-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.07
0.065473676 = sum of:
0.05333997 = product of:
0.21335988 = sum of:
0.21335988 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21335988 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37963173 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.044778395 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.012133708 = product of:
0.036401123 = sum of:
0.036401123 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036401123 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1568063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044778395 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
-
Zhu, W.Z.; Allen, R.B.: Document clustering using the LSI subspace signature model (2013)
0.03
0.033973403 = product of:
0.06794681 = sum of:
0.06794681 = product of:
0.10192021 = sum of:
0.06551909 = weight(_text_:k in 690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06551909 = score(doc=690,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15984893 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.044778395 = queryNorm
0.40988132 = fieldWeight in 690, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=690)
0.036401123 = weight(_text_:22 in 690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036401123 = score(doc=690,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1568063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044778395 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 690, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=690)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- We describe the latent semantic indexing subspace signature model (LSISSM) for semantic content representation of unstructured text. Grounded on singular value decomposition, the model represents terms and documents by the distribution signatures of their statistical contribution across the top-ranking latent concept dimensions. LSISSM matches term signatures with document signatures according to their mapping coherence between latent semantic indexing (LSI) term subspace and LSI document subspace. LSISSM does feature reduction and finds a low-rank approximation of scalable and sparse term-document matrices. Experiments demonstrate that this approach significantly improves the performance of major clustering algorithms such as standard K-means and self-organizing maps compared with the vector space model and the traditional LSI model. The unique contribution ranking mechanism in LSISSM also improves the initialization of standard K-means compared with random seeding procedure, which sometimes causes low efficiency and effectiveness of clustering. A two-stage initialization strategy based on LSISSM significantly reduces the running time of standard K-means procedures.
- Date
- 23. 3.2013 13:22:36
-
Sebastiani, F.: Classification of text, automatic (2006)
0.03
0.033049792 = product of:
0.066099584 = sum of:
0.066099584 = product of:
0.099149376 = sum of:
0.055017333 = weight(_text_:f in 5003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055017333 = score(doc=5003,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1784771 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.044778395 = queryNorm
0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 5003, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5003)
0.044132043 = weight(_text_:k in 5003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044132043 = score(doc=5003,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15984893 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.044778395 = queryNorm
0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 5003, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5003)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of language and linguistics. 2nd ed. Ed.: K. Brown. Vol. 14
-
Yi, K.: Automatic text classification using library classification schemes : trends, issues and challenges (2007)
0.03
0.028866675 = product of:
0.05773335 = sum of:
0.05773335 = product of:
0.08660002 = sum of:
0.044132043 = weight(_text_:k in 2560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044132043 = score(doc=2560,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15984893 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.044778395 = queryNorm
0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 2560, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2560)
0.042467978 = weight(_text_:22 in 2560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042467978 = score(doc=2560,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1568063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044778395 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2560, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2560)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 9.2008 18:31:54
-
Fagni, T.; Sebastiani, F.: Selecting negative examples for hierarchical text classification: An experimental comparison (2010)
0.02
0.023606993 = product of:
0.047213987 = sum of:
0.047213987 = product of:
0.07082098 = sum of:
0.039298095 = weight(_text_:f in 4101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039298095 = score(doc=4101,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1784771 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.044778395 = queryNorm
0.22018565 = fieldWeight in 4101, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4101)
0.031522885 = weight(_text_:k in 4101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031522885 = score(doc=4101,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15984893 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.044778395 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 4101, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4101)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Hierarchical text classification (HTC) approaches have recently attracted a lot of interest on the part of researchers in human language technology and machine learning, since they have been shown to bring about equal, if not better, classification accuracy with respect to their "flat" counterparts while allowing exponential time savings at both learning and classification time. A typical component of HTC methods is a "local" policy for selecting negative examples: Given a category c, its negative training examples are by default identified with the training examples that are negative for c and positive for the categories which are siblings of c in the hierarchy. However, this policy has always been taken for granted and never been subjected to careful scrutiny since first proposed 15 years ago. This article proposes a thorough experimental comparison between this policy and three other policies for the selection of negative examples in HTC contexts, one of which (BEST LOCAL (k)) is being proposed for the first time in this article. We compare these policies on the hierarchical versions of three supervised learning algorithms (boosting, support vector machines, and naïve Bayes) by performing experiments on two standard TC datasets, REUTERS-21578 and RCV1-V2.
