Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Prathap, G."
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Prathap, G.: ¬The thermodynamics-bibliometrics consilience and the meaning of h-type indices (2012) 0.01 
    0.008730226 = product of:
  0.017460452 = sum of:
    0.017460452 = product of:
      0.052381355 = sum of:
        0.052381355 = weight(_text_:h in 4990) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052381355 = score(doc=4990,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.4658342 = fieldWeight in 4990, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4990)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Object
    h-index
  2. Prathap, G.: ¬The inconsistency of the H-index (2012) 0.01 
    0.008730226 = product of:
  0.017460452 = sum of:
    0.017460452 = product of:
      0.052381355 = sum of:
        0.052381355 = weight(_text_:h in 287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052381355 = score(doc=287,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.4658342 = fieldWeight in 287, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=287)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Object
    h-index
  3. Prathap, G.: ¬A thermodynamic explanation for the Glänzel-Schubert model for the h-index (2011) 0.01 
    0.008230937 = product of:
  0.016461873 = sum of:
    0.016461873 = product of:
      0.04938562 = sum of:
        0.04938562 = weight(_text_:h in 4453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04938562 = score(doc=4453,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.4391927 = fieldWeight in 4453, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4453)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Recently, it was shown that among existing theoretical models for the h-index, the Glänzel-Schubert model provides the best fit for a chosen example involving the research evaluation of universities. In this brief communication, we propose a thermodynamic explanation for the success of the Glänzel-Schubert model of the h-index.
    Object
    h-index
  4. Prathap, G.: Fractionalized exergy for evaluating research performance (2011) 0.01 
    0.007933183 = product of:
  0.015866365 = sum of:
    0.015866365 = product of:
      0.047599096 = sum of:
        0.047599096 = weight(_text_:c in 4918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047599096 = score(doc=4918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 4918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4918)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The approach based on "thermodynamic" considerations that can quantify research performance using an exergy term defined as X = iC, where i is the impact and C is the number of citations is now extended to cases where fractionalized counting of citations is used instead of integer counting.
  5. Prathap, G.: ¬The zynergy-index and the formula for the h-index (2014) 0.01 
    0.0071282005 = product of:
  0.014256401 = sum of:
    0.014256401 = product of:
      0.0427692 = sum of:
        0.0427692 = weight(_text_:h in 1207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0427692 = score(doc=1207,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.38035205 = fieldWeight in 1207, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1207)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The h-index, as originally proposed (Hirsch, 2005), is a purely heuristic construction. Burrell (2013) showed that efforts to derive formulae from the mathematical framework of Lotkaian informetrics could lead to misleading results. On this note, we argue that a simple heuristic "thermodynamical" model can enable a better three-dimensional (3D) evaluation of the information production process leading to what we call the zynergy-index.
    Object
    h-index
  6. Prathap, G.: Measures for impact, consistency, and the h- and g-indices (2014) 0.01 
    0.005820151 = product of:
  0.011640302 = sum of:
    0.011640302 = product of:
      0.034920905 = sum of:
        0.034920905 = weight(_text_:h in 1250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034920905 = score(doc=1250,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.31055614 = fieldWeight in 1250, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1250)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Object
    h-index