Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  • × theme_ss:"Folksonomies"
  1. Park, H.: ¬A conceptual framework to study folksonomic interaction (2011) 0.02
    0.015060814 = product of:
      0.030121628 = sum of:
        0.030121628 = product of:
          0.04518244 = sum of:
            0.029749434 = weight(_text_:c in 4852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029749434 = score(doc=4852,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 4852, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4852)
            0.015433006 = weight(_text_:h in 4852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015433006 = score(doc=4852,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 4852, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4852)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper proposes a conceptual framework to recast a folksonomy as a Web classification and to use this to explore the ways in which people work with it in assessing, sharing, and navigating Web resources. The author uses information scent and foraging theory as a context to discuss how folksonomy is constructed through interactions among users, a folksonomic system, and a given domain that consists of a group of users who share the same interest or goals. The discussion centers on two dimensions of folksonomies: (1) folksonomy as a Web classification which puts like information together in a Web context; and (2) folksonomy as information scent which helps users to find related resources and users, and obtain desired information. This paper aims to integrate these two dimensions with a conceptual framework that addresses the structure of a folksonomy shaped by users' interactions. A proposed framework consists of three components of users' interactions with a folksonomy: (a) tagging - cognitive categorization of Web accessible resources by an individual user; (b) navigation - exploration and discovery of Web accessible resources in the folksonomic system; and (c) knowledge sharing - representation and communication of knowledge within a domain. This understanding will help us motivate possible future directions of research in folksonomy. This initial framework will frame a number of research questions and help lay the groundwork for future empirical research which focuses on qualitative analysis of a folksonomy and users' tagging behaviors.
  2. Watters, C.; Nizam, N.: Knowledge organization on the Web : the emergent role of social classification (2012) 0.01
    0.0069415346 = product of:
      0.013883069 = sum of:
        0.013883069 = product of:
          0.041649207 = sum of:
            0.041649207 = weight(_text_:c in 828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041649207 = score(doc=828,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 828, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=828)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Moreiro-González, J.-A.; Bolaños-Mejías, C.: Folksonomy indexing from the assignment of free tags to setup subject : a search analysis into the domain of legal history (2018) 0.00
    0.0049582394 = product of:
      0.009916479 = sum of:
        0.009916479 = product of:
          0.029749434 = sum of:
            0.029749434 = weight(_text_:c in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029749434 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Peters, I.: Folksonomies : nutzergenerierte Schlagwörter als Indexierungswerkzeug für die Massen (2011) 0.00
    0.0036010346 = product of:
      0.0072020693 = sum of:
        0.0072020693 = product of:
          0.021606207 = sum of:
            0.021606207 = weight(_text_:h in 4909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021606207 = score(doc=4909,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 4909, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4909)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 64(2011) H.3/4, S.444-459
  5. Peters, I.; Schumann, L.; Terliesner, J.: Folksonomy-basiertes Information Retrieval unter der Lupe (2012) 0.00
    0.0036010346 = product of:
      0.0072020693 = sum of:
        0.0072020693 = product of:
          0.021606207 = sum of:
            0.021606207 = weight(_text_:h in 406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021606207 = score(doc=406,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 406, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=406)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 63(2012) H.4, S.273-280
  6. Xie, H.; Li, X.; Wang, T.; Lau, R.Y.K.; Wong, T.-L.; Chen, L.; Wang, F.L.; Li, Q.: Incorporating sentiment into tag-based user profiles and resource profiles for personalized search in folksonomy (2016) 0.00
    0.0020577342 = product of:
      0.0041154684 = sum of:
        0.0041154684 = product of:
          0.012346405 = sum of:
            0.012346405 = weight(_text_:h in 2671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012346405 = score(doc=2671,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 2671, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2671)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)