-
Yang, P.; Gao, W.; Tan, Q.; Wong, K.-F.: ¬A link-bridged topic model for cross-domain document classification (2013)
0.02
0.023606993 = product of:
0.047213987 = sum of:
0.047213987 = product of:
0.07082098 = sum of:
0.039298095 = weight(_text_:f in 2706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039298095 = score(doc=2706,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1784771 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.044778395 = queryNorm
0.22018565 = fieldWeight in 2706, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2706)
0.031522885 = weight(_text_:k in 2706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031522885 = score(doc=2706,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15984893 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.044778395 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 2706, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2706)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Sparck Jones, K.: Automatic classification (1976)
0.02
0.016812207 = product of:
0.033624414 = sum of:
0.033624414 = product of:
0.10087324 = sum of:
0.10087324 = weight(_text_:k in 2908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10087324 = score(doc=2908,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15984893 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.044778395 = queryNorm
0.63105357 = fieldWeight in 2908, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2908)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Khoo, C.S.G.; Ng, K.; Ou, S.: ¬An exploratory study of human clustering of Web pages (2003)
0.02
0.016495243 = product of:
0.032990485 = sum of:
0.032990485 = product of:
0.04948573 = sum of:
0.02521831 = weight(_text_:k in 2741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02521831 = score(doc=2741,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15984893 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.044778395 = queryNorm
0.15776339 = fieldWeight in 2741, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2741)
0.024267416 = weight(_text_:22 in 2741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024267416 = score(doc=2741,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1568063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044778395 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2741, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2741)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 12. 9.2004 9:56:22
-
Yu, W.; Gong, Y.: Document clustering by concept factorization (2004)
0.01
0.012609154 = product of:
0.025218308 = sum of:
0.025218308 = product of:
0.075654924 = sum of:
0.075654924 = weight(_text_:k in 4084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.075654924 = score(doc=4084,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15984893 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.044778395 = queryNorm
0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 4084, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4084)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- SIGIR'04: Proceedings of the 27th Annual International ACM-SIGIR Conference an Research and Development in Information Retrieval. Ed.: K. Järvelin, u.a
-
Subramanian, S.; Shafer, K.E.: Clustering (2001)
0.01
0.012133708 = product of:
0.024267416 = sum of:
0.024267416 = product of:
0.072802246 = sum of:
0.072802246 = weight(_text_:22 in 1046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.072802246 = score(doc=1046,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1568063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044778395 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1046, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1046)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 5. 5.2003 14:17:22
-
Kwon, O.W.; Lee, J.H.: Text categorization based on k-nearest neighbor approach for web site classification (2003)
0.01
0.0117478855 = product of:
0.023495771 = sum of:
0.023495771 = product of:
0.07048731 = sum of:
0.07048731 = weight(_text_:k in 1070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07048731 = score(doc=1070,freq=10.0), product of:
0.15984893 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.044778395 = queryNorm
0.44096208 = fieldWeight in 1070, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1070)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Automatic categorization is a viable method to deal with the scaling problem on the World Wide Web. For Web site classification, this paper proposes the use of Web pages linked with the home page in a different manner from the sole use of home pages in previous research. To implement our proposed method, we derive a scheme for Web site classification based on the k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) approach. It consists of three phases: Web page selection (connectivity analysis), Web page classification, and Web site classification. Given a Web site, the Web page selection chooses several representative Web pages using connectivity analysis. The k-NN classifier next classifies each of the selected Web pages. Finally, the classified Web pages are extended to a classification of the entire Web site. To improve performance, we supplement the k-NN approach with a feature selection method and a term weighting scheme using markup tags, and also reform its document-document similarity measure. In our experiments on a Korean commercial Web directory, the proposed system, using both a home page and its linked pages, improved the performance of micro-averaging breakeven point by 30.02%, compared with an ordinary classification which uses a home page only.
-
Wätjen, H.-J.; Diekmann, B.; Möller, G.; Carstensen, K.-U.: Bericht zum DFG-Projekt: GERHARD : German Harvest Automated Retrieval and Directory (1998)
0.01
0.010507628 = product of:
0.021015257 = sum of:
0.021015257 = product of:
0.06304577 = sum of:
0.06304577 = weight(_text_:k in 3065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06304577 = score(doc=3065,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15984893 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.044778395 = queryNorm
0.39440846 = fieldWeight in 3065, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3065)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Shen, D.; Chen, Z.; Yang, Q.; Zeng, H.J.; Zhang, B.; Lu, Y.; Ma, W.Y.: Web page classification through summarization (2004)
0.01
0.010507628 = product of:
0.021015257 = sum of:
0.021015257 = product of:
0.06304577 = sum of:
0.06304577 = weight(_text_:k in 4132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06304577 = score(doc=4132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15984893 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.044778395 = queryNorm
0.39440846 = fieldWeight in 4132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4132)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- SIGIR'04: Proceedings of the 27th Annual International ACM-SIGIR Conference an Research and Development in Information Retrieval. Ed.: K. Järvelin, u.a
-
Autonomy, Inc.: Automatic classification (o.J.)
