Search (109 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Volltextretrieval"
  1. Kristensen, J.; Järvelin, K.: ¬The effectiveness of a searching thesaurus in free-text searching in a full-text database (1990) 0.04 
    0.040292937 = product of:
  0.080585875 = sum of:
    0.080585875 = product of:
      0.12087881 = sum of:
        0.018500382 = weight(_text_:a in 2043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018500382 = score(doc=2043,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.3530471 = fieldWeight in 2043, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2043)
        0.10237843 = weight(_text_:k in 2043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10237843 = score(doc=2043,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16223413 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.63105357 = fieldWeight in 2043, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2043)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    a
  2. Markey, K.; Atherton, P.; Newton, C.: ¬An analysis of controlled vocabulary and free text search statements in online searches (1980) 0.03 
    0.032975726 = product of:
  0.06595145 = sum of:
    0.06595145 = product of:
      0.09892717 = sum of:
        0.009346049 = weight(_text_:a in 1401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009346049 = score(doc=1401,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 1401, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1401)
        0.089581124 = weight(_text_:k in 1401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.089581124 = score(doc=1401,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16223413 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.5521719 = fieldWeight in 1401, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1401)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    a
  3. Böhle, K.; Riehm, U.: German fulltexts in working contexts : empirical findings on how end-users make use of fulltext databases (1989) 0.02 
    0.020146469 = product of:
  0.040292937 = sum of:
    0.040292937 = product of:
      0.060439404 = sum of:
        0.009250191 = weight(_text_:a in 2877) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009250191 = score(doc=2877,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 2877, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2877)
        0.051189214 = weight(_text_:k in 2877) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051189214 = score(doc=2877,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16223413 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.31552678 = fieldWeight in 2877, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2877)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Reports the result of a brief review of West German full text data bases and a user survey of over 40 users in the fields of medicine, law and economics. Questions common assumptions about the advantages and disadvantages of full text data bases.
    Type
    a
  4. Laegreid, J.A.: SIFT: a Norwegian information retrieval system (1993) 0.02 
    0.019980086 = product of:
  0.039960172 = sum of:
    0.039960172 = product of:
      0.059940256 = sum of:
        0.010681199 = weight(_text_:a in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010681199 = score(doc=7701,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
        0.049259055 = weight(_text_:22 in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049259055 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15914612 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Describes SIFT (Search in Free Text) an information retrieval system originally developed for administering governmental documents in Norway but which is now being applied alsewhere. SIFT handles structured information well. A library system, SIFT-BIBL, is now available. SIFT's retrieval engine and search facilities are powerful. Its user interface is limited but being imporved. An application programmer interface has been released which will allow programmers to develop their own interface. A Windows-based- client-server version is now being beta tested
    Date
    23. 1.1999 19:22:09
    Type
    a
  5. Reinisch, F.: Wer suchet - der findet? : oder Die Überwindung der sprachlichen Grenzen bei der Suche in Volltextdatenbanken (2000) 0.02 
    0.018199885 = product of:
  0.03639977 = sum of:
    0.03639977 = product of:
      0.054599654 = sum of:
        0.0053405995 = weight(_text_:a in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0053405995 = score(doc=4919,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
        0.049259055 = weight(_text_:22 in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049259055 = score(doc=4919,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15914612 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2000 17:48:06
    Type
    a
  6. Zillmann, H.: OSIRIS und eLib : Information Retrieval und Search Engines in Full-text Databases (2001) 0.02 
    0.018199885 = product of:
  0.03639977 = sum of:
    0.03639977 = product of:
      0.054599654 = sum of:
        0.0053405995 = weight(_text_:a in 5937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0053405995 = score(doc=5937,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 5937, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5937)
        0.049259055 = weight(_text_:22 in 5937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049259055 = score(doc=5937,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15914612 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5937, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5937)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    14. 6.2001 12:22:31
    Type
    a
  7. Dambeck, H.; Engler, T.: Gesucht und gefunden : Neun Volltext-Suchprogramme für den Desktop (2002) 0.02 
    0.018199885 = product of:
  0.03639977 = sum of:
    0.03639977 = product of:
      0.054599654 = sum of:
        0.0053405995 = weight(_text_:a in 1169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0053405995 = score(doc=1169,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 1169, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1169)
        0.049259055 = weight(_text_:22 in 1169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049259055 = score(doc=1169,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15914612 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1169, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1169)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    c't. 2002, H.22, S.190-197
    Type
    a
  8. Sievert, M.E.; McKinin, E.J.: Why full-text misses some relevant documents : an analysis of documents not retrieved by CCML or MEDIS (1989) 0.01 
    0.0142029505 = product of:
  0.028405901 = sum of:
    0.028405901 = product of:
      0.04260885 = sum of:
        0.0056645614 = weight(_text_:a in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0056645614 = score(doc=3564,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
        0.03694429 = weight(_text_:22 in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03694429 = score(doc=3564,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15914612 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Searches conducted as part of the MEDLINE/Full-Text Research Project revealed that the full-text data bases of clinical medical journal articles (CCML (Comprehensive Core Medical Library) from BRS Information Technologies, and MEDIS from Mead Data Central) did not retrieve all the relevant citations. An analysis of the data indicated that 204 relevant citations were retrieved only by MEDLINE. A comparison of the strategies used on the full-text data bases with the text of the articles of these 204 citations revealed that 2 reasons contributed to these failure. The searcher often constructed a restrictive strategy which resulted in the loss of relevant documents; and as in other kinds of retrieval, the problems of natural language caused the loss of relevant documents.
