Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Liu, Y."
  1. Liu, Y.: Precision One MediaSource : film/video locator on CD-ROM (1995) 0.01
    0.008130979 = product of:
      0.016261958 = sum of:
        0.016261958 = product of:
          0.048785873 = sum of:
            0.048785873 = weight(_text_:22 in 7744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048785873 = score(doc=7744,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15761736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045010004 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7744, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7744)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.1997 16:34:51
  2. Liu, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Citation analysis and the development of science : a case study using articles by some Nobel prize winners (2014) 0.01
    0.007265686 = product of:
      0.014531372 = sum of:
        0.014531372 = product of:
          0.043594114 = sum of:
            0.043594114 = weight(_text_:r in 1197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043594114 = score(doc=1197,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14899474 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045010004 = queryNorm
                0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 1197, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1197)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Liu, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Towards a representation of diffusion and interaction of scientific ideas : the case of fiber optics communication (2012) 0.01
    0.006357475 = product of:
      0.01271495 = sum of:
        0.01271495 = product of:
          0.03814485 = sum of:
            0.03814485 = weight(_text_:r in 2723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03814485 = score(doc=2723,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14899474 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045010004 = queryNorm
                0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 2723, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2723)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Liu, Y.; Rafols, I.; Rousseau, R.: ¬A framework for knowledge integration and diffusion (2012) 0.01
    0.005449265 = product of:
      0.01089853 = sum of:
        0.01089853 = product of:
          0.032695588 = sum of:
            0.032695588 = weight(_text_:r in 297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032695588 = score(doc=297,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14899474 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045010004 = queryNorm
                0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 297, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=297)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. Liu, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Interestingness and the essence of citation : Thomas Reid and bibliographic description (2013) 0.01
    0.005449265 = product of:
      0.01089853 = sum of:
        0.01089853 = product of:
          0.032695588 = sum of:
            0.032695588 = weight(_text_:r in 1764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032695588 = score(doc=1764,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14899474 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045010004 = queryNorm
                0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 1764, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1764)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  6. Liu, Y.; Li, W.; Huang, Z.; Fang, Q.: ¬A fast method based on multiple clustering for name disambiguation in bibliographic citations (2015) 0.01
    0.005201946 = product of:
      0.010403892 = sum of:
        0.010403892 = product of:
          0.031211676 = sum of:
            0.031211676 = weight(_text_:b in 1672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031211676 = score(doc=1672,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15946874 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045010004 = queryNorm
                0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 1672, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1672)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Name ambiguity in the context of bibliographic citation affects the quality of services in digital libraries. Previous methods are not widely applied in practice because of their high computational complexity and their strong dependency on excessive attributes, such as institutional affiliation, research area, address, etc., which are difficult to obtain in practice. To solve this problem, we propose a novel coarse-to-fine framework for name disambiguation which sequentially employs 3 common and easily accessible attributes (i.e., coauthor name, article title, and publication venue). Our proposed framework is based on multiple clustering and consists of 3 steps: (a) clustering articles by coauthorship and obtaining rough clusters, that is fragments; (b) clustering fragments obtained in step 1 by title information and getting bigger fragments; (c) and clustering fragments obtained in step 2 by the latent relations among venues. Experimental results on a Digital Bibliography and Library Project (DBLP) data set show that our method outperforms the existing state-of-the-art methods by 2.4% to 22.7% on the average pairwise F1 score and is 10 to 100 times faster in terms of execution time.
  7. Zhou, H.; Xiao, L.; Liu, Y.; Chen, X.: ¬The effect of prediscussion note-taking in hidden profile tasks (2018) 0.01
    0.005201946 = product of:
      0.010403892 = sum of:
        0.010403892 = product of:
          0.031211676 = sum of:
            0.031211676 = weight(_text_:b in 4184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031211676 = score(doc=4184,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15946874 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045010004 = queryNorm
                0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 4184, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4184)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Prior research has discovered that groups tend to discuss shared information while failing to discuss unique information in decision-making processes. In our study, we conducted a lab experiment to examine the effect of prediscussion note-taking on this phenomenon. The experiment used a murder-mystery hidden profile task. In all, 192 undergraduate students were recruited and randomly assigned into 48 four-person groups with gender being the matching variable (i.e., each group consisted of four same-gender participants). During the decision-making processes, some groups were asked to take notes while reading task materials and had their notes available in the following group discussion, while the other groups were not given this opportunity. Our analysis results suggest that (a) the presence of an information piece in group members' notes positively correlates with its appearance in the subsequent discussion and note-taking positively affects the group's information repetition rate; (b) group decision quality positively correlates with the group's information sampling rate and negatively correlates with the group's information sampling/repetition bias; and (c) gender has no statistically significant moderating effect on the relationship between note-taking and information sharing. These results imply that prediscussion note-taking could facilitate information sharing but could not alleviate the biased information pooling in hidden profile tasks.
  8. Tang, X.-B.; Fu, W.-G.; Liu, Y.: Knowledge big graph fusing ontology with property graph : a case study of financial ownership network (2021) 0.01
    0.005201946 = product of:
      0.010403892 = sum of:
        0.010403892 = product of:
          0.031211676 = sum of:
            0.031211676 = weight(_text_:b in 234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031211676 = score(doc=234,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15946874 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045010004 = queryNorm
                0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 234, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=234)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  9. Qin, C.; Liu, Y.; Mou, J.; Chen, J.: User adoption of a hybrid social tagging approach in an online knowledge community (2019) 0.01
    0.005081862 = product of:
      0.010163724 = sum of:
        0.010163724 = product of:
          0.030491171 = sum of:
            0.030491171 = weight(_text_:22 in 5492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030491171 = score(doc=5492,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15761736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045010004 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5492, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5492)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  10. Liu, Y.; Zhang, M.; Cen, R.; Ru, L.; Ma, S.: Data cleansing for Web information retrieval using query independent features (2007) 0.00
    0.0045410534 = product of:
      0.009082107 = sum of:
        0.009082107 = product of:
          0.02724632 = sum of:
            0.02724632 = weight(_text_:r in 607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02724632 = score(doc=607,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14899474 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045010004 = queryNorm
                0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 607, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=607)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  11. Liu, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Knowledge diffusion through publications and citations : a case study using ESI-fields as unit of diffusion (2010) 0.00
    0.0045410534 = product of:
      0.009082107 = sum of:
        0.009082107 = product of:
          0.02724632 = sum of:
            0.02724632 = weight(_text_:r in 3334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02724632 = score(doc=3334,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14899474 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045010004 = queryNorm
                0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 3334, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3334)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)