-
Bornmann, L.; Leydesdorff, L.: Which cities produce more excellent papers than can be expected? : a new mapping approach, using Google Maps, based on statistical significance testing (2011)
0.02
0.016797256 = product of:
0.03359451 = sum of:
0.03359451 = product of:
0.06718902 = sum of:
0.06718902 = weight(_text_:l in 4767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06718902 = score(doc=4767,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.045365814 = queryNorm
0.37262368 = fieldWeight in 4767, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4767)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: Mapping (USPTO) patent data using overlays to Google Maps (2012)
0.02
0.016797256 = product of:
0.03359451 = sum of:
0.03359451 = product of:
0.06718902 = sum of:
0.06718902 = weight(_text_:l in 288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06718902 = score(doc=288,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.045365814 = queryNorm
0.37262368 = fieldWeight in 288, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=288)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Radicchi, F.; Bornmann, L.; Castellano, C.; Nooy, W. de: Field-normalized impact factors (IFs) : a comparison of rescaling and fractionally counted IFs (2013)
0.02
0.016797256 = product of:
0.03359451 = sum of:
0.03359451 = product of:
0.06718902 = sum of:
0.06718902 = weight(_text_:l in 1108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06718902 = score(doc=1108,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.045365814 = queryNorm
0.37262368 = fieldWeight in 1108, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1108)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: ¬The operationalization of "fields" as WoS subject categories (WCs) in evaluative bibliometrics : the cases of "library and information science" and "science & technology studies" (2016)
0.02
0.016797256 = product of:
0.03359451 = sum of:
0.03359451 = product of:
0.06718902 = sum of:
0.06718902 = weight(_text_:l in 2779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06718902 = score(doc=2779,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.045365814 = queryNorm
0.37262368 = fieldWeight in 2779, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2779)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Bornmann, L.; Bauer, J.: Which of the world's institutions employ the most highly cited researchers : an analysis of the data from highlycited.com (2015)
0.02
0.015836604 = product of:
0.031673208 = sum of:
0.031673208 = product of:
0.063346416 = sum of:
0.063346416 = weight(_text_:l in 1556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063346416 = score(doc=1556,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.045365814 = queryNorm
0.35131297 = fieldWeight in 1556, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1556)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Bornmann, L.; Bauer, J.: Which of the world's institutions employ the most highly cited researchers : an analysis of the data from highlycited.com (2015)
0.02
0.015836604 = product of:
0.031673208 = sum of:
0.031673208 = product of:
0.063346416 = sum of:
0.063346416 = weight(_text_:l in 2223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063346416 = score(doc=2223,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.045365814 = queryNorm
0.35131297 = fieldWeight in 2223, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2223)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.; Daniel, H.D.: Do we need the h index and its variants in addition to standard bibliometric measures? (2009)
0.01
0.013997713 = product of:
0.027995426 = sum of:
0.027995426 = product of:
0.055990852 = sum of:
0.055990852 = weight(_text_:l in 2861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055990852 = score(doc=2861,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.045365814 = queryNorm
0.31051973 = fieldWeight in 2861, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2861)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this study, we investigate whether there is a need for the h index and its variants in addition to standard bibliometric measures (SBMs). Results from our recent study (L. Bornmann, R. Mutz, & H.-D. Daniel, 2008) have indicated that there are two types of indices: One type of indices (e.g., h index) describes the most productive core of a scientist's output and informs about the number of papers in the core. The other type of indices (e.g., a index) depicts the impact of the papers in the core. In evaluative bibliometric studies, the two dimensions quantity and quality of output are usually assessed using the SBMs number of publications (for the quantity dimension) and total citation counts (for the impact dimension). We additionally included the SBMs into the factor analysis. The results of the newly calculated analysis indicate that there is a high intercorrelation between number of publications and the indices that load substantially on the factor Quantity of the Productive Core as well as between total citation counts and the indices that load substantially on the factor Impact of the Productive Core. The high-loading indices and SBMs within one performance dimension could be called redundant in empirical application, as high intercorrelations between different indicators are a sign for measuring something similar (or the same). Based on our findings, we propose the use of any pair of indicators (one relating to the number of papers in a researcher's productive core and one relating to the impact of these core papers) as a meaningful approach for comparing scientists.