    Date
    9. 1.1996 10:22:31
  9. Pirkola, A.; Jarvelin, K.: ¬The effect of anaphor and ellipsis resolution on proximity searching in a text database (1995) 0.01 
    0.013811397 = product of:
  0.027622795 = sum of:
    0.027622795 = product of:
      0.04143419 = sum of:
        0.009440936 = weight(_text_:a in 4088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009440936 = score(doc=4088,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 4088, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4088)
        0.031993255 = weight(_text_:k in 4088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031993255 = score(doc=4088,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16223413 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 4088, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4088)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    So far, methods for ellipsis and anaphor resolution have been developed and the effects of anaphor resolution have been analyzed in the context of statistical information retrieval of scientific abstracts. No significant improvements has been observed. Analyzes the effects of ellipsis and anaphor resolution on proximity searching in a full text database. Anaphora and ellipsis are classified on the basis of the type of their correlates / antecedents rather than, as traditional, on the basis of their own linguistic type. The classification differentiates proper names and common nouns of basic words, compound words, and phrases. The study was carried out in a newspaper article database containing 55.000 full text articles. A set of 154 keyword pairs in different categories was created. Human resolution of keyword ellipsis and anaphora was performed to identify sentences and paragraphs which would match proximity searches after resolution. Findings indicate that ellipsis and anaphor resolution is most relevant for proper name phrases and only marginal in the other keyword categories. Therefore the recall effect of restricted resolution of proper name phrases only was analyzed for keyword pairs containing at least 1 proper name phrase. Findings indicate a recall increase of 38.2% in sentence searches, and 28.8% in paragraph searches when proper name ellipsis were resolved. The recall increase was 17.6% sentence searches, and 19.8% in paragraph searches when proper name anaphora were resolved. Some simple and computationally justifiable resolution method might be developed only for proper name phrases to support keyword based full text information retrieval. Discusses elements of such a method
    Type
    a
  10. Bernstein, L.M.; Williamson, R.E.: Testing of a natural language retrieval system for a full text knowledge base (1984) 0.00 
    0.0026979723 = product of:
  0.0053959447 = sum of:
    0.0053959447 = product of:
      0.016187834 = sum of:
        0.016187834 = weight(_text_:a in 1803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016187834 = score(doc=1803,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.3089162 = fieldWeight in 1803, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1803)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    a
  11. Marcus, J.: Everyone's a futurist : full text year in review - 1994 (1994) 0.00 
    0.0025175828 = product of:
  0.0050351657 = sum of:
    0.0050351657 = product of:
      0.015105497 = sum of:
        0.015105497 = weight(_text_:a in 2126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015105497 = score(doc=2126,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 2126, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2126)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    a
  12. Kristensen, J.: Expanding end-users' query statements for free text searching with a search-aid thesaurus (1993) 0.00 
    0.0023549832 = product of:
  0.0047099665 = sum of:
    0.0047099665 = product of:
      0.014129899 = sum of:
        0.014129899 = weight(_text_:a in 6621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014129899 = score(doc=6621,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.26964417 = fieldWeight in 6621, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6621)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Tests the effectiveness of a thesaurus as a search-aid in free text searching of a full text database. A set of queries was searched against a large full text database of newspaper articles. The thesaurus contained equivalence, hierarchical and associative relationships. Each query was searched in five modes: basic search, synonym search, narrower term search, related term search, and union of all previous searches. The searches were analyzed in terms of relative recall and precision
    Type
    a
  13. White, F.: ISYS 3.01 : a review (1993) 0.00 
    0.0023549832 = product of:
  0.0047099665 = sum of:
    0.0047099665 = product of:
      0.014129899 = sum of:
        0.014129899 = weight(_text_:a in 2052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014129899 = score(doc=2052,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.26964417 = fieldWeight in 2052, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2052)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Reviews ISYS, a full text retrieval system from Odyssey developments. ISYS supports a wide variety of wordprocessor, text and spreadsheet formats. A programming interface is included for developers to integrate ISYS into their own applications. Describes how to use ISYS to create a database index for a set of documents and then query that index to locate, retrieve and display information from the indexed documents. Discusses configuration options, precedence of operators, displaying and manipulating search results, the advanced menu, ease of learning and use, documentation and library applications
    Type
    a
  14. Tenopir, C.: Full text database retrieval performance (1985) 0.00 
    0.0022252498 = product of:
  0.0044504995 = sum of:
    0.0044504995 = product of:
      0.013351498 = sum of:
        0.013351498 = weight(_text_:a in 406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013351498 = score(doc=406,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.25478977 = fieldWeight in 406, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=406)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    a
  15. Ojala, M.: Research into full-text retrieval (1990) 0.00 
    0.0022252498 = product of:
  0.0044504995 = sum of:
    0.0044504995 = product of:
      0.013351498 = sum of:
        0.013351498 = weight(_text_:a in 576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013351498 = score(doc=576,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.25478977 = fieldWeight in 576, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=576)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    a
  16. Sievert, M.C.: Full-text information retrieval : introduction (1996) 0.00 
    0.0022252498 = product of:
  0.0044504995 = sum of:
    0.0044504995 = product of:
      0.013351498 = sum of:
        0.013351498 = weight(_text_:a in 4719) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013351498 = score(doc=4719,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.25478977 = fieldWeight in 4719, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4719)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Introduces a special section devoted to full text information retrieval. Gives an overview of full text databases and research into them. There is a lack of a single definition of full text. Articles in the library related literature about full text have appeared with increasing frequnecy
    Type
    a
  17. Hildreth, C.R.: ¬The use and understanding of keyword searching in a university online catalog (1997) 0.00 
    0.0022028852 = product of:
  0.0044057705 = sum of:
    0.0044057705 = product of:
      0.01321731 = sum of:
        0.01321731 = weight(_text_:a in 7377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01321731 = score(doc=7377,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 7377, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7377)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    a
  18. Dubois, C.P.R.: Free text vs. controlled vocabulary; a reassessment (1987) 0.00 
    0.0021802909 = product of:
  0.0043605817 = sum of:
    0.0043605817 = product of:
      0.013081744 = sum of:
        0.013081744 = weight(_text_:a in 2048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013081744 = score(doc=2048,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 2048, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2048)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Free text and controlled vocabulary searching can no longer be viewed as antagonistic techniques in information retrieval since they both display advantages and weaknesses dependent on a fairly wide range of context, with the option to use both increasingly favoured. An attempt is made to present a list of features associated with the two techniques and to suggest a methodology to assist in deciding on the optimal retrieval technique for a particular purpose. The relevance of the techniques in expert systems and full text contexts is also discussed. Finally, recommendations for further research are suggested, concentrating on survey techniques in real-life retrieval situations
    Type
    a
  19. Gross, T.; Taylor, A.G.; Joudrey, D.N.: Still a lot to lose : the role of controlled vocabulary in keyword searching (2015) 0.00 
    0.0020606103 = product of:
  0.0041212207 = sum of:
    0.0041212207 = product of:
      0.012363662 = sum of:
        0.012363662 = weight(_text_:a in 2007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012363662 = score(doc=2007,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 2007, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2007)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In their 2005 study, Gross and Taylor found that more than a third of records retrieved by keyword searches would be lost without subject headings. A review of the literature since then shows that numerous studies, in various disciplines, have found that a quarter to a third of records returned in a keyword search would be lost without controlled vocabulary. Other writers, though, have continued to suggest that controlled vocabulary be discontinued. Addressing criticisms of the Gross/Taylor study, this study replicates the search process in the same online catalog, but after the addition of automated enriched metadata such as tables of contents and summaries. The proportion of results that would be lost remains high.
    Type
    a
  20. Ellis, D.; Furner, J.; Willett, P.: On the creation of hypertext links in full-text documents : measurement of retrieval effectiveness (1996) 0.00 
    0.0020058132 = product of:
  0.0040116264 = sum of:
    0.0040116264 = product of:
      0.012034879 = sum of:
        0.012034879 = weight(_text_:a in 4214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012034879 = score(doc=4214,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.05240202 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544656 = queryNorm
            0.22966442 = fieldWeight in 4214, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4214)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    An important stage in the process or retrieval of objects from a hypertext database is the creation of a set of internodal links that are intended to represent the relationships existing between objects; this operation is often undertaken manually, just as index terms are often manually assigned to documents in a conventional retrieval system. In an earlier article (1994), the results were published of a study in which several different sets of links were inserted, each by a different person, between the paragraphs of each of a number of full-text documents. These results showed little similarity between the link-sets, a finding that was comparable with those of studies of inter-indexer consistency, which suggest that there is generally only a low level of agreement between the sets of index terms assigned to a document by different indexers. In this article, a description is provided of an investigation into the nature of the relationship existing between (i) the levels of inter-linker consistency obtaining among the group of hypertext databases used in our earlier experiments, and (ii) the levels of effectiveness of a number of searches carried out in those databases. An account is given of the implementation of the searches and of the methods used in the calculation of numerical values expressing their effectiveness. Analysis of the results of a comparison between recorded levels of consistency and those of effectiveness does not allow us to draw conclusions about the consistency - effectiveness relationship that are equivalent to those drawn in comparable studies of inter-indexer consistency
    Type
    a

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 106
  • s 2
  • el 1
  • m 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects