Search (15 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Verteilte bibliographische Datenbanken"
  1. Neuroth, H.; Lepschy, P.: ¬Das EU-Projekt Renardus (2001) 0.06
    0.060489736 = product of:
      0.12097947 = sum of:
        0.12097947 = sum of:
          0.08457313 = weight(_text_:z in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08457313 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.35381722 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
          0.036406342 = weight(_text_:22 in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036406342 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Der vollständige Projektname von Renardus lautet "Academic Subject Gateway Service Europe". Renardus wird von der Europäischen Union im 5. Rahmenprogramm mit dem Schwerpunktthema "Information Society Technologies" im zweiten Thematischen Programm "Benutzerfreundliche Informationsgesellschaft" ('Promoting a User-friendly Information Society') gefördert. Die Projektlaufzeit ist von Januar 2000 bis Juni 2002. Insgesamt zwölf Partner (Principal und Assistant Contractors) aus Finnland, Dänemark, Schweden, Großbritannien, den Niederlanden, Frankreich und Deutschland beteiligen sich an diesem Projekt. Die Europäische Union unterstützt das Projekt mit 1,7 Mio. EURO, die Gesamtkosten belaufen sich inklusive der Eigenbeteiligungen der Partner auf 2,3 Mio. EURO. Das Ziel des Projektes Renardus ist es, über eine Schnittstelle Zugriff auf verteilte Sammlungen von "High Quality" Internet Ressourcen in Europa zu ermöglichen. Diese Schnittstelle wird über den Renardus Broker realisiert, der das "Cross-Searchen" und "Cross-Browsen" über verteilte "Quality-Controlled Subject Gateways" ermöglicht. Ein weiteres Ziel von Renardus ist es, Möglichkeiten von "metadata sharing" zu evaluieren und in kleinen Experimenten zwischen z. B. Subject Gateways und Nationalbibliothek zu testen bzw. zu realisieren
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:32:15
  2. Milanesi, C.: Möglichkeiten der Kooperation im Rahmen von Subject Gateways : das Euler-Projekt im Vergleich mit weiteren europäischen Projekten (2001) 0.02
    0.018203171 = product of:
      0.036406342 = sum of:
        0.036406342 = product of:
          0.072812684 = sum of:
            0.072812684 = weight(_text_:22 in 4865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.072812684 = score(doc=4865,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4865, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4865)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:41:59
  3. Dupuis, P.; Lapointe, J.: Developpement d'un outil documentaire à Hydro-Quebec : le Thesaurus HQ (1997) 0.01
    0.012135447 = product of:
      0.024270894 = sum of:
        0.024270894 = product of:
          0.048541788 = sum of:
            0.048541788 = weight(_text_:22 in 3173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048541788 = score(doc=3173,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3173, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3173)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Argus. 26(1997) no.3, S.16-22
  4. Dempsey, L.; Russell, R.; Kirriemur, J.W.: Towards distributed library systems : Z39.50 in a European context (1996) 0.01
    0.012135447 = product of:
      0.024270894 = sum of:
        0.024270894 = product of:
          0.048541788 = sum of:
            0.048541788 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048541788 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Program. 30(1996) no.1, S.1-22
  5. Ashton, J.: ONE: the final OPAC frontier (1998) 0.01
    0.012135447 = product of:
      0.024270894 = sum of:
        0.024270894 = product of:
          0.048541788 = sum of:
            0.048541788 = weight(_text_:22 in 2588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048541788 = score(doc=2588,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2588, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2588)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Select newsletter. 1998, no.22, Spring, S.5-6
  6. Lunau, C.D.: Z39.50: a critical component of the Canadian resource sharing infrastructure : implementation activities and results achieved (1997) 0.01
    0.012135447 = product of:
      0.024270894 = sum of:
        0.024270894 = product of:
          0.048541788 = sum of:
