-
Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005)
0.03
0.031449687 = product of:
0.06289937 = sum of:
0.06289937 = product of:
0.2515975 = sum of:
0.2515975 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2515975 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38371542 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.045260075 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
-
Isaac, A.; Wang, S.; Zinn, C.; Matthezing, H.; Meij, L. van der; Schlobach, S.: Evaluating thesaurus alignments for semantic interoperability in the library domain (2009)
0.02
0.024097301 = product of:
0.048194602 = sum of:
0.048194602 = product of:
0.0722919 = sum of:
0.047599096 = weight(_text_:c in 1650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047599096 = score(doc=1650,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.045260075 = queryNorm
0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 1650, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1650)
0.02469281 = weight(_text_:h in 1650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02469281 = score(doc=1650,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045260075 = queryNorm
0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 1650, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1650)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Garcia Marco, F.J.: Compatibility & heterogeneity in knowledge organization : some reflections around a case study in the field of consumer information (2008)
0.02
0.020136671 = product of:
0.040273342 = sum of:
0.040273342 = product of:
0.06041001 = sum of:
0.029749434 = weight(_text_:c in 1678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029749434 = score(doc=1678,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.045260075 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 1678, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1678)
0.030660577 = weight(_text_:22 in 1678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030660577 = score(doc=1678,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045260075 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1678, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1678)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A case study in compatibility and heterogeneity of knowledge organization (KO) systems and processes is presented. It is based in the experience of the author in the field of information for consumer protection, a good example of the emerging transdisciplinary applied social sciences. The activities and knowledge organization problems and solutions of the Aragonian Consumers' Information and Documentation Centre are described and analyzed. Six assertions can be concluded: a) heterogeneity and compatibility are certainly an inherent problem in knowledge organization and also in practical domains; b) knowledge organization is also a social task, not only a lögical one; c) knowledge organization is affected by economical and efficiency considerations; d) knowledge organization is at the heart of Knowledge Management; e) identifying and maintaining the focus in interdisciplinary fields is a must; f the different knowledge organization tools of a institution must be considered as an integrated system, pursuing a unifying model.
- Date
- 16. 3.2008 18:22:50
-
Lauser, B.; Johannsen, G.; Caracciolo, C.; Hage, W.R. van; Keizer, J.; Mayr, P.: Comparing human and automatic thesaurus mapping approaches in the agricultural domain (2008)
0.02
0.020136671 = product of:
0.040273342 = sum of:
0.040273342 = product of:
0.06041001 = sum of:
0.029749434 = weight(_text_:c in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029749434 = score(doc=2627,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.045260075 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
0.030660577 = weight(_text_:22 in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030660577 = score(doc=2627,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045260075 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Euzenat, J.; Meilicke, C.; Stuckenschmidt, H.; Shvaiko, P.; Trojahn, C.: Ontology alignment evaluation initiative : six years of experience (2011)
0.02
0.019168355 = product of:
0.03833671 = sum of:
0.03833671 = product of:
0.057505064 = sum of:
0.042072058 = weight(_text_:c in 161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042072058 = score(doc=161,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.045260075 = queryNorm
0.2694848 = fieldWeight in 161, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=161)
0.015433006 = weight(_text_:h in 161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015433006 = score(doc=161,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045260075 = queryNorm
0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 161, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=161)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Gracy, K.F.; Zeng, M.L.; Skirvin, L.: Exploring methods to improve access to Music resources by aligning library Data with Linked Data : a report of methodologies and preliminary findings (2013)
0.02
0.016109336 = product of:
0.032218672 = sum of:
0.032218672 = product of:
0.04832801 = sum of:
0.023799548 = weight(_text_:c in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023799548 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.045260075 = queryNorm
0.1524436 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
0.02452846 = weight(_text_:22 in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02452846 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045260075 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- As a part of a research project aiming to connect library data to the unfamiliar data sets available in the Linked Data (LD) community's CKAN Data Hub (thedatahub.org), this project collected, analyzed, and mapped properties used in describing and accessing music recordings, scores, and music-related information used by selected music LD data sets, library catalogs, and various digital collections created by libraries and other cultural institutions. This article reviews current efforts to connect music data through the Semantic Web, with an emphasis on the Music Ontology (MO) and ontology alignment approaches; it also presents a framework for understanding the life cycle of a musical work, focusing on the central activities of composition, performance, and use. The project studied metadata structures and properties of 11 music-related LD data sets and mapped them to the descriptions commonly used in the library cataloging records for sound recordings and musical scores (including MARC records and their extended schema.org markup), and records from 20 collections of digitized music recordings and scores (featuring a variety of metadata structures). The analysis resulted in a set of crosswalks and a unified crosswalk that aligns these properties. The paper reports on detailed methodologies used and discusses research findings and issues. Topics of particular concern include (a) the challenges of mapping between the overgeneralized descriptions found in library data and the specialized, music-oriented properties present in the LD data sets; (b) the hidden information and access points in library data; and (c) the potential benefits of enriching library data through the mapping of properties found in library catalogs to similar properties used by LD data sets.
- Date
- 28.10.2013 17:22:17
-
Concepts in Context : Proceedings of the Cologne Conference on Interoperability and Semantics in Knowledge Organization July 19th - 20th, 2010 (2011)
0.02
0.015364528 = product of:
0.030729055 = sum of:
0.030729055 = product of:
0.046093583 = sum of:
0.015433006 = weight(_text_:h in 628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015433006 = score(doc=628,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045260075 = queryNorm
0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 628, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=628)
0.030660577 = weight(_text_:22 in 628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030660577 = score(doc=628,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045260075 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 628, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=628)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2013 11:34:18
- Footnote
- Rez. in: ZfBB 59(2012) H.2, S.119-120 (F. Förster); KO 39(2012) no.6, S.461-463 (I. Dahlberg)
-
Prongué, N.; Schneider, R.: Modelling library linked data in practice (2015)
0.01
0.014024019 = product of:
0.028048038 = sum of:
0.028048038 = product of:
0.084144115 = sum of:
0.084144115 = weight(_text_:c in 2985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084144115 = score(doc=2985,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.045260075 = queryNorm
0.5389696 = fieldWeight in 2985, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2985)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Re:inventing information science in the networked society: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Information Science, Zadar/Croatia, 19th-21st May 2015. Eds.: F. Pehar, C. Schloegl u. C. Wolff
-
Woldering, B.: ¬Die Europäische Digitale Bibliothek nimmt Gestalt an (2007)
0.01
0.013996305 = product of:
0.02799261 = sum of:
0.02799261 = product of:
0.041988913 = sum of:
0.017460452 = weight(_text_:h in 2439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017460452 = score(doc=2439,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045260075 = queryNorm
0.15527807 = fieldWeight in 2439, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2439)
0.02452846 = weight(_text_:22 in 2439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02452846 = score(doc=2439,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045260075 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2439, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2439)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Darin u.a. "Interoperabilität als Kernstück - Technische und semantische Interoperabilität bilden somit das Kernstück für das Funktionieren der Europäischen Digitalen Bibliothek. Doch bevor Wege gefunden werden können, wie etwas funktionieren kann, muss zunächst einmal festgelegt werden, was funktionieren soll. Hierfür sind die Nutzeranforderungen das Maß aller Dinge, weshalb sich ein ganzes Arbeitspaket in EDLnet mit der Nutzersicht, den Nutzeranforderungen und der Nutzbarkeit der Europäischen Digitalen Bibliothek befasst, Anforderungen formuliert und diese im Arbeitspaket »Interoperabilität« umgesetzt werden. Für die Entscheidung, welche Inhalte wie präsentiert werden, sind jedoch nicht allein technische und semantische Fragestellungen zu klären, sondern auch ein Geschäftsmodell zu entwickeln, das festlegt, was die beteiligten Institutionen und Organisationen in welcher Form zu welchen Bedingungen zur Europäischen Digitalen Bibliothek beitragen. Auch das Geschäftsmodell wird Auswirkungen auf technische und semantische Interoperabilität haben und liefert die daraus abgeleiteten Anforderungen zur Umsetzung an das entsprechende Arbeitspaket. Im EDLnet-Projekt ist somit ein ständiger Arbeitskreislauf installiert, in welchem die Anforderungen an die Europäische Digitale Bibliothek formuliert, an das Interoperabilitäts-Arbeitspaket weitergegeben und dort umgesetzt werden. Diese Lösung wird wiederum an die Arbeitspakete »Nutzersicht« und »Geschäftsmodell« zurückgemeldet, getestet, kommentiert und für die Kommentare wiederum technische Lösungen gesucht. Dies ist eine Form des »rapid prototyping«, das hier zur Anwendung kommt, d. h. die Funktionalitäten werden schrittweise gemäß des Feedbacks der zukünftigen Nutzer sowie der Projektpartner erweitert und gleichzeitig wird der Prototyp stets lauffähig gehalten und bis zur Produktreife weiterentwickelt. Hierdurch verspricht man sich ein schnelles Ergebnis bei geringem Risiko einer Fehlentwicklung durch das ständige Feedback."
- Date
- 22. 2.2009 19:10:56
- Source
- Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 20(2008) H.1, S.29-31
-
Isaac, A.: Aligning thesauri for an integrated access to Cultural Heritage Resources (2007)
0.01
0.013417847 = product of:
0.026835695 = sum of:
0.026835695 = product of:
0.040253542 = sum of:
0.029450439 = weight(_text_:c in 553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029450439 = score(doc=553,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.045260075 = queryNorm
0.18863934 = fieldWeight in 553, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=553)
0.010803103 = weight(_text_:h in 553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010803103 = score(doc=553,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045260075 = queryNorm
0.096073404 = fieldWeight in 553, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=553)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Currently, a number of efforts are being carried out to integrate collections from different institutions and containing heterogeneous material. Examples of such projects are The European Library [1] and the Memory of the Netherlands [2]. A crucial point for the success of these is the availability to provide a unified access on top of the different collections, e.g. using one single vocabulary for querying or browsing the objects they contain. This is made difficult by the fact that the objects from different collections are often described using different vocabularies - thesauri, classification schemes - and are therefore not interoperable at the semantic level. To solve this problem, one can turn to semantic links - mappings - between the elements of the different vocabularies. If one knows that a concept C from a vocabulary V is semantically equivalent to a concept to a concept D from vocabulary W, then an appropriate search engine can return all the objects that were indexed against D for a query for objects described using C. We thus have an access to other collections, using a single one vocabulary. This is however an ideal situation, and hard alignment work is required to reach it. Several projects in the past have tried to implement such a solution, like MACS [3] and Renardus [4]. They have demonstrated very interesting results, but also highlighted the difficulty of aligning manually all the different vocabularies involved in practical cases, which sometimes contain hundreds of thousands of concepts. To alleviate this problem, a number of tools have been proposed in order to provide with candidate mappings between two input vocabularies, making alignment a (semi-) automatic task. Recently, the Semantic Web community has produced a lot of these alignment tools'. Several techniques are found, depending on the material they exploit: labels of concepts, structure of vocabularies, collection objects and external knowledge sources. Throughout our presentation, we will present a concrete heterogeneity case where alignment techniques have been applied to build a (pilot) browser, developed in the context of the STITCH project [5]. This browser enables a unified access to two collections of illuminated manuscripts, using the description vocabulary used in the first collection, Mandragore [6], or the one used by the second, Iconclass [7]. In our talk, we will also make the point for using unified representations the vocabulary semantic and lexical information. Additionally to ease the use of the alignment tools that have these vocabularies as input, turning to a standard representation format helps designing applications that are more generic, like the browser we demonstrate. We give pointers to SKOS [8], an open and web-enabled format currently developed by the Semantic Web community.
References [1] http:// www.theeuropeanlibrary.org [2] http://www.geheugenvannederland.nl [3] http://macs.cenl.org [4] Day, M., Koch, T., Neuroth, H.: Searching and browsing multiple subject gateways in the Renardus service. In Proceedings of the RC33 Sixth International Conference on Social Science Methodology, Amsterdam , 2005. [5] http://stitch.cs.vu.nl [6] http://mandragore.bnf.fr [7] http://www.iconclass.nl [8] www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/ 1 The Semantic Web vision supposes sharing data using different conceptualizations (ontologies), and therefore implies to tackle the semantic interoperability problem
-
Dini, L.: CACAO : multilingual access to bibliographic records (2007)
0.01
0.012264231 = product of:
0.024528462 = sum of:
0.024528462 = product of:
0.07358538 = sum of:
0.07358538 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07358538 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045260075 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
-
Boteram, F.; Hubrich, J.: Towards a comprehensive international Knowledge Organization System (2008)
0.01
0.012264231 = product of:
0.024528462 = sum of:
0.024528462 = product of:
0.07358538 = sum of:
0.07358538 = weight(_text_:22 in 4786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07358538 = score(doc=4786,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045260075 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4786, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4786)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 9.2008 19:30:41
-
Isaac, A.; Schlobach, S.; Matthezing, H.; Zinn, C.: Integrated access to cultural heritage resources through representation and alignment of controlled vocabularies (2008)
0.01
0.0120486505 = product of:
0.024097301 = sum of:
0.024097301 = product of:
0.03614595 = sum of:
0.023799548 = weight(_text_:c in 3398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023799548 = score(doc=3398,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.045260075 = queryNorm
0.1524436 = fieldWeight in 3398, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3398)
0.012346405 = weight(_text_:h in 3398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012346405 = score(doc=3398,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045260075 = queryNorm
0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 3398, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3398)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Landry, P.: MACS: multilingual access to subject and link management : Extending the Multilingual Capacity of TEL in the EDL Project (2007)
0.01
0.010220192 = product of:
0.020440385 = sum of:
0.020440385 = product of:
0.061321154 = sum of:
0.061321154 = weight(_text_:22 in 1287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061321154 = score(doc=1287,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045260075 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1287, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1287)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
-
Celli, F. et al.: Enabling multilingual search through controlled vocabularies : the AGRIS approach (2016)
0.01
0.010220192 = product of:
0.020440385 = sum of:
0.020440385 = product of:
0.061321154 = sum of:
0.061321154 = weight(_text_:22 in 3278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061321154 = score(doc=3278,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045260075 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3278, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3278)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Kutz, O.; Mossakowski, T.; Galinski, C.; Lange, C.: Towards a standard for heterogeneous ontology integration and interoperability (2011)
0.01
0.009816813 = product of:
0.019633627 = sum of:
0.019633627 = product of:
0.058900878 = sum of:
0.058900878 = weight(_text_:c in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058900878 = score(doc=114,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.045260075 = queryNorm
0.3772787 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2012)
0.01
0.008672122 = product of:
0.017344244 = sum of:
0.017344244 = product of:
0.052032728 = sum of:
0.052032728 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052032728 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045260075 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
-
Lange, C.; Mossakowski, T.; Galinski, C.; Kutz, O.: Making heterogeneous ontologies interoperable through standardisation : a Meta Ontology Language to be standardised: Ontology Integration and Interoperability (OntoIOp) (2011)
0.01
0.008414412 = product of:
0.016828824 = sum of:
0.016828824 = product of:
0.050486468 = sum of:
0.050486468 = weight(_text_:c in 50) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050486468 = score(doc=50,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.045260075 = queryNorm
0.32338172 = fieldWeight in 50, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=50)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Faro, S.; Francesconi, E.; Marinai, E.; Sandrucci, V.: Report on execution and results of the interoperability tests (2008)
0.01
0.0081761535 = product of:
0.016352307 = sum of:
0.016352307 = product of:
0.04905692 = sum of:
0.04905692 = weight(_text_:22 in 7411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04905692 = score(doc=7411,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045260075 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7411, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7411)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 7.11.2008 10:40:22
-
Haslhofer, B.: Uniform SPARQL access to interlinked (digital library) sources (2007)
0.01
0.0081761535 = product of:
0.016352307 = sum of:
0.016352307 = product of:
0.04905692 = sum of:
0.04905692 = weight(_text_:22 in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04905692 = score(doc=541,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045260075 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26.12.2011 13:22:46
