Search (87 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × language_ss:"d"
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Schlögl, C.: Internationale Sichtbarkeit der europäischen und insbesondere der deutschsprachigen Informationswissenschaft (2013) 0.05 
    0.05309011 = product of:
  0.10618022 = sum of:
    0.10618022 = sum of:
      0.041649207 = weight(_text_:c in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041649207 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045260075 = queryNorm
          0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
      0.021606207 = weight(_text_:h in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.021606207 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045260075 = queryNorm
          0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
      0.042924806 = weight(_text_:22 in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042924806 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045260075 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2013 14:04:09
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 64(2013) H.1, S.1-8
  2. Krattenthaler, C.: Was der h-Index wirklich aussagt (2021) 0.03 
    0.0342713 = product of:
  0.0685426 = sum of:
    0.0685426 = product of:
      0.1028139 = sum of:
        0.047599096 = weight(_text_:c in 407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047599096 = score(doc=407,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 407, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=407)
        0.0552148 = weight(_text_:h in 407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0552148 = score(doc=407,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.4910324 = fieldWeight in 407, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=407)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Diese Note legt dar, dass der sogenannte h-Index (Hirschs bibliometrischer Index) im Wesentlichen dieselbe Information wiedergibt wie die Gesamtanzahl von Zitationen von Publikationen einer Autorin oder eines Autors, also ein nutzloser bibliometrischer Index ist. Dies basiert auf einem faszinierenden Satz der Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie, der hier ebenfalls erläutert wird.
    Content
    Vgl.: DOI: 10.1515/dmvm-2021-0050. Auch abgedruckt u.d.T.: 'Der h-Index - "ein nutzloser bibliometrischer Index"' in Open Password Nr. 1007 vom 06.12.2021 unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzM3NCwiZDI3MzMzOTEwMzUzIiwwLDAsMzQ4LDFd.
    Object
    h-index
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 2021, H.3, S.124-128
  3. H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008) 0.03 
    0.028596988 = product of:
  0.057193976 = sum of:
    0.057193976 = product of:
      0.08579096 = sum of:
        0.048998274 = weight(_text_:h in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048998274 = score(doc=590,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.435748 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
        0.03679269 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03679269 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    "Zur Kurzmitteilung "Latest enhancements in Scopus: ... h-Index incorporated in Scopus" in den letzten Online-Mitteilungen (Online-Mitteilungen 92, S.31) ist zu korrigieren, dass der h-Index sehr wohl bereits im Web of Science enthalten ist. Allerdings findet man/frau diese Information nicht in der "cited ref search", sondern neben der Trefferliste einer Quick Search, General Search oder einer Suche über den Author Finder in der rechten Navigationsleiste unter dem Titel "Citation Report". Der "Citation Report" bietet für die in der jeweiligen Trefferliste angezeigten Arbeiten: - Die Gesamtzahl der Zitierungen aller Arbeiten in der Trefferliste - Die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit dieser Arbeiten - Die Anzahl der Zitierungen der einzelnen Arbeiten, aufgeschlüsselt nach Publikationsjahr der zitierenden Arbeiten - Die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit dieser Arbeiten pro Jahr - Den h-Index (ein h-Index von x sagt aus, dass x Arbeiten der Trefferliste mehr als x-mal zitiert wurden; er ist gegenüber sehr hohen Zitierungen einzelner Arbeiten unempfindlicher als die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit)."
    Date
    6. 4.2008 19:04:22
    Object
    H-Index
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 61(2008) H.1, S.124-125
  4. Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006) 0.02 
    0.024583243 = product of:
  0.049166486 = sum of:
    0.049166486 = product of:
      0.07374973 = sum of:
        0.02469281 = weight(_text_:h in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02469281 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
        0.04905692 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04905692 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    4.12.2006 12:12:22
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 57(2006) H.8, S.401-406
  5. Pernik, V.; Schlögl, C.: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen von Web Structure Mining am Beispiel von informationswissenschaftlichen Hochschulinstituten im deutschsprachigen Raum (2006) 0.02 
    0.024097301 = product of:
  0.048194602 = sum of:
    0.048194602 = product of:
      0.0722919 = sum of:
        0.047599096 = weight(_text_:c in 78) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047599096 = score(doc=78,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 78, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=78)
        0.02469281 = weight(_text_:h in 78) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02469281 = score(doc=78,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 78, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=78)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 57(2006) H.8, S.407-414
  6. Reichmann, G.; Schlögl, C.: Möglichkeiten zur Steuerung der Ergebnisse einer Forschungsevaluation (2021) 0.02 
    0.024097301 = product of:
  0.048194602 = sum of:
    0.048194602 = product of:
      0.0722919 = sum of:
        0.047599096 = weight(_text_:c in 5660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047599096 = score(doc=5660,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 5660, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5660)
        0.02469281 = weight(_text_:h in 5660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02469281 = score(doc=5660,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 5660, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5660)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 72(2021) H.4, S.212-220
  7. Herb, U.; Geith, U.: Kriterien der qualitativen Bewertung wissenschaftlicher Publikationen : Befunde aus dem Projekt visOA (2020) 0.02 
    0.024097301 = product of:
  0.048194602 = sum of:
    0.048194602 = product of:
      0.0722919 = sum of:
        0.047599096 = weight(_text_:c in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047599096 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
        0.02469281 = weight(_text_:h in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02469281 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Dieser Beitrag beschreibt a) die Ergebnisse einer Literaturstudie zur qualitativen Wahrnehmung wissenschaftlicher Publikationen, b) die Konstruktion eines daraus abgeleiteten Kriterienkatalogs zur Wahrnehmung der Qualität wissenschaftlicher Publikationen sowie c) der Überprüfung dieses Katalogs in qualitativen Interviews mit Wissenschaflterinnen und Wissenschaftlern aus dem Fachspektrum Chemie, Physik, Biologie, Materialwissenschaft und Engineering. Es zeigte sich, dass die Wahrnehmung von Qualität auf äußerlichen und von außen herangetragenen Faktoren, inhaltlichen / semantischen Faktoren und sprachlichen, syntaktischen sowie strukturellen Faktoren beruht.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 71(2020) H.2/3, S.77-85
  8. Schlögl, C.; Gorraiz, J.; Bart, C.; Bargmann, M.: Messen und gemessen werden : Möglichkeiten und Grenzen quantitativer Forschungsevaluierungen am Beispiel eines Institutsvergleichs (2001) 0.02 
    0.023002025 = product of:
  0.04600405 = sum of:
    0.04600405 = product of:
      0.06900607 = sum of:
        0.050486468 = weight(_text_:c in 5958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050486468 = score(doc=5958,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.32338172 = fieldWeight in 5958, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5958)
        0.018519606 = weight(_text_:h in 5958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018519606 = score(doc=5958,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 5958, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5958)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    nfd Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 52(2001) H.4, S.221-228
  9. Schlögl, C.; Gorraiz, J.: Sind Downloads die besseren Zeitschriftennutzungsdaten? : Ein Vergleich von Download- und Zitationsidikatoren (2012) 0.02 
    0.02108514 = product of:
  0.04217028 = sum of:
    0.04217028 = product of:
      0.063255414 = sum of:
        0.041649207 = weight(_text_:c in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041649207 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
        0.021606207 = weight(_text_:h in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021606207 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 59(2012) H.2, S.87-95
  10. ¬Die deutsche Zeitschrift für Dokumentation, Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis von 1950 bis 2011 : eine vorläufige Bilanz in vier Abschnitten (2012) 0.02 
    0.020994458 = product of:
  0.041988917 = sum of:
    0.041988917 = product of:
      0.06298337 = sum of:
        0.026190678 = weight(_text_:h in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026190678 = score(doc=402,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.2329171 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
        0.03679269 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03679269 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:35:26
    Footnote
    Besteht aus 4 Teilen: Teil 1: Eden, D., A. Arndt, A. Hoffer, T. Raschke u. P. Schön: Die Nachrichten für Dokumentation in den Jahren 1950 bis 1962 (S.159-163). Teil 2: Brose, M., E. durst, D. Nitzsche, D. Veckenstedt u. R. Wein: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1963-1975 (S.164-170). Teil 3: Bösel, J., G. Ebert, P. Garz,, M. Iwanow u. B. Russ: Methoden und Ergebnisse einer statistischen Auswertung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1976 bis 1988 (S.171-174). Teil 4: Engelage, H., S. Jansen, R. Mertins, K. Redel u. S. Ring: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) / "Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis" (IWP) 1989-2011 (S.164-170).