            0.048541788 = weight(_text_:22 in 3193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048541788 = score(doc=3193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3193)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    3. 3.1999 17:22:57
  7. Burrows, T.: ¬The virtual catalogue : bibliographic access for the virtual library (1993) 0.01
    0.012135447 = product of:
      0.024270894 = sum of:
        0.024270894 = product of:
          0.048541788 = sum of:
            0.048541788 = weight(_text_:22 in 5286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048541788 = score(doc=5286,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5286, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5286)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8.10.2000 14:47:22
  8. Kaizik, A.; Gödert, W.; Milanesi, C.: Erfahrungen und Ergebnisse aus der Evaluierung des EU-Projektes EULER im Rahmen des an der FH Köln angesiedelten Projektes EJECT (Evaluation von Subject Gateways des World Wide Web (2001) 0.01
    0.0107263215 = product of:
      0.021452643 = sum of:
        0.021452643 = product of:
          0.042905286 = sum of:
            0.042905286 = weight(_text_:22 in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042905286 = score(doc=5801,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:42:22
  9. Heery, R.: Information gateways : collaboration and content (2000) 0.01
    0.010618516 = product of:
      0.021237032 = sum of:
        0.021237032 = product of:
          0.042474065 = sum of:
            0.042474065 = weight(_text_:22 in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042474065 = score(doc=4866,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:38:54
  10. Jahns, Y.; Trummer, M.: Sacherschließung - Informationsdienstleistung nach Maß : Kann Heterogenität beherrscht werden? (2004) 0.01
    0.009967038 = product of:
      0.019934077 = sum of:
        0.019934077 = product of:
          0.039868154 = sum of:
            0.039868154 = weight(_text_:z in 2789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039868154 = score(doc=2789,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.16679104 = fieldWeight in 2789, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2789)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Dieses DDC-Tool ermöglicht den Zugriff auf lokale, mit DDC-erschlossene Titeldaten. Für einige bereits übersetzte DDC-Klassen kann mithilfe eines Browsers gearbeitet werden. Auch die gezielte verbale Suche nach DDC-Elementen ist möglich. Die Frage nach Aspekten, wie z. B. geografischen, soll durch getrennte Ablage der Notationselemente in den Titeldatensätzen ermöglicht werden. Schließlich lassen sich künftig auch integrierte Suchen über DDC und SWD oder andere Erschließungssysteme denken, um Literatur zu einem Thema zu finden. Das von Lars Svensson vorgestellte Retrieval-Interface bietet eine zentrale Lösung: nicht für jeden lokalen OPAC müssen eigene Suchstrukturen entwickelt werden, um auf DDC-Daten zugreifen zu können. Wie Datenbestände mit verschiedenen Erschließungen unter einer Oberfläche zusammengeführt werden und dabei die DDC als Meta-Ebene genutzt wird, das ist heute schon im Subject Gateway Renardus sichtbar." Der Renardus-Broker ermöglicht das Cross-Browsen und Cross-Searchen über verteilte Internetquellen in Europa. Für die Navigation über die DDC mussten zunächst Crosswalks zwischen den lokalen Klassifikationsklassen und der DDC erstellt werden. Das an der Universitätsbibliothek Regensburg entwickelte Tool CarmenX wurde dazu von der Niedersächsischen Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen weiterentwickelt und ermöglicht den Zugriff auf die ver schiedenen Klassifikationssysteme. Über diese Entwicklungen berichtete Dr. Friedrich Geißelmann, Universitäsbibliothek Regensburg. Er leitete das CARMEN-Teilprojekt »Grosskonkordanzen zwischen Thesauri und Klassifikationen«, in dem das Werkzeug CarmenX entstand. In diesem CARMEN-Arbeitspaket erfolgten sowohl grundlegende methodische Untersuchungen zu Crosskonkordanzen als auch prototypische Umsetzungen in den Fachgebieten Mathematik, Physik und Sozialwissenschaften. Ziel war es, bei Recherchen in verteilten Datenbanken mit unterschiedlichen Klassifikationen und Thesauri von einem vertrauten System auszugehen und in weitere wechseln zu können, ohne genaue Kenntnis von den Systemen haben zu müssen. So wurden z. B. im Bereich Crosskonkordanzen zwischen Allgemein- und Fachklassifikationen die RVK und die Mathematical Subject Classification (MSC) und Physics and Astronomy Classification Scheme (PACS) ausgewählt.
