-
Trost, H.: Begriffsbildung im Bereich natürlichsprachiger Systeme (1989)
0.04
0.03768654 = product of:
0.07537308 = sum of:
0.07537308 = product of:
0.113059625 = sum of:
0.010681199 = weight(_text_:a in 3155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010681199 = score(doc=3155,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3155, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3155)
0.10237843 = weight(_text_:k in 3155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10237843 = score(doc=3155,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16223413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.63105357 = fieldWeight in 3155, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3155)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- 5. Österreichische Artificial Intelligence Tagung. Hrsg.: J. Retti u. K. Leidlmair
- Type
- a
-
Mudersbach, K.: Begriffe aus der Sicht des Sprachbenutzers (1994)
0.04
0.03768654 = product of:
0.07537308 = sum of:
0.07537308 = product of:
0.113059625 = sum of:
0.010681199 = weight(_text_:a in 8936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010681199 = score(doc=8936,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 8936, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=8936)
0.10237843 = weight(_text_:k in 8936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10237843 = score(doc=8936,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16223413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.63105357 = fieldWeight in 8936, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=8936)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Kageura, K.: Theories of terminology : a quest for a framework for the study of term formation (1999)
0.04
0.03525632 = product of:
0.07051264 = sum of:
0.07051264 = product of:
0.105768956 = sum of:
0.016187834 = weight(_text_:a in 6290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016187834 = score(doc=6290,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.3089162 = fieldWeight in 6290, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6290)
0.089581124 = weight(_text_:k in 6290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.089581124 = score(doc=6290,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16223413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.5521719 = fieldWeight in 6290, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6290)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Altmann, G.; Beöthy, E.; Best, K.-H.: ¬Die Bedeutungskomplexität der Wörter und das Menzerathsche Gesetz (1982)
0.03
0.032975726 = product of:
0.06595145 = sum of:
0.06595145 = product of:
0.09892717 = sum of:
0.009346049 = weight(_text_:a in 5933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009346049 = score(doc=5933,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 5933, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5933)
0.089581124 = weight(_text_:k in 5933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.089581124 = score(doc=5933,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16223413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.5521719 = fieldWeight in 5933, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5933)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die gegenstandsbezogene, analytische Begriffstheorie und ihre Definitionsarten (1987)
0.03
0.031849798 = product of:
0.063699596 = sum of:
0.063699596 = product of:
0.09554939 = sum of:
0.009346049 = weight(_text_:a in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009346049 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
0.086203344 = weight(_text_:22 in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.086203344 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15914612 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.9-22
- Type
- a
-
Manhart, K.: Zur Rolle von Theorie und Formalisierung bei der Begriffsbildung (1996)
0.03
0.028264908 = product of:
0.056529816 = sum of:
0.056529816 = product of:
0.08479472 = sum of:
0.0080109 = weight(_text_:a in 3930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0080109 = score(doc=3930,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 3930, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3930)
0.07678382 = weight(_text_:k in 3930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07678382 = score(doc=3930,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16223413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 3930, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3930)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Wüster, E.: Begriffs- und Themaklassifikation : Unterschiede in ihrem Wesen und in ihrer Anwendung (1971)
0.03
0.027299827 = product of:
0.054599654 = sum of:
0.054599654 = product of:
0.08189948 = sum of:
0.0080109 = weight(_text_:a in 3904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0080109 = score(doc=3904,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 3904, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3904)
0.07388858 = weight(_text_:22 in 3904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07388858 = score(doc=3904,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15914612 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3904, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3904)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 22(1971) H.3, S.98-104 (T.1); H.4, S.143-150 (T.2)
- Type
- a
-
Axelos, C.; Flasch, K.; Schepers, H.; Kuhlen, R.; Romberg, R.; Zimmermann, R.: Allgemeines/Besonderes (1971-2007)
0.02
0.023317358 = product of:
0.046634715 = sum of:
0.046634715 = product of:
0.06995207 = sum of:
0.006608655 = weight(_text_:a in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006608655 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
0.06334341 = weight(_text_:k in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06334341 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16223413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.39044446 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Als Erfinder des «Allgemeinen» gilt, gemäß dem Bericht des Aristoteles und seit diesem Bericht, Sokrates. Er ist es, der nicht mehr danach suchte, woraus ein Ding zu dem geworden ist, was es ist, oder wie es entstanden ist, sondern danach, «was [ein Ding] ist», und somit ist Sokrates der erste gewesen, der die Herausarbeitung des Allgemeinen (?a?????) forderte und mit seinen Fragen seine Gesprächspartner zu dieser Herausarbeitung trieb bzw. lockte; die Definition (???sµ??) war das Ziel des sokratischen Gesprächs, und die sokratische Aporie war das Vehikel.
- Source
- Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie. Hrsg.: J. Ritter, K. Gründer u. G. Gabriel
- Type
- a
-
Thellefsen, M.: ¬The dynamics of information representation and knowledge mediation (2006)
0.02
0.020146469 = product of:
0.040292937 = sum of:
0.040292937 = product of:
0.060439404 = sum of:
0.009250191 = weight(_text_:a in 170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009250191 = score(doc=170,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 170, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=170)
0.051189214 = weight(_text_:k in 170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051189214 = score(doc=170,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16223413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.31552678 = fieldWeight in 170, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=170)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper present an alternative approach to knowledge organization based on semiotic reasoning. The semantic distance between domain specific terminology and KOS is analyzed by means of their different sign systems. It is argued that a faceted approach may provide the means needed to minimize the gap between knowledge domains and KOS.
- Source
- Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
- Type
- a
-
Kageura, K.: Terminological semantics : an examination of 'concept' and 'meaning' in the study of terms (1995)
0.02
0.019580655 = product of:
0.03916131 = sum of:
0.03916131 = product of:
0.058741964 = sum of:
0.0075527485 = weight(_text_:a in 4561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0075527485 = score(doc=4561,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 4561, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4561)
0.051189214 = weight(_text_:k in 4561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051189214 = score(doc=4561,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16223413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.31552678 = fieldWeight in 4561, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4561)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The importance of 'concept' in the study of terms is recognized by most researchers in the field of terminological research. However, the theoretical status of 'concept' in the study of terms has not been clarified so far. Against this background, the status of 'concept' in the study of terms is theoretically examined in comparison with the status of 'meaning' in the semantic study of general languages. Sketches a possible scheme by which 'concept' and 'meaning' are properly plyced in the theoretical study of terms
- Type
- a
-
Dahlberg, I.: Begriffsarbeit in der Wissensorganisation (2010)
0.02
0.018199885 = product of:
0.03639977 = sum of:
0.03639977 = product of:
0.054599654 = sum of:
0.0053405995 = weight(_text_:a in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0053405995 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
0.049259055 = weight(_text_:22 in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049259055 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15914612 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
- Type
- a
-
Storms, G.; VanMechelen, I.; DeBoeck, P.: Structural-analysis of the intension and extension of semantic concepts (1994)
0.02
0.017850291 = product of:
0.035700582 = sum of:
0.035700582 = product of:
0.053550873 = sum of:
0.010449201 = weight(_text_:a in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010449201 = score(doc=2574,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
0.043101672 = weight(_text_:22 in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043101672 = score(doc=2574,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15914612 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A method (HICLAS, DeBoeck & Rosenberg, 1988) for studying the internal structure of semantic concepts is presented. The proposed method reveals the internal structure of the extension as well as the intesion of a concept, together with a correspondence relation that shows the mutual dependence of both structures. Its use is illustrated with the analysis of simple concepts (e.g. sports) and conjunctive concepts (e.g. birds that are also pets). The underlying structure that is revealed can be interpreted as a differentiation of the simple concepts studied and for conjunctive concepts the proposed method is able to extract non-inherited and emergent features (Hampton, 1988)
- Date
- 22. 7.2000 19:17:40
- Type
- a
-
Bauer, G.: ¬Die vielseitigen Anwendungsmöglichkeiten des Kategorienprinzips bei der Wissensorganisation (2006)
0.02
0.015924899 = product of:
0.031849798 = sum of:
0.031849798 = product of:
0.047774695 = sum of:
0.0046730246 = weight(_text_:a in 5710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0046730246 = score(doc=5710,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 5710, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5710)
0.043101672 = weight(_text_:22 in 5710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043101672 = score(doc=5710,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15914612 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5710, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5710)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.22-33
- Type
- a
-
Dahlberg, I.: Zur 'Begriffskultur' in den Sozialwissenschaften : lassen sich ihre Probleme lösen? (1996)
0.02
0.01578279 = product of:
0.03156558 = sum of:
0.03156558 = product of:
0.04734837 = sum of:
0.008956458 = weight(_text_:a in 3941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008956458 = score(doc=3941,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 3941, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3941)
0.03839191 = weight(_text_:k in 3941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03839191 = score(doc=3941,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16223413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 3941, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3941)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Dazu im selben Heft Erwiderungen von: J. Becker u. A. Reiss, W.L. Bühl, V. Dreier, R. Dürr, T. Eckes, W. Friedlmeier, W. Gödert, A. Hahn, H. Kerber, R. Kleinknecht, J. Klüver, J. Krause, S. Lamnek, M.-T. Liske, C. Lütge, R. Meyers, K. Manhart, H.P. Ohly, M. Patzak, R. Popp, F.J. Radermacher, A. Ros, P. Schimany, T.B. Seiler, A. Suchanek, E. Walther-Klaus, H. Weiss; eine Erwiderung von I. Dahlberg u. eine Metakritik von G. Endruweit. - Replik der Verfasserin auf die Erwiderungen: S.67-85
- Type
- a
-
Marradi, A.: ¬The concept of concept : concepts and terms (2012)
0.02
0.0151121225 = product of:
0.030224245 = sum of:
0.030224245 = product of:
0.045336366 = sum of:
0.014549458 = weight(_text_:a in 33) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014549458 = score(doc=33,freq=38.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.2776507 = fieldWeight in 33, product of:
6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
38.0 = termFreq=38.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=33)
0.03078691 = weight(_text_:22 in 33) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03078691 = score(doc=33,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15914612 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 33, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=33)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The concept of concept has seldom been examined in its entirety, and the term very seldom defined. The rigidity, or lack thereof, and the homogeneity, or lack thereof, of concepts, are only two of their characteristics that have been debated. These issues are reviewed in this paper, namely: 1) does a concept represent its referent(s), or is it a free creation of the mind?; 2) can a concept be analyzed in parts or elements?; 3) must a concept be general, i.e., refer to a category or a type, or can it refer to a single object, physical or mental?; 4) are concepts as clearly delimited as terms are? Are concepts voiceless terms?; and, 5) what do terms contribute to an individual's and a community's conceptual richness? As regards the relationship of concepts with their referents in the stage of formation, it seems reasonable to conclude that said relationship may be close in some concepts, less close in others, and lacking altogether in some cases. The set of elements of a concept, which varies from individual to individual and across time inside the same individual, is called the intension of a concept. The set of referents of a concept is called the extension of that concept. Most concepts don't have a clearly delimited extension: their referents form a fuzzy set. The aspects of a concept's intension form a scale of generality. A concept is not equal to the term that describes it; rather, many terms are joined to concepts. Language, therefore, renders a gamut of services to the development, consolidation, and communication of conceptual richness.
- Date
- 22. 1.2012 13:11:25
- Type
- a
-
Jouis, C.: Logic of relationships (2002)
0.01
0.01457148 = product of:
0.02914296 = sum of:
0.02914296 = product of:
0.04371444 = sum of:
0.012927534 = weight(_text_:a in 1204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012927534 = score(doc=1204,freq=30.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.24669915 = fieldWeight in 1204, product of:
5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
30.0 = termFreq=30.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1204)
0.03078691 = weight(_text_:22 in 1204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03078691 = score(doc=1204,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15914612 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1204, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1204)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A main goal of recent studies in semantics is to integrate into conceptual structures the models of representation used in linguistics, logic, and/or artificial intelligence. A fundamental problem resides in the need to structure knowledge and then to check the validity of constructed representations. We propose associating logical properties with relationships by introducing the relationships into a typed and functional system of specifcations. This makes it possible to compare conceptual representations against the relationships established between the concepts. The mandatory condition to validate such a conceptual representation is consistency. The semantic system proposed is based an a structured set of semantic primitives-types, relations, and properties-based an a global model of language processing, Applicative and Cognitive Grammar (ACG) (Desc16s, 1990), and an extension of this model to terminology (Jouis & Mustafa 1995, 1996, 1997). The ACG postulates three levels of representation of languages, including a cognitive level. At this level, the meanings of lexical predicates are represented by semantic cognitive schemes. From this perspective, we propose a set of semantic concepts, which defines an organized system of meanings. Relations are part of a specification network based an a general terminological scheure (i.e., a coherent system of meanings of relations). In such a system, a specific relation may be characterized as to its: (1) functional type (the semantic type of arguments of the relation); (2) algebraic properties (reflexivity, symmetry, transitivity, etc.); and (3) combinatorial relations with other entities in the same context (for instance, the part of the text where a concept is defined).
- Date
- 1.12.2002 11:12:22
- Type
- a
-
Besler, G.; Szulc, J.: Gottlob Frege's theory of definition as useful tool for knowledge organization : definition of 'context' - case study (2014)
0.01
0.01411655 = product of:
0.0282331 = sum of:
0.0282331 = product of:
0.042349648 = sum of:
0.011562739 = weight(_text_:a in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011562739 = score(doc=1440,freq=24.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
0.03078691 = weight(_text_:22 in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03078691 = score(doc=1440,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15914612 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The aim of this paper is to analyze the Gottlob Frege's (1848-1925) theory of definition as a tool for knowledge organization. The objective was achieved by discussing the theory of definition including: the aims of definition, kinds of definition, condition of correct definition, what is undefinable. Frege indicated the following aims of a defining: (1) to introduce a new word, which has had no precise meaning until then (2) to explain the meaning of a word; (3) to catch a thought. We would like to present three kinds of definitions used by Frege: a contextual definition, a stipulative definition and a piecemeal definition. In the history of theory of definition Frege was the first to have formulated the condition of a correct definition. According to Frege not everything can be defined, what is logically simple cannot have a proper definition Usability of Frege's theory of definition is referred in the case study. Definitions that serve as an example are definitions of 'context'. The term 'context' is used in different situations and meanings in the field of knowledge organization. The paper is rounded by a discussion of how Frege's theory of definition can be useful for knowledge organization. To present G. Frege's theory of definition in view of the need for knowledge organization we shall start with different ranges of knowledge organization.
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
- Type
- a
-
Treude, L.: ¬Das Problem der Konzeptdefinition in der Wissensorganisation : über einen missglückten Versuch der Klärung (2013)
0.01
0.0136499135 = product of:
0.027299827 = sum of:
0.027299827 = product of:
0.04094974 = sum of:
0.00400545 = weight(_text_:a in 3060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00400545 = score(doc=3060,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 3060, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3060)
0.03694429 = weight(_text_:22 in 3060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03694429 = score(doc=3060,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15914612 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3060, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3060)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Alon Friedman und Richard P. Smiraglia kündigen in ihrem aktuellen Artikel "Nodes and arcs: concept map, semiotics, and knowledge organization" an, eine "empirical demonstration of how the domain [of knowledge organisation] itself understands the meaning of a concept" durchzuführen. Die Klärung des Konzeptbegriffs ist ein begrüßenswertes Vorhaben, das die Autoren in einer empirischen Untersuchung von concept maps (also Konzeptdiagrammen) aus dem Bereich der Wissensorganisation nachvollziehen wollen. Beschränkte sich Friedman 2011 in seinem Artikel "Concept theory and semiotics in knowledge organization" [Fn 01] noch ausschließlich auf Sprache als Medium im Zeichenprozess, bezieht er sich nun auf Visualisierungen als Repräsentationsform und scheint somit seinen Ansatz um den Aspekt der Bildlichkeit zu erweitern. Zumindest erwartet man dies nach der Lektüre der Beschreibung des aktuellen Vorhabens von Friedman und Smiraglia, das - wie die Autoren verkünden - auf einer semiotischen Grundlage durchgeführt worden sei.
- Source
- LIBREAS: Library ideas. no.22, 2013, S.xx-xx
-
Olson, H.A.: How we construct subjects : a feminist analysis (2007)
0.01
0.013206033 = product of:
0.026412066 = sum of:
0.026412066 = product of:
0.039618097 = sum of:
0.008831187 = weight(_text_:a in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008831187 = score(doc=5588,freq=14.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.1685276 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
0.03078691 = weight(_text_:22 in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03078691 = score(doc=5588,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15914612 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- To organize information, librarians create structures. These structures grow from a logic that goes back at least as far as Aristotle. It is the basis of classification as we practice it, and thesauri and subject headings have developed from it. Feminist critiques of logic suggest that logic is gendered in nature. This article will explore how these critiques play out in contemporary standards for the organization of information. Our widely used classification schemes embody principles such as hierarchical force that conform to traditional/Aristotelian logic. Our subject heading strings follow a linear path of subdivision. Our thesauri break down subjects into discrete concepts. In thesauri and subject heading lists we privilege hierarchical relationships, reflected in the syndetic structure of broader and narrower terms, over all other relationships. Are our classificatory and syndetic structures gendered? Are there other options? Carol Gilligan's In a Different Voice (1982), Women's Ways of Knowing (Belenky, Clinchy, Goldberger, & Tarule, 1986), and more recent related research suggest a different type of structure for women's knowledge grounded in "connected knowing." This article explores current and potential elements of connected knowing in subject access with a focus on the relationships, both paradigmatic and syntagmatic, between concepts.
- Date
- 11.12.2019 19:00:22
- Type
- a
-
Working with conceptual structures : contributions to ICCS 2000. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures: Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues. Darmstadt, August 14-18, 2000 (2000)
0.01
0.0106763225 = product of:
0.021352645 = sum of:
0.021352645 = product of:
0.032028966 = sum of:
0.009633686 = weight(_text_:a in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009633686 = score(doc=5089,freq=34.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.1838419 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
34.0 = termFreq=34.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
0.022395281 = weight(_text_:k in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022395281 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16223413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.13804297 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures - Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues (ICCS 2000) brings together a wide range of researchers and practitioners working with conceptual structures. During the last few years, the ICCS conference series has considerably widened its scope on different kinds of conceptual structures, stimulating research across domain boundaries. We hope that this stimulation is further enhanced by ICCS 2000 joining the long tradition of conferences in Darmstadt with extensive, lively discussions. This volume consists of contributions presented at ICCS 2000, complementing the volume "Conceptual Structures: Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues" (B. Ganter, G.W. Mineau (Eds.), LNAI 1867, Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg 2000). It contains submissions reviewed by the program committee, and position papers. We wish to express our appreciation to all the authors of submitted papers, to the general chair, the program chair, the editorial board, the program committee, and to the additional reviewers for making ICCS 2000 a valuable contribution in the knowledge processing research field. Special thanks go to the local organizers for making the conference an enjoyable and inspiring event. We are grateful to Darmstadt University of Technology, the Ernst Schröder Center for Conceptual Knowledge Processing, the Center for Interdisciplinary Studies in Technology, the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Land Hessen, and NaviCon GmbH for their generous support
- Content
- Concepts & Language: Knowledge organization by procedures of natural language processing. A case study using the method GABEK (J. Zelger, J. Gadner) - Computer aided narrative analysis using conceptual graphs (H. Schärfe, P. 0hrstrom) - Pragmatic representation of argumentative text: a challenge for the conceptual graph approach (H. Irandoust, B. Moulin) - Conceptual graphs as a knowledge representation core in a complex language learning environment (G. Angelova, A. Nenkova, S. Boycheva, T. Nikolov) - Conceptual Modeling and Ontologies: Relationships and actions in conceptual categories (Ch. Landauer, K.L. Bellman) - Concept approximations for formal concept analysis (J. Saquer, J.S. Deogun) - Faceted information representation (U. Priß) - Simple concept graphs with universal quantifiers (J. Tappe) - A framework for comparing methods for using or reusing multiple ontologies in an application (J. van ZyI, D. Corbett) - Designing task/method knowledge-based systems with conceptual graphs (M. Leclère, F.Trichet, Ch. Choquet) - A logical ontology (J. Farkas, J. Sarbo) - Algorithms and Tools: Fast concept analysis (Ch. Lindig) - A framework for conceptual graph unification (D. Corbett) - Visual CP representation of knowledge (H.D. Pfeiffer, R.T. Hartley) - Maximal isojoin for representing software textual specifications and detecting semantic anomalies (Th. Charnois) - Troika: using grids, lattices and graphs in knowledge acquisition (H.S. Delugach, B.E. Lampkin) - Open world theorem prover for conceptual graphs (J.E. Heaton, P. Kocura) - NetCare: a practical conceptual graphs software tool (S. Polovina, D. Strang) - CGWorld - a web based workbench for conceptual graphs management and applications (P. Dobrev, K. Toutanova) - Position papers: The edition project: Peirce's existential graphs (R. Mülller) - Mining association rules using formal concept analysis (N. Pasquier) - Contextual logic summary (R Wille) - Information channels and conceptual scaling (K.E. Wolff) - Spatial concepts - a rule exploration (S. Rudolph) - The TEXT-TO-ONTO learning environment (A. Mädche, St. Staab) - Controlling the semantics of metadata on audio-visual documents using ontologies (Th. Dechilly, B. Bachimont) - Building the ontological foundations of a terminology from natural language to conceptual graphs with Ribosome, a knowledge extraction system (Ch. Jacquelinet, A. Burgun) - CharGer: some lessons learned and new directions (H.S. Delugach) - Knowledge management using conceptual graphs (W.K. Pun)