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 63(2012) H.3, S.157-182
  11. Jovanovic, M.: ¬Eine kleine Frühgeschichte der Bibliometrie (2012) 0.02 
    0.018437434 = product of:
  0.036874868 = sum of:
    0.036874868 = product of:
      0.0553123 = sum of:
        0.018519606 = weight(_text_:h in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018519606 = score(doc=326,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
        0.03679269 = weight(_text_:22 in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03679269 = score(doc=326,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:23:32
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 63(2012) H.2, S.71-80
  12. Gorraiz, J.; Schlögl, C.: Zusammenhang von Zeitschriftennachfrage und -zitationshäufigkeiten : ¬Eine bibliometrische Analyse eines Dokumentlieferdienstes am Beispiel von Subito (2003) 0.02 
    0.018072978 = product of:
  0.036145955 = sum of:
    0.036145955 = product of:
      0.05421893 = sum of:
        0.035699323 = weight(_text_:c in 718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035699323 = score(doc=718,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 718, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=718)
        0.018519606 = weight(_text_:h in 718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018519606 = score(doc=718,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 718, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=718)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 50(2003) H.3, S.131-140
  13. Juchem, K.; Schlögl, C.; Stock, W.G.: Dimensionen der Zeitschriftenszientometrie am Beispiel von "Buch und Bibliothek" (2006) 0.02 
    0.018072978 = product of:
  0.036145955 = sum of:
    0.036145955 = product of:
      0.05421893 = sum of:
        0.035699323 = weight(_text_:c in 4931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035699323 = score(doc=4931,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 4931, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4931)
        0.018519606 = weight(_text_:h in 4931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018519606 = score(doc=4931,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 4931, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4931)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 57(2006) H.1, S.31-37
  14. Schlögl, C; Stock, W.G.: Deutsche Zeitschriften des Bibliotheks- und Informationswesens : Leser, Zitate und Redaktionen in szientometrischer Analyse (2006) 0.02 
    0.018072978 = product of:
  0.036145955 = sum of:
    0.036145955 = product of:
      0.05421893 = sum of:
        0.035699323 = weight(_text_:c in 52) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035699323 = score(doc=52,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 52, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=52)
        0.018519606 = weight(_text_:h in 52) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018519606 = score(doc=52,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 52, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=52)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 53(2006) H.5, S.244-255
  15. Schlögl, C.; List, R,: Vergleiche von Zitaten, Downloads und Lesehäufigkeiten : am Beispiel von zwei Volkswirtschaftslehre-Zeitschriften (2018) 0.02 
    0.018072978 = product of:
  0.036145955 = sum of:
    0.036145955 = product of:
      0.05421893 = sum of:
        0.035699323 = weight(_text_:c in 4236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035699323 = score(doc=4236,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 4236, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4236)
        0.018519606 = weight(_text_:h in 4236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018519606 = score(doc=4236,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 4236, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4236)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 69(2018) H.1, S.121-128
  16. Ball, R.: Wissenschaftsindikatoren im Zeitalter digitaler Wissenschaft (2007) 0.02 
    0.015364528 = product of:
  0.030729055 = sum of:
    0.030729055 = product of:
      0.046093583 = sum of:
        0.015433006 = weight(_text_:h in 875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015433006 = score(doc=875,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 875, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=875)
        0.030660577 = weight(_text_:22 in 875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030660577 = score(doc=875,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 875, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=875)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    23.12.2007 19:22:21
