-
Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017)
0.05
0.046282627 = product of:
0.09256525 = sum of:
0.09256525 = sum of:
0.0046730246 = weight(_text_:a in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0046730246 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.044790562 = weight(_text_:k in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044790562 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16223413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.043101672 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043101672 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15914612 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.22-36
- Source
- Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
- Type
- a
-
Kumar, K.: Theoretical bases for universal classification systems (1982)
0.03
0.028264908 = product of:
0.056529816 = sum of:
0.056529816 = product of:
0.08479472 = sum of:
0.0080109 = weight(_text_:a in 34) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0080109 = score(doc=34,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 34, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=34)
0.07678382 = weight(_text_:k in 34) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07678382 = score(doc=34,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16223413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 34, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=34)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
LaBarre, K.: Interrogating facet theory : decolonizing knowledge organization (2017)
0.03
0.028264908 = product of:
0.056529816 = sum of:
0.056529816 = product of:
0.08479472 = sum of:
0.0080109 = weight(_text_:a in 4155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0080109 = score(doc=4155,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 4155, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4155)
0.07678382 = weight(_text_:k in 4155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07678382 = score(doc=4155,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16223413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 4155, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4155)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999)
0.03
0.027299827 = product of:
0.054599654 = sum of:
0.054599654 = product of:
0.08189948 = sum of:
0.0080109 = weight(_text_:a in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0080109 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
0.07388858 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07388858 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15914612 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
- Type
- a
-
Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999)
0.03
0.027299827 = product of:
0.054599654 = sum of:
0.054599654 = product of:
0.08189948 = sum of:
0.0080109 = weight(_text_:a in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0080109 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
0.07388858 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07388858 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15914612 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
- Type
- a
-
Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017)
0.03
0.027299827 = product of:
0.054599654 = sum of:
0.054599654 = product of:
0.08189948 = sum of:
0.0080109 = weight(_text_:a in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0080109 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
0.07388858 = weight(_text_:22 in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07388858 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15914612 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 5.2017 18:46:22
- Type
- a
-
Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997)
0.02
0.019503083 = product of:
0.039006166 = sum of:
0.039006166 = product of:
0.058509246 = sum of:
0.009250191 = weight(_text_:a in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009250191 = score(doc=1171,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.049259055 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049259055 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15914612 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- All classifications are based on ideologies and Dewey is marked by its author's origins in 19th century North America. Subsequent revisions indicate changed ways of understanding the world. Section 157 (psycho-pathology) is now included with 616.89 (mental troubles), reflecting the move to a genetic-based approach. Table 5 (racial, ethnic and national groups) is however unchanged, despite changing views on such categorisation
- Source
- Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
- Type
- a
-
Connaway, L.S.; Sievert, M.C.: Comparison of three classification systems for information on health insurance (1996)
0.02
0.018937267 = product of:
0.037874535 = sum of:
0.037874535 = product of:
0.056811802 = sum of:
0.0075527485 = weight(_text_:a in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0075527485 = score(doc=7242,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
0.049259055 = weight(_text_:22 in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049259055 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15914612 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a comparative study of 3 classification schemes: LCC, DDC and NLM Classification to determine their effectiveness in classifying materials on health insurance. Examined 2 hypotheses: that there would be no differences in the scatter of the 3 classification schemes; and that there would be overlap between all 3 schemes but no difference in the classes into which the subject was placed. There was subject scatter in all 3 classification schemes and litlle overlap between the 3 systems
- Date
- 22. 4.1997 21:10:19
- Type
- a
-
Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006)
0.02
0.018199885 = product of:
0.03639977 = sum of:
0.03639977 = product of:
0.054599654 = sum of:
0.0053405995 = weight(_text_:a in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0053405995 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
0.049259055 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049259055 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15914612 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27. 5.2007 22:19:35
- Type
- a
-
Lorenz, B.: Zur Theorie und Terminologie der bibliothekarischen Klassifikation (2018)
0.02
0.018199885 = product of:
0.03639977 = sum of:
0.03639977 = product of:
0.054599654 = sum of:
0.0053405995 = weight(_text_:a in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0053405995 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
0.049259055 = weight(_text_:22 in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049259055 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15914612 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.1-22
- Type
- a
-
Kumar, K.: Distinctive contribution of Ranganathan to library classification (1992)
0.02
0.017133072 = product of:
0.034266144 = sum of:
0.034266144 = product of:
0.051399216 = sum of:
0.006608655 = weight(_text_:a in 6991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006608655 = score(doc=6991,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 6991, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6991)
0.044790562 = weight(_text_:k in 6991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044790562 = score(doc=6991,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16223413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 6991, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6991)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Stresses that S.R. Ranganathan was truly a great scholar, who made rich contribution to different aspects of library and information science, but is better known for his work in the field of library classification. discusses his distinctive contributions to classification such as normative principles, 3 plane model of work, freely faceted classification (involving facet analysis and the synthetic principle), postulational approach, fundamental categories and certain notational devices like the sector device, group notation device, emptying digit device and seminal mnemonic device. Regards these as seminal ideas forming the basis of his theory of library classification. Considers 7th ed. of the Colon Classification as the best example of the application of theses ideas
- Type
- a
-
McCool, M.; St. Amant, K.: Field dependence and classification : implications for global information systems (2009)
0.02
0.017133072 = product of:
0.034266144 = sum of:
0.034266144 = product of:
0.051399216 = sum of:
0.006608655 = weight(_text_:a in 2854) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006608655 = score(doc=2854,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 2854, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2854)
0.044790562 = weight(_text_:k in 2854) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044790562 = score(doc=2854,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16223413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 2854, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2854)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article describes research designed to assess the interaction between culture and classification. Mounting evidence in cross-cultural psychology has indicated that culture may affect classification, which is an important dimension to global information systems. Data were obtained through three classification tasks, two of which were adapted from recent studies in cross-cultural psychology. Data were collected from 36 participants, 19 from China and 17 from the United States. The results of this research indicate that Chinese participants appear to be more field dependent, which may be related to a cultural preference for relationships instead of categories.
- Type
- a
-
Olson, H.A.: Sameness and difference : a cultural foundation of classification (2001)
0.02
0.017065197 = product of:
0.034130394 = sum of:
0.034130394 = product of:
0.051195588 = sum of:
0.008093917 = weight(_text_:a in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008093917 = score(doc=166,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
0.043101672 = weight(_text_:22 in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043101672 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15914612 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The idea of sameness is used to gather material in classifications. However, it is also used to separate what is different. Sameness and difference as guiding principles of classification seem obvious but are actually fundamental characteristics specifically related to Western culture. Sameness is not a singular factor, but has the potential to represent multiple characteristics or facets. This article explores the ramifications of which characteristics are used to define classifications and in what order. It explains the primacy of division by discipline, its origins in Western philosophy, and the cultural specificity that results. The Dewey Decimal Classification is used as an example throughout.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Type
- a
-
Gnoli, C.: Classifying phenomena : part 4: themes and rhemes (2018)
0.02
0.016742956 = product of:
0.03348591 = sum of:
0.03348591 = product of:
0.050228864 = sum of:
0.013284575 = weight(_text_:a in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013284575 = score(doc=4152,freq=22.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.25351265 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
0.03694429 = weight(_text_:22 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03694429 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15914612 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This is the fourth in a series of papers on classification based on phenomena instead of disciplines. Together with types, levels and facets that have been discussed in the previous parts, themes and rhemes are further structural components of such a classification. In a statement or in a longer document, a base theme and several particular themes can be identified. Base theme should be cited first in a classmark, followed by particular themes, each with its own facets. In some cases, rhemes can also be expressed, that is new information provided about a theme, converting an abstract statement ("wolves, affected by cervids") into a claim that some thing actually occurs ("wolves are affected by cervids"). In the Integrative Levels Classification rhemes can be expressed by special deictic classes, including those for actual specimens, anaphoras, unknown values, conjunctions and spans, whole universe, anthropocentric favoured classes, and favoured host classes. These features, together with rules for pronounciation, make a classification of phenomena a true language, that may be suitable for many uses.
- Date
- 17. 2.2018 18:22:25
- Type
- a
-
Winske, E.: ¬The development and structure of an urban, regional, and local documents classification scheme (1996)
0.02
0.01657011 = product of:
0.03314022 = sum of:
0.03314022 = product of:
0.049710326 = sum of:
0.006608655 = weight(_text_:a in 7241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006608655 = score(doc=7241,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 7241, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7241)
0.043101672 = weight(_text_:22 in 7241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043101672 = score(doc=7241,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15914612 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7241, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7241)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Paper presented at conference on 'Local documents, a new classification scheme' at the Research Caucus of the Florida Library Association Annual Conference, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 22 Apr 95
- Type
- a
-
Kwasnik, B.H.: ¬The role of classification in knowledge representation (1999)
0.02
0.016091138 = product of:
0.032182276 = sum of:
0.032182276 = product of:
0.04827341 = sum of:
0.011329123 = weight(_text_:a in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011329123 = score(doc=2464,freq=16.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
0.03694429 = weight(_text_:22 in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03694429 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15914612 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A fascinating, broad-ranging article about classification, knowledge, and how they relate. Hierarchies, trees, paradigms (a two-dimensional classification that can look something like a spreadsheet), and facets are covered, with descriptions of how they work and how they can be used for knowledge discovery and creation. Kwasnick outlines how to make a faceted classification: choose facets, develop facets, analyze entities using the facets, and make a citation order. Facets are useful for many reasons: they do not require complete knowledge of the entire body of material; they are hospitable, flexible, and expressive; they do not require a rigid background theory; they can mix theoretical structures and models; and they allow users to view things from many perspectives. Facets do have faults: it can be hard to pick the right ones; it is hard to show relations between them; and it is difficult to visualize them. The coverage of the other methods is equally thorough and there is much to consider for anyone putting a classification on the web.
- Source
- Library trends. 48(1999) no.1, S.22-47
- Type
- a
-
Gnoli, C.; Poli, R.: Levels of reality and levels of representation (2004)
0.02
0.01578279 = product of:
0.03156558 = sum of:
0.03156558 = product of:
0.04734837 = sum of:
0.008956458 = weight(_text_:a in 3533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008956458 = score(doc=3533,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 3533, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3533)
0.03839191 = weight(_text_:k in 3533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03839191 = score(doc=3533,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16223413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 3533, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3533)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Ontology, in its philosophical meaning, is the discipline investigating the structure of reality. Its findings can be relevant to knowledge organization, and models of knowledge can, in turn, offer relevant ontological suggestions. Several philosophers in time have pointed out that reality is structured into a series of integrative levels, like the physical, the biological, the mental, and the cultural, and that each level plays as a base for the emergence of more complex levels. More detailed theories of levels have been developed by Nicolai Hartmann and James K. Feibleman, and these have been considered as a source for structuring principles in bibliographic classification by both the Classification Research Group (CRG) and Ingetraut Dahlberg. CRG's analysis of levels and of their possible application to a new general classification scheme based an phenomena instead of disciplines, as it was formulated by Derek Austin in 1969, is examined in detail. Both benefits and open problems in applying integrative levels to bibliographic classification are pointed out.
- Type
- a
-
Kumar, K.: Theory of classification (1985)
0.02
0.015467605 = product of:
0.03093521 = sum of:
0.03093521 = product of:
0.046402812 = sum of:
0.0080109 = weight(_text_:a in 2069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0080109 = score(doc=2069,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 2069, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2069)
0.03839191 = weight(_text_:k in 2069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03839191 = score(doc=2069,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16223413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 2069, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2069)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This book provides a coherent account of the theory of classification. It discusses the contributions made by theoreticians like E.C. Richardson, J.B. Brown, W. Hulme, W.C. Berwick Sayers, H.E. Bliss and S.R. Ranganathan. However, the theory put forward by S.R. Ranganathan predominates the whole book because his contribution is far more than anybody else's. Five major schemes - DDC, UDC, LCC, CC, and BC - have also been discussed. Library classification is a specialized area of study. In recent years, library classification has become a vast and complicated field of study using highly technical terminology. A special attempt has been made to provide descriptions as simple and direct as could be possible. To illustrate the theory of classification, large number of examples have been given from all major schemes so that an average student ould also grasp the concepts easily. This book has been especially written to meet the requirements of students, preparing for their library science, documentation, information science diplomas and degrees.
-
Howarth, L.C.; Jansen, E.H.: Towards a typology of warrant for 21st century knowledge organization systems (2014)
0.02
0.01530025 = product of:
0.0306005 = sum of:
0.0306005 = product of:
0.045900747 = sum of:
0.008956458 = weight(_text_:a in 1425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008956458 = score(doc=1425,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 1425, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1425)
0.03694429 = weight(_text_:22 in 1425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03694429 = score(doc=1425,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15914612 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1425, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1425)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper returns to Beghtol's (1986) insightful typology of warrant to consider an empirical example of a traditional top-down hierarchical classification system as it continues to evolve in the early 21st century. Our examination considers there may be multiple warrants identified among the processes of design and the relationships to users of the National Occupational Classification (NOC), the standard occupational classification system published in Canada. We argue that this shift in semantic warrant signals a transition for traditional knowledge organization systems, and that warrant continues to be a relevant analytical concept and organizing principle, both within and beyond the domain of bibliographic control.
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
- Type
- a
-
Vukadin, A.; Slavic, A.: Challenges of facet analysis and concept placement in Universal Classifications : the example of architecture in UDC (2014)
0.02
0.01530025 = product of:
0.0306005 = sum of:
0.0306005 = product of:
0.045900747 = sum of:
0.008956458 = weight(_text_:a in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008956458 = score(doc=1428,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
0.03694429 = weight(_text_:22 in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03694429 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15914612 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544656 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The paper discusses the challenges of faceted vocabulary organization in universal classifications which treat the universe of knowledge as a coherent whole and in which the concepts and subjects in different disciplines are shared, related and combined. The authors illustrate the challenges of the facet analytical approach using, as an example, the revision of class 72 in UDC. The paper reports on the research undertaken in 2013 as preparation for the revision. This consisted of analysis of concept organization in the UDC schedules in comparison with the Art & Architecture Thesaurus and class W of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification. The paper illustrates how such research can contribute to a better understanding of the field and may lead to improvements in the facet structure of this segment of the UDC vocabulary.
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
- Type
- a
