-
Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017)
0.06
0.059820227 = product of:
0.08973034 = sum of:
0.0392027 = weight(_text_:k in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0392027 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14199455 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.039776858 = queryNorm
0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.050527632 = product of:
0.07579145 = sum of:
0.038066942 = weight(_text_:29 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038066942 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13992254 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.039776858 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.037724506 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037724506 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13929178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039776858 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Pages
- S.22-36
- Source
- Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
-
Kumar, K.: Theoretical bases for universal classification systems (1982)
0.02
0.022401541 = product of:
0.067204624 = sum of:
0.067204624 = weight(_text_:k in 34) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067204624 = score(doc=34,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14199455 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.039776858 = queryNorm
0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 34, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=34)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
LaBarre, K.: Interrogating facet theory : decolonizing knowledge organization (2017)
0.02
0.022401541 = product of:
0.067204624 = sum of:
0.067204624 = weight(_text_:k in 4155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067204624 = score(doc=4155,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14199455 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.039776858 = queryNorm
0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 4155, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4155)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997)
0.02
0.019248623 = product of:
0.057745866 = sum of:
0.057745866 = product of:
0.086618796 = sum of:
0.043505076 = weight(_text_:29 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043505076 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13992254 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.039776858 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.04311372 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04311372 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13929178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039776858 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 29. 1.1996 16:50:24
- Source
- Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
-
Kumar, K.: Distinctive contribution of Ranganathan to library classification (1992)
0.01
0.013067568 = product of:
0.0392027 = sum of:
0.0392027 = weight(_text_:k in 6991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0392027 = score(doc=6991,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14199455 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.039776858 = queryNorm
0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 6991, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6991)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
McCool, M.; St. Amant, K.: Field dependence and classification : implications for global information systems (2009)
0.01
0.013067568 = product of:
0.0392027 = sum of:
0.0392027 = weight(_text_:k in 2854) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0392027 = score(doc=2854,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14199455 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.039776858 = queryNorm
0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 2854, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2854)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Green, R.: Relational aspects of subject authority control : the contributions of classificatory structure (2015)
0.01
0.012030389 = product of:
0.036091167 = sum of:
0.036091167 = product of:
0.05413675 = sum of:
0.027190674 = weight(_text_:29 in 2282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027190674 = score(doc=2282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13992254 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.039776858 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2282)
0.026946075 = weight(_text_:22 in 2282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026946075 = score(doc=2282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13929178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039776858 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2282)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 8.11.2015 21:27:22
- Source
- Classification and authority control: expanding resource discovery: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar 2015, 29-30 October 2015, Lisbon, Portugal. Eds.: Slavic, A. u. M.I. Cordeiro
-
Gnoli, C.; Poli, R.: Levels of reality and levels of representation (2004)
0.01
0.011200771 = product of:
0.033602312 = sum of:
0.033602312 = weight(_text_:k in 3533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033602312 = score(doc=3533,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14199455 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.039776858 = queryNorm
0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 3533, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3533)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Ontology, in its philosophical meaning, is the discipline investigating the structure of reality. Its findings can be relevant to knowledge organization, and models of knowledge can, in turn, offer relevant ontological suggestions. Several philosophers in time have pointed out that reality is structured into a series of integrative levels, like the physical, the biological, the mental, and the cultural, and that each level plays as a base for the emergence of more complex levels. More detailed theories of levels have been developed by Nicolai Hartmann and James K. Feibleman, and these have been considered as a source for structuring principles in bibliographic classification by both the Classification Research Group (CRG) and Ingetraut Dahlberg. CRG's analysis of levels and of their possible application to a new general classification scheme based an phenomena instead of disciplines, as it was formulated by Derek Austin in 1969, is examined in detail. Both benefits and open problems in applying integrative levels to bibliographic classification are pointed out.
-
Kumar, K.: Theory of classification (1985)
0.01
0.011200771 = product of:
0.033602312 = sum of:
0.033602312 = weight(_text_:k in 2069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033602312 = score(doc=2069,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14199455 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.039776858 = queryNorm
0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 2069, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2069)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Gnoli, C.: ¬The meaning of facets in non-disciplinary classifications (2006)
0.01
0.009333976 = product of:
0.028001927 = sum of:
0.028001927 = weight(_text_:k in 2291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028001927 = score(doc=2291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14199455 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.039776858 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 2291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2291)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
-
Foskett, A.C.: ¬The future of facetted classification (2000)
0.01
0.008459321 = product of:
0.025377963 = sum of:
0.025377963 = product of:
0.076133884 = sum of:
0.076133884 = weight(_text_:29 in 3162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.076133884 = score(doc=3162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13992254 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.039776858 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 3162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3162)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 27. 1.2002 19:30:29
-
Feibleman, J.K.: Theory of integrative levels (1985)
0.01
0.0074671805 = product of:
0.022401541 = sum of:
0.022401541 = weight(_text_:k in 3637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022401541 = score(doc=3637,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14199455 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.039776858 = queryNorm
0.15776339 = fieldWeight in 3637, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3637)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- In the early 1960s, the Classification Research Group in London (q.v.) had reached the point in its experimentation with faceted classification systems where some kind of amalgamation of individual schemes was needed. They sought a unifying principle or set of principles that would provide a basis for a general system. The individual faceted schemes would not merge; what was central to one subject was fringe to another, but the fringes did not coalesce. In looking farther afield, they discovered the theory of "integrative levels" set forth by James K. Feibleman, Chairman and Professor of Philosophy at Tulane University until 1969 and author of forty-five books and more than 175 articles in various fields of philosophy. Feibleman's research concerned the development of the sciences considered in terms of an organizing principle. In the physical sciences, one Gould begin with subparticles and work up to atoms, molecules, and molecular assemblages, interpolating the biological equivalents. Feibleman separates the various levels by use of a "no return" device: "each level organizes the level or levels below it plus one emergent quality." The process is not reversible without loss of identity. A dog, in his system, is no longer a dog when it has been run over by a car; the smashed parts cannot be put together again to function as a dog. The theory of integrative levels is an interesting one. The levels from subparticles to clusters of galaxies or from nuclei to organisms are relatively clearly defined. A discipline, such as any of the ones comprising the "hard sciences," is made up of integrative levels. Research is cumulative so that scholars are ready to contribute when very young. Classification in these fields can make good use of the theory of integrative levels-in fact it should do so. It would appear that the method is more difficult to apply in the social sciences and humanities. This appearance may, however, be superficial. Almost all past happenings are irrevocable; one cannot recall the French Revolution and re-fight it. Any academic discipline that moves an over time does not usually return to an earlier position, even when there are schools of thought involved. Philosophy may have "neo-" this or that, but the subsequent new is not the same as the previous new. One has only to look at the various kinds of neo-Platonists that arise from time to time to realize that. Physical science recognizes a series of paradigms in changing its methodology over time and a similar situation may also turn out to be true in cognitive science." If this should turn out to be the case, integrative levels would probably have a part in that field as weIl.
