Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

0.031524464 = product of:
  0.06304893 = sum of:
    0.06304893 = product of:
      0.09457339 = sum of:
        0.041649207 = weight(_text_:c in 243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041649207 = score(doc=243,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 243, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=243)
        0.052924186 = weight(_text_:h in 243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052924186 = score(doc=243,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.47066164 = fieldWeight in 243, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=243)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Based on earlier results about the shifted Lotka function, we prove an implicit functional relation between the Hirsch index (h-index) and the total number of sources (T). It is shown that the corresponding function, h(T), is concavely increasing. Next, we construct an implicit relation between the h-index and the impact factor IF (an average number of items per source). The corresponding function h(IF) is increasing and we show that if the parameter C in the numerator of the shifted Lotka function is high, then the relation between the h-index and the impact factor is almost linear.

Object

h-index

0.010220192 = product of:
  0.020440385 = sum of:
    0.020440385 = product of:
      0.061321154 = sum of:
        0.061321154 = weight(_text_:22 in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061321154 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

14. 2.2012 12:53:22

0.008730226 = product of:
  0.017460452 = sum of:
    0.017460452 = product of:
      0.052381355 = sum of:
        0.052381355 = weight(_text_:h in 683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052381355 = score(doc=683,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.4658342 = fieldWeight in 683, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=683)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Object

h-index

0.0075605977 = product of:
  0.015121195 = sum of:
    0.015121195 = product of:
      0.045363586 = sum of:
        0.045363586 = weight(_text_:h in 3336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045363586 = score(doc=3336,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.40342426 = fieldWeight in 3336, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3336)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Adding or deleting items such as self-citations has an influence on the h-index of an author. This influence will be proved mathematically in this article. We hereby prove the experimental finding in E. Gianoli and M.A. Molina-Montenegro ([2009]) that the influence of adding or deleting self-citations on the h-index is greater for low values of the h-index. Why this is logical also is shown by a simple theoretical example. Adding or deleting sources such as adding or deleting minor contributions of an author also has an influence on the h-index of this author; this influence is modeled in this article. This model explains some practical examples found in X. Hu, R. Rousseau, and J. Chen (in press).

Object

h-index

0.0061732023 = product of:
  0.012346405 = sum of:
    0.012346405 = product of:
      0.037039213 = sum of:
        0.037039213 = weight(_text_:h in 1597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037039213 = score(doc=1597,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 1597, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1597)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Object

h-index

0.004365113 = product of:
  0.008730226 = sum of:
    0.008730226 = product of:
      0.026190678 = sum of:
        0.026190678 = weight(_text_:h in 4994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026190678 = score(doc=4994,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.2329171 = fieldWeight in 4994, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4994)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Contrary to what one might expect, Nobel laureates and Fields medalists have a rather large fraction (10% or more) of uncited publications. This is the case for (in total) 75 examined researchers from the fields of mathematics (Fields medalists), physics, chemistry, and physiology or medicine (Nobel laureates). We study several indicators for these researchers, including the h-index, total number of publications, average number of citations per publication, the number (and fraction) of uncited publications, and their interrelations. The most remarkable result is a positive correlation between the h-index and the number of uncited articles. We also present a Lotkaian model, which partially explains the empirically found regularities.