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: Integrated impact indicators compared with impact factors : an alternative research design with policy implications (2011)
0.01
0.013997713 = product of:
0.027995426 = sum of:
0.027995426 = product of:
0.055990852 = sum of:
0.055990852 = weight(_text_:l in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055990852 = score(doc=4919,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.045365814 = queryNorm
0.31051973 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Zhou, P.; Bornmann, L.: How can journal impact factors be normalized across fields of science? : An assessment in terms of percentile ranks and fractional counts (2013)
0.01
0.013997713 = product of:
0.027995426 = sum of:
0.027995426 = product of:
0.055990852 = sum of:
0.055990852 = weight(_text_:l in 532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055990852 = score(doc=532,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.045365814 = queryNorm
0.31051973 = fieldWeight in 532, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=532)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Bornmann, L.; Wagner, C.; Leydesdorff, L.: BRICS countries and scientific excellence : a bibliometric analysis of most frequently cited papers (2015)
0.01
0.013997713 = product of:
0.027995426 = sum of:
0.027995426 = product of:
0.055990852 = sum of:
0.055990852 = weight(_text_:l in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055990852 = score(doc=2047,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.045365814 = queryNorm
0.31051973 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Bauer, J.; Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: Highly cited papers in Library and Information Science (LIS) : authors, institutions, and network structures (2016)
0.01
0.013997713 = product of:
0.027995426 = sum of:
0.027995426 = product of:
0.055990852 = sum of:
0.055990852 = weight(_text_:l in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055990852 = score(doc=3231,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.045365814 = queryNorm
0.31051973 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.; Mingers, J.: Statistical significance and effect sizes of differences among research universities at the level of nations and worldwide based on the Leiden rankings (2019)
0.01
0.013997713 = product of:
0.027995426 = sum of:
0.027995426 = product of:
0.055990852 = sum of:
0.055990852 = weight(_text_:l in 5225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055990852 = score(doc=5225,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.045365814 = queryNorm
0.31051973 = fieldWeight in 5225, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5225)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: What do we know about the h index? (2007)
0.01
0.013857029 = product of:
0.027714059 = sum of:
0.027714059 = product of:
0.055428118 = sum of:
0.055428118 = weight(_text_:l in 477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055428118 = score(doc=477,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.045365814 = queryNorm
0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 477, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=477)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Bornmann, L.; Marx, W.: Distributions instead of single numbers : percentiles and beam plots for the assessment of single researchers (2014)
0.01
0.013857029 = product of:
0.027714059 = sum of:
0.027714059 = product of:
0.055428118 = sum of:
0.055428118 = weight(_text_:l in 1190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055428118 = score(doc=1190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.045365814 = queryNorm
0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 1190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1190)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Bornmann, L.; Marx, W.: ¬The wisdom of citing scientists (2014)
0.01
0.013857029 = product of:
0.027714059 = sum of:
0.027714059 = product of:
0.055428118 = sum of:
0.055428118 = weight(_text_:l in 1293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055428118 = score(doc=1293,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.045365814 = queryNorm
0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 1293, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1293)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Bornmann, L.: How well does a university perform in comparison with its peers? : The use of odds, and odds ratios, for the comparison of institutional citation impact using the Leiden Rankings (2015)
0.01
0.013857029 = product of:
0.027714059 = sum of:
0.027714059 = product of:
0.055428118 = sum of:
0.055428118 = weight(_text_:l in 2340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055428118 = score(doc=2340,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.045365814 = queryNorm
0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 2340, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2340)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Bornmann, L.; Haunschild, R.: Relative Citation Ratio (RCR) : an empirical attempt to study a new field-normalized bibliometric indicator (2017)
0.01
0.013857029 = product of:
0.027714059 = sum of:
0.027714059 = product of:
0.055428118 = sum of:
0.055428118 = weight(_text_:l in 3541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055428118 = score(doc=3541,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.045365814 = queryNorm
0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 3541, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3541)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Bornmann, L.: What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? : a literature survey (2013)
0.01
0.011877453 = product of:
0.023754906 = sum of:
0.023754906 = product of:
0.04750981 = sum of:
0.04750981 = weight(_text_:l in 606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04750981 = score(doc=606,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.045365814 = queryNorm
0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 606, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=606)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Bornmann, L.: Lässt sich die Qualität von Forschung messen? (2013)
0.01
0.011877453 = product of:
0.023754906 = sum of:
0.023754906 = product of:
0.04750981 = sum of:
0.04750981 = weight(_text_:l in 928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04750981 = score(doc=928,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.045365814 = queryNorm
0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 928, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=928)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Bornmann, L.; Moya Anegón, F. de; Mutz, R.: Do universities or research institutions with a specific subject profile have an advantage or a disadvantage in institutional rankings? (2013)
0.01
0.011877453 = product of:
0.023754906 = sum of:
0.023754906 = product of:
0.04750981 = sum of:
0.04750981 = weight(_text_:l in 1109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04750981 = score(doc=1109,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.045365814 = queryNorm
0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 1109, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1109)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
