Search (398 results, page 1 of 20)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. ¬Die deutsche Zeitschrift für Dokumentation, Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis von 1950 bis 2011 : eine vorläufige Bilanz in vier Abschnitten (2012) 0.07
    0.06994684 = product of:
      0.10492025 = sum of:
        0.02158242 = weight(_text_:h in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02158242 = score(doc=402,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09266138 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03729655 = queryNorm
            0.2329171 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
        0.08333783 = sum of:
          0.053018827 = weight(_text_:u in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.053018827 = score(doc=402,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.12212547 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03729655 = queryNorm
              0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.030319003 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030319003 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13060616 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03729655 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:35:26
    Footnote
    Besteht aus 4 Teilen: Teil 1: Eden, D., A. Arndt, A. Hoffer, T. Raschke u. P. Schön: Die Nachrichten für Dokumentation in den Jahren 1950 bis 1962 (S.159-163). Teil 2: Brose, M., E. durst, D. Nitzsche, D. Veckenstedt u. R. Wein: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1963-1975 (S.164-170). Teil 3: Bösel, J., G. Ebert, P. Garz,, M. Iwanow u. B. Russ: Methoden und Ergebnisse einer statistischen Auswertung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1976 bis 1988 (S.171-174). Teil 4: Engelage, H., S. Jansen, R. Mertins, K. Redel u. S. Ring: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) / "Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis" (IWP) 1989-2011 (S.164-170).
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 63(2012) H.3, S.157-182
  2. Rostaing, H.; Barts, N.; Léveillé, V.: Bibliometrics: representation instrument of the multidisciplinary positioning of a scientific area : Implementation for an Advisory Scientific Committee (2007) 0.06
    0.06407955 = product of:
      0.09611933 = sum of:
        0.020348102 = weight(_text_:h in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020348102 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09266138 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03729655 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
        0.07577123 = sum of:
          0.035345886 = weight(_text_:u in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035345886 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12212547 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03729655 = queryNorm
              0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
          0.04042534 = weight(_text_:22 in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04042534 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13060616 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03729655 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    30.12.2007 11:22:39
    Source
    ¬La interdisciplinariedad y la transdisciplinariedad en la organización del conocimiento científico : actas del VIII Congreso ISKO-España, León, 18, 19 y 20 de Abril de 2007 : Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in the organization of scientific knowledge. Ed.: B. Rodriguez Bravo u. M.L Alvite Diez
  3. Gerdel, W.: Datentechnische Methoden in der Referenzanalyse (1980) 0.04
    0.038021043 = product of:
      0.057031564 = sum of:
        0.03052215 = weight(_text_:h in 7571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03052215 = score(doc=7571,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09266138 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03729655 = queryNorm
            0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 7571, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7571)
        0.026509413 = product of:
          0.053018827 = sum of:
            0.053018827 = weight(_text_:u in 7571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053018827 = score(doc=7571,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12212547 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03729655 = queryNorm
                0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 7571, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7571)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1979, Willingen/Hochsauerland, 1.-5.10.1979. Das IuD-Programm heute - Online-Benutzergruppe - Bibliometrie, Scientometrie - Terminologiearbeit - Datenschutz - Tariffragen, Berufsbilder - Informationsmarkt - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  4. Eisenhardt, O.; Ohly, P.: Quantitative Analyse und Suchstrategien (1981) 0.04
    0.038021043 = product of:
      0.057031564 = sum of:
        0.03052215 = weight(_text_:h in 36) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03052215 = score(doc=36,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09266138 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03729655 = queryNorm
            0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 36, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=36)
        0.026509413 = product of:
          0.053018827 = sum of:
            0.053018827 = weight(_text_:u in 36) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053018827 = score(doc=36,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12212547 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03729655 = queryNorm
                0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 36, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=36)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1980, Berlin, 29.9.-3.10.1980: IuD und Normung - Neue Kommunikationstechnologie - Berufspolitik - Datenbanken - Betriebsstatistik - Informetrie - Parlamentsdokumentation - Arbeitskreis Senioren - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  5. Nacke, O.: Zitatenanalyse im engeren Sinne (1980) 0.04
    0.038021043 = product of:
      0.057031564 = sum of:
        0.03052215 = weight(_text_:h in 399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03052215 = score(doc=399,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09266138 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03729655 = queryNorm
            0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 399, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=399)
        0.026509413 = product of:
          0.053018827 = sum of:
            0.053018827 = weight(_text_:u in 399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053018827 = score(doc=399,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12212547 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03729655 = queryNorm
                0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 399, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=399)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1979, Willingen/Hochsauerland, 1.-5.10.1979. Das IuD-Programm heute - Online-Benutzergruppe - Bibliometrie, Scientometrie - Terminologiearbeit - Datenschutz - Tariffragen, Berufsbilder - Informationsmarkt - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  6. Nacke, O.: Fehlerquellen bei der Zitatenanalyse (1980) 0.04
    0.038021043 = product of:
      0.057031564 = sum of:
        0.03052215 = weight(_text_:h in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03052215 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09266138 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03729655 = queryNorm
            0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.026509413 = product of:
          0.053018827 = sum of:
            0.053018827 = weight(_text_:u in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053018827 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12212547 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03729655 = queryNorm
                0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1979, Willingen/Hochsauerland, 1.-5.10.1979. Das IuD-Programm heute - Online-Benutzergruppe - Bibliometrie, Scientometrie - Terminologiearbeit - Datenschutz - Tariffragen, Berufsbilder - Informationsmarkt - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  7. Eisenhardt, O.H.: Ergebnisse der Referenzanalyse (1980) 0.04
    0.038021043 = product of:
      0.057031564 = sum of:
        0.03052215 = weight(_text_:h in 401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03052215 = score(doc=401,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09266138 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03729655 = queryNorm
            0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 401, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=401)
        0.026509413 = product of:
          0.053018827 = sum of:
            0.053018827 = weight(_text_:u in 401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053018827 = score(doc=401,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12212547 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03729655 = queryNorm
                0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 401, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=401)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1979, Willingen/Hochsauerland, 1.-5.10.1979. Das IuD-Programm heute - Online-Benutzergruppe - Bibliometrie, Scientometrie - Terminologiearbeit - Datenschutz - Tariffragen, Berufsbilder - Informationsmarkt - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  8. Henzler, R.: Bibliometrische Methoden der Termanalyse (1980) 0.04
    0.038021043 = product of:
      0.057031564 = sum of:
        0.03052215 = weight(_text_:h in 403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03052215 = score(doc=403,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09266138 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03729655 = queryNorm
            0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 403, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=403)
        0.026509413 = product of:
          0.053018827 = sum of:
            0.053018827 = weight(_text_:u in 403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053018827 = score(doc=403,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12212547 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03729655 = queryNorm
                0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 403, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=403)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1979, Willingen/Hochsauerland, 1.-5.10.1979. Das IuD-Programm heute - Online-Benutzergruppe - Bibliometrie, Scientometrie - Terminologiearbeit - Datenschutz - Tariffragen, Berufsbilder - Informationsmarkt - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  9. Wersig, G.: Quantitative Methoden der Benutzerforschung (1981) 0.04
    0.038021043 = product of:
      0.057031564 = sum of:
        0.03052215 = weight(_text_:h in 414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03052215 = score(doc=414,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09266138 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03729655 = queryNorm
            0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 414, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=414)
        0.026509413 = product of:
          0.053018827 = sum of:
            0.053018827 = weight(_text_:u in 414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053018827 = score(doc=414,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12212547 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03729655 = queryNorm
                0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 414, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=414)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1980, Berlin, 29.9.-3.10.1980: IuD und Normung - Neue Kommunikationstechnologie - Berufspolitik - Datenbanken - Betriebsstatistik - Informetrie - Parlamentsdokumentation - Arbeitskreis Senioren - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  10. Hunter, J.A.: Quantifizierbare Merkmale von Datenbanken (1981) 0.04
    0.038021043 = product of:
      0.057031564 = sum of:
        0.03052215 = weight(_text_:h in 416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03052215 = score(doc=416,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09266138 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03729655 = queryNorm
            0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 416, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=416)
        0.026509413 = product of:
          0.053018827 = sum of:
            0.053018827 = weight(_text_:u in 416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053018827 = score(doc=416,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12212547 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03729655 = queryNorm
                0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 416, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=416)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1980, Berlin, 29.9.-3.10.1980: IuD und Normung - Neue Kommunikationstechnologie - Berufspolitik - Datenbanken - Betriebsstatistik - Informetrie - Parlamentsdokumentation - Arbeitskreis Senioren - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  11. ¬The Web of knowledge : Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield (2000) 0.04
    0.037784517 = product of:
      0.05667677 = sum of:
        0.025435127 = weight(_text_:h in 461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025435127 = score(doc=461,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09266138 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03729655 = queryNorm
            0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 461, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=461)
        0.031241644 = product of:
          0.06248329 = sum of:
            0.06248329 = weight(_text_:u in 461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06248329 = score(doc=461,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12212547 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03729655 = queryNorm
                0.5116319 = fieldWeight in 461, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=461)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Editor
    Cronin, B. u. H.B. Atkins
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 28(2001) no.1, S.45-46 (M.J. López Huertas u. E. Jiménez-Contreras); Password 2002, H.3, S.14-19 (W.G. Stock)
  12. H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008) 0.04
    0.037024345 = product of:
      0.055536516 = sum of:
        0.040377013 = weight(_text_:h in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040377013 = score(doc=590,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.09266138 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03729655 = queryNorm
            0.435748 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
        0.015159502 = product of:
          0.030319003 = sum of:
