Search (727 results, page 1 of 37)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001) 0.11
    0.11392936 = product of:
      0.22785872 = sum of:
        0.22785872 = product of:
          0.45571744 = sum of:
            0.17782538 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17782538 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.37968612 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
            0.27789205 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.27789205 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.47464174 = queryWeight, product of:
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
          0.5 = coord(2/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
  2. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.07
    0.07155078 = sum of:
      0.05334761 = product of:
        0.21339044 = sum of:
          0.21339044 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.21339044 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.37968612 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.018203171 = product of:
        0.036406342 = sum of:
          0.036406342 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036406342 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  3. Khurshid, Z.: ¬The impact of information technology an job requirements and qualifications for catalogers (2003) 0.07
    0.070571356 = product of:
      0.14114271 = sum of:
        0.14114271 = sum of:
          0.09866865 = weight(_text_:z in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09866865 = score(doc=2323,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.41278675 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
          0.042474065 = weight(_text_:22 in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042474065 = score(doc=2323,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 22(2003) no. March, S.18-21
  4. Jiang, T.: Architektur und Anwendungen des kollaborativen Lernsystems K3 (2008) 0.07
    0.070571356 = product of:
      0.14114271 = sum of:
        0.14114271 = sum of:
          0.09866865 = weight(_text_:z in 1391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09866865 = score(doc=1391,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.41278675 = fieldWeight in 1391, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1391)
          0.042474065 = weight(_text_:22 in 1391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042474065 = score(doc=1391,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1391, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1391)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Die K3-Architektur zur technischen Entwicklung und Realisierung des netzbasierten Wissensmanagement in der Lehre wird dargestellt. Das aktuelle K3-System besteht aus drei zentralen Komponenten; K3Forum (Diskurs), K3Vis (Visualisierung) und K3Wiki (kollaborative Textproduktion, z. B. für Zusammenfassungen). K3 verwendet Open-Source-Software unter der LGPL Lizenz.. Dadurch können freie Verwendung, überschaubare Entwicklungskosten und Nachhaltigkeit garantiert und die Unabhängigkeit von kommerziellen Software-Anbietern gesichert werden. Dank des komponentenbasierten Entwicklungskonzepts kann K3 flexibel und robust laufend weiterentwickelt werden, ohne die Stabilität der bestehenden Funktionalitäten zu beeinträchtigen. Der Artikel dokumentiert exemplarisch die Hauptkomponenten und Funktionen von K3, so dass nachfolgende Entwickler leicht eine Übersicht über das K3-System gewinnen können. Die Anforderungen an den Transfer des Systems in Umgebungen außerhalb von Konstanz werden beschrieben.
    Date
    10. 2.2008 14:22:00
  5. Thissen, F.: Screen-Design-Manual : Communicating Effectively Through Multimedia (2003) 0.07
    0.0650045 = product of:
      0.130009 = sum of:
        0.130009 = sum of:
          0.09967038 = weight(_text_:z in 1397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09967038 = score(doc=1397,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.41697758 = fieldWeight in 1397, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1397)
          0.030338619 = weight(_text_:22 in 1397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030338619 = score(doc=1397,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1397, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1397)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Classification
    ST 253 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Web-Programmierwerkzeuge (A-Z)
    Date
    22. 3.2008 14:29:25
    RVK
    ST 253 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Web-Programmierwerkzeuge (A-Z)
  6. Genereux, C.: Building connections : a review of the serials literature 2004 through 2005 (2007) 0.06
    0.060489736 = product of:
      0.12097947 = sum of:
        0.12097947 = sum of:
          0.08457313 = weight(_text_:z in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08457313 = score(doc=2548,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.35381722 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
          0.036406342 = weight(_text_:22 in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036406342 = score(doc=2548,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This review of 2004 and 2005 serials literature covers the themes of cost, management, and access. Interwoven through the serials literature of these two years are the importance of collaboration, communication, and linkages between scholars, publishers, subscription agents and other intermediaries, and librarians. The emphasis in the literature is on electronic serials and their impact on publishing, libraries, and vendors. In response to the crisis of escalating journal prices and libraries' dissatisfaction with the Big Deal licensing agreements, Open Access journals and publishing models were promoted. Libraries subscribed to or licensed increasing numbers of electronic serials. As a result, libraries sought ways to better manage licensing and subscription data (not handled by traditional integrated library systems) by implementing electronic resources management systems. In order to provide users with better, faster, and more current information on and access to electronic serials, libraries implemented tools and services to provide A-Z title lists, title by title coverage data, MARC records, and OpenURL link resolvers.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  7. He, Z.-L.: International collaboration does not have greater epistemic authority (2009) 0.06
    0.060489736 = product of:
      0.12097947 = sum of:
        0.12097947 = sum of:
          0.08457313 = weight(_text_:z in 3122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08457313 = score(doc=3122,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.35381722 = fieldWeight in 3122, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3122)
          0.036406342 = weight(_text_:22 in 3122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036406342 = score(doc=3122,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3122, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3122)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26. 9.2009 11:22:05
  8. Doszkocs, T.E.; Zamora, A.: Dictionary services and spelling aids for Web searching (2004) 0.06
    0.056691445 = product of:
      0.11338289 = sum of:
        0.11338289 = sum of:
          0.070477605 = weight(_text_:z in 2541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.070477605 = score(doc=2541,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.29484767 = fieldWeight in 2541, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2541)
          0.042905286 = weight(_text_:22 in 2541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042905286 = score(doc=2541,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2541, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2541)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Specialized Information Services Division (SIS) of the National Library of Medicine (NLM) provides Web access to more than a dozen scientific databases on toxicology and the environment on TOXNET . Search queries on TOXNET often include misspelled or variant English words, medical and scientific jargon and chemical names. Following the example of search engines like Google and ClinicalTrials.gov, we set out to develop a spelling "suggestion" system for increased recall and precision in TOXNET searching. This paper describes development of dictionary technology that can be used in a variety of applications such as orthographic verification, writing aid, natural language processing, and information storage and retrieval. The design of the technology allows building complex applications using the components developed in the earlier phases of the work in a modular fashion without extensive rewriting of computer code. Since many of the potential applications envisioned for this work have on-line or web-based interfaces, the dictionaries and other computer components must have fast response, and must be adaptable to open-ended database vocabularies, including chemical nomenclature. The dictionary vocabulary for this work was derived from SIS and other databases and specialized resources, such as NLM's Unified Medical Language Systems (UMLS) . The resulting technology, A-Z Dictionary (AZdict), has three major constituents: 1) the vocabulary list, 2) the word attributes that define part of speech and morphological relationships between words in the list, and 3) a set of programs that implements the retrieval of words and their attributes, and determines similarity between words (ChemSpell). These three components can be used in various applications such as spelling verification, spelling aid, part-of-speech tagging, paraphrasing, and many other natural language processing functions.
    Date
    14. 8.2004 17:22:56
    Source
    Online. 28(2004) no.3, S.22-29
  9. Zheng, R.; Li, J.; Chen, H.; Huang, Z.: ¬A framework for authorship identification of online messages : writing-style features and classification techniques (2006) 0.05
    0.05040811 = product of:
      0.10081622 = sum of:
        0.10081622 = sum of:
          0.070477605 = weight(_text_:z in 5276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.070477605 = score(doc=5276,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.29484767 = fieldWeight in 5276, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5276)
          0.030338619 = weight(_text_:22 in 5276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030338619 = score(doc=5276,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5276, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5276)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:14:37
  10. Corbett, L.E.: Serials: review of the literature 2000-2003 (2006) 0.05
    0.05040811 = product of:
      0.10081622 = sum of:
        0.10081622 = sum of:
          0.070477605 = weight(_text_:z in 1088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.070477605 = score(doc=1088,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.29484767 = fieldWeight in 1088, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1088)
          0.030338619 = weight(_text_:22 in 1088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030338619 = score(doc=1088,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1088, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1088)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The topic of electronic journals (e-journals) dominated the serials literature from 2000 to 2003. This review is limited to the events and issues within the broad topics of cost, management, and archiving. Coverage of cost includes such initiatives as PEAK, JACC, BioMed Central, SPARC, open access, the "Big Deal," and "going e-only." Librarians combated the continued price increase trend for journals, fueled in part by publisher mergers, with the economies found with bundled packages and consortial subscriptions. Serials management topics include usage statistics; core title lists; staffing needs; the "A-Z list" and other services from such companies as Serials Solutions; "deep linking"; link resolvers such as SFX; development of standards or guidelines, such as COUNTER and ERMI; tracking of license terms; vendor mergers; and the demise of integrated library systems and a subscription agent's bankruptcy. Librarians archived print volumes in storage facilities due to space shortages. Librarians and publishers struggled with electronic archiving concepts, discussing questions of who, where, and how. Projects such as LOCKSS tested potential solutions, but missing online content due to the Tasini court case and retractions posed more archiving difficulties. The serials literature captured much of the upheaval resulting from the rapid pace of changes, many linked to the advent of e-journals.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  11. Hu, D.; Kaza, S.; Chen, H.: Identifying significant facilitators of dark network evolution (2009) 0.05
    0.05040811 = product of:
      0.10081622 = sum of:
        0.10081622 = sum of:
          0.070477605 = weight(_text_:z in 2753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.070477605 = score(doc=2753,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.29484767 = fieldWeight in 2753, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2753)
          0.030338619 = weight(_text_:22 in 2753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030338619 = score(doc=2753,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2753, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2753)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Social networks evolve over time with the addition and removal of nodes and links to survive and thrive in their environments. Previous studies have shown that the link-formation process in such networks is influenced by a set of facilitators. However, there have been few empirical evaluations to determine the important facilitators. In a research partnership with law enforcement agencies, we used dynamic social-network analysis methods to examine several plausible facilitators of co-offending relationships in a large-scale narcotics network consisting of individuals and vehicles. Multivariate Cox regression and a two-proportion z-test on cyclic and focal closures of the network showed that mutual acquaintance and vehicle affiliations were significant facilitators for the network under study. We also found that homophily with respect to age, race, and gender were not good predictors of future link formation in these networks. Moreover, we examined the social causes and policy implications for the significance and insignificance of various facilitators including common jails on future co-offending. These findings provide important insights into the link-formation processes and the resilience of social networks. In addition, they can be used to aid in the prediction of future links. The methods described can also help in understanding the driving forces behind the formation and evolution of social networks facilitated by mobile and Web technologies.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:50:30
  12. Liu, Z.; Wang, C.: Mapping interdisciplinarity in demography : a journal network analysis (2005) 0.05
    0.049334325 = product of:
      0.09866865 = sum of:
        0.09866865 = product of:
          0.1973373 = sum of:
            0.1973373 = weight(_text_:z in 4384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1973373 = score(doc=4384,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.8255735 = fieldWeight in 4384, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4384)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  13. Wang, Z.; Chaudhry, A.S.; Khoo, C.S.G.: Using classification schemes and thesauri to build an organizational taxonomy for organizing content and aiding navigation (2008) 0.04
    0.040326487 = product of:
      0.080652975 = sum of:
        0.080652975 = sum of:
          0.056382082 = weight(_text_:z in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056382082 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.23587814 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
          0.024270894 = weight(_text_:22 in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024270894 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7.11.2008 15:22:04
  14. Codes for the representation of languages for information interchange (2001) 0.04
    0.035238802 = product of:
      0.070477605 = sum of:
        0.070477605 = product of:
          0.14095521 = sum of:
            0.14095521 = weight(_text_:z in 3927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14095521 = score(doc=3927,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.58969533 = fieldWeight in 3927, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3927)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Series
    ANSI/NISO Z.39-53-2001
  15. Tang, C.; Dwarkadas, S.; Xu, Z.; Ma, W.Y.: On scaling Latent semantic indexing for large peer-to peer systems (2004) 0.04
    0.035238802 = product of:
      0.070477605 = sum of:
        0.070477605 = product of:
          0.14095521 = sum of:
            0.14095521 = weight(_text_:z in 4082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14095521 = score(doc=4082,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.58969533 = fieldWeight in 4082, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4082)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  16. Shen, D.; Chen, Z.; Yang, Q.; Zeng, H.J.; Zhang, B.; Lu, Y.; Ma, W.Y.: Web page classification through summarization (2004) 0.04
    0.035238802 = product of:
      0.070477605 = sum of:
        0.070477605 = product of:
          0.14095521 = sum of:
            0.14095521 = weight(_text_:z in 4132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14095521 = score(doc=4132,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.58969533 = fieldWeight in 4132, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4132)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  17. Hawking, D.; Robertson, S.: On collection size and retrieval effectiveness (2003) 0.03
    0.03432423 = product of:
      0.06864846 = sum of:
        0.06864846 = product of:
          0.13729692 = sum of:
            0.13729692 = weight(_text_:22 in 4109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13729692 = score(doc=4109,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4109, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4109)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    14. 8.2005 14:22:22
  18. Buzydlowski, J.W.; White, H.D.; Lin, X.: Term Co-occurrence Analysis as an Interface for Digital Libraries (2002) 0.03
    0.031528816 = product of:
      0.06305763 = sum of:
        0.06305763 = product of:
          0.12611526 = sum of:
            0.12611526 = weight(_text_:22 in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12611526 = score(doc=1339,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.804159 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2003 17:25:39
    22. 2.2003 18:16:22
  19. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.03
    0.031119442 = product of:
      0.062238883 = sum of:
        0.062238883 = product of:
          0.24895553 = sum of:
            0.24895553 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24895553 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.37968612 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  20. Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: Universality of citation distributions : a validation of Radicchi et al.'s relative indicator cf = c/c0 at the micro level using data from chemistry (2009) 0.03
    0.030517697 = product of:
      0.061035395 = sum of:
        0.061035395 = product of:
          0.12207079 = sum of:
            0.12207079 = weight(_text_:z in 2954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12207079 = score(doc=2954,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.51069117 = fieldWeight in 2954, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2954)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In a recently published PNAS paper, Radicchi, Fortunato, and Castellano (2008) propose the relative indicator cf as an unbiased indicator for citation performance across disciplines (fields, subject areas). To calculate cf, the citation rate for a single paper is divided by the average number of citations for all papers in the discipline in which the single paper has been categorized. cf values are said to lead to a universality of discipline-specific citation distributions. Using a comprehensive dataset of an evaluation study on Angewandte Chemie International Edition (AC-IE), we tested the advantage of using this indicator in practical application at the micro level, as compared with (1) simple citation rates, and (2) z-scores, which have been used in psychological testing for many years for normalization of test scores. To calculate z-scores, the mean number of citations of the papers within a discipline is subtracted from the citation rate of a single paper, and the difference is then divided by the citations' standard deviation for a discipline. Our results indicate that z-scores are better suited than cf values to produce universality of discipline-specific citation distributions.

Types

  • a 608
  • m 75
  • el 49
  • s 36
  • b 24
  • n 2
  • x 2
  • i 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications