-
Lengnink, K.: Ähnlichkeit als Distanz in Begriffsverbänden (2000)
0.03
0.032975726 = product of:
0.06595145 = sum of:
0.06595145 = product of:
0.09892717 = sum of:
0.009346049 = weight(_text_:a in 4033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009346049 = score(doc=4033,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4033, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4033)
0.089581124 = weight(_text_:k in 4033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.089581124 = score(doc=4033,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16223413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.5521719 = fieldWeight in 4033, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4033)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Wille, R.; Wachter, C.: Begriffsanalyse von Dokumenten (1992)
0.03
0.028264908 = product of:
0.056529816 = sum of:
0.056529816 = product of:
0.08479472 = sum of:
0.0080109 = weight(_text_:a in 341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0080109 = score(doc=341,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 341, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=341)
0.07678382 = weight(_text_:k in 341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07678382 = score(doc=341,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16223413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 341, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=341)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information und Dokumentation in den 90er Jahren: neue Herausforderung, neue Technologien. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1991, Universität Ulm, 30.9.-2.10.1991. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer u. K.-H. Meier
- Type
- a
-
Vogt, F.; Wille, R.: TOSCANA - a graphical tool for analyzing and exploring data (1995)
0.02
0.020400334 = product of:
0.04080067 = sum of:
0.04080067 = product of:
0.061201 = sum of:
0.011941944 = weight(_text_:a in 1901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011941944 = score(doc=1901,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 1901, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1901)
0.049259055 = weight(_text_:22 in 1901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049259055 = score(doc=1901,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15914612 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1901, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1901)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- TOSCANA is a computer program which allows an online interaction with larger data bases to analyse and explore data conceptually. It uses labelled line diagrams of concept lattices to communicate knowledge coded in given data. The basic problem to create online presentations of concept lattices is solved by composing prepared diagrams to nested line diagrams. A larger number of applications in different areas have already shown that TOSCANA is a useful tool for many purposes
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.2, S.78-81
- Type
- a
-
Priss, U.: Faceted information representation (2000)
0.02
0.017482575 = product of:
0.03496515 = sum of:
0.03496515 = product of:
0.05244772 = sum of:
0.009346049 = weight(_text_:a in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009346049 = score(doc=5095,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
0.043101672 = weight(_text_:22 in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043101672 = score(doc=5095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15914612 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper presents an abstract formalization of the notion of "facets". Facets are relational structures of units, relations and other facets selected for a certain purpose. Facets can be used to structure large knowledge representation systems into a hierarchical arrangement of consistent and independent subsystems (facets) that facilitate flexibility and combinations of different viewpoints or aspects. This paper describes the basic notions, facet characteristics and construction mechanisms. It then explicates the theory in an example of a faceted information retrieval system (FaIR)
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 17:47:06
- Type
- a
-
Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999)
0.02
0.017482575 = product of:
0.03496515 = sum of:
0.03496515 = product of:
0.05244772 = sum of:
0.009346049 = weight(_text_:a in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009346049 = score(doc=2654,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
0.043101672 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043101672 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15914612 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Faceted Knowledge Representation provides a formalism for implementing knowledge systems. The basic notions of faceted knowledge representation are "unit", "relation", "facet" and "interpretation". Units are atomic elements and can be abstract elements or refer to external objects in an application. Relations are sequences or matrices of 0 and 1's (binary matrices). Facets are relational structures that combine units and relations. Each facet represents an aspect or viewpoint of a knowledge system. Interpretations are mappings that can be used to translate between different representations. This paper introduces the basic notions of faceted knowledge representation. The formalism is applied here to an abstract modeling of a faceted thesaurus as used in information retrieval.
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 17:30:31
- Type
- a
-
Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung : Methoden und Anwendungen. Mit Beiträgen zahlreicher Fachwissenschaftler (2000)
0.01
0.011777043 = product of:
0.023554087 = sum of:
0.023554087 = product of:
0.03533113 = sum of:
0.0033378745 = weight(_text_:a in 4193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0033378745 = score(doc=4193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 4193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4193)
0.031993255 = weight(_text_:k in 4193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031993255 = score(doc=4193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16223413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 4193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4193)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: GANTER, B.: Begriffe und Implikationen; BURMEISTER, P.: ConImp: Ein Programm zur Fromalen Begriffsanalyse; Lengnink, K.: Ähnlichkeit als Distanz in Begriffsverbänden; POLLANDT, S.: Datenanalyse mit Fuzzy-Begriffen; PREDIGER, S.: Terminologische Merkmalslogik in der Formalen Begriffsanalyse; WILLE, R. u. M. ZICKWOLFF: Grundlagen einer Triadischen Begriffsanalyse; LINDIG, C. u. G. SNELTING: Formale Begriffsanalyse im Software Engineering; STRACK, H. u. M. SKORSKY: Zugriffskontrolle bei Programmsystemen und im Datenschutz mittels Formaler Begriffsanalyse; ANDELFINGER, U.: Inhaltliche Erschließung des Bereichs 'Sozialorientierte Gestaltung von Informationstechnik': Ein begriffsanalytischer Ansatz; GÖDERT, W.: Wissensdarstellung in Informationssystemen, Fragetypen und Anforderungen an Retrievalkomponenten; ROCK, T. u. R. WILLE: Ein TOSCANA-Erkundungssystem zur Literatursuche; ESCHENFELDER, D. u.a.: Ein Erkundungssystem zum Baurecht: Methoden der Entwicklung eines TOSCANA-Systems; GROßKOPF, A. u. G. HARRAS: Begriffliche Erkundung semantischer Strukturen von Sprechaktverben; ZELGER, J.: Grundwerte, Ziele und Maßnahmen in einem regionalen Krankenhaus: Eine Anwendung des Verfahrens GABEK; KOHLER-KOCH, B. u. F. VOGT: Normen- und regelgeleitete internationale Kooperationen: Formale Begriffsanalyse in der Politikwissenschaft; HENNING, H.J. u. W. KEMMNITZ: Entwicklung eines kontextuellen Methodenkonzeptes mit Hilfer der Formalen Begriffsanalyse an Beispielen zum Risikoverständnis; BARTEL, H.-G.: Über Möglichkeiten der Formalen Begriffsanalyse in der Mathematischen Archäochemie
-
Working with conceptual structures : contributions to ICCS 2000. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures: Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues. Darmstadt, August 14-18, 2000 (2000)
0.01
0.0106763225 = product of:
0.021352645 = sum of:
0.021352645 = product of:
0.032028966 = sum of:
0.009633686 = weight(_text_:a in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009633686 = score(doc=5089,freq=34.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.1838419 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
34.0 = termFreq=34.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
0.022395281 = weight(_text_:k in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022395281 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16223413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.13804297 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures - Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues (ICCS 2000) brings together a wide range of researchers and practitioners working with conceptual structures. During the last few years, the ICCS conference series has considerably widened its scope on different kinds of conceptual structures, stimulating research across domain boundaries. We hope that this stimulation is further enhanced by ICCS 2000 joining the long tradition of conferences in Darmstadt with extensive, lively discussions. This volume consists of contributions presented at ICCS 2000, complementing the volume "Conceptual Structures: Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues" (B. Ganter, G.W. Mineau (Eds.), LNAI 1867, Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg 2000). It contains submissions reviewed by the program committee, and position papers. We wish to express our appreciation to all the authors of submitted papers, to the general chair, the program chair, the editorial board, the program committee, and to the additional reviewers for making ICCS 2000 a valuable contribution in the knowledge processing research field. Special thanks go to the local organizers for making the conference an enjoyable and inspiring event. We are grateful to Darmstadt University of Technology, the Ernst Schröder Center for Conceptual Knowledge Processing, the Center for Interdisciplinary Studies in Technology, the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Land Hessen, and NaviCon GmbH for their generous support
- Content
- Concepts & Language: Knowledge organization by procedures of natural language processing. A case study using the method GABEK (J. Zelger, J. Gadner) - Computer aided narrative analysis using conceptual graphs (H. Schärfe, P. 0hrstrom) - Pragmatic representation of argumentative text: a challenge for the conceptual graph approach (H. Irandoust, B. Moulin) - Conceptual graphs as a knowledge representation core in a complex language learning environment (G. Angelova, A. Nenkova, S. Boycheva, T. Nikolov) - Conceptual Modeling and Ontologies: Relationships and actions in conceptual categories (Ch. Landauer, K.L. Bellman) - Concept approximations for formal concept analysis (J. Saquer, J.S. Deogun) - Faceted information representation (U. Priß) - Simple concept graphs with universal quantifiers (J. Tappe) - A framework for comparing methods for using or reusing multiple ontologies in an application (J. van ZyI, D. Corbett) - Designing task/method knowledge-based systems with conceptual graphs (M. Leclère, F.Trichet, Ch. Choquet) - A logical ontology (J. Farkas, J. Sarbo) - Algorithms and Tools: Fast concept analysis (Ch. Lindig) - A framework for conceptual graph unification (D. Corbett) - Visual CP representation of knowledge (H.D. Pfeiffer, R.T. Hartley) - Maximal isojoin for representing software textual specifications and detecting semantic anomalies (Th. Charnois) - Troika: using grids, lattices and graphs in knowledge acquisition (H.S. Delugach, B.E. Lampkin) - Open world theorem prover for conceptual graphs (J.E. Heaton, P. Kocura) - NetCare: a practical conceptual graphs software tool (S. Polovina, D. Strang) - CGWorld - a web based workbench for conceptual graphs management and applications (P. Dobrev, K. Toutanova) - Position papers: The edition project: Peirce's existential graphs (R. Mülller) - Mining association rules using formal concept analysis (N. Pasquier) - Contextual logic summary (R Wille) - Information channels and conceptual scaling (K.E. Wolff) - Spatial concepts - a rule exploration (S. Rudolph) - The TEXT-TO-ONTO learning environment (A. Mädche, St. Staab) - Controlling the semantics of metadata on audio-visual documents using ontologies (Th. Dechilly, B. Bachimont) - Building the ontological foundations of a terminology from natural language to conceptual graphs with Ribosome, a knowledge extraction system (Ch. Jacquelinet, A. Burgun) - CharGer: some lessons learned and new directions (H.S. Delugach) - Knowledge management using conceptual graphs (W.K. Pun)
-
Prediger, S.: Kontextuelle Urteilslogik mit Begriffsgraphen : Ein Beitrag zur Restrukturierung der mathematischen Logik (1998)
0.01
0.010262303 = product of:
0.020524606 = sum of:
0.020524606 = product of:
0.06157382 = sum of:
0.06157382 = weight(_text_:22 in 3142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06157382 = score(doc=3142,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15914612 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3142, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3142)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26. 2.2008 15:58:22
-
Conceptual structures : logical, linguistic, and computational issues. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2000, Darmstadt, Germany, August 14-18, 2000 (2000)
0.01
0.008805628 = product of:
0.017611256 = sum of:
0.017611256 = product of:
0.026416883 = sum of:
0.0072209267 = weight(_text_:a in 691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0072209267 = score(doc=691,freq=26.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.13779864 = fieldWeight in 691, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=691)
