-
Brooks, T.A.: How good are the best papers of JASIS? (2000)
0.01
0.0070558335 = product of:
0.014111667 = sum of:
0.014111667 = product of:
0.042335 = sum of:
0.042335 = weight(_text_:i in 4593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042335 = score(doc=4593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 4593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4593)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Top by numbers of citations: (1) Saracevic, T. et al.: A study of information seeking and retrieving I-III (1988); (2) Bates, M.: Information search tactics (1979); (3) Cooper, W.S.: On selecting a measure of retrieval effectiveness (1973); (4) Marcus, R.S.: A experimental comparison of the effectiveness of computers and humans as search intermediaries (1983); (4) Fidel, R.: Online searching styles (1984)
-
Marshakova-Shaikevich, I.: Bibliometric maps of field of science (2005)
0.01
0.0070558335 = product of:
0.014111667 = sum of:
0.014111667 = product of:
0.042335 = sum of:
0.042335 = weight(_text_:i in 1069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042335 = score(doc=1069,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 1069, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1069)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Neuhaus, C.; Daniel, H.-D.: Data sources for performing citation analysis : an overview (2008)
0.01
0.006884975 = product of:
0.01376995 = sum of:
0.01376995 = product of:
0.04130985 = sum of:
0.04130985 = weight(_text_:c in 1735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04130985 = score(doc=1735,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 1735, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1735)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996)
0.01
0.006082151 = product of:
0.012164302 = sum of:
0.012164302 = product of:
0.036492907 = sum of:
0.036492907 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036492907 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
-
Snyder, H.; Bonzi, S.: Patterns of self-citation across disciplines : 1980-1989 (1998)
0.01
0.006082151 = product of:
0.012164302 = sum of:
0.012164302 = product of:
0.036492907 = sum of:
0.036492907 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036492907 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:33:24
-
wst: Cut-and-paste-Wissenschaft (2003)
0.01
0.006082151 = product of:
0.012164302 = sum of:
0.012164302 = product of:
0.036492907 = sum of:
0.036492907 = weight(_text_:22 in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036492907 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- "Mikhail Simkin und Vwani Roychowdhury von der University of Califomia, Los Angeles, haben eine in der wissenschaftlichen Gemeinschaft verbreitete Unsitte erstmals quantitativ erfasst. Die Wissenschaftler analysierten die Verbreitung von Druckfehlern in den Literaturlisten wissenschaftlicher Arbeiten (www.arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0212043). 78 Prozent aller zitierten Aufsätze - so schätzen die Forscher - haben die zitierenden Wissenschaftler demnach nicht gelesen, sondern nur per 'cut and paste' von einer Vorlage in ihre eigene Literaturliste übernommen. Das könne man beispielsweise abschätzen aus der Analyse fehlerhafter Seitenangaben in der Literaturliste eines 1973 veröffentlichten Aufsatzes über die Struktur zweidimensionaler Kristalle: Dieser Aufsatz ist rund 4300 mal zitiert worden. In 196 Fällen enthalten die Zitate jedoch Fehler in der Jahreszahl, dem Band der Zeitschrift oder der Seitenzahl, die als Indikatoren für cut and paste genommen werden können, denn man kann, obwohl es Milliarden Möglichkeiten gibt, nur 45 verschiedene Arten von Druckfehlern unterscheiden. In erster Näherung ergibt sich eine Obergrenze für die Zahl der `echten Leser' daher aus der Zahl der unterscheidbaren Druckfehler (45) geteilt durch die Gesamtzahl der Publikationen mit Druckfehler (196), das macht etwa 22 Prozent."
-
Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006)
0.01
0.006082151 = product of:
0.012164302 = sum of:
0.012164302 = product of:
0.036492907 = sum of:
0.036492907 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036492907 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3. 1.2007 17:22:03
-
H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008)
0.01
0.006082151 = product of:
0.012164302 = sum of:
0.012164302 = product of:
0.036492907 = sum of:
0.036492907 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036492907 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 4.2008 19:04:22
-
Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006)
0.01
0.006082151 = product of:
0.012164302 = sum of:
0.012164302 = product of:
0.036492907 = sum of:
0.036492907 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036492907 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26.12.2007 19:22:05
-
Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008)
0.01
0.006082151 = product of:
0.012164302 = sum of:
0.012164302 = product of:
0.036492907 = sum of:
0.036492907 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036492907 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 31. 7.2008 14:22:05
-
Baird, L.M.; Oppenheim, C.: Do citations matter? (1994)
0.01
0.0059014075 = product of:
0.011802815 = sum of:
0.011802815 = product of:
0.035408445 = sum of:
0.035408445 = weight(_text_:c in 6896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035408445 = score(doc=6896,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 6896, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6896)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Chen, C.; Paul, R.J.; O'Keefe, B.: Fitting the Jigsaw of citation : information visualization in domain analysis (2001)
0.01
0.0059014075 = product of:
0.011802815 = sum of:
0.011802815 = product of:
0.035408445 = sum of:
0.035408445 = weight(_text_:c in 5766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035408445 = score(doc=5766,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 5766, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5766)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Chen, C.; Cribbin, T.; Macredie, R.; Morar, S.: Visualizing and tracking the growth of competing paradigms : two case studies (2002)
0.01
0.0059014075 = product of:
0.011802815 = sum of:
0.011802815 = product of:
0.035408445 = sum of:
0.035408445 = weight(_text_:c in 602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035408445 = score(doc=602,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 602, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=602)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Gorraiz, J.; Schlögl, C.: Zusammenhang von Zeitschriftennachfrage und -zitationshäufigkeiten : ¬Eine bibliometrische Analyse eines Dokumentlieferdienstes am Beispiel von Subito (2003)
0.01
0.0059014075 = product of:
0.011802815 = sum of:
0.011802815 = product of:
0.035408445 = sum of:
0.035408445 = weight(_text_:c in 718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035408445 = score(doc=718,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 718, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=718)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Prime-Claverie, C.; Beigbeder, M.; Lafouge, T.: Transposition of the cocitation method with a view to classifying Web pages (2004)
0.01
0.0059014075 = product of:
0.011802815 = sum of:
0.011802815 = product of:
0.035408445 = sum of:
0.035408445 = weight(_text_:c in 3095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035408445 = score(doc=3095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 3095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3095)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Lai, K.-K.; Wu, S.-J.: Using the patent co-citation approach to establish a new patent classification system (2005)
0.01
0.0058798613 = product of:
0.011759723 = sum of:
0.011759723 = product of:
0.035279166 = sum of:
0.035279166 = weight(_text_:i in 1013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035279166 = score(doc=1013,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 1013, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1013)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The paper proposes a new approach to create a patent classification system to replace the IPC or UPC system for conducting patent analysis and management. The new approach is based on co-citation analysis of bibliometrics. The traditional approach for management of patents, which is based on either the IPC or UPC, is too general to meet the needs of specific industries. In addition, some patents are placed in incorrect categories, making it difficult for enterprises to carry out R&D planning, technology positioning, patent strategy-making and technology forecasting. Therefore, it is essential to develop a patent classification system that is adaptive to the characteristics of a specific industry. The analysis of this approach is divided into three phases. Phase I selects appropriate databases to conduct patent searches according to the subject and objective of this study and then select basic patents. Phase II uses the co-cited frequency of the basic patent pairs to assess their similarity. Phase III uses factor analysis to establish a classification system and assess the efficiency of the proposed approach. The main contribution of this approach is to develop a patent classification system based on patent similarities to assist patent manager in understanding the basic patents for a specific industry, the relationships among categories of technologies and the evolution of a technology category.
-
Safder, I.; Ali, M.; Aljohani, N.R.; Nawaz, R.; Hassan, S.-U.: Neural machine translation for in-text citation classification (2023)
0.01
0.0058798613 = product of:
0.011759723 = sum of:
0.011759723 = product of:
0.035279166 = sum of:
0.035279166 = weight(_text_:i in 1053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035279166 = score(doc=1053,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 1053, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1053)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Hayer, L.: Lazarsfeld zitiert : eine bibliometrische Analyse (2008)
0.01
0.0050684595 = product of:
0.010136919 = sum of:
0.010136919 = product of:
0.030410757 = sum of:
0.030410757 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030410757 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2008 12:54:12
-
Brown, C.: ¬The evolution of preprints in the scholarly communication of physicists and astronomers (2001)
0.00
0.0049178395 = product of:
0.009835679 = sum of:
0.009835679 = product of:
0.029507035 = sum of:
0.029507035 = weight(_text_:c in 5184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029507035 = score(doc=5184,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 5184, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5184)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Gabel, J.: Improving information retrieval of subjects through citation-analysis : a study (2006)
0.00
0.0049178395 = product of:
0.009835679 = sum of:
0.009835679 = product of:
0.029507035 = sum of:
0.029507035 = weight(_text_:c in 225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029507035 = score(doc=225,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 225, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=225)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