0.01
0.010479493 = product of:
0.020958986 = sum of:
0.020958986 = product of:
0.062876955 = sum of:
0.062876955 = weight(_text_:f in 1666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062876955 = score(doc=1666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1784771 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.044778395 = queryNorm
0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 1666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1666)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- http://www.autonomy.com/Content/Products/IDOL/f/Classification#01
-
Guerrero-Bote, V.P.; Moya Anegón, F. de; Herrero Solana, V.: Document organization using Kohonen's algorithm (2002)
0.01
0.010479493 = product of:
0.020958986 = sum of:
0.020958986 = product of:
0.062876955 = sum of:
0.062876955 = weight(_text_:f in 2564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062876955 = score(doc=2564,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1784771 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.044778395 = queryNorm
0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 2564, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2564)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Hu, G.; Zhou, S.; Guan, J.; Hu, X.: Towards effective document clustering : a constrained K-means based approach (2008)
0.01
0.010402022 = product of:
0.020804044 = sum of:
0.020804044 = product of:
0.062412128 = sum of:
0.062412128 = weight(_text_:k in 2113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062412128 = score(doc=2113,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15984893 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.044778395 = queryNorm
0.39044446 = fieldWeight in 2113, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2113)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Document clustering is an important tool for document collection organization and browsing. In real applications, some limited knowledge about cluster membership of a small number of documents is often available, such as some pairs of documents belonging to the same cluster. This kind of prior knowledge can be served as constraints for the clustering process. We integrate the constraints into the trace formulation of the sum of square Euclidean distance function of K-means. Then, the combined criterion function is transformed into trace maximization, which is further optimized by eigen-decomposition. Our experimental evaluation shows that the proposed semi-supervised clustering method can achieve better performance, compared to three existing methods.
-
Reiner, U.: Automatische DDC-Klassifizierung von bibliografischen Titeldatensätzen (2009)
0.01
0.010111424 = product of:
0.020222848 = sum of:
0.020222848 = product of:
0.060668543 = sum of:
0.060668543 = weight(_text_:22 in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060668543 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1568063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044778395 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 8.2009 12:54:24
-
HaCohen-Kerner, Y. et al.: Classification using various machine learning methods and combinations of key-phrases and visual features (2016)
0.01
0.010111424 = product of:
0.020222848 = sum of:
0.020222848 = product of:
0.060668543 = sum of:
0.060668543 = weight(_text_:22 in 2748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060668543 = score(doc=2748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1568063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044778395 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2748)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 2.2016 18:25:22
-
Salles, T.; Rocha, L.; Gonçalves, M.A.; Almeida, J.M.; Mourão, F.; Meira Jr., W.; Viegas, F.: ¬A quantitative analysis of the temporal effects on automatic text classification (2016)
0.01
0.00926265 = product of:
0.0185253 = sum of:
0.0185253 = product of:
0.0555759 = sum of:
0.0555759 = weight(_text_:f in 3014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0555759 = score(doc=3014,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1784771 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.044778395 = queryNorm
0.31138954 = fieldWeight in 3014, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3014)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Wille, J.: Automatisches Klassifizieren bibliographischer Beschreibungsdaten : Vorgehensweise und Ergebnisse (2006)
0.01
0.009169556 = product of:
0.018339112 = sum of:
0.018339112 = product of:
0.055017333 = sum of:
0.055017333 = weight(_text_:f in 6090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055017333 = score(doc=6090,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1784771 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.044778395 = queryNorm
0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 6090, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6090)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Diese Arbeit befasst sich mit den praktischen Aspekten des Automatischen Klassifizierens bibliographischer Referenzdaten. Im Vordergrund steht die konkrete Vorgehensweise anhand des eigens zu diesem Zweck entwickelten Open Source-Programms COBRA "Classification Of Bibliographic Records, Automatic". Es werden die Rahmenbedingungen und Parameter f¨ur einen Einsatz im bibliothekarischen Umfeld geklärt. Schließlich erfolgt eine Auswertung von Klassifizierungsergebnissen am Beispiel sozialwissenschaftlicher Daten aus der Datenbank SOLIS.