0.019195955 = weight(_text_:k in 691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019195955 = score(doc=691,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16223413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.118322544 = fieldWeight in 691, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=691)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Computer scientists create models of a perceived reality. Through AI techniques, these models aim at providing the basic support for emulating cognitive behavior such as reasoning and learning, which is one of the main goals of the Al research effort. Such computer models are formed through the interaction of various acquisition and inference mechanisms: perception, concept learning, conceptual clustering, hypothesis testing, probabilistic inference, etc., and are represented using different paradigms tightly linked to the processes that use them. Among these paradigms let us cite: biological models (neural nets, genetic programming), logic-based models (first-order logic, modal logic, rule-based systems), virtual reality models (object systems, agent systems), probabilistic models (Bayesian nets, fuzzy logic), linguistic models (conceptual dependency graphs, language-based rep resentations), etc. One of the strengths of the Conceptual Graph (CG) theory is its versatility in terms of the representation paradigms under which it falls. It can be viewed and therefore used, under different representation paradigms, which makes it a popular choice for a wealth of applications. Its full coupling with different cognitive processes lead to the opening of the field toward related research communities such as the Description Logic, Formal Concept Analysis, and Computational Linguistic communities. We now see more and more research results from one community enrich the other, laying the foundations of common philosophical grounds from which a successful synergy can emerge. ICCS 2000 embodies this spirit of research collaboration. It presents a set of papers that we believe, by their exposure, will benefit the whole community. For instance, the technical program proposes tracks on Conceptual Ontologies, Language, Formal Concept Analysis, Computational Aspects of Conceptual Structures, and Formal Semantics, with some papers on pragmatism and human related aspects of computing. Never before was the program of ICCS formed by so heterogeneously rooted theories of knowledge representation and use. We hope that this swirl of ideas will benefit you as much as it already has benefited us while putting together this program
- Content
- Concepts and Language: The Role of Conceptual Structure in Human Evolution (Keith Devlin) - Concepts in Linguistics - Concepts in Natural Language (Gisela Harras) - Patterns, Schemata, and Types: Author Support through Formalized Experience (Felix H. Gatzemeier) - Conventions and Notations for Knowledge Representation and Retrieval (Philippe Martin) - Conceptual Ontology: Ontology, Metadata, and Semiotics (John F. Sowa) - Pragmatically Yours (Mary Keeler) - Conceptual Modeling for Distributed Ontology Environments (Deborah L. McGuinness) - Discovery of Class Relations in Exception Structured Knowledge Bases (Hendra Suryanto, Paul Compton) - Conceptual Graphs: Perspectives: CGs Applications: Where Are We 7 Years after the First ICCS ? (Michel Chein, David Genest) - The Engineering of a CC-Based System: Fundamental Issues (Guy W. Mineau) - Conceptual Graphs, Metamodeling, and Notation of Concepts (Olivier Gerbé, Guy W. Mineau, Rudolf K. Keller) - Knowledge Representation and Reasonings: Based on Graph Homomorphism (Marie-Laure Mugnier) - User Modeling Using Conceptual Graphs for Intelligent Agents (James F. Baldwin, Trevor P. Martin, Aimilia Tzanavari) - Towards a Unified Querying System of Both Structured and Semi-structured Imprecise Data Using Fuzzy View (Patrice Buche, Ollivier Haemmerlé) - Formal Semantics of Conceptual Structures: The Extensional Semantics of the Conceptual Graph Formalism (Guy W. Mineau) - Semantics of Attribute Relations in Conceptual Graphs (Pavel Kocura) - Nested Concept Graphs and Triadic Power Context Families (Susanne Prediger) - Negations in Simple Concept Graphs (Frithjof Dau) - Extending the CG Model by Simulations (Jean-François Baget) - Contextual Logic and Formal Concept Analysis: Building and Structuring Description Logic Knowledge Bases: Using Least Common Subsumers and Concept Analysis (Franz Baader, Ralf Molitor) - On the Contextual Logic of Ordinal Data (Silke Pollandt, Rudolf Wille) - Boolean Concept Logic (Rudolf Wille) - Lattices of Triadic Concept Graphs (Bernd Groh, Rudolf Wille) - Formalizing Hypotheses with Concepts (Bernhard Ganter, Sergei 0. Kuznetsov) - Generalized Formal Concept Analysis (Laurent Chaudron, Nicolas Maille) - A Logical Generalization of Formal Concept Analysis (Sébastien Ferré, Olivier Ridoux) - On the Treatment of Incomplete Knowledge in Formal Concept Analysis (Peter Burmeister, Richard Holzer) - Conceptual Structures in Practice: Logic-Based Networks: Concept Graphs and Conceptual Structures (Peter W. Eklund) - Conceptual Knowledge Discovery and Data Analysis (Joachim Hereth, Gerd Stumme, Rudolf Wille, Uta Wille) - CEM - A Conceptual Email Manager (Richard Cole, Gerd Stumme) - A Contextual-Logic Extension of TOSCANA (Peter Eklund, Bernd Groh, Gerd Stumme, Rudolf Wille) - A Conceptual Graph Model for W3C Resource Description Framework (Olivier Corby, Rose Dieng, Cédric Hébert) - Computational Aspects of Conceptual Structures: Computing with Conceptual Structures (Bernhard Ganter) - Symmetry and the Computation of Conceptual Structures (Robert Levinson) An Introduction to SNePS 3 (Stuart C. Shapiro) - Composition Norm Dynamics Calculation with Conceptual Graphs (Aldo de Moor) - From PROLOG++ to PROLOG+CG: A CG Object-Oriented Logic Programming Language (Adil Kabbaj, Martin Janta-Polczynski) - A Cost-Bounded Algorithm to Control Events Generalization (Gaël de Chalendar, Brigitte Grau, Olivier Ferret)
-
Wille, R.: Lattices in data analysis : how to draw them with a computer (1989)
0.00
0.0025175828 = product of:
0.0050351657 = sum of:
0.0050351657 = product of:
0.015105497 = sum of:
0.015105497 = weight(_text_:a in 3043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015105497 = score(doc=3043,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 3043, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3043)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Ganter, B.; Stahl, J.; Wille, R.: Conceptual measurement and many-valued contexts (1986)
0.00
0.0022028852 = product of:
0.0044057705 = sum of:
0.0044057705 = product of:
0.01321731 = sum of:
0.01321731 = weight(_text_:a in 3137) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01321731 = score(doc=3137,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 3137, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3137)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Classification as a tool of research. Ed.: W. Gaul u. M. Schader
- Type
- a
-
Vogt, F.; Wachter, C.; Wille, R.: Data analysis based on a conceptual file (1991)
0.00
0.0022028852 = product of:
0.0044057705 = sum of:
0.0044057705 = product of:
0.01321731 = sum of:
0.01321731 = weight(_text_:a in 3140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01321731 = score(doc=3140,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 3140, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3140)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Vogt, F.; Wille, R.: TOSCANA - a graphical tool for analyzing and exploring data (1995)
0.00
0.0022028852 = product of:
0.0044057705 = sum of:
0.0044057705 = product of:
0.01321731 = sum of:
0.01321731 = weight(_text_:a in 595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01321731 = score(doc=595,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 595, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=595)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Lex, W.: ¬A representation of concepts for their computerization (1987)
0.00
0.0021802909 = product of:
0.0043605817 = sum of:
0.0043605817 = product of:
0.013081744 = sum of:
0.013081744 = weight(_text_:a in 618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013081744 = score(doc=618,freq=12.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 618, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=618)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A lattice theoretical description of concept hierarchies is developed using for attributes the terms "given", "negated", "open" and "impossible" as the truth-values of a four-valued logic. Similar to the theory of B. Ganter and R. Wille so does this framework permit a precise representation of the usual interdependences in a field of related concepts - such as superconcepts, subconcept, contrary concepts etc. -, whenever the concepts under consideration can be sufficiently described by the presence or absence of certain attributes ...
- Type
- a
-
Luksch, P.; Wille, R.: ¬A mathematical model for conceptual knowledge systems (1991)
0.00
0.0020606103 = product of:
0.0041212207 = sum of:
0.0041212207 = product of:
0.012363662 = sum of:
0.012363662 = weight(_text_:a in 3033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012363662 = score(doc=3033,freq=14.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 3033, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3033)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Objects, attributes, and concepts are basic notations of conceptual knowledge; they are linked by the following four basic relations: an object has an attribute, an object belongs to a concept, an attribute abstracts from a concept, and a concept is a subconcept of another concept. These structural elements are well mathematized in formal concept analysis. Therefore, conceptual knowledge systems can be mathematically modelled in the frame of formal concept analysis. How such modelling may be performed is indicated by an example of a conceptual knowledge system. The formal definition of the model finally clarifies in which ways representation, inference, acquisition, and communication of conceptual knowledge can be mathematically treated
- Type
- a
-
Kaytoue, M.; Kuznetsov, S.O.; Assaghir, Z.; Napoli, A.: Embedding tolerance relations in concept lattices : an application in information fusion (2010)
0.00
0.0020058132 = product of:
0.0040116264 = sum of:
0.0040116264 = product of:
0.012034879 = sum of:
0.012034879 = weight(_text_:a in 4843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012034879 = score(doc=4843,freq=26.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.22966442 = fieldWeight in 4843, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4843)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Formal Concept Analysis (FCA) is a well founded mathematical framework used for conceptual classication and knowledge management. Given a binary table describing a relation between objects and attributes, FCA consists in building a set of concepts organized by a subsumption relation within a concept lattice. Accordingly, FCA requires to transform complex data, e.g. numbers, intervals, graphs, into binary data leading to loss of information and poor interpretability of object classes. In this paper, we propose a pre-processing method producing binary data from complex data taking advantage of similarity between objects. As a result, the concept lattice is composed of classes being maximal sets of pairwise similar objects. This method is based on FCA and on a formalization of similarity as a tolerance relation (reexive and symmetric). It applies to complex object descriptions and especially here to interval data. Moreover, it can be applied to any kind of structured data for which a similarity can be dened (sequences, graphs, etc.). Finally, an application highlights that the resulting concept lattice plays an important role in information fusion problem, as illustrated with a real-world example in agronomy.
-
Priss, U.: Lattice-based information retrieval (2000)
0.00
0.0019077545 = product of:
0.003815509 = sum of:
0.003815509 = product of:
0.011446526 = sum of:
0.011446526 = weight(_text_:a in 6055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011446526 = score(doc=6055,freq=12.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 6055, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6055)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A lattice-based model for information retrieval was suggested in the 1960's but has been seen as a theoretical possibility hard to practically apply ever since. This paper attempts to revive the lattice model and demonstrate its applicability in an information retrieval system, FalR, that incorporates a graphical representation of a faceted thesaurus. It shows how Boolean queries can be lattice-theoretically related to the concepts of the thesaurus and visualized within the thesaurus display. An advantage of FaIR is that it allows for a high level of transparency of the system, which can be controlled by the user
- Type
- a
-
Priss, U.: ¬A graphical interface for conceptually navigating faceted thesauri (1998)
0.00
0.0019077545 = product of:
0.003815509 = sum of:
0.003815509 = product of:
0.011446526 = sum of:
0.011446526 = weight(_text_:a in 6658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011446526 = score(doc=6658,freq=12.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 6658, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6658)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper describes a graphical interface for the navigation and construction of faceted thesauri that is based on formal concept analysis. Each facet of a thesaurus is represented as a mathematical lattice that is further subdivided into components. Users can graphically navigate through the Java implementation of the interface by clicking on terms that connect facets and components. Since there are many applications for thesauri in the knowledge representation field, such a graphical interface has the potential of being very useful
- Type
- a
-
Wille, R.: Begriffliche Datensysteme als Werkzeuge der Wissenskommunikation (1992)
0.00
0.0018881871 = product of:
0.0037763743 = sum of:
0.0037763743 = product of:
0.011329123 = sum of:
0.011329123 = weight(_text_:a in 8826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011329123 = score(doc=8826,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 8826, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8826)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Mensch und Maschine: Informationelle Schnittstellen der Kommunikation. Proc. des 3. Int. Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI'92), 5.-7.11.1992 in Saarbrücken. Hrsg.: H.H. Zimmermann, H.-D. Luckhardt u. A. Schulz
- Type
- a
-
Skorsky, M.: How to draw a concept lattice with parallelograms (1989)
0.00
0.0018881871 = product of:
0.0037763743 = sum of:
0.0037763743 = product of:
0.011329123 = sum of:
0.011329123 = weight(_text_:a in 592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011329123 = score(doc=592,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 592, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=592)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
