Search (29 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantische Interoperabilität"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Schubert, C.; Kinkeldey, C.; Reich, H.: Handbuch Datenbankanwendung zur Wissensrepräsentation im Verbundprojekt DeCOVER (2006) 0.03
    0.030669367 = product of:
      0.061338734 = sum of:
        0.061338734 = product of:
          0.0920081 = sum of:
            0.06731529 = weight(_text_:c in 4256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06731529 = score(doc=4256,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.43117565 = fieldWeight in 4256, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4256)
            0.02469281 = weight(_text_:h in 4256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02469281 = score(doc=4256,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 4256, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4256)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  2. Galinski, C.: Fragen der semantischen Interoperabilität brechen jetzt überall auf (o.J.) 0.02
    0.024164006 = product of:
      0.048328012 = sum of:
        0.048328012 = product of:
          0.07249202 = sum of:
            0.035699323 = weight(_text_:c in 4183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035699323 = score(doc=4183,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 4183, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4183)
            0.03679269 = weight(_text_:22 in 4183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03679269 = score(doc=4183,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4183, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4183)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 10:16:32
  3. Hafner, R.; Schelling, B.: Automatisierung der Sacherschließung mit Semantic Web Technologie (2015) 0.01
    0.014308269 = product of:
      0.028616538 = sum of:
        0.028616538 = product of:
          0.08584961 = sum of:
            0.08584961 = weight(_text_:22 in 8365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08584961 = score(doc=8365,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 8365, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8365)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2015 16:08:38
  4. Isaac, A.: Aligning thesauri for an integrated access to Cultural Heritage Resources (2007) 0.01
    0.013417847 = product of:
      0.026835695 = sum of:
        0.026835695 = product of:
          0.040253542 = sum of:
            0.029450439 = weight(_text_:c in 553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029450439 = score(doc=553,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.18863934 = fieldWeight in 553, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=553)
            0.010803103 = weight(_text_:h in 553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010803103 = score(doc=553,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.096073404 = fieldWeight in 553, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=553)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Currently, a number of efforts are being carried out to integrate collections from different institutions and containing heterogeneous material. Examples of such projects are The European Library [1] and the Memory of the Netherlands [2]. A crucial point for the success of these is the availability to provide a unified access on top of the different collections, e.g. using one single vocabulary for querying or browsing the objects they contain. This is made difficult by the fact that the objects from different collections are often described using different vocabularies - thesauri, classification schemes - and are therefore not interoperable at the semantic level. To solve this problem, one can turn to semantic links - mappings - between the elements of the different vocabularies. If one knows that a concept C from a vocabulary V is semantically equivalent to a concept to a concept D from vocabulary W, then an appropriate search engine can return all the objects that were indexed against D for a query for objects described using C. We thus have an access to other collections, using a single one vocabulary. This is however an ideal situation, and hard alignment work is required to reach it. Several projects in the past have tried to implement such a solution, like MACS [3] and Renardus [4]. They have demonstrated very interesting results, but also highlighted the difficulty of aligning manually all the different vocabularies involved in practical cases, which sometimes contain hundreds of thousands of concepts. To alleviate this problem, a number of tools have been proposed in order to provide with candidate mappings between two input vocabularies, making alignment a (semi-) automatic task. Recently, the Semantic Web community has produced a lot of these alignment tools'. Several techniques are found, depending on the material they exploit: labels of concepts, structure of vocabularies, collection objects and external knowledge sources. Throughout our presentation, we will present a concrete heterogeneity case where alignment techniques have been applied to build a (pilot) browser, developed in the context of the STITCH project [5]. This browser enables a unified access to two collections of illuminated manuscripts, using the description vocabulary used in the first collection, Mandragore [6], or the one used by the second, Iconclass [7]. In our talk, we will also make the point for using unified representations the vocabulary semantic and lexical information. Additionally to ease the use of the alignment tools that have these vocabularies as input, turning to a standard representation format helps designing applications that are more generic, like the browser we demonstrate. We give pointers to SKOS [8], an open and web-enabled format currently developed by the Semantic Web community.
    References [1] http:// www.theeuropeanlibrary.org [2] http://www.geheugenvannederland.nl [3] http://macs.cenl.org [4] Day, M., Koch, T., Neuroth, H.: Searching and browsing multiple subject gateways in the Renardus service. In Proceedings of the RC33 Sixth International Conference on Social Science Methodology, Amsterdam , 2005. [5] http://stitch.cs.vu.nl [6] http://mandragore.bnf.fr [7] http://www.iconclass.nl [8] www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/ 1 The Semantic Web vision supposes sharing data using different conceptualizations (ontologies), and therefore implies to tackle the semantic interoperability problem
  5. Dini, L.: CACAO : multilingual access to bibliographic records (2007) 0.01
    0.012264231 = product of:
      0.024528462 = sum of:
        0.024528462 = product of:
          0.07358538 = sum of:
            0.07358538 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07358538 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  6. Landry, P.: MACS: multilingual access to subject and link management : Extending the Multilingual Capacity of TEL in the EDL Project (2007) 0.01
    0.010220192 = product of:
      0.020440385 = sum of:
        0.020440385 = product of:
          0.061321154 = sum of:
            0.061321154 = weight(_text_:22 in 1287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061321154 = score(doc=1287,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1287, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1287)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  7. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2012) 0.01
    0.008672122 = product of:
      0.017344244 = sum of:
        0.017344244 = product of:
          0.052032728 = sum of:
            0.052032728 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052032728 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
  8. Lange, C.; Mossakowski, T.; Galinski, C.; Kutz, O.: Making heterogeneous ontologies interoperable through standardisation : a Meta Ontology Language to be standardised: Ontology Integration and Interoperability (OntoIOp) (2011) 0.01
    0.008414412 = product of:
      0.016828824 = sum of:
        0.016828824 = product of:
          0.050486468 = sum of:
            0.050486468 = weight(_text_:c in 50) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050486468 = score(doc=50,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.32338172 = fieldWeight in 50, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=50)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  9. Faro, S.; Francesconi, E.; Marinai, E.; Sandrucci, V.: Report on execution and results of the interoperability tests (2008) 0.01
    0.0081761535 = product of:
      0.016352307 = sum of:
        0.016352307 = product of:
          0.04905692 = sum of:
            0.04905692 = weight(_text_:22 in 7411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04905692 = score(doc=7411,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7411, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7411)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7.11.2008 10:40:22
  10. Haslhofer, B.: Uniform SPARQL access to interlinked (digital library) sources (2007) 0.01
    0.0081761535 = product of:
      0.016352307 = sum of:
        0.016352307 = product of:
          0.04905692 = sum of:
            0.04905692 = weight(_text_:22 in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04905692 = score(doc=541,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:46
  11. Faro, S.; Francesconi, E.; Sandrucci, V.: Thesauri KOS analysis and selected thesaurus mapping methodology on the project case-study (2007) 0.01
    0.0081761535 = product of:
      0.016352307 = sum of:
        0.016352307 = product of:
          0.04905692 = sum of:
            0.04905692 = weight(_text_:22 in 2227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04905692 = score(doc=2227,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2227, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2227)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7.11.2008 10:40:22
  12. Karg, H.: CrissCross: was bringt es dem Nutzer? (2010) 0.01
    0.0072020693 = product of:
      0.014404139 = sum of:
        0.014404139 = product of:
          0.043212414 = sum of:
            0.043212414 = weight(_text_:h in 5514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043212414 = score(doc=5514,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.38429362 = fieldWeight in 5514, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5514)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  13. Si, L.: Encoding formats and consideration of requirements for mapping (2007) 0.01
    0.0071541346 = product of:
      0.014308269 = sum of:
        0.014308269 = product of:
          0.042924806 = sum of:
            0.042924806 = weight(_text_:22 in 540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042924806 = score(doc=540,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 540, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=540)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:27
  14. Heflin, J.; Hendler, J.: Semantic interoperability on the Web (2000) 0.01
    0.0071541346 = product of:
      0.014308269 = sum of:
        0.014308269 = product of:
          0.042924806 = sum of:
            0.042924806 = weight(_text_:22 in 759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042924806 = score(doc=759,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 759, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=759)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11. 5.2013 19:22:18
  15. Bittner, T.; Donnelly, M.; Winter, S.: Ontology and semantic interoperability (2006) 0.01
    0.0061321156 = product of:
      0.012264231 = sum of:
        0.012264231 = product of:
          0.03679269 = sum of:
            0.03679269 = weight(_text_:22 in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03679269 = score(doc=4820,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    3.12.2016 18:39:22
  16. Vizine-Goetz, D.; Hickey, C.; Houghton, A.; Thompson, R.: Vocabulary mapping for terminology services (2004) 0.01
    0.0059498874 = product of:
      0.011899775 = sum of:
        0.011899775 = product of:
          0.035699323 = sum of:
            0.035699323 = weight(_text_:c in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035699323 = score(doc=918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  17. Mayr, P.; Zapilko, B.; Sure, Y.: ¬Ein Mehr-Thesauri-Szenario auf Basis von SKOS und Crosskonkordanzen (2010) 0.01
    0.0059498874 = product of:
      0.011899775 = sum of:
        0.011899775 = product of:
          0.035699323 = sum of:
            0.035699323 = weight(_text_:c in 3392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035699323 = score(doc=3392,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 3392, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3392)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Im August 2009 wurde SKOS "Simple Knowledge Organization System" als neuer Standard für web-basierte kontrollierte Vokabulare durch das W3C veröffentlicht1. SKOS dient als Datenmodell, um kontrollierte Vokabulare über das Web anzubieten sowie technisch und semantisch interoperabel zu machen. Perspektivisch kann die heterogene Landschaft der Erschließungsvokabulare über SKOS vereinheitlicht und vor allem die Inhalte der klassischen Datenbanken (Bereich Fachinformation) für Anwendungen des Semantic Web, beispielsweise als Linked Open Data2 (LOD), zugänglich und stär-ker miteinander vernetzt werden. Vokabulare im SKOS-Format können dabei eine relevante Funktion einnehmen, indem sie als standardisiertes Brückenvokabular dienen und semantische Verlinkung zwischen erschlossenen, veröffentlichten Daten herstellen. Die folgende Fallstudie skizziert ein Szenario mit drei thematisch verwandten Thesauri, die ins SKOS-Format übertragen und inhaltlich über Crosskonkordanzen aus dem Projekt KoMoHe verbunden werden. Die Mapping Properties von SKOS bieten dazu standardisierte Relationen, die denen der Crosskonkordanzen entsprechen. Die beteiligten Thesauri der Fallstudie sind a) TheSoz (Thesaurus Sozialwissenschaften, GESIS), b) STW (Standard-Thesaurus Wirtschaft, ZBW) und c) IBLK-Thesaurus (SWP).
  18. Shaw, R.; Rabinowitz, A.; Golden, P.; Kansa, E.: Report on and demonstration of the PeriodO period gazetteer (2015) 0.01
    0.0059498874 = product of:
      0.011899775 = sum of:
        0.011899775 = product of:
          0.035699323 = sum of:
            0.035699323 = weight(_text_:c in 2249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035699323 = score(doc=2249,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 2249, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2249)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The PeriodO period gazetteer documents definitions of historical period names. Each entry of the gazetteer identifies the definition of a single period. To be included in the gazetteer, a definition must a) give the period a name, b) impose some temporal bounds on the period, c) have some implicit or explicit association with a geographical region, and d) have been formally or informally published in some citable source. Much care has been put into giving period definitions stable identifiers that can be resolved to RDF representations of period definitions. Anyone can propose additions of new definitions to PeriodO, and we have implemented an open source web service and browser-based client for distributed versioning and collaborative maintenance of the gazetteer.
  19. Si, L.E.; O'Brien, A.; Probets, S.: Integration of distributed terminology resources to facilitate subject cross-browsing for library portal systems (2009) 0.01
    0.005110096 = product of:
      0.010220192 = sum of:
        0.010220192 = product of:
          0.030660577 = sum of:
            0.030660577 = weight(_text_:22 in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030660577 = score(doc=3628,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    This paper is a pre-print version presented at the ISKO UK 2009 conference, 22-23 June, prior to peer review and editing. For published proceedings see special issue of Aslib Proceedings journal.
  20. Binding, C.; Tudhope, D.: Improving interoperability using vocabulary linked data (2015) 0.00
    0.0049582394 = product of:
      0.009916479 = sum of:
        0.009916479 = product of:
          0.029749434 = sum of:
            0.029749434 = weight(_text_:c in 2205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029749434 = score(doc=2205,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 2205, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2205)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)