-
¬Die deutsche Zeitschrift für Dokumentation, Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis von 1950 bis 2011 : eine vorläufige Bilanz in vier Abschnitten (2012)
0.06
0.060140975 = product of:
0.12028195 = sum of:
0.12028195 = sum of:
0.03745401 = weight(_text_:b in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03745401 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15946874 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.045010004 = queryNorm
0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.046238538 = weight(_text_:r in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046238538 = score(doc=402,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14899474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.045010004 = queryNorm
0.3103367 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.036589403 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036589403 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15761736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045010004 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2012 19:35:26
- Footnote
- Besteht aus 4 Teilen: Teil 1: Eden, D., A. Arndt, A. Hoffer, T. Raschke u. P. Schön: Die Nachrichten für Dokumentation in den Jahren 1950 bis 1962 (S.159-163). Teil 2: Brose, M., E. durst, D. Nitzsche, D. Veckenstedt u. R. Wein: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1963-1975 (S.164-170). Teil 3: Bösel, J., G. Ebert, P. Garz,, M. Iwanow u. B. Russ: Methoden und Ergebnisse einer statistischen Auswertung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1976 bis 1988 (S.171-174). Teil 4: Engelage, H., S. Jansen, R. Mertins, K. Redel u. S. Ring: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) / "Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis" (IWP) 1989-2011 (S.164-170).
-
Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003)
0.05
0.05137697 = product of:
0.10275394 = sum of:
0.10275394 = sum of:
0.02496934 = weight(_text_:b in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02496934 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15946874 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.045010004 = queryNorm
0.15657827 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.05339167 = weight(_text_:r in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05339167 = score(doc=5171,freq=12.0), product of:
0.14899474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.045010004 = queryNorm
0.358346 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.024392936 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024392936 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15761736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045010004 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Ahlgren, Jarneving, and. Rousseau review accepted procedures for author co-citation analysis first pointing out that since in the raw data matrix the row and column values are identical i,e, the co-citation count of two authors, there is no clear choice for diagonal values. They suggest the number of times an author has been co-cited with himself excluding self citation rather than the common treatment as zeros or as missing values. When the matrix is converted to a similarity matrix the normal procedure is to create a matrix of Pearson's r coefficients between data vectors. Ranking by r and by co-citation frequency and by intuition can easily yield three different orders. It would seem necessary that the adding of zeros to the matrix will not affect the value or the relative order of similarity measures but it is shown that this is not the case with Pearson's r. Using 913 bibliographic descriptions form the Web of Science of articles form JASIS and Scientometrics, authors names were extracted, edited and 12 information retrieval authors and 12 bibliometric authors each from the top 100 most cited were selected. Co-citation and r value (diagonal elements treated as missing) matrices were constructed, and then reconstructed in expanded form. Adding zeros can both change the r value and the ordering of the authors based upon that value. A chi-squared distance measure would not violate these requirements, nor would the cosine coefficient. It is also argued that co-citation data is ordinal data since there is no assurance of an absolute zero number of co-citations, and thus Pearson is not appropriate. The number of ties in co-citation data make the use of the Spearman rank order coefficient problematic.
- Date
- 9. 7.2006 10:22:35
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.05
0.049555134 = product of:
0.09911027 = sum of:
0.09911027 = product of:
0.1486654 = sum of:
0.062423352 = weight(_text_:b in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062423352 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15946874 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.045010004 = queryNorm
0.3914457 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.08624205 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08624205 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15761736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045010004 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Cerda-Cosme, R.; Méndez, E.: Analysis of shared research data in Spanish scientific papers about COVID-19 : a first approach (2023)
0.04
0.044474583 = product of:
0.088949166 = sum of:
0.088949166 = sum of:
0.031211676 = weight(_text_:b in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031211676 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15946874 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.045010004 = queryNorm
0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
0.02724632 = weight(_text_:r in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02724632 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14899474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.045010004 = queryNorm
0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
0.030491171 = weight(_text_:22 in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030491171 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15761736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045010004 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- During the coronavirus pandemic, changes in the way science is done and shared occurred, which motivates meta-research to help understand science communication in crises and improve its effectiveness. The objective is to study how many Spanish scientific papers on COVID-19 published during 2020 share their research data. Qualitative and descriptive study applying nine attributes: (a) availability, (b) accessibility, (c) format, (d) licensing, (e) linkage, (f) funding, (g) editorial policy, (h) content, and (i) statistics. We analyzed 1,340 papers, 1,173 (87.5%) did not have research data. A total of 12.5% share their research data of which 2.1% share their data in repositories, 5% share their data through a simple request, 0.2% do not have permission to share their data, and 5.2% share their data as supplementary material. There is a small percentage that shares their research data; however, it demonstrates the researchers' poor knowledge on how to properly share their research data and their lack of knowledge on what is research data.
- Date
- 21. 3.2023 19:22:02
-
Falkingham, L.T.; Reeves, R.: Context analysis : a technique for analysing research in a field, applied to literature on the management of R&D at the section level (1998)
0.04
0.039659113 = product of:
0.079318225 = sum of:
0.079318225 = product of:
0.11897734 = sum of:
0.0762897 = weight(_text_:r in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0762897 = score(doc=3689,freq=8.0), product of:
0.14899474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.045010004 = queryNorm
0.51202947 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
0.042687636 = weight(_text_:22 in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042687636 = score(doc=3689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15761736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045010004 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Context analysis is a new method for appraising a body of publications. the process consists of creating a database of attributes assigned to each paper by the reviewer and then looking for interesting relationships in the data. Assigning the attributes requires an understanding of the subject matter of the papers. Presents findings about one particular research field, Management of R&D at the Section Level. The findings support the view that this body of academic publications does not meet the needs of practitioner R&D managers. Discusses practical aspects of how to apply the method in other fields
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:18:46
-
Li, J.; Shi, D.: Sleeping beauties in genius work : when were they awakened? (2016)
0.03
0.033820555 = product of:
0.06764111 = sum of:
0.06764111 = product of:
0.101461664 = sum of:
0.06487226 = weight(_text_:b in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06487226 = score(doc=2647,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15946874 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.045010004 = queryNorm
0.40680233 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
0.036589403 = weight(_text_:22 in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036589403 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15761736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045010004 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- "Genius work," proposed by Avramescu, refers to scientific articles whose citations grow exponentially in an extended period, for example, over 50 years. Such articles were defined as "sleeping beauties" by van Raan, who quantitatively studied the phenomenon of delayed recognition. However, the criteria adopted by van Raan at times are not applicable and may confer recognition prematurely. To revise such deficiencies, this paper proposes two new criteria, which are applicable (but not limited) to exponential citation curves. We searched for genius work among articles of Nobel Prize laureates during the period of 1901-2012 on the Web of Science, finding 25 articles of genius work out of 21,438 papers including 10 (by van Raan's criteria) sleeping beauties and 15 nonsleeping-beauties. By our new criteria, two findings were obtained through empirical analysis: (a) the awakening periods for genius work depend on the increase rate b in the exponential function, and (b) lower b leads to a longer sleeping period.
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 14:13:32
-
Rostaing, H.; Barts, N.; Léveillé, V.: Bibliometrics: representation instrument of the multidisciplinary positioning of a scientific area : Implementation for an Advisory Scientific Committee (2007)
0.03
0.032908186 = product of:
0.06581637 = sum of:
0.06581637 = product of:
0.09872455 = sum of:
0.04993868 = weight(_text_:b in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04993868 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15946874 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.045010004 = queryNorm
0.31315655 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
0.048785873 = weight(_text_:22 in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048785873 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15761736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045010004 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 30.12.2007 11:22:39
- Source
- ¬La interdisciplinariedad y la transdisciplinariedad en la organización del conocimiento científico : actas del VIII Congreso ISKO-España, León, 18, 19 y 20 de Abril de 2007 : Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in the organization of scientific knowledge. Ed.: B. Rodriguez Bravo u. M.L Alvite Diez
-
Scholarly metrics under the microscope : from citation analysis to academic auditing (2015)
0.03
0.032908186 = product of:
0.06581637 = sum of:
0.06581637 = product of:
0.09872455 = sum of:
0.04993868 = weight(_text_:b in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04993868 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15946874 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.045010004 = queryNorm
0.31315655 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
0.048785873 = weight(_text_:22 in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048785873 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15761736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045010004 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2017 17:12:50
- Editor
- Cronin, B. u. C.R. Sugimoto
-
Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014)
0.03
0.03079333 = product of:
0.06158666 = sum of:
0.06158666 = product of:
0.09237999 = sum of:
0.043594114 = weight(_text_:r in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043594114 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14899474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.045010004 = queryNorm
0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
0.048785873 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048785873 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15761736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045010004 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:05:18
-
Rousseau, R.; Jin, B.: ¬The age-dependent h-type AR**2-index : basic properties and a case study (2008)
0.03
0.027897518 = product of:
0.055795036 = sum of:
0.055795036 = product of:
0.08369255 = sum of:
0.03745401 = weight(_text_:b in 2638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03745401 = score(doc=2638,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15946874 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.045010004 = queryNorm
0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 2638, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2638)
0.046238538 = weight(_text_:r in 2638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046238538 = score(doc=2638,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14899474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.045010004 = queryNorm
0.3103367 = fieldWeight in 2638, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2638)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Hirsch-type indices are studied with special attention to the AR**2-index introduced by Jin. The article consists of two parts: a theoretical part and a practical illustration. In the theoretical part, we recall the definition of the AR**2-index and show that an alternative definition, the so-called AR**2,1, does not have the properties expected for this type of index. A practical example shows the existence of some of these mathematical properties and illustrates the difference between different h-type indices. Clearly the h-index itself is the most robust of all. It is shown that excluding so-called non-WoS source articles may have a significant influence on the R-and, especially, the g-index.
-
Debackere, K.; Clarysse, B.: Advanced bibliometric methods to model the relationship between entry behavior and networking in emerging technological communities (1998)
0.03
0.027280398 = product of:
0.054560795 = sum of:
0.054560795 = product of:
0.08184119 = sum of:
0.043696344 = weight(_text_:b in 330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043696344 = score(doc=330,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15946874 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.045010004 = queryNorm
0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 330, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=330)
0.03814485 = weight(_text_:r in 330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03814485 = score(doc=330,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14899474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.045010004 = queryNorm
0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 330, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=330)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Organizational ecology and social network theory are used to explain entries in technological communities. Using bibliometric data on 411 organizations in the field of plant biotechnology, we test several hypotheses that entry is not only influenced by the density of the field, but also by the structure of the R&D network within the community. The empirical findings point to the usefulness of bibliometric data in mapping change and evolution in technological communities, as well as to the effects of networking on entry behavior
-
Milard, B.; Pitarch, Y.: Egocentric cocitation networks and scientific papers destinies (2023)
0.02
0.024681136 = product of:
0.049362272 = sum of:
0.049362272 = product of:
0.07404341 = sum of:
0.03745401 = weight(_text_:b in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03745401 = score(doc=918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15946874 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.045010004 = queryNorm
0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
0.036589403 = weight(_text_:22 in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036589403 = score(doc=918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15761736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045010004 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 21. 3.2023 19:22:14
-
Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: Growth rates of modern science : a bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2015)
0.02
0.023795431 = product of:
0.047590863 = sum of:
0.047590863 = product of:
0.07138629 = sum of:
0.044139974 = weight(_text_:b in 2261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044139974 = score(doc=2261,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15946874 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.045010004 = queryNorm
0.2767939 = fieldWeight in 2261, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2261)
0.02724632 = weight(_text_:r in 2261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02724632 = score(doc=2261,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14899474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.045010004 = queryNorm
0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 2261, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2261)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Many studies (in information science) have looked at the growth of science. In this study, we reexamine the question of the growth of science. To do this we (a) use current data up to publication year 2012 and (b) analyze the data across all disciplines and also separately for the natural sciences and for the medical and health sciences. Furthermore, the data were analyzed with an advanced statistical technique-segmented regression analysis-which can identify specific segments with similar growth rates in the history of science. The study is based on two different sets of bibliometric data: (a) the number of publications held as source items in the Web of Science (WoS, Thomson Reuters) per publication year and (b) the number of cited references in the publications of the source items per cited reference year. We looked at the rate at which science has grown since the mid-1600s. In our analysis of cited references we identified three essential growth phases in the development of science, which each led to growth rates tripling in comparison with the previous phase: from less than 1% up to the middle of the 18th century, to 2 to 3% up to the period between the two world wars, and 8 to 9% to 2010.
-
Jin, B.; Li, L.; Rousseau, R.: Long-term influences of interventions in the normal development of science : China and the cultural revolution (2004)
0.02
0.0233832 = product of:
0.0467664 = sum of:
0.0467664 = product of:
0.0701496 = sum of:
0.03745401 = weight(_text_:b in 2232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03745401 = score(doc=2232,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15946874 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.045010004 = queryNorm
0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 2232, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2232)
0.032695588 = weight(_text_:r in 2232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032695588 = score(doc=2232,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14899474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.045010004 = queryNorm
0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 2232, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2232)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data (1996)
0.02
0.023094997 = product of:
0.046189994 = sum of:
0.046189994 = product of:
0.06928499 = sum of:
0.032695588 = weight(_text_:r in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032695588 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14899474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.045010004 = queryNorm
0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
0.036589403 = weight(_text_:22 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036589403 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15761736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045010004 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.3, S.165-170
-
Asonuma, A.; Fang, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Reflections on the age distribution of Japanese scientists (2006)
0.02
0.023094997 = product of:
0.046189994 = sum of:
0.046189994 = product of:
0.06928499 = sum of:
0.032695588 = weight(_text_:r in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032695588 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14899474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.045010004 = queryNorm
0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
0.036589403 = weight(_text_:22 in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036589403 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15761736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045010004 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:26:24
-
Raan, A.F.J. van: Scaling rules in the science system : influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of research groups (2008)
0.02
0.023094997 = product of:
0.046189994 = sum of:
0.046189994 = product of:
0.06928499 = sum of:
0.032695588 = weight(_text_:r in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032695588 = score(doc=2758,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14899474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.045010004 = queryNorm
0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
0.036589403 = weight(_text_:22 in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036589403 = score(doc=2758,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15761736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045010004 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:03:12
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch: Costas, R., M. Bordons u. T.N. van Leeuwen u.a.: Scaling rules in the science system: Influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of individual researchers. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.740-753.
-
Huang, M.-H.; Huang, W.-T.; Chang, C.-C.; Chen, D. Z.; Lin, C.-P.: The greater scattering phenomenon beyond Bradford's law in patent citation (2014)
0.02
0.023094997 = product of:
0.046189994 = sum of:
0.046189994 = product of:
0.06928499 = sum of:
0.032695588 = weight(_text_:r in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032695588 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14899474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.045010004 = queryNorm
0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.036589403 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036589403 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15761736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045010004 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Patent analysis has become important for management as it offers timely and valuable information to evaluate R&D performance and identify the prospects of patents. This study explores the scattering patterns of patent impact based on citations in 3 distinct technological areas, the liquid crystal, semiconductor, and drug technological areas, to identify the core patents in each area. The research follows the approach from Bradford's law, which equally divides total citations into 3 zones. While the result suggests that the scattering of patent citations corresponded with features of Bradford's law, the proportion of patents in the 3 zones did not match the proportion as proposed by the law. As a result, the study shows that the distributions of citations in all 3 areas were more concentrated than what Bradford's law proposed. The Groos (1967) droop was also presented by the scattering of patent citations, and the growth rate of cumulative citation decreased in the third zone.
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:11:29
-
Ntuli, H.; Inglesi-Lotz, R.; Chang, T.; Pouris, A.: Does research output cause economic growth or vice versa? : evidence from 34 OECD countries (2015)
0.02
0.023094997 = product of:
0.046189994 = sum of:
0.046189994 = product of:
0.06928499 = sum of:
0.032695588 = weight(_text_:r in 2132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032695588 = score(doc=2132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14899474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.045010004 = queryNorm
0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 2132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2132)
0.036589403 = weight(_text_:22 in 2132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036589403 = score(doc=2132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15761736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045010004 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2132)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 8. 7.2015 22:00:42
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.; Wagner, C.S.: ¬The relative influences of government funding and international collaboration on citation impact (2019)
0.02
0.023094997 = product of:
0.046189994 = sum of:
0.046189994 = product of:
0.06928499 = sum of:
0.032695588 = weight(_text_:r in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032695588 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14899474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.045010004 = queryNorm
0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
0.036589403 = weight(_text_:22 in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036589403 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15761736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045010004 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A recent publication in Nature reports that public R&D funding is only weakly correlated with the citation impact of a nation's articles as measured by the field-weighted citation index (FWCI; defined by Scopus). On the basis of the supplementary data, we up-scaled the design using Web of Science data for the decade 2003-2013 and OECD funding data for the corresponding decade assuming a 2-year delay (2001-2011). Using negative binomial regression analysis, we found very small coefficients, but the effects of international collaboration are positive and statistically significant, whereas the effects of government funding are negative, an order of magnitude smaller, and statistically nonsignificant (in two of three analyses). In other words, international collaboration improves the impact of research articles, whereas more government funding tends to have a small adverse effect when comparing OECD countries.
- Date
- 8. 1.2019 18:22:45
