22 in 3688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048601355 = score(doc=3688,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15702122 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044839766 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3688, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3688)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:12:28
  5. Riechert, M.; Schmitz, J.: Qualitätssicherung von Forschungsinformationen durch visuelle Repräsentation : das Fallbeispiel des "Informationssystems Promotionsnoten" (2017) 0.03
    0.031518064 = product of:
      0.06303613 = sum of:
        0.06303613 = product of:
          0.094554186 = sum of:
            0.044192526 = weight(_text_:k in 3724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044192526 = score(doc=3724,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.160068 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044839766 = queryNorm
                0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 3724, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3724)
            0.05036166 = weight(_text_:w in 3724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05036166 = score(doc=3724,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17087564 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044839766 = queryNorm
                0.29472697 = fieldWeight in 3724, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3724)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
  6. Tunger, D.: Bibliometrie : quo vadis? (2017) 0.03
    0.031518064 = product of:
      0.06303613 = sum of:
        0.06303613 = product of:
          0.094554186 = sum of:
            0.044192526 = weight(_text_:k in 3519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044192526 = score(doc=3519,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.160068 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044839766 = queryNorm
                0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 3519, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3519)
            0.05036166 = weight(_text_:w in 3519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05036166 = score(doc=3519,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17087564 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044839766 = queryNorm
                0.29472697 = fieldWeight in 3519, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3519)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
  7. Möller, T.: Woher stammt das Wissen über die Halbwertzeiten des Wissens? (2017) 0.03
    0.031518064 = product of:
      0.06303613 = sum of:
        0.06303613 = product of:
          0.094554186 = sum of:
            0.044192526 = weight(_text_:k in 3520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044192526 = score(doc=3520,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.160068 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044839766 = queryNorm
                0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 3520, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3520)
            0.05036166 = weight(_text_:w in 3520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05036166 = score(doc=3520,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17087564 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044839766 = queryNorm
                0.29472697 = fieldWeight in 3520, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3520)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
  8. Chang, K.-C.; Zhou, W.; Zhang, S.; Yuan, C,-C.: Threshold effects of the patent H-index in the relationship between patent citations and market value (2015) 0.03
    0.027015483 = product of:
      0.054030966 = sum of:
        0.054030966 = product of:
          0.08104645 = sum of:
            0.037879307 = weight(_text_:k in 2344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037879307 = score(doc=2344,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.160068 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044839766 = queryNorm
                0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 2344, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2344)
            0.043167137 = weight(_text_:w in 2344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043167137 = score(doc=2344,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17087564 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044839766 = queryNorm
                0.2526231 = fieldWeight in 2344, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2344)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  9. Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006) 0.03
    0.026539385 = product of:
      0.05307877 = sum of:
        0.05307877 = product of:
          0.079618156 = sum of:
            0.043167137 = weight(_text_:w in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043167137 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17087564 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044839766 = queryNorm
                0.2526231 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
            0.036451016 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036451016 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15702122 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044839766 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    3. 1.2007 17:22:03
  10. Huang, M.-H.; Huang, W.-T.; Chang, C.-C.; Chen, D. Z.; Lin, C.-P.: The greater scattering phenomenon beyond Bradford's law in patent citation (2014) 0.03
    0.026539385 = product of:
      0.05307877 = sum of:
        0.05307877 = product of:
          0.079618156 = sum of:
            0.043167137 = weight(_text_:w in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043167137 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17087564 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044839766 = queryNorm
                0.2526231 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
            0.036451016 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036451016 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15702122 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044839766 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:11:29
  11. Stvilia, B.; Hinnant, C.C.; Schindler, K.; Worrall, A.; Burnett, G.; Burnett, K.; Kazmer, M.M.; Marty, P.F.: Composition of scientific teams and publication productivity at a national science lab (2011) 0.03
    0.025005681 = product of:
      0.050011363 = sum of:
        0.050011363 = product of:
          0.07501704 = sum of:
            0.044641193 = weight(_text_:k in 4191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044641193 = score(doc=4191,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.160068 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044839766 = queryNorm
                0.2788889 = fieldWeight in 4191, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4191)
            0.030375848 = weight(_text_:22 in 4191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030375848 = score(doc=4191,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15702122 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044839766 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4191, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4191)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 13:19:42
  12. Ajiferuke, I.; Lu, K.; Wolfram, D.: ¬A comparison of citer and citation-based measure outcomes for multiple disciplines (2010) 0.02
    0.024776775 = product of:
      0.04955355 = sum of:
        0.04955355 = product of:
          0.07433032 = sum of:
            0.037879307 = weight(_text_:k in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037879307 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.160068 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044839766 = queryNorm
                0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
            0.036451016 = weight(_text_:22 in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036451016 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15702122 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044839766 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    28. 9.2010 12:54:22
  13. ¬Die deutsche Zeitschrift für Dokumentation, Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis von 1950 bis 2011 : eine vorläufige Bilanz in vier Abschnitten (2012) 0.02
    0.024776775 = product of:
      0.04955355 = sum of:
        0.04955355 = product of:
          0.07433032 = sum of:
            0.037879307 = weight(_text_:k in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037879307 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.160068 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044839766 = queryNorm
                0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
            0.036451016 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036451016 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15702122 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044839766 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:35:26
    Footnote
    Besteht aus 4 Teilen: Teil 1: Eden, D., A. Arndt, A. Hoffer, T. Raschke u. P. Schön: Die Nachrichten für Dokumentation in den Jahren 1950 bis 1962 (S.159-163). Teil 2: Brose, M., E. durst, D. Nitzsche, D. Veckenstedt u. R. Wein: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1963-1975 (S.164-170). Teil 3: Bösel, J., G. Ebert, P. Garz,, M. Iwanow u. B. Russ: Methoden und Ergebnisse einer statistischen Auswertung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1976 bis 1988 (S.171-174). Teil 4: Engelage, H., S. Jansen, R. Mertins, K. Redel u. S. Ring: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) / "Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis" (IWP) 1989-2011 (S.164-170).
  14. Wu, Q.: ¬The w-index : a measure to assess scientific impact by focusing on widely cited papers (2010) 0.02
    0.024719816 = product of:
      0.04943963 = sum of:
        0.04943963 = product of:
          0.14831889 = sum of:
            0.14831889 = weight(_text_:w in 3428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14831889 = score(doc=3428,freq=34.0), product of:
                0.17087564 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044839766 = queryNorm
                0.8679932 = fieldWeight in 3428, product of:
                  5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
                    34.0 = termFreq=34.0
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3428)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Based on the principles of the h-index, I propose a new measure, the w-index, as a particularly simple and more useful way to assess the substantial impact of a researcher's work, especially regarding excellent papers. The w-index can be defined as follows: If w of a researcher's papers have at least 10w citations each and the other papers have fewer than 10(w+1) citations, that researcher's w-index is w. The results demonstrate that there are noticeable differences between the w-index and the h-index, because the w-index plays close attention to the more widely cited papers. These discrepancies can be measured by comparing the ranks of 20 astrophysicists, a few famous physical scientists, and 16 Price medalists. Furthermore, I put forward the w(q)-index to improve the discriminatory power of the w-index and to rank scientists with the same w. The factor q is the least number of citations a researcher with w needed to reach w+1. In terms of both simplicity and accuracy, the w-index or w(q)-index can be widely used for evaluation of scientists, journals, conferences, scientific topics, research institutions, and so on.
    Object
    W-index
  15. Chang, Y.-W.; Huang, M.-H.: ¬A study of the evolution of interdisciplinarity in library and information science : using three bibliometric methods (2012) 0.02
    0.022116154 = product of:
      0.04423231 = sum of:
        0.04423231 = product of:
          0.06634846 = sum of:
            0.035972614 = weight(_text_:w in 4959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035972614 = score(doc=4959,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17087564 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044839766 = queryNorm
                0.21051927 = fieldWeight in 4959, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4959)
            0.030375848 = weight(_text_:22 in 4959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030375848 = score(doc=4959,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15702122 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044839766 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4959, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4959)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.1, S.22-33
  16. Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: How is science cited on the Web? : a classification of google unique Web citations (2007) 0.02
    0.020647313 = product of:
      0.041294627 = sum of:
        0.041294627 = product of:
          0.061941937 = sum of:
            0.031566087 = weight(_text_:k in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031566087 = score(doc=586,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.160068 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044839766 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
            0.030375848 = weight(_text_:22 in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030375848 = score(doc=586,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15702122 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044839766 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Although the analysis of citations in the scholarly literature is now an established and relatively well understood part of information science, not enough is known about citations that can be found on the Web. In particular, are there new Web types, and if so, are these trivial or potentially useful for studying or evaluating research communication? We sought evidence based upon a sample of 1,577 Web citations of the URLs or titles of research articles in 64 open-access journals from biology, physics, chemistry, and computing. Only 25% represented intellectual impact, from references of Web documents (23%) and other informal scholarly sources (2%). Many of the Web/URL citations were created for general or subject-specific navigation (45%) or for self-publicity (22%). Additional analyses revealed significant disciplinary differences in the types of Google unique Web/URL citations as well as some characteristics of scientific open-access publishing on the Web. We conclude that the Web provides access to a new and different type of citation information, one that may therefore enable us to measure different aspects of research, and the research process in particular; but to obtain good information, the different types should be separated.
  17. Shibata, N.; Kajikawa, Y.; Takeda, Y.; Matsushima, K.: Comparative study on methods of detecting research fronts using different types of citation (2009) 0.02
    0.020647313 = product of:
      0.041294627 = sum of:
        0.041294627 = product of:
          0.061941937 = sum of:
            0.031566087 = weight(_text_:k in 2743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031566087 = score(doc=2743,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.160068 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044839766 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 2743, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2743)
            0.030375848 = weight(_text_:22 in 2743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030375848 = score(doc=2743,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15702122 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044839766 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2743, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2743)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:52:50
  18. Liu, D.-R.; Shih, M.-J.: Hybrid-patent classification based on patent-network analysis (2011) 0.02
    0.020647313 = product of:
      0.041294627 = sum of:
        0.041294627 = product of:
          0.061941937 = sum of:
            0.031566087 = weight(_text_:k in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031566087 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.160068 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044839766 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
            0.030375848 = weight(_text_:22 in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030375848 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15702122 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044839766 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Effective patent management is essential for organizations to maintain their competitive advantage. The classification of patents is a critical part of patent management and industrial analysis. This study proposes a hybrid-patent-classification approach that combines a novel patent-network-based classification method with three conventional classification methods to analyze query patents and predict their classes. The novel patent network contains various types of nodes that represent different features extracted from patent documents. The nodes are connected based on the relationship metrics derived from the patent metadata. The proposed classification method predicts a query patent's class by analyzing all reachable nodes in the patent network and calculating their relevance to the query patent. It then classifies the query patent with a modified k-nearest neighbor classifier. To further improve the approach, we combine it with content-based, citation-based, and metadata-based classification methods to develop a hybrid-classification approach. We evaluate the performance of the hybrid approach on a test dataset of patent documents obtained from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, and compare its performance with that of the three conventional methods. The results demonstrate that the proposed patent-network-based approach yields more accurate class predictions than the patent network-based approach.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 13:04:21
  19. Song, M.; Kang, K.; An, J.Y.: Investigating drug-disease interactions in drug-symptom-disease triples via citation relations (2018) 0.02
    0.020647313 = product of:
      0.041294627 = sum of:
        0.041294627 = product of:
          0.061941937 = sum of:
            0.031566087 = weight(_text_:k in 4545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031566087 = score(doc=4545,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.160068 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044839766 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 4545, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4545)
            0.030375848 = weight(_text_:22 in 4545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030375848 = score(doc=4545,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15702122 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044839766 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4545, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4545)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1.11.2018 18:19:22
  20. Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.; Abdoli, M.; Stuart, E.; Makita, M.; Wilson, P.; Levitt, J.: Why are coauthored academic articles more cited : higher quality or larger audience? (2023) 0.02
    0.020647313 = product of:
      0.041294627 = sum of:
        0.041294627 = product of:
          0.061941937 = sum of:
            0.031566087 = weight(_text_:k in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031566087 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.160068 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044839766 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
            0.030375848 = weight(_text_:22 in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030375848 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15702122 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044839766 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:11:50

Years

Languages

  • e 222
  • d 39
  • ro 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 252
  • m 5
  • s 4
  • el 3
  • r 1
  • More… Less…