  11. Avrahami, T.T.; Yau, L.; Si, L.; Callan, J.P.: ¬The FedLemur project : Federated search in the real world (2006) 0.01
    0.0091015855 = product of:
      0.018203171 = sum of:
        0.018203171 = product of:
          0.036406342 = sum of:
            0.036406342 = weight(_text_:22 in 5271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036406342 = score(doc=5271,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5271, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5271)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:02:07
  12. Meiert, M.: Elektronische Publikationen an Hochschulen : Modellierung des elektronischen Publikationsprozesses am Beispiel der Universität Hildesheim (2006) 0.01
    0.0091015855 = product of:
      0.018203171 = sum of:
        0.018203171 = product of:
          0.036406342 = sum of:
            0.036406342 = weight(_text_:22 in 5974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036406342 = score(doc=5974,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5974, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5974)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 9.2006 13:22:15
  13. Nicholson, D.; Steele, M.: CATRIONA : a distributed, locally-oriented, Z39.50 OPAC-based approach to cataloguing the Internet (1996) 0.01
    0.0091015855 = product of:
      0.018203171 = sum of:
        0.018203171 = product of:
          0.036406342 = sum of:
            0.036406342 = weight(_text_:22 in 603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036406342 = score(doc=603,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 603, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=603)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.127-141
  14. Johnson, E.H.: Objects for distributed heterogeneous information retrieval (2000) 0.01
    0.0075846547 = product of:
      0.015169309 = sum of:
        0.015169309 = product of:
          0.030338619 = sum of:
            0.030338619 = weight(_text_:22 in 6959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030338619 = score(doc=6959,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 6959, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6959)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  15. Subject retrieval in a networked environment : Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting held in Dublin, OH, 14-16 August 2001 and sponsored by the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section, the IFLA Information Technology Section and OCLC (2003) 0.00
    0.0030338618 = product of:
      0.0060677235 = sum of:
        0.0060677235 = product of:
          0.012135447 = sum of:
            0.012135447 = weight(_text_:22 in 3964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012135447 = score(doc=3964,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 3964, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3964)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: KO 31(2004) no.2, S.117-118 (D. Campbell): "This excellent volume offers 22 papers delivered at an IFLA Satellite meeting in Dublin Ohio in 2001. The conference gathered together information and computer scientists to discuss an important and difficult question: in what specific ways can the accumulated skills, theories and traditions of librarianship be mobilized to face the challenges of providing subject access to information in present and future networked information environments? The papers which grapple with this question are organized in a surprisingly deft and coherent way. Many conferences and proceedings have unhappy sessions that contain a hodge-podge of papers that didn't quite fit any other categories. As befits a good classificationist, editor I.C. McIlwaine has kept this problem to a minimum. The papers are organized into eight sessions, which split into two broad categories. The first five sessions deal with subject domains, and the last three deal with subject access tools. The five sessions and thirteen papers that discuss access in different domains appear in order of in creasing intension. The first papers deal with access in multilingual environments, followed by papers an access across multiple vocabularies and across sectors, ending up with studies of domain-specific retrieval (primarily education). Some of the papers offer predictably strong work by scholars engaged in ongoing, long-term research. Gerard Riesthuis offers a clear analysis of the complexities of negotiating non-identical thesauri, particularly in cases where hierarchical structure varies across different languages. Hope Olson and Dennis Ward use Olson's familiar and welcome method of using provocative and unconventional theory to generate meliorative approaches to blas in general subject access schemes. Many papers, an the other hand, deal with specific ongoing projects: Renardus, The High Level Thesaurus Project, The Colorado Digitization Project and The Iter Bibliography for medieval and Renaissance material. Most of these papers display a similar structure: an explanation of the theory and purpose of the project, an account of problems encountered in the implementation, and a discussion of the results, both promising and disappointing, thus far. Of these papers, the account of the Multilanguage Access to Subjects Project in Europe (MACS) deserves special mention. In describing how the project is founded an the principle of the equality of languages, with each subject heading language maintained in its own database, and with no single language used as a pivot for the others, Elisabeth Freyre and Max Naudi offer a particularly vivid example of the way the ethics of librarianship translate into pragmatic contexts and concrete procedures. The three sessions and nine papers devoted to subject access tools split into two kinds: papers that discuss the use of theory and research to generate new tools for a networked environment, and those that discuss the transformation of traditional subject access tools in this environment. In the new tool development area, Mary Burke provides a promising example of the bidirectional approach that is so often necessary: in her case study of user-driven classification of photographs, she user personal construct theory to clarify the practice of classification, while at the same time using practice to test the theory. Carol Bean and Rebecca Green offer an intriguing combination of librarianship and computer science, importing frame representation technique from artificial intelligence to standardize syntagmatic relationships to enhance recall and precision.