Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Chan, L.M."
  • × theme_ss:"International bedeutende Universalklassifikationen"
  1. Chan, L.M.; Hodges, T.L.: Library of Congress Classification (LCC) (2009) 0.02 
    0.024164006 = product of:
  0.048328012 = sum of:
    0.048328012 = product of:
      0.07249202 = sum of:
        0.035699323 = weight(_text_:c in 3842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035699323 = score(doc=3842,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 3842, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3842)
        0.03679269 = weight(_text_:22 in 3842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03679269 = score(doc=3842,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3842, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3842)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The Library of Congress Classification (LCC), originally designed for classifying the Library's own collection, is now used in a wide range of libraries, both in the United States and abroad. This entry recounts its history and development from its genesis to the present time, leading up to an explanation of LCC structure, tables, and notation. It then considers the system's potential for wider application in the online age, through speculation on using LCC as a tool for (a) partitioning large files; (b) generating domain-specific taxonomies; and (c) integrating classification and controlled subject terms for improved retrieval in the online public access catalog (OPAC) and the Internet. Finally, analyzing both its strong and relatively weak features, it addresses the question of whether in its current state LCC is in all respects ready for playing such roles
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:22:42
  2. Chan, L.M.; Mitchell, J.S.; Alex, H. (Übers.); Heiner-Freiling, M. (Übers.); Preuss, M. (Übers.): Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation : Theorie und Praxis (2006) 0.00 
    0.0036010346 = product of:
  0.0072020693 = sum of:
    0.0072020693 = product of:
      0.021606207 = sum of:
        0.021606207 = weight(_text_:h in 3068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021606207 = score(doc=3068,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 3068, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3068)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Authors

Types