Search (21 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Ding, Y."
  1. Ding, Y.; Zhang, G.; Chambers, T.; Song, M.; Wang, X.; Zhai, C.: Content-based citation analysis : the next generation of citation analysis (2014) 0.02
    0.024164006 = product of:
      0.048328012 = sum of:
        0.048328012 = product of:
          0.07249202 = sum of:
            0.035699323 = weight(_text_:c in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035699323 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
            0.03679269 = weight(_text_:22 in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03679269 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 16:52:04
  2. Xu, H.; Bu, Y.; Liu, M.; Zhang, C.; Sun, M.; Zhang, Y.; Meyer, E.; Salas, E.; Ding, Y.: Team power dynamics and team impact : new perspectives on scientific collaboration using career age as a proxy for team power (2022) 0.02
    0.015060814 = product of:
      0.030121628 = sum of:
        0.030121628 = product of:
          0.04518244 = sum of:
            0.029749434 = weight(_text_:c in 663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029749434 = score(doc=663,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 663, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=663)
            0.015433006 = weight(_text_:h in 663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015433006 = score(doc=663,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 663, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=663)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Hu, B.; Dong, X.; Zhang, C.; Bowman, T.D.; Ding, Y.; Milojevic, S.; Ni, C.; Yan, E.; Larivière, V.: ¬A lead-lag analysis of the topic evolution patterns for preprints and publications (2015) 0.01
    0.008414412 = product of:
      0.016828824 = sum of:
        0.016828824 = product of:
          0.050486468 = sum of:
            0.050486468 = weight(_text_:c in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050486468 = score(doc=2337,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.32338172 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Lu, C.; Bu, Y.; Wang, J.; Ding, Y.; Torvik, V.; Schnaars, M.; Zhang, C.: Examining scientific writing styles from the perspective of linguistic complexity : a cross-level moderation model (2019) 0.01
    0.008414412 = product of:
      0.016828824 = sum of:
        0.016828824 = product of:
          0.050486468 = sum of:
            0.050486468 = weight(_text_:c in 5219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050486468 = score(doc=5219,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.32338172 = fieldWeight in 5219, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5219)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. Ding, Y.: Applying weighted PageRank to author citation networks (2011) 0.01
    0.0071541346 = product of:
      0.014308269 = sum of:
        0.014308269 = product of:
          0.042924806 = sum of:
            0.042924806 = weight(_text_:22 in 4188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042924806 = score(doc=4188,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4188, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4188)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 13:02:21
  6. Milojevic, S.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Yan, E.; Ding, Y.: ¬The cognitive structure of Library and Information Science : analysis of article title words (2011) 0.01
    0.0070120096 = product of:
      0.014024019 = sum of:
        0.014024019 = product of:
          0.042072058 = sum of:
            0.042072058 = weight(_text_:c in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042072058 = score(doc=4608,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.2694848 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This study comprises a suite of analyses of words in article titles in order to reveal the cognitive structure of Library and Information Science (LIS). The use of title words to elucidate the cognitive structure of LIS has been relatively neglected. The present study addresses this gap by performing (a) co-word analysis and hierarchical clustering, (b) multidimensional scaling, and (c) determination of trends in usage of terms. The study is based on 10,344 articles published between 1988 and 2007 in 16 LIS journals. Methodologically, novel aspects of this study are: (a) its large scale, (b) removal of non-specific title words based on the "word concentration" measure (c) identification of the most frequent terms that include both single words and phrases, and (d) presentation of the relative frequencies of terms using "heatmaps". Conceptually, our analysis reveals that LIS consists of three main branches: the traditionally recognized library-related and information-related branches, plus an equally distinct bibliometrics/scientometrics branch. The three branches focus on: libraries, information, and science, respectively. In addition, our study identifies substructures within each branch. We also tentatively identify "information seeking behavior" as a branch that is establishing itself separate from the three main branches. Furthermore, we find that cognitive concepts in LIS evolve continuously, with no stasis since 1992. The most rapid development occurred between 1998 and 2001, influenced by the increased focus on the Internet. The change in the cognitive landscape is found to be driven by the emergence of new information technologies, and the retirement of old ones.
  7. Lu, C.; Zhang, Y.; Ahn, Y.-Y.; Ding, Y.; Zhang, C.; Ma, D.: Co-contributorship network and division of labor in individual scientific collaborations (2020) 0.01
    0.0070120096 = product of:
      0.014024019 = sum of:
        0.014024019 = product of:
          0.042072058 = sum of:
            0.042072058 = weight(_text_:c in 5963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042072058 = score(doc=5963,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.2694848 = fieldWeight in 5963, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5963)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  8. Liu, M.; Bu, Y.; Chen, C.; Xu, J.; Li, D.; Leng, Y.; Freeman, R.B.; Meyer, E.T.; Yoon, W.; Sung, M.; Jeong, M.; Lee, J.; Kang, J.; Min, C.; Zhai, Y.; Song, M.; Ding, Y.: Pandemics are catalysts of scientific novelty : evidence from COVID-19 (2022) 0.01
    0.0070120096 = product of:
      0.014024019 = sum of:
        0.014024019 = product of:
          0.042072058 = sum of:
            0.042072058 = weight(_text_:c in 633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042072058 = score(doc=633,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.2694848 = fieldWeight in 633, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=633)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  9. Ding, Y.; Chowdhury, G.; Foo, S.: Organsising keywords in a Web search environment : a methodology based on co-word analysis (2000) 0.01
    0.0059498874 = product of:
      0.011899775 = sum of:
        0.011899775 = product of:
          0.035699323 = sum of:
            0.035699323 = weight(_text_:c in 105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035699323 = score(doc=105,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 105, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=105)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 6th International ISKO-Conference, 10-13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada. Ed.: C. Beghtol et al
  10. Ni, C.; Shaw, D.; Lind, S.M.; Ding, Y.: Journal impact and proximity : an assessment using bibliographic features (2013) 0.01
    0.0059498874 = product of:
      0.011899775 = sum of:
        0.011899775 = product of:
          0.035699323 = sum of:
            0.035699323 = weight(_text_:c in 686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035699323 = score(doc=686,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 686, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=686)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  11. Zhang, C.; Bu, Y.; Ding, Y.; Xu, J.: Understanding scientific collaboration : homophily, transitivity, and preferential attachment (2018) 0.01
    0.0059498874 = product of:
      0.011899775 = sum of:
        0.011899775 = product of:
          0.035699323 = sum of:
            0.035699323 = weight(_text_:c in 4011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035699323 = score(doc=4011,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 4011, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4011)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. He, B.; Ding, Y.; Ni, C.: Mining enriched contextual information of scientific collaboration : a meso perspective (2011) 0.00
    0.0049582394 = product of:
      0.009916479 = sum of:
        0.009916479 = product of:
          0.029749434 = sum of:
            0.029749434 = weight(_text_:c in 4444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029749434 = score(doc=4444,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 4444, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4444)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  13. Li, D.; Ding, Y.; Sugimoto, C.; He, B.; Tang, J.; Yan, E.; Lin, N.; Qin, Z.; Dong, T.: Modeling topic and community structure in social tagging : the TTR-LDA-Community model (2011) 0.00
    0.0049582394 = product of:
      0.009916479 = sum of:
        0.009916479 = product of:
          0.029749434 = sum of:
            0.029749434 = weight(_text_:c in 4759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029749434 = score(doc=4759,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 4759, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4759)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Lin, N.; Li, D.; Ding, Y.; He, B.; Qin, Z.; Tang, J.; Li, J.; Dong, T.: ¬The dynamic features of Delicious, Flickr, and YouTube (2012) 0.00
    0.0049582394 = product of:
      0.009916479 = sum of:
        0.009916479 = product of:
          0.029749434 = sum of:
            0.029749434 = weight(_text_:c in 4970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029749434 = score(doc=4970,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 4970, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4970)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article investigates the dynamic features of social tagging vocabularies in Delicious, Flickr, and YouTube from 2003 to 2008. Three algorithms are designed to study the macro- and micro-tag growth as well as the dynamics of taggers' activities, respectively. Moreover, we propose a Tagger Tag Resource Latent Dirichlet Allocation (TTR-LDA) model to explore the evolution of topics emerging from those social vocabularies. Our results show that (a) at the macro level, tag growth in all the three tagging systems obeys power law distribution with exponents lower than 1; at the micro level, the tag growth of popular resources in all three tagging systems follows a similar power law distribution; (b) the exponents of tag growth vary in different evolving stages of resources; (c) the growth of number of taggers associated with different popular resources presents a feature of convergence over time; (d) the active level of taggers has a positive correlation with the macro-tag growth of different tagging systems; and (e) some topics evolve into several subtopics over time while others experience relatively stable stages in which their contents do not change much, and certain groups of taggers continue their interests in them.
  15. Tan, L.K.-W.; Na, J.-C.; Ding, Y.: Influence diffusion detection using the influence style (INFUSE) model (2015) 0.00
    0.0049582394 = product of:
      0.009916479 = sum of:
        0.009916479 = product of:
          0.029749434 = sum of:
            0.029749434 = weight(_text_:c in 2125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029749434 = score(doc=2125,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 2125, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2125)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  16. Min, C.; Ding, Y.; Li, J.; Bu, Y.; Pei, L.; Sun, J.: Innovation or imitation : the diffusion of citations (2018) 0.00
    0.0049582394 = product of:
      0.009916479 = sum of:
        0.009916479 = product of:
          0.029749434 = sum of:
            0.029749434 = weight(_text_:c in 4445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029749434 = score(doc=4445,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 4445, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4445)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  17. Ding, Y.; Yan, E.; Frazho, A.; Caverlee, J.: PageRank for ranking authors in co-citation networks (2009) 0.00
    0.004365113 = product of:
      0.008730226 = sum of:
        0.008730226 = product of:
          0.026190678 = sum of:
            0.026190678 = weight(_text_:h in 3161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026190678 = score(doc=3161,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.2329171 = fieldWeight in 3161, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3161)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper studies how varied damping factors in the PageRank algorithm influence the ranking of authors and proposes weighted PageRank algorithms. We selected the 108 most highly cited authors in the information retrieval (IR) area from the 1970s to 2008 to form the author co-citation network. We calculated the ranks of these 108 authors based on PageRank with the damping factor ranging from 0.05 to 0.95. In order to test the relationship between different measures, we compared PageRank and weighted PageRank results with the citation ranking, h-index, and centrality measures. We found that in our author co-citation network, citation rank is highly correlated with PageRank with different damping factors and also with different weighted PageRank algorithms; citation rank and PageRank are not significantly correlated with centrality measures; and h-index rank does not significantly correlate with centrality measures but does significantly correlate with other measures. The key factors that have impact on the PageRank of authors in the author co-citation network are being co-cited with important authors.
  18. Yan, E.; Ding, Y.: Discovering author impact : a PageRank perspective (2011) 0.00
    0.0041154684 = product of:
      0.008230937 = sum of:
        0.008230937 = product of:
          0.02469281 = sum of:
            0.02469281 = weight(_text_:h in 2704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02469281 = score(doc=2704,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 2704, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2704)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article provides an alternative perspective for measuring author impact by applying PageRank algorithm to a coauthorship network. A weighted PageRank algorithm considering citation and coauthorship network topology is proposed. We test this algorithm under different damping factors by evaluating author impact in the informetrics research community. In addition, we also compare this weighted PageRank with the h-index, citation, and program committee (PC) membership of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI) conferences. Findings show that this weighted PageRank algorithm provides reliable results in measuring author impact.
  19. Bu, Y.; Ding, Y.; Xu, J.; Liang, X.; Gao, G.; Zhao, Y.: Understanding success through the diversity of collaborators and the milestone of career (2018) 0.00
    0.0036375946 = product of:
      0.0072751893 = sum of:
        0.0072751893 = product of:
          0.021825567 = sum of:
            0.021825567 = weight(_text_:h in 4012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021825567 = score(doc=4012,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.1940976 = fieldWeight in 4012, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4012)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Scientific collaboration is vital to many fields, and it is common to see scholars seek out experienced researchers or experts in a domain with whom they can share knowledge, experience, and resources. To explore the diversity of research collaborations, this article performs a temporal analysis on the scientific careers of researchers in the field of computer science. Specifically, we analyze collaborators using 2 indicators: the research topic diversity, measured by the Author-Conference-Topic model and cosine, and the impact diversity, measured by the normalized standard deviation of h-indices. We find that the collaborators of high-impact researchers tend to study diverse research topics and have diverse h-indices. Moreover, by setting PhD graduation as an important milestone in researchers' careers, we examine several indicators related to scientific collaboration and their effects on a career. The results show that collaborating with authoritative authors plays an important role prior to a researcher's PhD graduation, but working with non-authoritative authors carries more weight after PhD graduation.
  20. Ding, Y.: Topic-based PageRank on author cocitation networks (2011) 0.00
    0.0030866012 = product of:
      0.0061732023 = sum of:
        0.0061732023 = product of:
          0.018519606 = sum of:
            0.018519606 = weight(_text_:h in 4348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018519606 = score(doc=4348,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 4348, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4348)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Ranking authors is vital for identifying a researcher's impact and standing within a scientific field. There are many different ranking methods (e.g., citations, publications, h-index, PageRank, and weighted PageRank), but most of them are topic-independent. This paper proposes topic-dependent ranks based on the combination of a topic model and a weighted PageRank algorithm. The author-conference-topic (ACT) model was used to extract topic distribution of individual authors. Two ways for combining the ACT model with the PageRank algorithm are proposed: simple combination (I_PR) or using a topic distribution as a weighted vector for PageRank (PR_t). Information retrieval was chosen as the test field and representative authors for different topics at different time phases were identified. Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to analyze the ranking difference between I_PR and PR_t.