-
Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999)
0.01
0.0071856203 = product of:
0.02155686 = sum of:
0.02155686 = product of:
0.06467058 = sum of:
0.06467058 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06467058 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13929178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039776858 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
-
Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999)
0.01
0.0071856203 = product of:
0.02155686 = sum of:
0.02155686 = product of:
0.06467058 = sum of:
0.06467058 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06467058 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13929178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039776858 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
-
Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017)
0.01
0.0071856203 = product of:
0.02155686 = sum of:
0.02155686 = product of:
0.06467058 = sum of:
0.06467058 = weight(_text_:22 in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06467058 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13929178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039776858 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 6. 5.2017 18:46:22
-
Foskett, D.J.: Classification and integrative levels (1985)
0.01
0.006533784 = product of:
0.01960135 = sum of:
0.01960135 = weight(_text_:k in 3639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01960135 = score(doc=3639,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14199455 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.039776858 = queryNorm
0.13804297 = fieldWeight in 3639, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3639)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Very interesting experimental work was done by Douglas Foskett and other British classificationists during the fifteen-year period following the end of World War II. The research was effective in demonstrating that it was possible to make very sophisticated classification systems for virtually any subject-systems suitable for experts and for the general user needing a detailed subject classification. The success of these special systems led to consideration of the possibility of putting them together to form a new general classification system. To do such a thing would require a general, overall framework of some kind, since systems limited to a special subject are easier to construct because one does not have to worry about including all of the pertinent facets needed for a general system. Individual subject classifications do not automatically coalesce into a general pattern. For example, what is central to one special classification might be fringe in another or in several others. Fringe terminologies may not coincide in terms of logical relationships. Homographs and homonyms may not rear their ugly heads until attempts at merger are made. Foskett points out that even identifying a thing in terms of a noun or verb involves different assumptions in approach. For these and other reasons, it made sense to look for existing work in fields where the necessary framework already existed. Foskett found the rudiments of such a system in a number of writings, culminating in a logical system called "integrative levels" suggested by James K. Feibleman (q.v.). This system consists of a set of advancing conceptual levels relating to the apparent organization of nature. These levels are irreversible in that if one once reached a certain level there was no going back. Foskett points out that with higher levels and greater complexity in structure the analysis needed to establish valid levels becomes much more difficult, especially as Feibleman stipulates that a higher level must not be reducible to a lower one. (That is, one cannot put Humpty Dumpty together again.) Foskett is optimistic to the extent of suggesting that references from level to level be made upwards, with inductive reasoning, a system used by Derek Austin (q.v.) for making reference structures in PRECIS. Though the method of integrative levels so far has not been used successfully with the byproducts of human social behavior and thought, so much has been learned about these areas during the past twenty years that Foskett may yet be correct in his optimism. Foskett's name has Jong been associated with classification in the social sciences. As with many of the British classificationists included in this book, he has been a member of the Classification Research Group for about forty years. Like the others, he continues to contribute to the field.
-
Loehrlein, A.J.; Lemieux, V.L.; Bennett, M.: ¬The classification of financial products (2014)
0.01
0.005127123 = product of:
0.015381369 = sum of:
0.015381369 = product of:
0.046144105 = sum of:
0.046144105 = weight(_text_:29 in 1196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046144105 = score(doc=1196,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13992254 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.039776858 = queryNorm
0.3297832 = fieldWeight in 1196, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1196)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 29. 1.2014 16:29:52
-
Cheti, A.: ¬Le categorie nell'indicizzazione (1990)
0.00
0.0048338976 = product of:
0.014501693 = sum of:
0.014501693 = product of:
0.043505076 = sum of:
0.043505076 = weight(_text_:29 in 3527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043505076 = score(doc=3527,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13992254 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.039776858 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3527, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3527)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Biblioteche oggi. 8(1990) no.1, S.29-49
-
Grimaldi, T.: ¬L'indicizzazione dal punto di vista cognitivo (II) (1996)
0.00
0.0048338976 = product of:
0.014501693 = sum of:
0.014501693 = product of:
0.043505076 = sum of:
0.043505076 = weight(_text_:29 in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043505076 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13992254 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.039776858 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 14. 7.1996 13:29:45
-
Poli, R.: Framing information (2003)
0.00
0.0048338976 = product of:
0.014501693 = sum of:
0.014501693 = product of:
0.043505076 = sum of:
0.043505076 = weight(_text_:29 in 2711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043505076 = score(doc=2711,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13992254 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.039776858 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2711, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2711)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 11. 9.2004 15:29:04