            0.030319003 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030319003 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13060616 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03729655 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    "Zur Kurzmitteilung "Latest enhancements in Scopus: ... h-Index incorporated in Scopus" in den letzten Online-Mitteilungen (Online-Mitteilungen 92, S.31) ist zu korrigieren, dass der h-Index sehr wohl bereits im Web of Science enthalten ist. Allerdings findet man/frau diese Information nicht in der "cited ref search", sondern neben der Trefferliste einer Quick Search, General Search oder einer Suche über den Author Finder in der rechten Navigationsleiste unter dem Titel "Citation Report". Der "Citation Report" bietet für die in der jeweiligen Trefferliste angezeigten Arbeiten: - Die Gesamtzahl der Zitierungen aller Arbeiten in der Trefferliste - Die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit dieser Arbeiten - Die Anzahl der Zitierungen der einzelnen Arbeiten, aufgeschlüsselt nach Publikationsjahr der zitierenden Arbeiten - Die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit dieser Arbeiten pro Jahr - Den h-Index (ein h-Index von x sagt aus, dass x Arbeiten der Trefferliste mehr als x-mal zitiert wurden; er ist gegenüber sehr hohen Zitierungen einzelner Arbeiten unempfindlicher als die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit)."
    Date
    6. 4.2008 19:04:22
    Object
    H-Index
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 61(2008) H.1, S.124-125
  13. Norris, M.; Oppenheim, C.: ¬The h-index : a broad review of a new bibliometric indicator (2010) 0.03
    0.032402415 = product of:
      0.04860362 = sum of:
        0.035970703 = weight(_text_:h in 4147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035970703 = score(doc=4147,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.09266138 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03729655 = queryNorm
            0.3881952 = fieldWeight in 4147, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4147)
        0.012632919 = product of:
          0.025265837 = sum of:
            0.025265837 = weight(_text_:22 in 4147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025265837 = score(doc=4147,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13060616 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03729655 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4147, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4147)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This review aims to show, broadly, how the h-index has become a subject of widespread debate, how it has spawned many variants and diverse applications since first introduced in 2005 and some of the issues in its use. Design/methodology/approach - The review drew on a range of material published in 1990 or so sources published since 2005. From these sources, a number of themes were identified and discussed ranging from the h-index's advantages to which citation database might be selected for its calculation. Findings - The analysis shows how the h-index has quickly established itself as a major subject of interest in the field of bibliometrics. Study of the index ranges from its mathematical underpinning to a range of variants perceived to address the indexes' shortcomings. The review illustrates how widely the index has been applied but also how care must be taken in its application. Originality/value - The use of bibliometric indicators to measure research performance continues, with the h-index as its latest addition. The use of the h-index, its variants and many applications to which it has been put are still at the exploratory stage. The review shows the breadth and diversity of this research and the need to verify the veracity of the h-index by more studies.
    Date
    8. 1.2011 19:22:13
    Object
    h-index
  14. Stock, W.: Informetrische Vermessung der Forschung und Entwicklung eines Landes : beispielhafte Resultate und Probleme (1992) 0.03
    0.031684205 = product of:
      0.047526307 = sum of:
        0.025435127 = weight(_text_:h in 342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025435127 = score(doc=342,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09266138 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03729655 = queryNorm
            0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 342, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=342)
        0.022091178 = product of:
          0.044182356 = sum of:
            0.044182356 = weight(_text_:u in 342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044182356 = score(doc=342,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12212547 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03729655 = queryNorm
                0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 342, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=342)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Information und Dokumentation in den 90er Jahren: neue Herausforderung, neue Technologien. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1991, Universität Ulm, 30.9.-2.10.1991. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer u. K.-H. Meier
  15. Herb, U.; Geith, U.: Kriterien der qualitativen Bewertung wissenschaftlicher Publikationen : Befunde aus dem Projekt visOA (2020) 0.03
    0.030227613 = product of:
      0.045341417 = sum of:
        0.020348102 = weight(_text_:h in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020348102 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09266138 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03729655 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
        0.024993315 = product of:
          0.04998663 = sum of:
            0.04998663 = weight(_text_:u in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04998663 = score(doc=108,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12212547 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03729655 = queryNorm
                0.40930554 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 71(2020) H.2/3, S.77-85
  16. Meho, L.I.; Rogers, Y.: Citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of human-computer interaction researchers : a comparison of Scopus and Web of Science (2008) 0.03
    0.029189639 = product of:
      0.04378446 = sum of:
        0.03115154 = weight(_text_:h in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03115154 = score(doc=2352,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.09266138 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03729655 = queryNorm
            0.3361869 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
        0.012632919 = product of:
          0.025265837 = sum of:
            0.025265837 = weight(_text_:22 in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025265837 = score(doc=2352,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13060616 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03729655 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This study examines the differences between Scopus and Web of Science in the citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of 22 top human-computer interaction (HCI) researchers from EQUATOR - a large British Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration project. Results indicate that Scopus provides significantly more coverage of HCI literature than Web of Science, primarily due to coverage of relevant ACM and IEEE peer-reviewed conference proceedings. No significant differences exist between the two databases if citations in journals only are compared. Although broader coverage of the literature does not significantly alter the relative citation ranking of individual researchers, Scopus helps distinguish between the researchers in a more nuanced fashion than Web of Science in both citation counting and h-index. Scopus also generates significantly different maps of citation networks of individual scholars than those generated by Web of Science. The study also presents a comparison of h-index scores based on Google Scholar with those based on the union of Scopus and Web of Science. The study concludes that Scopus can be used as a sole data source for citation-based research and evaluation in HCI, especially when citations in conference proceedings are sought, and that researchers should manually calculate h scores instead of relying on system calculations.
    Object
    h-index
  17. Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006) 0.03
    0.027040517 = product of:
      0.040560775 = sum of:
        0.020348102 = weight(_text_:h in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020348102 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09266138 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03729655 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
        0.02021267 = product of:
          0.04042534 = sum of:
            0.04042534 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04042534 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13060616 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03729655 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    4.12.2006 12:12:22
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 57(2006) H.8, S.401-406
  18. Scholarly metrics under the microscope : from citation analysis to academic auditing (2015) 0.03
    0.025257077 = product of:
      0.07577123 = sum of:
        0.07577123 = sum of:
          0.035345886 = weight(_text_:u in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035345886 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12212547 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03729655 = queryNorm
              0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
          0.04042534 = weight(_text_:22 in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04042534 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13060616 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03729655 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2017 17:12:50
    Editor
    Cronin, B. u. C.R. Sugimoto
  19. Schlögl, C.: Internationale Sichtbarkeit der europäischen und insbesondere der deutschsprachigen Informationswissenschaft (2013) 0.02
    0.023660451 = product of:
      0.035490677 = sum of:
        0.01780459 = weight(_text_:h in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01780459 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09266138 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03729655 = queryNorm
            0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
        0.017686086 = product of:
          0.03537217 = sum of:
            0.03537217 = weight(_text_:22 in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03537217 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13060616 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03729655 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2013 14:04:09
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 64(2013) H.1, S.1-8
  20. Informations- und Wissensverarbeitung in den Sozialwissenschaften : Beiträge zur Umsetzung neuer Informationstechnologien (1994) 0.02
    0.022404116 = product of:
      0.03360617 = sum of:
        0.017985351 = weight(_text_:h in 5067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017985351 = score(doc=5067,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09266138 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03729655 = queryNorm
            0.1940976 = fieldWeight in 5067, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5067)
        0.015620822 = product of:
          0.031241644 = sum of:
            0.031241644 = weight(_text_:u in 5067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031241644 = score(doc=5067,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12212547 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03729655 = queryNorm
                0.25581595 = fieldWeight in 5067, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5067)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: INGWERSEN, P.: Information science as a cognitive science; MEDER, N.: Objekt-orientierte Wissensdarstellung und -navigation; SPIESS, M.: Repräsentation unsicheren Wissens; HENRICHS, N.: Begriffswandel in Datenbanken: kontextuelle Inhaltsanalyse für Disambiguierung und ideengeschichtliche Analyse; VOGT, C. u. R. WILLE: Formale Begriffsanalyse: Darstellung und Analyse von bibliographischen Daten; RITTBERGER, M.: Online-Retrieval und Hypertext: auf dem Weg zu verknüpften Datenbanken und offenen Hypertextsystemen; SCHOPEN, M.: GRIPS-Menu: Unterstützung von Endnutzerrecherchen in Literaturdatenbanken des DIMDI; KLOSE, G. u. T. PIRLEIN: Wissensmodellierung in LILOG; DANIEL, H.-D.: Peer-review als Qualitätsfilter im wissenschaftlichen Publikationswesen
    Editor
    Best, H. u.a.

Years

Languages

  • e 293
  • d 100
  • chi 1
  • m 1
  • ro 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 381
  • el 12
  • m 8
  • s 8
  • r 1
  • More… Less…