Search (27 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Leydesdorff, L."
  1. Leydesdorff, L.: ¬The construction and globalization of the knowledge base in inter-human communication systems (2003) 0.03
    0.026275968 = product of:
      0.052551936 = sum of:
        0.052551936 = product of:
          0.0788279 = sum of:
            0.042335 = weight(_text_:i in 1621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042335 = score(doc=1621,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 1621, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1621)
            0.036492907 = weight(_text_:22 in 1621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036492907 = score(doc=1621,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1621, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1621)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The relationship between the "knowledge base" and the "globalization" of communication systems is discussed from the perspective of communication theory. I argue that inter-human communication takes place at two levels. At the first level information is exchanged and provided with meaning and at the second level meaning can reflexively be communicated. Human language can be considered as the evolutionary achievement which enables us to use these two channels of communication simultaneously. Providing meaning with hindsight is a recursive operation: a meaning that makes a difference can be considered as knowledge. If the production of knowledge is socially organized, the perspective of hindsight can further be codified. This adds globalization to the historically stabilized patterns of communications. Globalization can be expected to transform the communications in an evolutionary mode. However, the self-organization of a knowledge-based society remains an expectation with the status of a hypothesis.
    Date
    22. 5.2003 19:48:04
  2. Hellsten, I.; Leydesdorff, L.: ¬The construction of interdisciplinarity : the development of the knowledge base and programmatic focus of the journal Climatic Change, 1977-2013 (2016) 0.02
    0.021896642 = product of:
      0.043793283 = sum of:
        0.043793283 = product of:
          0.06568992 = sum of:
            0.035279166 = weight(_text_:i in 3089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035279166 = score(doc=3089,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 3089, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3089)
            0.030410757 = weight(_text_:22 in 3089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030410757 = score(doc=3089,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3089, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3089)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    24. 8.2016 17:53:22
  3. Leydesdorff, L.; Johnson, M.W.; Ivanova, I.: Toward a calculus of redundancy : signification, codification, and anticipation in cultural evolution (2018) 0.02
    0.021896642 = product of:
      0.043793283 = sum of:
        0.043793283 = product of:
          0.06568992 = sum of:
            0.035279166 = weight(_text_:i in 4463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035279166 = score(doc=4463,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 4463, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4463)
            0.030410757 = weight(_text_:22 in 4463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030410757 = score(doc=4463,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4463, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4463)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    29. 9.2018 11:22:09
  4. Leydesdorff, L.; Rafols, I.; Chen, C.: Interactive overlays of journals and the measurement of interdisciplinarity on the basis of aggregated journal-journal citations (2013) 0.02
    0.021595402 = product of:
      0.043190803 = sum of:
        0.043190803 = product of:
          0.0647862 = sum of:
            0.035279166 = weight(_text_:i in 1131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035279166 = score(doc=1131,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 1131, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1131)
            0.029507035 = weight(_text_:c in 1131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029507035 = score(doc=1131,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 1131, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1131)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor : normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science (2011) 0.02
    0.019972598 = product of:
      0.039945196 = sum of:
        0.039945196 = product of:
          0.059917793 = sum of:
            0.029507035 = weight(_text_:c in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029507035 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
            0.030410757 = weight(_text_:22 in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030410757 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Impact Factors (IFs) of the Institute for Scientific Information suffer from a number of drawbacks, among them the statistics-Why should one use the mean and not the median?-and the incomparability among fields of science because of systematic differences in citation behavior among fields. Can these drawbacks be counteracted by fractionally counting citation weights instead of using whole numbers in the numerators? (a) Fractional citation counts are normalized in terms of the citing sources and thus would take into account differences in citation behavior among fields of science. (b) Differences in the resulting distributions can be tested statistically for their significance at different levels of aggregation. (c) Fractional counting can be generalized to any document set including journals or groups of journals, and thus the significance of differences among both small and large sets can be tested. A list of fractionally counted IFs for 2008 is available online at http:www.leydesdorff.net/weighted_if/weighted_if.xls The between-group variance among the 13 fields of science identified in the U.S. Science and Engineering Indicators is no longer statistically significant after this normalization. Although citation behavior differs largely between disciplines, the reflection of these differences in fractionally counted citation distributions can not be used as a reliable instrument for the classification.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 12:51:07
  6. Leydesdorff, L.; Wagner, C,; Bornmann, L.: Replicability and the public/private divide (2016) 0.01
    0.011802815 = product of:
      0.02360563 = sum of:
        0.02360563 = product of:
          0.07081689 = sum of:
            0.07081689 = weight(_text_:c in 3023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07081689 = score(doc=3023,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.45733082 = fieldWeight in 3023, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3023)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  7. Ye, F.Y.; Yu, S.S.; Leydesdorff, L.: ¬The Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations at the country level and its dynamic evolution under the pressures of globalization (2013) 0.01
    0.0099784555 = product of:
      0.019956911 = sum of:
        0.019956911 = product of:
          0.05987073 = sum of:
            0.05987073 = weight(_text_:i in 1110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05987073 = score(doc=1110,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.35359967 = fieldWeight in 1110, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1110)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Using data from the Web of Science (WoS), we analyze the mutual information among university, industry, and government addresses (U-I-G) at the country level for a number of countries. The dynamic evolution of the Triple Helix can thus be compared among developed and developing nations in terms of cross-sectional coauthorship relations. The results show that the Triple Helix interactions among the three subsystems U-I-G become less intensive over time, but unequally for different countries. We suggest that globalization erodes local Triple Helix relations and thus can be expected to have increased differentiation in national systems since the mid-1990s. This effect of globalization is more pronounced in developed countries than in developing ones. In the dynamic analysis, we focus on a more detailed comparison between China and the United States. Specifically, the Chinese Academy of the (Social) Sciences is changing increasingly from a public research institute to an academic one, and this has a measurable effect on China's position in the globalization.
  8. Rafols, I.; Porter, A.L.; Leydesdorff, L.: Science overlay maps : a new tool for research policy and library management (2010) 0.01
    0.0070558335 = product of:
      0.014111667 = sum of:
        0.014111667 = product of:
          0.042335 = sum of:
            0.042335 = weight(_text_:i in 3987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042335 = score(doc=3987,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 3987, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3987)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  9. Leydesdorff, L.; Rafols, I.: Local emergence and global diffusion of research technologies : an exploration of patterns of network formation (2011) 0.01
    0.0070558335 = product of:
      0.014111667 = sum of:
        0.014111667 = product of:
          0.042335 = sum of:
            0.042335 = weight(_text_:i in 4445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042335 = score(doc=4445,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 4445, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4445)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  10. Leydesdorff, L.; Rotolo, D.; Rafols, I.: Bibliometric perspectives on medical innovation using the medical subject headings of PubMed (2012) 0.01
    0.0070558335 = product of:
      0.014111667 = sum of:
        0.014111667 = product of:
          0.042335 = sum of:
            0.042335 = weight(_text_:i in 494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042335 = score(doc=494,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 494, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=494)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  11. Rotolo, D.; Rafols, I.; Hopkins, M.M.; Leydesdorff, L.: Strategic intelligence on emerging technologies : scientometric overlay mapping (2017) 0.01
    0.0070558335 = product of:
      0.014111667 = sum of:
        0.014111667 = product of:
          0.042335 = sum of:
            0.042335 = weight(_text_:i in 3322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042335 = score(doc=3322,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 3322, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3322)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Leydesdorff, L.; Park, H.W.; Wagner, C.: International coauthorship relations in the Social Sciences Citation Index : is internationalization leading the Network? (2014) 0.01
    0.0069548762 = product of:
      0.0139097525 = sum of:
        0.0139097525 = product of:
          0.041729257 = sum of:
            0.041729257 = weight(_text_:c in 1505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041729257 = score(doc=1505,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.2694848 = fieldWeight in 1505, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1505)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    International coauthorship relations have increasingly shaped another dynamic in the natural and life sciences during recent decades. However, much less is known about such internationalization in the social sciences. In this study, we analyze international and domestic coauthorship relations of all citable items in the DVD version of the Social Sciences Citation Index 2011 (SSCI). Network statistics indicate 4 groups of nations: (a) an Asian-Pacific one to which all Anglo-Saxon nations (including the United Kingdom and Ireland) are attributed, (b) a continental European one including also the Latin-American countries, (c) the Scandinavian nations, and (d) a community of African nations. Within the EU-28, 11 of the EU-15 states have dominant positions. In many respects, the network parameters are not so different from the Science Citation Index. In addition to these descriptive statistics, we address the question of the relative weights of the international versus domestic networks. An information-theoretical test is proposed at the level of organizational addresses within each nation; the results are mixed, but the international dimension is more important than the national one in the aggregated sets (as in the Science Citation Index). In some countries (e.g., France), however, the national distribution is leading more than the international one. Decomposition of the United States in terms of states shows a similarly mixed result; more U.S. states are domestically oriented in the SSCI and more internationally in the SCI. The international networks have grown during the last decades in addition to the national ones but not by replacing them.
  13. Leydesdorff, L.: Can networks of journal-journal citations be used as indicators of change in the social sciences? (2003) 0.01
    0.006082151 = product of:
      0.012164302 = sum of:
        0.012164302 = product of:
          0.036492907 = sum of:
            0.036492907 = weight(_text_:22 in 4460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036492907 = score(doc=4460,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4460, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4460)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6.11.2005 19:02:22
  14. Leydesdorff, L.; Sun, Y.: National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan : university-industry-government versus international coauthorship relations (2009) 0.01
    0.006082151 = product of:
      0.012164302 = sum of:
        0.012164302 = product of:
          0.036492907 = sum of:
            0.036492907 = weight(_text_:22 in 2761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036492907 = score(doc=2761,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2761, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2761)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:07:20
  15. Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.; Wagner, C.S.: ¬The relative influences of government funding and international collaboration on citation impact (2019) 0.01
    0.006082151 = product of:
      0.012164302 = sum of:
        0.012164302 = product of:
          0.036492907 = sum of:
            0.036492907 = weight(_text_:22 in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036492907 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8. 1.2019 18:22:45
  16. Leydesdorff, L.; Probst, C.: ¬The delineation of an interdisciplinary specialty in terms of a journal set : the case of communication studies (2009) 0.01
    0.0059014075 = product of:
      0.011802815 = sum of:
        0.011802815 = product of:
          0.035408445 = sum of:
            0.035408445 = weight(_text_:c in 2952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035408445 = score(doc=2952,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 2952, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2952)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  17. Leydesdorff, L.; Radicchi, F.; Bornmann, L.; Castellano, C.; Nooy, W. de: Field-normalized impact factors (IFs) : a comparison of rescaling and fractionally counted IFs (2013) 0.01
    0.0059014075 = product of:
      0.011802815 = sum of:
        0.011802815 = product of:
          0.035408445 = sum of:
            0.035408445 = weight(_text_:c in 1108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035408445 = score(doc=1108,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 1108, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1108)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  18. Leydesdorff, L.; Goldstone, R.L.: Interdisciplinarity at the journal and specialty level : the changing knowledge bases of the journal cognitive science (2014) 0.01
    0.0059014075 = product of:
      0.011802815 = sum of:
        0.011802815 = product of:
          0.035408445 = sum of:
            0.035408445 = weight(_text_:c in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035408445 = score(doc=1187,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Using the referencing patterns in articles in Cognitive Science over three decades, we analyze the knowledge base of this literature in terms of its changing disciplinary composition. Three periods are distinguished: (A) construction of the interdisciplinary space in the 1980s, (B) development of an interdisciplinary orientation in the 1990s, and (C) reintegration into "cognitive psychology" in the 2000s. The fluidity and fuzziness of the interdisciplinary delineations in the different visualizations can be reduced and clarified using factor analysis. We also explore newly available routines ("CorText") to analyze this development in terms of "tubes" using an alluvial map and compare the results with an animation (using "Visone"). The historical specificity of this development can be compared with the development of "artificial intelligence" into an integrated specialty during this same period. Interdisciplinarity should be defined differently at the level of journals and of specialties.
  19. Leydesdorff, L.; Rafols, I.: ¬A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories (2009) 0.01
    0.0058798613 = product of:
      0.011759723 = sum of:
        0.011759723 = product of:
          0.035279166 = sum of:
            0.035279166 = weight(_text_:i in 2713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035279166 = score(doc=2713,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 2713, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2713)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  20. Rafols, I.; Leydesdorff, L.: Content-based and algorithmic classifications of journals : perspectives on the dynamics of scientific communication and indexer effects (2009) 0.01
    0.0058798613 = product of:
      0.011759723 = sum of:
        0.011759723 = product of:
          0.035279166 = sum of:
            0.035279166 = weight(_text_:i in 3095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035279166 = score(doc=3095,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 3095, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3095)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)