    Source
    B.I.T.online. 10(2007) H.2, S.xxx-xxx
  17. Hayer, L.: Lazarsfeld zitiert : eine bibliometrische Analyse (2008) 0.02 
    0.015364528 = product of:
  0.030729055 = sum of:
    0.030729055 = product of:
      0.046093583 = sum of:
        0.015433006 = weight(_text_:h in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015433006 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
        0.030660577 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030660577 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 6.2008 12:54:12
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 61(2008) H.2, S.14-20
  18. Sieben Fragen zu Bibliometrie : Antworten von Ilka Agricola, Friedrich Götze, Martin Grötschel, Klaus Hulek, Peter Michor, Gabriele Nebe, Hans Jürgen Prömel, Jens Vygen, Gerhard Woeginger (2017) 0.02 
    0.015060814 = product of:
  0.030121628 = sum of:
    0.030121628 = product of:
      0.04518244 = sum of:
        0.029749434 = weight(_text_:c in 4216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029749434 = score(doc=4216,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 4216, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4216)
        0.015433006 = weight(_text_:h in 4216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015433006 = score(doc=4216,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 4216, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4216)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Wissenschaftliche Institutionen und einzelne WissenschaftlerInnen werden zunehmend nach bibliometrischen Daten beurteilt. Jeder Mathematiker hat Vorbehalte gegenüber dieser Praxis. Über diese beiden Dinge waren sich alle TeilnemerInnen und Wortmeldungen des Panels zur Bibliometrie auf der DMV-Jahrestagung in Salzburg einig. Für einzelne WissenschaftlerInnen hat die IMU bereits 2014 (tinyurl.com/ycd7wvh7) die Vorbehalte gegenüber rein bibliometrischen Beurteilungen klar formuliert. Universitätsleitungen, Politik und andere bis hin zur öffentlichen Diskussion verlassen sich aber teilweise aif diese Art der Bewertung. Konkret kann das so aussehen: Zur Beurteilung von Departements zählt eine Universität Publikationen und gewichtet sie nach ihrer Güte. Die Güte entnimmt man einer Einteilung von Fachzeitschriften etwa in A, B und C. Liegt eine solche Einteilung nicht vor, sind alle Journale des Faches mit 1 gewichtet, d.h. 'junk'. Die Diskrepanz zwischen unserer Einschätzung und der allgemeinen Wirkmächtigkeit von Biblimetrie wirft für die DMV als Fachgegsellschaft die Frage auf, wie sie Einfluss nehmen kann und soll. Die 'Mitteilungen' versuchen an dieser Stelle zunächst, ein möglichst breites Meinungsbild zu sammeln. Wir haben sieben Fragen an eine Reihe von Kolleginnen und Kollegen gestellt, die am Panel teilgenmmen haben oder aus anderen Gründen mit dem Thema besfasst sind.
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 2017, H.4, S.215-224
  19. Wettlauf der Wissenschaft (2004) 0.01 
    0.012291621 = product of:
  0.024583243 = sum of:
    0.024583243 = product of:
      0.036874864 = sum of:
        0.012346405 = weight(_text_:h in 2495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012346405 = score(doc=2495,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 2495, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2495)
        0.02452846 = weight(_text_:22 in 2495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02452846 = score(doc=2495,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2495, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2495)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Online Mitteilungen. 2004, Nr.79, S.22-23 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 57(2004) H.2]
  20. Grazia Colonia; Dimmler, E.; Dresel, R.; Messner, C.; Krobath, A.; Petz, S.; Sypien, M.; Boxen, P. van; Harders, M.; Heuer, D.; Jordans, I.; Juchem, K.; Linnertz, M.; Mittelhuber, I.; Schwammel, S.; Schlögl, C.; Stock, W.G.: Informationswissenschaftliche Zeitschriften in szientometrischer Analyse (2002) 0.01 
    0.009816813 = product of:
  0.019633627 = sum of:
    0.019633627 = product of:
      0.058900878 = sum of:
        0.058900878 = weight(_text_:c in 1075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058900878 = score(doc=1075,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.3772787 = fieldWeight in 1075, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1075)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Authors

Years

Types

  • a 81
  • el 3
  • m 3
  • r 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications